logo
US senators reintroduce bill to open Apple and Google's app stores

US senators reintroduce bill to open Apple and Google's app stores

Engadget5 hours ago

Senators Marsha Blacburn (R-Tenn.), Mike Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) have reintroduced a bill that would force app store owners like Apple and Google to allow third-party payment systems and sideloading apps, among a collection of other developer-friendly changes. The bill, called the Open App Markets App, was originally introduced in 2021, but it never came up for a vote after passing through the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2022.
The Open App Markets Act applies its changes to app stores with 50,000 monthly users or more, most obviously applicable to the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store. Like the original bill, the reintroduced Open App Markets Act wants covered companies to allow things like sideloading, third-party app stores and alternative payments systems, while protecting developers ability to "tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing." It would also prevent app store operators from privileging their own apps and services in app store search results.
While the aims of the new bill are largely the same as the original one, the legal environment is meaningfully different. Apple has been forced to allow third-party app stores and alternative payment systems in the European Union following the introduction of the Digital Markets Act in 2022. Thanks to its failure to make good on the small concession Epic won via its lawsuit, Apple has also been forced to allow developers to direct customers to pay for things outside of the App Store and its in-app payments system. The Open App Markets Act would make these kinds of changes the law in the US.
It seems possible the bill could pass, too. Regulatory pressure on tech companies has only increased since 2021. For example, Utah recently passed an age-verification law that would require app stores to only allow users 18 and up to make an account.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Key Tech Firms Unite As Google Donates A2A To Linux Foundation
Key Tech Firms Unite As Google Donates A2A To Linux Foundation

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Key Tech Firms Unite As Google Donates A2A To Linux Foundation

Neurons Major technology vendors are converging around a single protocol for artificial intelligence agent communication, potentially ending the fragmentation that has limited the deployment of enterprise AI. Google's donation of its Agent2Agent protocol to the Linux Foundation brings together Amazon Web Services, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP and ServiceNow as foundational members of a new standardization effort. The move addresses a fundamental challenge facing enterprise technology leaders: how to deploy AI agents that can work together across different platforms without requiring custom integrations for each vendor relationship. Current enterprise AI implementations often create isolated systems that cannot share information or coordinate tasks, limiting the automation potential that drives AI investment decisions. Technical Foundation Enables Cross-Platform Agent Communication The a2a protocol operates as a communication layer that allows AI agents to discover each other's capabilities, exchange information securely and coordinate complex tasks regardless of their underlying technology stack. The system uses JSON-RPC 2.0 over HTTP for standardized communication, with server-sent events enabling real-time streaming interactions between agents. Agent discovery occurs through 'Agent Cards,' which serve as digital business cards that contain capability descriptions and connection information. When an agent needs to complete a task requiring specialized expertise, it can query available agents, review their capabilities and establish secure communication channels without human intervention. The protocol supports both synchronous request-response patterns and asynchronous workflows, accommodating enterprise scenarios where tasks may require human approval or extend across multiple business days. Authentication mechanisms ensure that only authorized agents can access specific capabilities while maintaining audit trails for compliance requirements. Amazon Web Services has already demonstrated practical implementation by creating tools that expose Bedrock agents through a2a endpoints. This enables enterprises using AWS infrastructure to make their AI agents accessible to agents running on other platforms, thereby creating the interoperability that enterprise architectures require. Market Convergence Accelerates Standards Adoption The Linux Foundation announcement represents the consolidation of previously competing approaches to agent interoperability. More than 100 technology companies now support the a2a protocol, expanding from the initial 50 partners when Google first launched the specification in April. Microsoft has integrated a2a support into Azure AI Foundry and enabled a2a agent invocation through Copilot Studio. This integration allows enterprises already committed to Microsoft's AI toolchain to participate in multi-vendor agent workflows without replacing existing investments. Salesforce contributed the Agent Card concept that became central to a2a's capability discovery mechanism. The company positions agent interoperability as essential for reaching what it terms 'Level 4 multi-agent orchestration,' where specialized agents collaborate across enterprise systems. The convergence creates particular implications for Cisco's AGNTCY initiative, which has been developing infrastructure for what it calls the 'Internet of Agents'. Rather than competing with a2a, Cisco is integrating a2a support directly into AGNTCY's core components including the Directory, Identity, SLIM Messaging and Observability frameworks. This approach transforms AGNTCY from a potential competing standard into complementary infrastructure that enhances a2a's capabilities. Strategic Implications for Technology Decision Makers The Linux Foundation's governance model offers vendor neutrality, addressing enterprise concerns about being locked into proprietary ecosystems. Technology leaders can invest in a2a implementations with confidence that the protocol will evolve through community input rather than single-vendor control. Standardization creates opportunities for enterprises to implement modular AI strategies, where specialized agents from different vendors can collaborate on complex workflows. For example, a customer service workflow might combine Salesforce agents for CRM interactions, ServiceNow agents for incident management and AWS agents for data analysis, all coordinating through a2a protocols. However, successful implementation requires careful architectural planning. Enterprises need to establish agent governance frameworks, implement monitoring capabilities and develop policies for inter-agent data sharing before deploying production systems. The protocol provides the technical foundation, but organizational readiness determines success. Technology leaders should evaluate their current integration capabilities and security postures before committing to multi-agent architectures. While a2a reduces technical barriers to agent interoperability, it does not eliminate the need for robust data governance, identity management and compliance frameworks that enterprise AI deployments require.

