Ex-football star JAILED for 14 years over ‘significant role' in record £2.36million crystal meth haul
LOCKED UP Ex-football star JAILED for 14 years over 'significant role' in record £2.36million crystal meth haul
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A FORMER football star who was caught with millions of pounds worth of crystal meth has been jailed for 14 years.
Michael Boateng, who began his youth career at Crystal Palace, was arrested on Valentine's Day last year after police found 19.7kg of the Class A drug in a sports bag at a flat he shared with his girlfriend and infant son.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
5
Michael Boateng has been jailed for 14 years for his 'significant role' in a multi-million pound crystal meth operation
Credit: PA
5
Close to 20kg of the Class A substance were found in a bag at a flat he was living in with his girlfriend and two-month-old son last February
Credit: PA
5
Boateng admitted to supplying crystal meth, cocaine and MDMA at Croydon Crown Court in September
Credit: Alamy
A court ruled he played a "significant role" in an organised crime group as the former footballer was sent down for more than a decade.
The 34-year-old - who had become a successful personal trainer after his playing career, with clients including England star Jadon Sancho - admitted to supplying crystal meth, cocaine and MDMA at Croydon Crown Court in September.
Boateng, donning a blue prison t-shirt and grey tracksuit bottoms, sat motionless as the judge read out his sentence.
His girlfriend - who is the mum to the pair's now 18-month-old son - shook her head in disbelief as the sentence was confirmed.
Croydon Crown Court head on June 20 how Boateng had been "doing well" while working as a personal trainer between 2018 and 2023.
However, he was issued with an Osman Warning from the Metropolitan Police in 2022 - a warning which indicates an immediate threat to one's life.
Representing the defence, Paul Crampin told the court how Boateng was informed of a "credible threat against his life".
This then caused his partner at the time to "essential refuse him access to their family".
After "cutting him off completely from his son", Boateng suffered from a period of stress and depression, Crampin said.
He added that this led to drug use, including Class A substances, with Crampin saying he was then "involved in the small scale supply of drugs to essentially people he knew".
Ex-Premier League star Ronnie Stam jailed for seven years in multi-million pound drug-smuggling probe
This was done to "fund his own Class A drug habit", the defence said.
Boateng was stopped by police officers in Bromley, south London, in September 2023 after acting suspiciously.
He then ran from the cops down a dead-end road before a dog unit found a snap bag - which had been thrown over a garden wall - containing 19 wraps of cocaine.
John Carmichael, prosecuting, told the court how a search of Boateng's flat in Croydon found 14 additional wraps of cocaine, 32 tablets of MDMA and one block of 22 grams of MDMA.
The overall street value of the cocaine and MDMA stood at between £3,000 and £4,180, the court heard.
Cops also found 26 bags of ketamine, with a street value of £260 to £520 and £1,570 in cash.
Boateng said nothing at interview and later pleaded guilty to intent to supply cocaine and MDMA and possession of ketamine.
He was granted bail on the condition he abided by a curfew and reported regularly to a police station.
However, his story took a further turn after police raided the former football star's new address in Croydon - where he was living with his girlfriend and their two-month-old son - on Valentine's Day last year.
A Slazenger sports bag with 19.7kg of crystal meth was found in the hallway of the property.
CCTV footage also showed Boateng arriving seven days earlier, dumping the bag in the same position it was found in, after being handed the bag outside the home.
The court heard that while the crystal meth had a wholesale value of between £200,000 to £400,000, its street value could range from anywhere between £1,182,000 and £2,364,000.
Mr Carmichael said: "He is clearly trusted within an organisation, holding onto a significant amount of drugs."
While the defence did not dispute the weight of the drugs the former footballer possessed, they argued it could not be ruled out that Boateng was not a victim of "coercion or intimidation" from organised criminals when holding onto the drugs.
However, Judge Daniel Flahive told the court it was clear Boateng played a "significant role" within an organised crime group, saying this position was "not a matter of negotiation".
He added: "He had some awareness and understanding of the operation. This does put him squarely in the significant book.
"At the moment I can't see how this falls into a lesser role."
'YOU WERE PLAYING A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE DRUG DEALING ENTERPRISE'
In his closing statement, Judge Flahive said: "You were playing a significant role in the drug dealing enterprise. Your role was not minimal.
"The amount of drugs we are talking about, just shy of 20kg, the value at street level, we are talking potentially millions of pounds.
"The reason for the 14 years will be to reflect the sheer quantity of drugs you were looking after in the period of time and reminding myself this was an offence that was committed while on bail for the earlier case.
"When you are released you will be subject to licence, the licence will have conditions attached to it. You can go down now."
Right back Boateng was a youth player at Crystal Palace between 2005 and 2007 before he eventually made his senior debut for Tonbridge Angels while on loan from Bristol Rovers in 2011.
The star then had stints at Sutton United, Bromley, Newport County and Whitehawk before he was dismissed from the latter after being charged following a match-fixing probe in December 2013.
He was sentenced to 16 months in prison in June 2014 and the following January got a lifetime ban from football.
He was then jailed again in June 2015 for drug dealing.
