Anthropic wins key US ruling on AI training in authors' copyright lawsuit
June 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge in San Francisco ruled late on Monday that Anthropic's use of books without permission to train its artificial intelligence system was legal under U.S. copyright law.
Siding with tech companies on a pivotal question for the AI industry, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said Anthropic made "fair use", opens new tab of books by writers Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson to train its Claude large language model.
Alsup also said, however, that Anthropic's copying and storage of more than 7 million pirated books in a "central library" infringed the authors' copyrights and was not fair use. The judge has ordered a trial in December to determine how much Anthropic owes for the infringement.
U.S. copyright law says that willful copyright infringement can justify statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work.
An Anthropic spokesperson said the company was pleased that the court recognized its AI training was "transformative" and "consistent with copyright's purpose in enabling creativity and fostering scientific progress."
The writers filed the proposed class action against Anthropic last year, arguing that the company, which is backed by Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, used pirated versions of their books without permission or compensation to teach Claude to respond to human prompts.
The proposed class action is one of several lawsuits brought by authors, news outlets and other copyright owners against companies including OpenAI, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab over their AI training.
The doctrine of fair use allows the use of copyrighted works without the copyright owner's permission in some circumstances.
Fair use is a key legal defense for the tech companies, and Alsup's decision is the first to address it in the context of generative AI.
AI companies argue their systems make fair use of copyrighted material to create new, transformative content, and that being forced to pay copyright holders for their work could hamstring the burgeoning AI industry.
Anthropic told the court that it made fair use of the books and that U.S. copyright law "not only allows, but encourages" its AI training because it promotes human creativity. The company said its system copied the books to "study Plaintiffs' writing, extract uncopyrightable information from it, and use what it learned to create revolutionary technology."
Copyright owners say that AI companies are unlawfully copying their work to generate competing content that threatens their livelihoods.
Alsup agreed with Anthropic on Monday that its training was "exceedingly transformative."
"Like any reader aspiring to be a writer, Anthropic's LLMs trained upon works not to race ahead and replicate or supplant them — but to turn a hard corner and create something different," Alsup said.
Alsup also said, however, that Anthropic violated the authors' rights by saving pirated copies of their books as part of a "central library of all the books in the world" that would not necessarily be used for AI training.
Anthropic and other prominent AI companies including OpenAI and Meta Platforms have been accused of downloading pirated digital copies of millions of books to train their systems.
Anthropic had told Alsup in a court filing that the source of its books was irrelevant to fair use.
"This order doubts that any accused infringer could ever meet its burden of explaining why downloading source copies from pirate sites that it could have purchased or otherwise accessed lawfully was itself reasonably necessary to any subsequent fair use," Alsup said on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration expects deal with Harvard by end-June, Washington Post reports
WASHINGTON, June 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is ramping up negotiations with Harvard University and expects a deal by the end of June to resolve the White House's campaign against the country's oldest and richest university, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. On Friday, Trump said a deal could be announced "over the next week or so" to end a months-long battle with the Ivy League school, which sued after the administration terminated billions of dollars in grants and moved to bar the school from admitting international students.
