logo
‘Budget Bjelke-Petersen': Organiser lashes lord mayor as court blocks Story Bridge protest

‘Budget Bjelke-Petersen': Organiser lashes lord mayor as court blocks Story Bridge protest

A protest organiser has labelled Brisbane's lord mayor 'budget Bjelke-Petersen' after a protest that would have shut down all six traffic lanes on the Story Bridge during peak hour was blocked by a court ruling.
Protesters had lodged a notice of intention of the protest on May 20, making it an authorised action under the Peaceful Assembly Act, for a one-hour walk across the bridge on Friday from 8am to draw attention to their calls for Brisbane City Council to allocate one car lane to pedestrian, cyclist and scooter traffic while the footpaths were repaired.
The Story Bridge footpaths – used by about 4000 walkers, bike and scooter riders daily – were closed on March 5, with reports later revealing parts of the bridge were an 'extreme risk' to the public, while council has called for cash from the state and federal governments to restore it.
Mediation efforts last week failed, and police took the matter to Brisbane Magistrates Court, with the support of the council.
Prosecutor Acting Senior Sergeant Donna Kay said closing the bridge during peak hour would cause 'mass disruption'.
In making his ruling, magistrate Ross Mack pointed to disruptions for thousands of commuters if the protest went ahead.
Kathryn Good, who lodged notice of the protest and was self-represented, told the court she understood the protest would cause disruption, but pointed to numerous other times the Story Bridge was shut, including for seven hours this Sunday for the Brisbane Marathon.
Mack asked a Brisbane City Council solicitor when the footpaths would be reopened, and he replied: 'I don't have those instructions'.
A business case for the full bridge restoration is not due until 2027, but the council plans to work on a temporary footpath replacement first.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

John Carey admits he wants more money to fix Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital after state of disrepair exposed
John Carey admits he wants more money to fix Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital after state of disrepair exposed

West Australian

timea day ago

  • West Australian

John Carey admits he wants more money to fix Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital after state of disrepair exposed

John Carey has finally admitted that he wants more money to fix the ailing Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, despite other ministers rejecting evidence it has fallen into disrepair. The Health Infrastructure Minister said that he expected more funding would be allocated but would not say how much he had asked for — or whether previous requests had been refused. 'We are spending currently at Charlies on upgrades, maintenance and equipment, it's around $113 million,' he said outside State Parliament on Thursday. 'I do anticipate that we will be making more investment in Charlies with that ageing infrastructure . . . I will, look, as a minister, every minister and every portfolio advocates for more funding.' Mr Carey would not commit to any fast-tracked funding before the Budget's usual mid-year review in December. 'Respectfully, I'm not going into any internal processes relating to budgeting,' he said. 'I point to the fact that we've already made decisions that's seeing around $113 million invested in Charlies.' Cabinet secretary Daniel Pastorelli, who was previously Premier Roger Cook's chief of staff, insisted when asked about hundreds of leaks and claims of black mould that the $100 million spent was enough. One nurse even said she has seen mushrooms growing out of the ceiling. Mr Pastorelli is in charge of Labor's community consultation process for the Burswood race track and amphitheatre, which the Opposition wants scrapped to free up $217 million for hospital repairs. Outside Parliament on Thursday, Mr Pastorelli said the Burswood project was an election promise. 'The Premier is very committed to delivering election commitments and that's what we'll be doing,' he said. Mr Pastorelli agreed that maintaining WA's hospitals to standard was also an election commitment. 'That's exactly right and that's what the Government is doing as well,' he said. 'The Government's committed a bit more than $100 million on a range of maintenance funding for Charlies hospital and that's been delivered.' Pressed on whether it had been enough, Mr Pastorelli said: 'I think it has.' Treasurer Rita Saffioti appeared to blame the Health Department for maintenance shortfalls, questioning a whistleblower's claims that management was unable to sign off on critical but costly works. 'They request funding in the budget submissions annually,' the staff member said. 'Only our top five requests are funded. Imagine that, only five issues across all of NMHS hospitals are funded. 'Things like critical infrastructure works, fire-related building risks, air-conditioning systems, water quality. 'So things keep failing because large funding amounts are not provided to replace the 40-year-old infrastructure.' Ms Saffioti said those decisions were not for her to make. 'We set a budget each year, we allocate those budgets to the departments,' she said. 'The departments make those operational decisions. We're not signing off on individual maintenance items.' Ms Saffioti accused the Opposition of lying over claims the maintenance budget had been cut. 'They weren't comparing like with like,' she said. 'Total health maintenance expenditure in 2017-18 was $180 million, now it's $240 million. 'We understand that both Charlies and Royal Perth, in particular, are ageing hospitals. We understand that and that's why we're injecting so much.' Ms Saffioti would not say whether more money has been requested by Mr Carey or Health Minister Meredith Hammat. 'There's always huge demand,' she said. 'Every agency across every budget will always have new spending measures. 'We have got more money in the system, there's more money today than there was yesterday. But we want to make sure that it's spent effectively.'

