
Live updates: Trump told donors he threatened to bomb Moscow and Beijing, audio reveals

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
AOC labels Trump a ‘rapist' in brutal Epstein files rant amid Pam Bondi-Dan Bongino ‘war'
New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez branded Donald Trump a 'rapist' as the administration continues to face fallout from MAGA faithfuls and far-left foes alike over the release of information about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?' the socialist-leaning congresswoman, better known by her initials AOC, wrote on X Friday. The president was found civilly liable for sexually abusing and defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll in 2023. Trump has maintained his innocence. It comes as Trump and top members of the administration sparked outrage after announcing that a so-called 'client list' belonging to Epstein did not exist, and that he died by suicide — in contrast to popular MAGA conspiracy theories. The report has also pitted Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Deputy Chief Dan Bongino against each other, with the latter reportedly not turning up for work on Friday. In response to Ocasio-Cortez's post on X, Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung said: ' AOC likes to play pretend like she's from the block, but in reality she's just a sad, miserable blockhead who is trying to overcompensate for her lack of self-confidence that has followed her for her entire life.' 'Instead, she should get some serious help for her obvious and severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted her pea-sized brain,' he said, in a statement shared with the Daily Beast. Trump himself has also lashed out at AOC, who is a persistent and vocal critic of his administration. Last month, the president called her 'stupid AOC' and the 'dumbest member of Congress.' Controversy over the Epstein files rumbles over a month after billionaire Elon Musk accused the president of appearing in the 'Epstein files,' – redacted court documents that name his alleged associates and victims. Epstein died shortly after he was indicted on federal sex trafficking charges. At a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, Trump shut down a reporter's question about the Epstein files. 'Are you still talking about Jeffery Epstein?' Trump asked. 'This guy's been talked about for years.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
2024 book review: Trump, Biden, Harris and a turbulent election full of what-ifs
Donald Trump is on a roll. The 'big, beautiful bill' is law. Ice, his paramilitary immigration force, rivals foreign armies for size and funding. Democrats stand demoralized and divided. 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, by Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf, is a book for these times: aptly named, deeply sourced. Kamala Harris declined to speak. Joe Biden criticized his successor in a brief phone call, then balked. Trump talked, of course. 'If that didn't happen … I think I would've won, but it might have been a little bit closer,' he says of the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, which set the race alight. Yet 2024 is about more than the horse race. It also chronicles how the elites unintentionally made Trump's restoration possible, despite a torrent of criminal charges against him, 34 resulting in convictions, and civil lawsuits that saw him fined hundreds of millions of dollars. 'Trump always drew his strength from decades of pent-up frustration with the American democratic system's failures to address the hardships and problems the people experienced in their daily lives,' Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf write. 'In 2024, [Trump's] supporters saw institutions stacked against them … leading them to identify viscerally with his legal ordeal, even though they had not experienced anything like it before.' Dawsey is a Pulitzer prize winner, working political investigations and enterprise for the Wall Street Journal. Pager covers the White House for the New York Times. Arnsdorf was part of the Washington Post team that won a Pulitzer for coverage of the assassination attempt. Dawsey and Pager are Post alumni. With Arnsdorf, they capture the aspirations and delusions of Trump and the pretenders to his Republican throne, of Biden and Harris too. 'In the weeks after the election, Biden repeatedly told allies that he could have won if he'd stayed in the race,' 2024 reports, 'even as he publicly questioned whether he could have served another four years.' Really? Biden's approval rating fell below 50% in August 2021 and never recovered. From October 2023, he trailed Trump. A year out, the authors reveal, Barack Obama warned his former vice-president's staff: 'Your campaign is a mess.' Biden's aides privately derided Obama as 'a prick'. 'They thought he and his inner circle had constantly disrespected and mistreated Biden, despite his loyal service as vice-president.' As for Harris, Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf report that she 'knew that the race would be close, but she really thought she would win'. Despite that, David Plouffe, a senior Harris adviser, admitted post-election that internal polls never showed her leading. 'I think it surprised people because there were these public polls that came out in late September, early October, showing us with leads that we never saw,' he said. Harris's debate win never moved the needle. Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf contend that the outcome was not foreordained. Rather, they raise a series of plausible-enough 'what-ifs'. One is: 'If the Democrats got clobbered, as expected, in the 2022 midterms, and Joe Biden never ran for re-election.' Except, by early 2022, according to This Shall Not Pass, a campaign book published that year, Biden saw himself as a cross between FDR and Obama. A telephone conversation between Biden and Abigail Spanberger, a moderate congresswoman now the Democratic candidate for governor in Virginia, captures Biden's self-perception. 