
BREAKING NEWS The astonishing story behind this purple Lamborghini seized by NSW police in Sydney
The arrests follow an extensive investigation under Strike Force Alcova, launched by the State Crime Command's Organised Crime Squad Unexplained Wealth Team in collaboration with the NSW Crime Commission.
The syndicate is accused of distributing fake designer clothing, watches, shoes, and handbags, while laundering millions in profits through multiple bank accounts.
Police allege the group used social media platforms to market and sell the counterfeit items, generating approximately $9.75million in illicit revenue.
Police executed three search warrants in in Fairfield East, Merrylands and Guildford.
During the raids, officers seized nine vehicles valued at around $3million including a purple Lambo, over 500 counterfeit luxury items, $270,000 in cash, and a gel blaster firearm.
Three men were arrested at the respective locations and taken to Granville Police Station.
The 30-year-old Fairfield East man faces multiple charges including dealing with proceeds of crime, concealing criminal proceeds, and participating in a criminal group.
The 33-year-old Merrylands man was charged with similar offences, while the 30-year-old Guildford man also faces a charge for failing to comply with a digital evidence access order.
All three were refused bail and are scheduled to appear in Parramatta Local Court today.
Detective Superintendent Peter Faux, Commander of the Organised Crime Squad said the arrests send a strong message to criminal networks.
'We will allege these individuals built a multi-million-dollar empire by deceiving consumers and undermining legitimate businesses,' he said.
'Behind the filters and followers was a sophisticated criminal enterprise exploiting digital platforms to sell counterfeit luxury goods.'
NSW Crime Commission Executive Director Darren Bennett praised the operation, highlighting the seizure of tainted assets.
'The evidence suggests this criminal group stockpiled significant wealth through the sale of counterfeit items. These assets are now under the control of the NSW Crime Commission,' he said.
'We've commenced proceedings to recover millions of dollars, with the aim of returning that money to the people of New South Wales.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man jailed after stabbing victim through car window in Arnold
A man who stabbed another man through a car window has been jailed. Connor Gladwin approached his victim as he sat in his car in Arnold, Nottinghamshire, in the early hours of 8 March, before stabbing him in the chest. Nottinghamshire Police said the 23-year-old was identified on CCTV footage and his fingerprint was found on the victim's Monday at Nottingham Crown Court, Gladwin, of Hungerhill Road, St Ann's, Nottingham, was jailed for three years and nine months. Police said Gladwin's victim, who attended the Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham with a deep chest wound, chose not to engage with officers. However, an investigation began after doctors confirmed the injury was caused by a footage revealed the victim's car had arrived in Front Street in Arnold at about 00:40 GMT, and he and another man attended a bar for a short period before leaving as part of a larger left the bar shortly after and walked towards the car, where he was seen speaking to the victim before reaching into the car window twice. Then, after an altercation with a number of other people, Gladwin folded an object in his hands and walked away, police said. He pleaded guilty to committing grievous bodily harm without intent and possession of a knife in a public place, the force added. Det Insp Julian Eminson-Ferry said: "Tackling knife crime is a priority for the force, so any report of a stabbing is treated with the utmost seriousness."The victim chose not to engage with officers, but following this incident, we used all the investigative tools at our disposal to identify Connor Gladwin as the offender and arrest him."


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
One in four Britons admit to witnessing shoplifting but not reporting it
Almost a quarter of Britons have admitted to witnessing a minor crime like shoplifting but not reporting it, a new survey has revealed. The research, conducted by security company Get Licensed last month, also found one in eight people (12 per cent) who have never witnessed any crime say they would ignore it if they did. One in ten of the respondents confessed they have purposely stolen from a shop, while one in six (16 per cent) of people admitted to having walked out of a store with unpaid items without realising. The new research comes amid a shoplifting crisis, as the number of offences recorded by police in England and Wales climbed to another record high in 2024-25, up 20 per cent from 2023-24. Last month, home secretary Yvette Cooper announced a new crime 'blitz' to crack down on crime, featuring more visible policing and stronger enforcement in a bid to restore confidence in policing. But as The Independent revealed recently, shopkeepers are struggling against the wave of shoplifting offences. Supermarket chain Iceland is now even set to offer customers a £1 reward for actively spotting and reporting shoplifters in their stores. A policing chief faced criticism when he intervened last week, telling the public to stop shoplifters and not just rely on police officers to curb thefts. Matthew Barber, the Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley, branded people who do not do anything in the face of shoplifting as 'part of the problem'. Joshua Reynolds, the Liberal Democrat MP for Maidenhead, which is in the Thames Valley Police area, launched a strong criticism of Mr Barber's remarks, telling The Independent they were 'dangerous' and 'irresponsible'. And following Mr Barber's claims, policing minister Dame Diana Johnson warned members of the public against confronting shoplifters. Get Licensed's survey of 1,004 people found men are more likely to report on such crimes than women (25 per cent compared to 21 per cent), while the 45-54-year-olds are the least likely to report these crimes, with more than a quarter having seen a small crime and not reported it (27 per cent). Across the UK, Leeds residents were found to be the least likely to report shoplifting, with 35 per cent of locals who have witnessed a minor crime like shoplifting admitting that they did not take action. The next highest rates were recorded in London, Newcastle and Sheffield. Meanwhile, those who find a lost wallet in London were revealed to be the most likely in the country to steal any cash inside before handing it in, with almost one in 10 residents (9 per cent) admitting they would. And shockingly, as many as 11 per cent of locals who have witnessed a violent crime in Cardiff admitted they did not take action - the highest proportion of any UK city.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