Two men extradited, charged over match fixing
Two men extradited, charged over match fixing

Perth Now

time2 days ago

  • Perth Now

Two men extradited, charged over match fixing

Two men are accused of acting as "player agents" and approaching a Queensland football competitor in attempts to fix matches. Queensland Police have extradited the men, aged 55 and 45, from Sydney and charged them after a months-long investigation into attempted sports match fixing at Gold Coast-based football games. Police allege that on May 12 and June 20, two employees of an offshore investment group acted as "player agents" and approached a football player at a Coomera home on the Gold Coast in a "co-ordinated effort" to match fix in exchange for payment. Police are yet to confirm the football code involved. Match fixing is the act of deliberately manipulating the outcome of a sports event for illicit gain, often involving betting or bribery. NSW Police searched homes in Sydney's Mosman and Mount Colah on Tuesday before Queensland Police detectives travelled to NSW to seek the two men's extradition. The men have been charged with one count each of procuring a person to engage in match-fixing pecuniary benefit. It is only the second time a person in Queensland has been charged with match-fixing since the legislation was introduced in 2014. Detective Chief Inspector Melissa Anderson said the charges should serve as a warning to anyone taking part in match-fixing. "Match-fixers attempt to manipulate games to gain a benefit, usually gambling profit, or the overall value of clubs, teams and players," she said. "Match-fixing is serious criminal behaviour that undermines community confidence in the fairness of sport." The men will face Brisbane Magistrates Court on Thursday.

WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day
WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day

ABC News

time3 days ago

  • ABC News

WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day

Less than 0.04 per cent of the WA government's budget could have been the difference between the well-run elections voters expect, and the array of problems experienced in March. That's the shocking conclusion of a wide-ranging inquiry called to try and understand what went so wrong at the state poll. Some voters were left queuing for hours, or confused about how to cast their ballots, or in some cases completely unable to vote. Former governor Malcolm McCusker concluded many issues could be traced back to a lack of staff. On the surface, that was a result of Election Operations Director, Shani Wood, requesting 30 per cent fewer staff than had originally been forecast. "It was the budget. It was always the budget. Everything was getting cut," she told the inquiry. Everything was being cut because of a decision of the government's powerful Expenditure Review Committee (ERC), chaired by Treasurer Rita Saffioti, which signs off on government spending. The WA Electoral Commission had gone to the ERC, warning if it did not get an extra $16 million there would be problems. It got only $4 million. The WAEC was told, however, that "if these increased costs simply can't be absorbed … then … come back to the ERC for supplementary funding after the election". But that message did not seem to make it to Wood, who stuck to the budget she was given. "The premier, the treasurer and those other senior ministers had considered their request and had refused to support them in the way that they had asked," Opposition Electoral Affairs spokesperson Shane Love said, suggesting the Commission may have been reluctant to ask again. Those issues were exacerbated, McCusker found, by Wood not telling Commissioner Robert Kennedy about the shortfall. "Had she told him that, the Commissioner deposed … that he probably would have gone back to Treasury 'to convince ERC to give us the money'," the report reads. "In his evidence he said 'I distinctly recall saying to her (i.e. Shani Wood) cut numbers elsewhere. Don't cut into the polling staff.'" In her evidence, Wood accepted she had never passed that information along to the commissioner. "She believed that [three other staff], all with more election experience than her, accepted that the reduced numbers of [temporary election workers] would be sufficient for election day," the report found. "Although she does not say that she told them how much of a reduction in numbers she was making." The hole the commission was digging for itself was made even deeper by the original estimations for both staff and ballot paper allocations being based on 2021 data — an election held during COVID — which assumed half of all in-person votes would be cast early. In November — four months before the election — a senior WAEC official questioned the accuracy of that number. They said even if it was true, election day staff would likely still be overwhelmed and suggested adding more staff. "For the sake of a vest and a badge it may alleviate risk around fatigue management, media scrutiny regarding queues and show [returning officers] we are listening to their concerns," they wrote. In the end, only 31 per cent of in-person votes were cast early — meaning demand on election day was much higher than expected. That appeared to be one of many disagreements between the commission's upper-most staff and those closer to the ground, which resulted in a "soured relationship". "I think there was a couple of, shall we say, dominant personalities there … both of them felt that they were in the right and they should be running things," Commissioner Kennedy reflected. That meant head office wasn't fully aware of issues experienced on the day, including ballot paper shortages. And, unsurprisingly, staff shortages meant those working booths struggled to respond to that increased demand. "[Presiding Officers] and experienced election staff had to respond to other front line issues, such as having to arrange for an ambulance if someone fainted in long queues," the report concluded. That recruitment had been outsourced — apparently in a bid to save the WAEC's reputation after the previous election — was not to blame for every issue, but did add a complicating factor, the report concluded. It noted staff were not vetted, and that a phone number given to polling place officials to replace staff who did not show up was the same one given to more than 7,000 staff across the sate and often rang out. "If people don't turn up for the election, or the wrong people turn up, it is a fundamental impact on the … democratic architecture either of the state or federally," former Australian Electoral commissioner Tom Rogers told the inquiry. "So you have to be responsible for your own workforce … and you need to minimise somebody else doing that for you, because they just don't have the same level of accountability and responsibility that we do." Indeed, even Commissioner Kennedy — who gave the final sign off to outsource — agreed "in hindsight" it would have been better for the WAEC to recruit its own staff. The government has pledged in-principle support to 23 of the report's 24 recommendations, including establishing an oversight committee and overhauling recruitment. But the one marked as "noted" is potentially the most significant. It's leaving it up to the WAEC and Treasury to work out a future funding model and report back. Given the whole array of issues at the election almost all stem back to funding, the pressure to get that arrangement right is a big one. And it's not just about dollars and cents. Electoral Affairs Minister David Michael said he was "surprised that the funding message from Treasury did not filter through the organisation". Understanding what role government, and the WAEC, played in that miscommunication will be key to avoiding a repeat of these issues. Issues which seemingly could have been avoided for the low, low price of $12 million.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store