'This is President Roosevelt,' Biden begins, before thanking Spanberger for her sense of humor. She replies: 'I'm glad you have a sense of humor, Mr President.' Back to 2024. Biden bristled at being challenged. Pushback risked being equated with disloyalty. His closest advisers were either family members or dependent on him for their livelihoods. He lacked social peers with incomes and personages of their own. Mike Donilon, a longtime aide, tells the authors: 'It was an act of insanity by the Democratic leadership to have forced Biden out. 'Tell me why you walked away from a guy with 81m votes … A native of [swing-state] Pennsylvania. Why do that?' Because Biden's debate performance was a gobsmacking disaster. He also found navigating the stairs of Air Force One difficult and needed prompts to find the podium. In May 2025, Biden announced that he had been diagnosed with stage-four prostate cancer – a disclosure that came after 2024 went to press. The authors of 2024 pose Republican hypotheticals too. One: 'If Trump never got indicted, or if Republicans didn't respond by rallying to him, or if the prosecutions were more successful.' Ron DeSantis, Florida's governor, demonstrated a lack of nerve. Glaringly, he failed to use the initial E Jean Carroll trial, over the writer's allegation that Trump sexually assaulted her, to bolster his presidential ambitions. DeSantis didn't dispatch his wife, Casey DeSantis, to Manhattan to offer daily thoughts and prayers for the plaintiff, or for Melania Trump. If you want to be the man, first you've got to beat the man. Another hypothetical: 'If Trump and Biden didn't agree to an early debate …' That question hangs over everything. Trump's pronouncements leave Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf anxious. After the 2022 midterms, he mused about terminating the constitution. Later, on the campaign trail, he spoke openly of being a 'dictator for a day'. When he was back in the West Wing, reporters asked: 'Are you a dictator on day one?' 'No,' he replied. 'I can't imagine even being called that.' Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf then catalog Trump's unilateral actions on that first day, including stripping political opponents of security clearances. Later that month, he commenced his vendetta against law firms he deemed to be enemies. In February, Trump barred the Associated Press from the White House press pool unless the news agency referred to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America'. 2024 contains no mention of Hungary's Viktor Orbán. Perhaps it should have made space. Hungary's leader is an autocrat in all but name, an elected leader who has removed freedoms regardless. Republicans adore him. 2024 is published in the US by Penguin Random House


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Putin ‘tells Iran to accept nuclear deal with no enrichment'
Vladimir Putin has told Iran to accept a US nuclear deal that would ban it from enriching uranium, according to reports. For years, Moscow has been the Islamic republic's most prominent diplomatic ally, consistently backing its right to process radioactive materials. However the Russian president has conveyed both to Iranian leaders and to Donald Trump that he now supports a deal with zero enrichment, the Axios news site reported. A European official told the site: 'Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favourable. The Iranians said they won't consider it.' Putin was also reported to have expressed this position in phone conversations last week with Emmanuel Macron, the French president. Furthermore, Russian officials were reported to have briefed the Israeli government about Putin's stance. A senior Israeli official was quoted as saying: 'We know that this is what Putin told the Iranians.' However, Tasnim, Iran's semi-official news agency, denied the claim, quoting an 'informed source' as saying Putin had not sent any messages to Iran in this regard. Iran has repeatedly said it will not give up enriching uranium, a process used to make fuel for nuclear power plants, but which can also yield material for an atomic warhead. In June, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, said abandoning uranium enrichment was '100 per cent' against the country's interests. Recent Israeli and US air strikes seriously damaged Iran's nuclear infrastructure, and Mr Trump has since made clear that he wants a new nuclear deal with the Islamic republic. In May, Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said Iran had to 'walk away' from uranium enrichment, while multiple sources told Axios that zero uranium enrichment on Iranian soil would be a central American demand in any future negotiations. Putin's reported intervention comes after Iranian officials were reportedly disappointed with the Russian response to Tehran's 12-day war with Israel, which involved press statements but little else. The two nations are long-time allies and Iran has provided significant support to Moscow in its war with Ukraine, supplying hundreds of attack drones and surface-to-surface missiles. They also co-operated for almost a decade in an attempt to keep Bashar al-Assad in power in Syria. 'Russia is not as good a friend of dictators as it pretends: Putin often turns his back on his autocratic friends when they need him,' Fabrice Pothier, a former top adviser to the Nato leadership, told the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). The WSJ reported on Saturday that Mr Trump would not object to Israel carrying out further military strikes on Iran if it resumed attempts to build a nuclear weapon. The US president was said to have told Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, that while he preferred a diplomatic settlement he did not object to Israel attacking the Islamic Republic if it once again tried to build a bomb. Meanwhile, Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said on Saturday that his country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency 'will take on a new form', following a law suspending ties with the UN watchdog. 'Our co-operation with the agency has not stopped, but will take on a new form,' said Mr Araghchi, adding that requests to monitor nuclear sites would be 'reviewed on a case-by-case basis... taking into account safety and security issues'.