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Judge blocks Trump from withholding EV charger funds awarded to 14 states
A US district judge has blocked the Trump administration from withholding funds previously awarded to 14 states for electric vehicle charger infrastructure. Seattle-based judge Tana Lin, who was appointed to the bench by Joe Biden in 2021, granted a partial injunction to the states that filed suit against Trump's Department of Transportation. She ruled that the states' lawsuit – led by attorneys general in California, Colorado and Washington – would likely succeed. Her ruling did not apply to the District of Columbia, Minnesota and Vermont, which she found did not provide evidence that they would suffer immediate harm. The injunction will go into effect on 1 July, unless the Trump administration files an appeal blocking it. In February, the Trump administration ordered states not to spend $5bn in funds allocated under the Biden administration as part of the national electric vehicle infrastructure (Nevi) program. The program provided up to 80% of eligible project costs to deploy electric vehicle charges. Currently, 16 states have at least one operational EV station, according to EV States Clearinghouse. 'The new leadership of the Department of Transportation … has decided to review the policies underlying the implementation of the Nevi formula program,' Emily Biondi, associate administrator for planning, environment and realty at the transportation department's Federal Highway Administration, wrote in a memo. 'As result of the rescission of the Nevi formula program guidance, the FHWA is also immediately suspending the approval of all state electric vehicle infrastructure deployment plans for all fiscal years. Therefore, effective immediately, no new obligations may occur under the Nevi formula program until the updated final Nevi formula program guidance is issued and new state plans are submitted and approved,' she added. In May, the Government Accountability Office found that the Trump administration violated the law when it withheld the funding. The administration 'must continue to carry out the statutory requirements of the program', it said. The White House challenged those findings, which it called 'wrong and legally indefensible', and ordered the transportation department to ignore them. The department is expected to release a draft of its updated electric vehicle guidance this month. During a hearing before the Seattle judge earlier this month, Leah Brown, of Washington's attorney general's office said, 'This passing reference to revised guidance and to changed priorities is simply insufficient to override congressional intent.' She added that the states aren't 'challenging the ability to revise guidance, but we are arguing that doing so simply is not a sufficient explanation for the actions that they've taken,' the Washington State Standard reported. 'The agency has no intent to withhold funds from the states,' justice department attorney Heidy Gonzalez said. 'It just wants the opportunity to review past guidance and to promulgate guidance that comports with the current administration's policies and priorities.' During his campaign for the presidency, Donald Trump voiced a hatred for electric vehicles that ran counter to his growing friendship with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. At one point in the campaign, Trump said supporters of the vehicles should 'rot in hell' and that Biden's support of EVs would bring a 'bloodbath' to the US's automotive industry. Although he later appointed Musk to serve as head of the 'department of government efficiency', Musk and Trump have since parted ways.
Finextra
42 minutes ago
- Finextra
BIS report pours cold water on stablecoin hype
They may be the current darling of the financial services world, but stablecoins fall short as a form of sound money and at best may "eventually play a subsidiary role in the hinterland of the financial system," according to the Bank for International Settlement. 0 Stablecoins have seen a surge in interest in recent months, with US regulators paving the way for adoption. big banks exploring rolling out their own tokens, USDC issuer Circle soaring on its market debut, and Citi predicting that the market will hit trillions within five years. Yet, while offering some promise on tokenisation, they are fundamentally flawed, says a report into the next generation monetary and financial system from the BIS, because they "do not stack up well against the three desirable characteristics of sound monetary arrangements and thus cannot be the mainstay of the future monetary system". These characteristics are the ability to deliver singleness of money (acceptance for payment at par), elasticity (timely discharge of obligations, preventing gridlock) and integrity (safeguarding against financial crime). Therefore, "besides acting as a gateway to the crypto ecosystem, their future role is unclear," says the report. In fact, without regulation they could be actively damaging, posing a risk to financial stability and monetary sovereignty. The BIS instead predicts that a tokenised unified ledger incorporating central bank money, commercial bank deposits and government bonds will lay the foundations of a tokenised monetary and financial system based on the time-tested principles of sound money. This trilogy can boost efficiency and open new possibilities in cross-border payments, securities markets and beyond, while maintaining the key principles of sound money that stablecoins fail in: singleness, elasticity and integrity. Hyun Song Shin, head, monetary and economic department, says: "Tokenisation of deposits and central bank money means that both the primary means of payment as well as the settlement function of central bank money can be integrated seamlessly on the same programmable platform. It has the potential to transform securities markets and its application to correspondent banking is especially promising." The BIS is already exploring this through Project Agorá, a collaboration led by the group with seven central banks and 43 private sector institutions to "test and develop tokenisation as the backbone of the future monetary and financial system," says Andréa M Maechler, acting head, BIS Innovation Hub. Read the report.