WA lawyer referred to regulator after preparing documents with AI-generated citations for nonexistent cases
A lawyer has been referred to Western Australia's legal regulator after using artificial intelligence in preparing court documents for an immigration case. The documents contained AI-generated case citations for cases that did not exist. It is one of more than 20 cases so far in Australia in which AI use has resulted in fake citations or other errors in court submissions, with warnings from judges across the country to be wary of using the technology in the legal profession. In a federal court judgment published this week, the anonymised lawyer was referred to the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia for consideration and ordered to pay the federal government's costs of $8,371.30 after submissions to an immigration case were found by the representative for the immigration minister to include four case citations that did not exist. Justice Arran Gerrard said the incident 'demonstrates the inherent dangers associated with practitioners solely relying on the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of court documents and the way in which that interacts with a practitioner's duty to the court'. The lawyer told the court in an affidavit that he had relied on Anthropic's Claude AI 'as a research tool to identify potentially relevant authorities and to improve my legal arguments and position', and then used Microsoft Copilot to validate the submissions. The lawyer said he had 'developed an overconfidence in relying on AI tools and failed to adequately verify the generated results'. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I had an incorrect assumption that content generated by AI tools would be inherently reliable, which led me to neglect independently verifying all citations through established legal databases,' the lawyer said in the affidavit. The lawyer unreservedly apologised to the court and the minister's solicitors for the errors. Gerrard said the court 'does not adopt a luddite approach' to the use of generative AI, and understood why the complexity of migration law might make using an AI tool attractive. But he warned there was now a 'concerning number' of cases where AI had led to citation of fictitious cases. Gerrard said it risked 'a good case to be undermined by rank incompetence' and the prevalence of such cases 'significantly wastes the time and resources of opposing parties and the court'. He said it also risked damage to the legal profession. Gerrard said the lawyer did 'not fully comprehend what was required of him' and it was not sufficient to merely check that the cases cited were not fake, but to review those cases thoroughly. 'Legal principles are not simply slogans which can be affixed to submissions without context or analysis.' There have been at least 20 cases of AI hallucinations reported in Australian courts since generative AI tools exploded in popularity in 2023. Last week, a Victorian supreme court judge criticised lawyers acting for a boy accused of murder for filing misleading information with the courts after failing to check documents created using AI. The documents included references to nonexistent case citations and inaccurate quotes from a parliamentary speech. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion There have also been similar cases involving lawyers in New South Wales and Victoria in the past year, who were referred to their state's regulatory bodies. However, the spate of cases is not just limited to qualified lawyers. In a NSW supreme court decision this month, a self-represented litigant in a trusts case admitted to the chief justice, Andrew Bell, to have used AI to prepare her speech for the appeal hearing. Bell said in his judgment that he was not criticising the person, who he said was doing her best to represent herself. But he said problems with using AI in preparing submissions were exacerbated when the technology was used by unrepresented litigants 'who are not subject to the professional and ethical responsibilities of legal practitioners'. He said the use of generative AI tools 'may introduce added costs and complexity' to proceedings and 'add to the burden of other parties and the court in responding to it'. 'Notwithstanding the fact that generative AI may contribute to improved access to justice, which is itself an obviously laudable goal, the present case illustrates the need for judicial vigilance in its use, especially but not only, by unrepresented litigants.' The Law Council of Australia's president, Juliana Warner, said sophisticated AI tools offered unique opportunities to support the legal profession in administrative tasks, but reliance on AI tools did not diminish the professional judgment a legal practitioner was expected to bring to a client's matter. 'Where these tools are utilised by lawyers, this must be done with extreme care,' she said. 'Lawyers must always keep front of mind their professional and ethical obligations to the court and to their clients.' Warner said courts were regarding cases where AI had generated fake citations as a 'serious concern', but added that given the widespread use of generative AI, a broadly framed prohibition on its use in legal proceedings would be 'neither practical nor proportionate, and risks hindering innovation and access to justice'.