HECS repayment changes in Australia as government slashes loans by 20 per cent
Anthony Albanese 's government will cut 20 per cent off all student loan debts, wiping around $16billion for about three million Australians.
The policy - central to Labor's re-election campaign - is now set to be backdated to June 1, with the Greens expected to back Labor's legislation in the Senate during the next sitting of Parliament in coming weeks.
Under the plan, a graduate with an average student debt of $27,600 will see their loan reduced by $5,520.
Albanese's proposed reform would apply to all Higher Education Loan Program, vocational education and training student loans, Australian Apprenticeship Support Loans and other income-contingent student loans.
'Our whole nation benefits when we make it easier for people to access education. This is about opening the doors of opportunity – and widening them,' he said when announcing the plan.
The reforms would also raise the threshold for repayment from $54,453 to $67,000 for the 2025-26 financial year, and lower the rate to be repaid.
For someone on a middle income of $70,000, this will mean they will pay around $1,300 less a year in repayments.
Education Minister Jason Clare said the cuts to student loans could be the first piece of legislation that Labor introduces when Parliament returns on July 22.
How much your student debt will be wiped by is revealed in the table above
'The legislation will cut 20 per cent off your student debt and backdate it to 1 June, before indexation was applied,' Mr Clare said.
'This is a game-changer for the more than three million Australians with a student loan.'
After the legislation is passed, the tax office will apply a one-off 20 per cent reduction to a student loan - without borrowers having to do a thing.
This 20 per cent reduction will be calculated based on the amount of your HELP debt as at 1 June 2025, before any indexation is added.
The government will notify you when the changes are implemented, and balances can be checked via myGov.
The gap between the newly discounted repayments, and what tertiary institutions charged the students, will be funded by taxpayers and government borrowing.
This builds on a $3billion policy introduced last year, which links student debt indexation to the lower of the wage price index or the consumer price index.
Without it, graduates could have faced another steep increase, like in 2023, when indexation soared to 7.1 per cent - up from 3.9 per cent the year before - adding $1,759 to the average student debt of $24,770.
The Higher Education Contribution Scheme in 1989 replaced the old system of free university education that had existed since 1974.
Graduates pay a higher proportion of their salary on their student debt the more they earn, rising from one per cent under the existing $54,435 minimum repayment threshold to 10 per cent for those earning more than $159,664.
Labor was re-elected in a landslide in May, and claimed three inner-city seats in Melbourne and Brisbane from the Greens that have a higher proportion of university students, including that of former leader Adam Bandt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Australia social media teen ban software trial organisers say the tech works
SYDNEY, June 20 (Reuters) - Some age-checking applications collect too much data and no product works 100% of the time, but using software to enforce a teenage social media ban can work in Australia, the head of the world's biggest trial of the technology said on Friday. The view from the government-commissioned Age Assurance Technology Trial of more than 1,000 Australian school students and hundreds of adults is a boost to the country's plan to keep under 16s off social media. From December, in a world first ban, companies like Facebook and Instagram owner Meta (META.O), opens new tab, Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab and TikTok must prove they are taking reasonable steps to block young people from their platforms or face a fine of up A$49.5 million ($32 million). Since the Australian government announced the legislation last year, child protection advocates, tech industry groups and children themselves have questioned whether the ban can be enforced due to workarounds like Virtual Private Networks, which obscure an internet user's location. "Age assurance can be done in Australia privately, efficiently and effectively," said Tony Allen, CEO of the Age Check Certification Scheme, the UK-based organisation overseeing the Australian trial. The trial found "no significant tech barriers" to rolling out a software-based scheme in Australia, although there was "no one-size-fits-all solution, and no solution that worked perfectly in all deployments," Allen added in an online presentation. Allen noted that some age-assurance software firms "don't really know at this stage what data they may need to be able to support law enforcement and regulators in the future. "There's a risk there that they could be inadvertently over-collecting information that wouldn't be used or needed." Organisers of the trial, which concluded earlier this month, gave no data findings and offered only a broad overview which did not name individual products. They will deliver a report to the government next month which officials have said will inform an industry consultation ahead of the December deadline. A spokesperson for the office of the eSafety Commissioner, which will advise the government on how to implement the ban, said the preliminary findings were a "useful indication of the likely outcomes from the trial. "We are pleased to see the trial suggests that age assurance technologies, when deployed the right way and likely in conjunction with other techniques and methods, can be private, robust and effective," the spokesperson said. The Australian ban is being watched closely around the world with several governments exploring ways to limit children's exposure to social media. ($1 = 1.5427 Australian dollars)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hunger doesn't clock off for the summer holidays
