
Research finds glaciers far more vulnerable to global warming than earlier estimates
Glaciers worldwide are far more vulnerable to global warming than scientists previously estimated, with potentially catastrophic consequences for billions who depend on glacier-fed water systems, according to new research published in the journal Science.
The dangers from such climate crisis-linked change was evident on Wednesday. A massive rock and ice avalanche from Switzerland's Birch glacier thundered down a mountainside in Blatten, sending dust plumes skyward and coating the evacuated Alpine village with mud, according to a news report by AP.
The comprehensive study reveals that only 24% of current glacier mass would survive if global temperatures rise by 2.7°C — the warming trajectory anticipated under existing climate policies. However, limiting warming to 1.5°C could preserve 54% of glacier mass, highlighting the critical importance of aggressive climate action.
The findings carry particular significance for the Hindu Kush Himalayas (HKH), where glaciers sustain river systems supporting 2 billion people. Under 1.5°C warming, only 40% of the region's 2020 glacier mass would remain, plummeting to just 25% at 2°C warming.
'Our study makes it painfully clear that every fraction of a degree matters,' said lead author Harry Zekollari from Vrije Universiteit Brussel. 'The choices we make today will resonate for centuries, determining how much of our glaciers can be preserved.'
Regional variations within the vast HKH system are stark. The Central and Eastern Himalayas face nearly 63% glacier mass loss at 1.5°C warming, whilst the Western region — encompassing Hindu Kush, Karakorum and Western Himalayas — would lose approximately 17%.
'It is important to note that these projections are based on when the glaciers fully adjust to warmed climate, which can take hundreds of years,' explained James Kirkham, a glaciologist and climate scientist, based on the findings of the study.
While overall findings of the paper are global and largely apply to very large glaciers around Antarctica and Greenland, 'the glacier regions most important to human communities are even more sensitive, with several losing nearly all glacier ice already at 2 degree C,' scientists have said.
The European Alps, North American Rockies and Iceland would retain merely 10-15% of their 2020 ice levels under sustained 2°C warming. Scandinavia faces complete glacier loss at 2°C.
Staying within 1.5°C warming offers a dramatically different scenario, preserving at least some glacier ice across all regions. Even Scandinavia would retain glacier ice, whilst the four most sensitive regions would maintain 20-30% of current levels, and the Himalayas and Caucasus would preserve 40-45%.
The research, titled 'Glacier preservation doubled by limiting warming to 1.5°C versus 2.7°C' and conducted by 21 scientists from leading institutions including ETH Zurich, University of Innsbruck and University of Bristol, employed eight state-of-the-art glacier evolution models across 80 climate scenarios to simulate long-term mass loss for all glaciers outside the major ice sheets.
'Glaciers are good indicators of climate change because their retreat allows us to see with our own eyes how climate is changing,' said co-lead author Lilian Schuster from the University of Innsbruck. 'But the situation for glaciers is actually far worse than visible in the mountains today.'
The study's release coincided with the first global UN conference on glaciers in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, underscoring growing international concern over accelerating ice loss.
Some regions, including the Central Andes of Peru, Ecuador and Colombia, plus East Africa and Indonesia, appear to maintain higher ice levels — but only because they have already suffered massive losses. Venezuela's last glacier, Humboldt, lost its glacier status in 2024, whilst Indonesia's ironically named 'Infinity Glacier' is expected to disappear within two years.
European losses continue mounting. Germany lost one of its five remaining glaciers during the 2022 heatwave, whilst Slovenia likely lost its final glacier decades ago.