Boateng had appeared as a co-host on the podcast series "Banged Up" which explored life inside Britain's prison system.
He had spoken candidly about his wish not to reoffend and stay out of trouble.
5
Boateng played a 'significant role' in an organised crime group, the court heard
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man accused of ramming car into Liverpool soccer parade faces a further 24 charges
The man accused of ramming his car into a parade of Liverpool soccer fans in May as the team was celebrating its Premier League triumph is to face a further 24 charges, including two relating to victims who were babies. Paul Doyle, 53, was in tears as he appeared over videolink from prison for the Liverpool Crown Court hearing on Thursday. During the hearing, he was informed of the new charges, 23 of which were for assault. Six of the new charges relate to children, including two babies aged 6 and 7 months at the time. He was originally charged with seven offenses after the incident in the city center on May 26. Doyle is expected to enter pleas on Sept. 4. Fans had been celebrating Liverpool's record-tying 20th title when Doyle allegedly drove down a street full of fans and joy quickly turned to tragedy. Police said they believed Doyle got through a roadblock by following an ambulance that was trying to reach a possible heart attack victim. In a video the car could be seen hitting and sending a person wrapped in a red Liverpool flag into the air before swerving into a sea of people packed on the side of the road. At least four people, including a child, had to be freed from beneath the vehicle when it came to a halt. The victims ranged in age from 9 to 78, police said. The suspect was believed to have acted alone and terrorism was not suspected, Merseyside Police said. They have not disclosed an alleged motive for the act.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
I watched the police arrest hundreds of peaceful protesters – I fear Britain is on a slippery slope towards authoritarianism
Last Saturday, I stood in Parliament Square and bore witness to the largest mass arrest in a single day in the last decade. The Metropolitan Police detained 532 peaceful protesters – an operation that will live in infamy. The demonstration was organised by Defend Our Juries, which had called on participants to sit peacefully on the Parliament Square lawn between 1pm and 2pm, holding signs that read: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.' Organisers had expected around 500 people. In fact, thousands turned up. That morning, I had published an opinion piece in The Independent announcing that I would be there, holding a sign quoting Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): 'Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.' I also quoted Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, who warned that the UK government's proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation 'appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that is at odds with the UK's obligation under international human rights law'. When I arrived at 1pm, the square was surrounded by police. Hundreds of Metropolitan Police vans were stationed around the square, stretching as far as Oxford Street. Officers formed cordons to prevent people entering, but I managed to squeeze in. For nearly three hours, I stood in silence, holding my sign. The arrests began shortly after the scheduled sit-in concluded at 2pm. Officers began to position themselves to advance against the peaceful protesters seated on the lawn, and the few lying on the ground. Police reinforcements, including officers from Wales, swept into the square. Of the 532 arrests, 522 were for the simple act of holding placards supporting Palestine Action, under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The statistics are as shocking as the scenes I saw. According to the police's own figures, 112 of those detained were in their 70s, and 15 in their 80s. Nearly half were 60 or older, with an average age of 54. The police waged a relentless campaign against the protesters. Many were frail, elderly, or disabled. I saw priests and vicars in clerical collars led away in handcuffs. I saw retired nurses and NHS healthcare workers in scrubs being taken into police vans. One of them, Nick, was interviewed, and asked if he was afraid. His reply was very moving and and it almost brought me to tears: 'I'm absolutely terrified. I'm shaking. I'll be honest with you. I nearly cried earlier. The thought of doing something like this is just awful, but it's even more awful if we don't do it. I mean, I think to myself, you know, I've seen things, not on the mass media. I've seen things that cannot ever be unseen. And if we don't protest about it, we're culpable.' I also saw Jewish protesters critical of the Israeli government's actions being arrested alongside climate and human rights activists, including Chris Romberg, 75, a former British Army colonel and the son of a Holocaust survivor. No one was spared. One image that is seared in my mind: an elderly blind man in a wheelchair being dragged away by multiple officers as demonstrators shouted 'Let him go!' and 'Shame on you, shame on you!' I also watched the police arrest a frail woman in her 80s suffering from Parkinson's disease, while her son pleaded with the officers not to arrest her. The Metropolitan Police's motto is 'Working Together for a Safer London', but it is hard to see how dedicating so many resources to policing a peaceful protest and arresting frail and elderly citizens exercising such an ancient British freedom achieves this objective. Jonathan Porritt, former environmental adviser to King Charles, referred to the UK government's policy as 'absolutely standard authoritarian tactics'. 