It's what drove me and all Scottish Green MSPs to make expanding free school meals a priority in recent Budget negotiations. Last week, the Education Secretary and I announced the result of those negotiations. From August, thousands more young people will benefit from a free school meal thanks to our new pilot programme. Eligibility for free school meals will be expanded to S1-S3 pupils who receive the Scottish Child Payment (SCP) in eight council areas across Scotland. READ MORE: Scotland can lead the world with 'ecocide' bill currently in Holyrood This builds on what Scottish Green MSPs achieved in previous years, namely the expansion of universal free school meals to P4 and P5 pupils, as well as the ongoing expansion to all P6 and P7 pupils who receive the SCP. These policies are the direct result of Green influence in government and Parliament. They show the transformational power voters will hold next May when deciding who they send to Holyrood for the next five years. It has a huge impact when you elect MSPs committed to changing Scotland for the better. In this case, free school meals do more than fill stomachs. They fuel learning, reduce stigma, and ease pressure on hard-pressed families during a brutal cost of living crisis. They're an investment not just in individual pupils but in a fairer and healthier society. But we can and must go further. Scotland should be leading the way in delivering universal free school meals across the whole of our education system. That's what the Scottish Greens are working towards. Another major Green achievement for Scotland's children was our cancellation of school meal debts. Almost £3 million has now been wiped off the books after years of campaigning on the issue. For thousands of families, it has brought urgent relief at a time of growing hardship. As the Scottish Greens' education spokesperson, I first published research back in 2021 which showed that more than £1 million of school meal debt was being carried by families. As the cost of living crisis deepened, that figure soared. But the emotional toll was even greater. I've heard directly from teachers who dreaded chasing children for money that their families simply didn't have. READ MORE: Westminster is set to decriminalise abortion – what about Scotland? I've talked to parents who went without so that their children didn't have to face shame in the lunch hall. No child should be forced to learn under the weight of that stress and embarrassment. No teacher should be put in that impossible situation. That's why I worked so hard to ensure that this debt was wiped out. Cancelling it was clearly the right thing to do. It's something the Greens are incredibly proud to have delivered. But again we believe in doing more than just wiping the slate clean only to see those debts build back up. We believe in changing the system which created the problem in the first place. That's why we will continue to push for universal free school meals for every child from nursery to the end of high school. Contrast this with the attitude of successive UK governments, both Conservative and Labour. Westminster politicians continue to dig their heels in on the indefensible two-child benefit cap and associated 'rape clause', a policy that has directly plunged hundreds of thousands of children into poverty. Research from the Child Poverty Action Group has shown that lifting this cap would lift 250,000 children out of poverty across the UK. Yet they refuse to act, instead prioritising their race to the bottom style of politics, demonising the poor and disabled, while succumbing to their own vested interests. Their silence speaks volumes. It shows us exactly how deep the commitment to austerity and inequality runs in the halls of Westminster. While Scotland has limited powers to undo the damage they inflict, we do have the means to make a meaningful difference, and that's exactly what Scotland's Green MSPs and councillors have been doing. READ MORE: Plans for Glasgow tourist tax approved by councillors Of course, this work is never finished. Hunger doesn't clock off at the end of a parliamentary session and neither can we. The Scottish Greens will continue to fight for policies that put people first – and we're not afraid to say that it's the super-rich who should pay more in tax to pay for this. At the end of the day, the choices we make reflect the kind of country we want to be. Do we want to be a nation where children go hungry while their parents work two or three jobs for poverty wages? Or do we want to be a country that invests in its young people, supports families, and builds a future based on fairness and compassion? The Scottish Greens know where we stand and we're proud to keep fighting for the Scotland that our children and young people deserve.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Coalition frontbencher Julian Leeser on why a closer alliance with the US is necessary
In a year shaped by rising global tensions and growing concerns over social cohesion at home, the shadow attorney general, Julian Leeser, presents his views on Australia's place in the world