New group wants to rehabilitate reputation of ‘big business'
New group wants to rehabilitate reputation of ‘big business'

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New group wants to rehabilitate reputation of ‘big business'

WASHINGTON — A newly created organization wants to change how people view corporate America, even as Democrats and Republicans in Congress have targeted the business community with new proposed regulations. The American Growth and Innovation Forum is set to launch this week, the Deseret News has first learned, seeking to drive 'fact-based discussions' to change how people view corporations. The group also hopes to convince lawmakers to cut regulations. The group will focus on sharing information about how 'responsible growth' can benefit the U.S. and international economies as a way to spur economic development. 'Behind every affordable household item, reliable broadband connection, or breakthrough technology is a story of American scale and ingenuity at work,' Diana London, the executive director of AGIF, said in a statement. 'At our core, AGIF champions the reality that U.S. companies make life better for families, communities, and the country as a whole.' The creation of the group comes in response to public perceptions that big businesses are untrustworthy. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal for AGIF shows that only 40% of Americans hold a favorable view of big businesses, despite 87% of respondents acknowledging they occasionally or frequently use their products. The polling does show respondents have generally positive perceptions of corporations Apple, Amazon and Walmart. Even with the unfavorable perception, a majority of consumers (50%) say they think businesses can be used as a force for good by driving innovation, creating jobs and improving lives. That polling, AGIF founders say, reflects the misconceptions surrounding big businesses and corporations that the nonprofit organization hopes to counter. 'AGIF starts with a simple hypothesis: while the rhetoric around 'big business' is negative, we believe a majority of American businesses add tremendous value to communities and the attacks on them do not reflect the true opinions of consumers,' London said. As a result, the group hopes its educational efforts can crack down on regulatory measures often proposed by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. For example, Republicans have sought ways to rein in certain corporations for pushing what they consider to be progressive and 'woke' agendas, such as policies that prioritize diversity, equity and inclusion or environmental initiatives. Meanwhile, some Democrats have pushed to crack down on monopolies and other large businesses over accusations over price gouging and corporate consolidation. Much of that criticism is targeted toward Big Tech and Big Pharma. The AGIF says it will provide research and data advocating for 'responsible growth' in sectors such as health care, agriculture, retail and infrastructure to boost their economic growth.

How Apple may solve its Google Search problem
How Apple may solve its Google Search problem

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

How Apple may solve its Google Search problem

I hate my Dell laptop. If I close the lid, the laptop will "suspend," but not really. Putting it in a bag in that state will make it hot, and the fans will choke. I have to watch out for this because if I don't, it will get damaged over time and die. This should be enough for the product to be recalled. There are more issues with it, but that is a topic for another day. I know that other manufacturers have the same problem. This is what you get from a modern-ish PC. Related: Analysts reset Qualcomm stock price target, send warning Anyone with an Apple MacBook would be puzzled to hear this. They don't have this problem, and how the heck do PC users tolerate it? It seems that PC manufacturers can get away with anything today, and Apple can't; it is held to a higher standard. With the release of the M1 chip in 2020, Apple left the PC competitors in the dust. It took them years to catch up. Even though I still wouldn't buy an Apple laptop for myself, this chip made me comfortable recommending them. But I digress. The reality is that innovation takes time. After all, Apple needed thirteen years to make something really "life-changing" following the launch of the iPhone. In fact, Apple generally takes its time, opting for others' so-called best-in-breed until it creates something better. Perhaps that's why it relies so much on Google for search, rather than a homegrown solution. Apple's deal with Google has worked out well for it (and is profitable), but, unfortunately, that relationship may end soon. The Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit against Google revealed that Apple (AAPL) was paid $20 billion by Google in 2022 to keep it the default search engine in the Safari browser, reported Bloomberg. Google lost the lawsuit, and the DOJ wants the company to cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple, among other things. Reuters reported that Google plans to appeal the decision. Apple does not reveal revenue from this deal with Google in its earnings reports; however, it is part of its services revenue. Related: Analysts revamp forecast for Nvidia-backed AI stock In fiscal 2022, Apple's services revenue was about $78 billion. The calendar and fiscal year don't align, but making an estimate would mean Google's payment was about 25% of services revenue. Total revenue was $394 billion, so about 5% came from Google. More Tech Stocks: Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time)Veteran portfolio manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms moveGoogle plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move When you need to keep your revenue growing constantly, having 5% of it at risk is something you can't afford. This is especially true given that Apple has been under fire lately for its apparent failure to launch some amazing artificial intelligence products. I've already written about why the company is struggling on that front. Unconfirmed media reports suggest Apple wants to buy or partner with Perplexity AI to get its hands on its AI-powered search, which provides cited responses to search queries using third-party LLMs. According to Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan, if this deal happens, it will quickly give Apple AI abilities that can be integrated into Siri. It will also provide access to the search advertising market and a high-quality team of AI workers. Related: OpenAI makes shocking move amid fierce competition, Microsoft problems It's not all roses, though. He pointed out four drawbacks: Technology integration might prove to be company might face legal and regulatory deal would have an impact on existing Google of Perplexity's offerings are dependent on rival LLMs. Mohan has an Apple stock price target of $235 and rates the stock a buy, based on a favorable price-to-earnings ratio. He says Apple is trading at approximately 29 times his estimate for calendar year 2026 earnings per share of $8.07. The 5-year historical P/E range is 16 to 34. "We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a multi-year upgrade cycle, large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services," said Mohan. Getting into the search advertising market and fixing Siri, with one acquisition, sounds like killing two birds with one stone, but I have my doubts. Knowing that Meta tried to buy Perplexity AI and instead bought Scale AI, I hope that Apple is playing 4D chess. I think Apple would be better off buying a real search engine instead, because Google is getting worse and worse every day. Related: Amazon's latest big bet may flop The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store