'I've come to the conclusion that the UK government is incontrovertibly complicit in this genocide not just through the continuing sale of arms to Israel, but because of its reckless refusal to follow guidance to seek to prevent genocide in countries like Gaza.' This is exactly how states erode democratic freedoms – not in one sudden lurch, but in small, calculated steps, until dissent itself becomes a criminal offence. The decision to ban Palestine Action was itself the product of a cynical political ploy. Home secretary Yvette Cooper bundled the group together with two violent white supremacist organisations – the neo-Nazi Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement – and forced MPs to vote for all or none. Many later admitted they felt they had no choice but to approve the ban. As Yasmine Ahmed, UK Director of Human Rights Watch, has warned: 'Proscribing Palestine Action is a grave abuse of state power and a terrifying escalation in this government's crusade to curtail protest rights.' The crucial issue here is that Palestine Action exposed what it – and many of us – see as the UK's complicity in the commission of genocide by Israel against the Palestinian people. Since December 2023, the RAF has flown more than 600 surveillance missions over Gaza, reputedly to locate hostages. This is why ordinary citizens – older people, clergy, disabled protesters – were criminalised for condemning what we believe to be genocide and demanding accountability. It also begs the question: who does prime minister Keir Starmer answer to – the UK electorate, Donald Trump, or the Israeli government and its lobbying organisations? Let me be clear: I unequivocally condemn Hamas for the atrocities of 7 October 2023. I call for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, and the unconditional release of all hostages. I was horrified seeing the images of an emaciated hostage. These crimes demand justice, but not through the carpet bombing of Gaza from North to South, the slaughter of civilians, and what is surely a deliberate policy of starvation of the population. Renowned human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith, who has defended Guantánamo Bay detainees, has drawn direct parallels between this crackdown and authoritarian measures elsewhere: 'Supporting Palestine Action's right to protest is not the same as supporting Palestine Action. It's time for Keir Starmer to remember why human rights exist.' Even conservative voices such as Andrew Neil, who strongly disagrees with Palestine Action's aims, have condemned the terrorism designation as absurd and a waste of police time and public resources. What I saw on Saturday was not public order policing. It was the suppression of lawful dissent, and the deliberate targeting of vulnerable people to send a chilling message: no cause is safe from criminalisation. This is the logic of authoritarianism – a steady erosion of freedoms under the pretext of security. I know what authoritarianism looks like. I was born in Nicaragua. In 1981, in Honduras, I faced Salvadorian death squads armed with M16 assault rifles. I had a terrifying experience that changed the course of my life. That experience taught me the importance of bearing witness. I came to Parliament Square to stand with ordinary citizens calling attention to the genocide against the Palestinian people – and the UK government's complicity. The UK government has embarked upon a dangerous path. The right to peaceful protest, the cornerstone of our democracy – from the suffragettes to the anti-apartheid movement – is under attack. The government has conflated dissent with terrorism, and the police have acted as enforcers of political orthodoxy rather than guardians of public safety. When Benjamin Disraeli said in 1845 that 'a Conservative government is an organised hypocrisy', who could have imagined that his words would describe so aptly the current Labour government and its authoritarian home secretary? The question we must ask ourselves is simple: When history judges us, will we be remembered as those who stood against injustice, or those who stood by in silence? Parliament Square on 9 August was not just a police operation. It was a test of our democracy – and it is a test we are in danger of failing.
Scottish Sun
27 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Travellers' in 30 caravans take over park in leafy suburb – but cops have NO power to evict them
Cops and the local authority are monitoring the encampment closely PARK STRIFE 'Travellers' in 30 caravans take over park in leafy suburb – but cops have NO power to evict them Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MORE than two dozen caravans have taken over a local park with cops left powerless to evict them. Around 30 caravans appeared yesterday evening at Guildford's Stoke Park with police officers "monitoring the situation closely." Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Officers say they are currently powerless to evict the 'travellers' Credit: User Generated Surrey Police have visited the makeshift caravan site but are unable to evict the caravans and their owners. Cops said they are working closely with Guildford Borough Council, which owns the 130-acre town centre park, to monitor the encampment. More than 30 caravans and a number of cars appeared overnight, setting up camp on one of the playing fields in the park uninvited. The quiet greenspace quickly began to resemble a caravan site with cops becoming involved. The force have said that the large encampment does not currently meet the threshold of powers available to police to manage unauthorised encampments. Officer's powers to manage encampments are "reliant on certain criteria with regards to damage, disruption, or distress" according to Surrey Police. Cops paid a visit to the site after it was reported to them but concluded that nothing could be done about the pop up camp. Surrey Police said they will continue to review the criteria to judge whether the threshold to evict the camper vans had been met. Images of the encampment show the caravans parked in a haphazard style on a playing pitch. A set of goalposts can be seen in the background of one of the pictures with the caravans blocking a large area of the pitch. Moment French farmers use tractors to spray hordes of squatters with manure The campers appear to have generators and gas canisters hooked up to them as the owners look to be settling in for a long stay. Each of the caravans seems to have come with its own car to tow it along, taking up even more space in the leafy suburb. Officers have so far been completely powerless to evict the caravan owners with locals forced to put up with the encampment for the time being. A police spokesperson said: "We are aware of an unauthorised encampment of around 30 caravans and 28 other vehicles in Stoke Park, which arrived yesterday evening (August 12). "Officers visited the site and will continue to monitor the situation while working closely with our partners at Guildford Borough Council, who own the land. "The powers available to police to manage unauthorised encampments under Sections 60, 61, and 62 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 are reliant on meeting certain criteria with regards to damage, disruption, or distress. "It was judged that the encampment does not currently meet this threshold, but the relevant sections of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 will be reviewed on an ongoing basis to judge whether the criteria to direct the site to be vacated has been met."