The crisis has reached Nepal, where the Yala glacier in Langtang was recently declared 'dead'— the first Nepalese glacier to receive this designation. Glaciologists and local communities from Nepal, India, China and Bhutan gathered to commemorate its loss, marking it with a memorial plaque bearing words by author Andri Snaer Magnason. Yala becomes the first Asian glacier and third worldwide to receive such commemoration.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
The dark side of former ESPN host John Brenkus' untimely death: struggles, family and legacy
The world lost a thoughtful voice and a creative soul on May 31, 2025. John Brenkus, known to many for his on-screen brilliance and behind-the-scenes vision, known for his performance as former ESPN host and founder of Sport Science, among his other notable performances, passed away at the age of 54. His loved ones confirmed the heartbreaking news, sharing that he had been privately enduring a long struggle with depression. The official statement revealed by his family said, ' It is with profound sadness that we share the news that John Brenkus has passed away.' They added, 'John, co-founder of Base Productions, Founder of and co-creator and host of the six-time Emmy award-winning 'Science' had been battling depression. John lost his fight with this terrible illness on May 31, 2025. His heartbroken family and friends request privacy at this time, and encourage anyone who is struggling with depression to seek help. ' Who was John Brenkus? John wasn't just a media personality—he was a builder of ideas. A creative visionary, he co-founded and worked as the co-CEO of Base Productions and launched putting bold storytelling on center stage. He also co-created and hosted the multi-Emmy-winning series 'Science,' where sports meet innovation in thrilling ways. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo His brain-child BASE Productions is a well known production company that amalgamates reality with entertainment, successfully working with channels such as Spike, National Geographic and ESPN. He brought athletic performance under the microscope—literally—and made it digestible, fun, and mind-blowing for viewers. His programs like Fight Science and Sport Science tweaked the internet among the youth for an in depth understanding of the science behind sports. Who is John Brenkus' wife? John's life was full of ambition, but his greatest collaboration was with his wife, Lizzie Brenkus. The two married in 2004 and quickly became more than life partners—they were artistic allies. Lizzie, an artist, entrepreneur, and endurance athlete, was the spark behind many of their creative projects. Their musical journey began in the most unexpected way—John playing a casual tune, and Lizzie spontaneously jumping in with a harmony. That serendipitous moment lit the fuse for Brink of Midnight, their band that launched in 2014. Their debut track, 'Christmas Is My Favorite Time of Year,' caught fire almost instantly. How many kids did John Brenkus have? John and Lizzie were not only collaborators in music, but also proud parents. Together, they raised two children—Bryce and Arabella. Their family home in Park City, Utah, was filled with rhythm, adventure, and unconditional love. Whether it was family jam sessions or outdoor escapades, the Brenkus household lived life out loud. Silent Battles of John Brenkus Behind the screen presence and media accomplishments, John carried invisible weight. The spotlight or the constant screen presence could not take a hint of the silent battles he was fighting every day. He silently drowned to the dark emptiness of depression. His family courageously acknowledged his years-long mental health struggle—a reminder that even the brightest lights can flicker in silence. His family's heartfelt statement on his passing aims to break the stigma and encourages anyone in pain to speak out and seek support. John Brenkus' legacy lives on John Brenkus leaves behind more than memories—he leaves a legacy of curiosity, love, and fearless creativity. Through Lizzie, Bryce, and Arabella, and the many lives touched by his work, his spirit continues to resonate. Let's remember John not just for what he made, but for the love he shared and the courage he showed.


Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
Trump-Musk ties strain as Isaacman ousted, Musk exits DOGE; NYT alleges drug use
AP (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File) US president Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk appear to be drifting apart after a series of high-profile moves involving their close associates, political roles, and a damaging media report. Trump withdrew his pick of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA, while Musk exited his advisory role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump pulls Isaacman's NASA nomination Trump on Saturday said he was rescinding the nomination of Isaacman, a private astronaut and payments entrepreneur, to head the US space agency. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space.' Isaacman, founder of Shift4 Payments, has worked closely with Musk's SpaceX and is known for leading the first all-civilian space mission. His ties to Musk reportedly played a key role in his nomination. The New York Times reported that Trump decided to pull back after learning that Isaacman had previously donated to well-known Democratic candidates. Responding to that report, the White House told AFP in an email, 'It is essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with president Trump's America First agenda. The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute president Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars.' Musk leaves DOGE amid growing scrutiny Appointed by the president himself, Musk became in-charge of DOGE, a key project aimed at cutting government spending. His appointment made headlines and sparked strong reactions from both supporters and many expected Musk to step down, his exit came shortly after he publicly disagreed with parts of Trump's policy plans. That added to growing concerns about his role in his time at DOGE, Musk pushed for major spending cuts. Several government agencies were shut down and thousands of jobs were cut. These changes led to public protests and raised questions about whether it was appropriate for someone running large private companies to be involved in such Musk led DOGE, his companies, including Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink, continued to operate, Tesla shares fell sharply, and protests erupted following DOGE's sweeping budget cuts and the closure of several federal agencies. Musk denies drug use claims by NYT Meanwhile, Musk hit back at a New York Times report that accused him of regular drug use during the 2024 campaign newspaper reported that Musk had used ketamine, ecstasy, and mushrooms and even developed bladder issues from frequent ketamine use. It said he carried a pill box and it was unclear whether he continued using drugs after joining the Trump administration in rejected the claims on Saturday. 'To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs. The New York Times was lying their ass off,' he wrote on added, 'I tried 'prescription' ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this is not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.'When asked by a reporter if he knew about Musk's alleged drug use, Trump replied, 'I wasn't. I think Elon is a fantastic guy.'


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
3 hours of sleep and no fatigue? Scientists uncover the secret of natural short sleepers
How some people function perfectly on 3.5 hours of sleep For decades, the mantra has been the same: adults should aim for seven to eight hours of uninterrupted sleep each night for optimal health, performance, and longevity. From doctors to wellness influencers, the message has echoed across platforms, backed by countless studies linking insufficient sleep to heart disease, diabetes, depression, cognitive decline, and early mortality. But what if this universal advice doesn't apply to everyone? Enter a rare, fascinating group of people who are redefining what it means to be well-rested. Known as natural short sleepers, these individuals thrive on just three to four hours of sleep per night — and not because they're skimping on rest. Rather, they are biologically wired to require less of it. These are not productivity-obsessed workaholics running on caffeine and willpower. They are genetically programmed to complete all the vital functions of sleep in a fraction of the time, waking up refreshed, alert, and high-functioning without any of the side effects typical of sleep deprivation. This condition, called Familial Natural Short Sleep (FNSS), is exceedingly rare and largely misunderstood, but recent breakthroughs in neuroscience and genetics are helping demystify it. From groundbreaking studies to the potential for revolutionizing sleep medicine, the science of short sleepers is gaining momentum — and it may just unlock answers to one of biology's greatest enigmas. How some people function perfectly on 3.5 hours of sleep Natural short sleepers are often highly energetic, productive, and resistant to common health issues associated with insufficient sleep. According to neuroscientist Dr. Ying-Hui Fu at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), these individuals don't experience the cognitive fog, irritability, or health decline that plagues typical short sleepers. Natural short sleep isn't a result of lifestyle, stress, or overcommitment. It's genetically driven and often runs in families, hence the term familial in FNSS. In most cases, these individuals sleep between 3.5 to 5 hours a night — every night — and report feeling completely rested and mentally sharp. They don't rely on naps or stimulants to compensate. Their bodies simply don't seem to need more. Though estimates vary, only about 1% of the population may possess this trait, making it an incredibly rare but fascinating subject of study in the world of sleep research. Why some people need just 4 hours of sleep: The genetic blueprint The scientific journey into FNSS began with Dr. Fu's landmark study published in Science in 2009, where her team identified a mutation in the DEC2 gene in members of a family who consistently slept for just 4 to 6 hours a night without adverse effects. Since then, Dr. Fu and colleagues have discovered five key mutations across four different genes involved in regulating sleep, including DEC2, NPSR1, ADRB1, and most recently, SIK3. Each mutation alters the sleep architecture of the brain, effectively condensing the sleep process without compromising its restorative benefits. In a 2022 study published in Neuron, researchers used genetically engineered mice to test the impact of the SIK3 mutation. The mice exhibited significantly reduced sleep times without observable physical or cognitive impairment. These findings strongly suggest that FNSS is not just a fluke — it's a biologically viable alternative to conventional sleep patterns. While each mutation alone only slightly reduces sleep needs, stacking them together may have cumulative effects, a hypothesis currently under investigation. If confirmed, this could pave the way to replicating FNSS-like effects safely in individuals with sleep disorders. Can short sleep genes treat insomnia The implications of this research extend far beyond curiosity. Sleep disorders like insomnia, narcolepsy, and sleep apnea affect hundreds of millions globally. Understanding the biological mechanisms that allow short sleepers to thrive on less sleep could revolutionize sleep medicine. Dr. Fu's team believes that, in the future, therapies could be developed to mimic or activate these gene mutations in people suffering from insomnia or irregular sleep cycles. This would allow them to achieve restorative sleep in shorter durations, potentially improving quality of life for those who cannot sustain long sleep hours due to work schedules, health issues, or neurological conditions. Professor Clifford Saper, a renowned sleep scientist at Harvard Medical School, supports this line of inquiry, emphasizing that we are only scratching the surface of sleep genetics. 'If we can understand how to safely 'accelerate' the sleep process, we could one day provide relief to millions who struggle with poor sleep,' he notes. The dark side of sleeping less (if you're not genetically wired) Despite the allure of being able to function optimally on minimal sleep, it's crucial to underscore that Short Sleep Syndrome is not something you can train yourself into. Most people who sleep less than six hours a night accumulate sleep debt, which can lead to severe health consequences over time. A 2022 UK Biobank study involving over 7,800 participants found that individuals in their 50s who slept less than five hours per night were 20% more likely to develop multiple chronic conditions, including: Cardiovascular disease Type 2 diabetes Depression Obesity Dementia Moreover, sleep deprivation is associated with weakened immune function, poor memory, mood instability, and a higher risk of accidents. So unless you're genetically tested and confirmed to be a natural short sleeper, cutting back on sleep can be dangerous — not admirable. Why sleep matters: The body's restoration cycle To understand why most people need 7–8 hours of sleep, it's important to know what happens during that time. Sleep is not a passive state; it's a dynamic biological process governed by our circadian rhythm, the body's internal 24-hour clock. Sleep consists of multiple stages: Light Sleep (N1 and N2) – Helps the body relax and transition. Deep Sleep (N3) – Critical for physical restoration, tissue repair, and immune function. REM Sleep – Vital for learning, memory consolidation, and emotional processing. During a typical night, we cycle through these stages four to six times. For natural short sleepers, research suggests that their bodies compress these cycles, achieving full restoration in a shorter window. They may experience a more efficient distribution of deep sleep and REM stages, allowing them to complete the 'tasks' of sleep at high speed — like a compressed file that contains all the data in less space. Are you a natural short sleeper? Wondering if you might be part of this rare elite group? According to sleep researchers, natural short sleepers exhibit several consistent traits: Sleep just 3–5 hours per night and wake up feeling fully rested Never feel the need to nap or 'catch up' on weekends Show no signs of fatigue, brain fog, or irritability Maintain excellent health and cognitive function Often display high energy, optimism, and productivity Still, self-diagnosis is not recommended. If you suspect you might be a natural short sleeper, consult a sleep specialist and undergo polysomnography or genetic testing to confirm. Many people mistakenly believe they're short sleepers but are, in fact, sleep-deprived. The future of sleep: Genetic engineering or natural evolution? With genetic research accelerating, it's not far-fetched to imagine a future where gene-editing technologies like CRISPR could give people FNSS-like traits. But such advancements are years — if not decades — away, and ethical considerations abound. In the meantime, scientists are using the study of FNSS to understand how sleep works at the molecular level, which could have applications in fields ranging from neurodegenerative disease treatment to space travel, where managing sleep in constrained environments is vital. Ultimately, natural short sleepers challenge one of the most fundamental assumptions of modern medicine — that all humans have the same biological need for rest. And in doing so, they open the door to a future where sleep is not just a necessity, but a personalized experience based on genetics. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change