logo
Will Lebanon succeed in disarming Hezbollah?

Will Lebanon succeed in disarming Hezbollah?

Al Jazeera2 days ago
Lebanon's government has announced a timeline for Hezbollah's disarmament, saying the military would set out a plan to bring all weapons under state authority before the end of 2025.
This comes after months of pressure from the United States after Israel's war on Lebanon killed more than 4,000 people and culminated in a ceasefire in November. Israel has continuously violated the ceasefire and still occupies five points in Lebanon.
Hezbollah's arms have long been a contentious issue in Lebanon, and attempts to interfere in Hezbollah's infrastructure or military capabilities have led to internal conflict.
However, Hezbollah took heavy losses in Israeli attacks last year, which diminished its status as Lebanon's political and military hegemon.
As the issue of disarming Hezbollah heats up, here's what you need to know about the government's announcement on Tuesday and the situation in Lebanon:
What did Hezbollah say?
It doesn't like the disarmament plan.
In fact, Hezbollah said it would treat the decision as though it didn't exist.
'The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam committed a grave sin by taking a decision to strip Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy. … This decision fully serves Israel's interest,' the group said in a statement.
Despite its flat-out rejection of the government's decision, Hezbollah has yet to respond with force.
Under its late leader Hassan Nasrallah, the group threatened that any act taken against its arms could lead to civil war.
This time, Hezbollah has not taken military action, possibly a result of a change in its strategy or because of its weakened capacity after the war.
Rumours circulated during a cabinet session on Tuesday that Hezbollah supporters in black shirts were gathering along the highway in Khaldeh, just south of Beirut, but that turned out to be a restaurant celebrating reaching one million followers on Instagram.
Pro-Hezbollah protesters did briefly block the airport road in Beirut after the government's decision, but little else has manifested despite heightened domestic concerns.
What about Iran, Hezbollah's backer?
Iran voiced support for Hezbollah but said it has no role in shaping the group's decisions or policy.
The comments came from Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said the efforts to disarm Hezbollah wouldn't work.
‏'This is not the first time they've tried to strip Hezbollah of its weapons,' Araghchi said. 'The reason is clear: The power of resistance has proven itself in the field.'
Iran played a formative role in founding Hezbollah in 1982 during the heat of the Lebanese Civil War and has been the group's main benefactor ever since.
But since Israel's war on Lebanon, Iran's ability to support Hezbollah has taken a major hit. The Lebanese government has blocked flights from Tehran, and the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime in neighbouring Syria has blocked the land route used to transport funding and weapons.
How did Lebanon respond?
Iran's comments angered some Lebanese officials.
Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi said Araghchi's statement is 'firmly rejected and condemned'.
'Such statements undermine Lebanon's sovereignty, unity and stability and constitute an unacceptable interference in its internal matters and sovereign decisions,' Raggi said.
Is disarmament going to happen?
This remains to be seen.
Salam said after a follow-up cabinet meeting on Thursday that his ministers approved the 'objectives' of a US proposal for 'ensuring that the possession of weapons is restricted solely to the state'.
'The government is now expected to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah, a decision that could … ignite a political crisis,' Al Jazeera's Beirut correspondent Zeina Khodr said.
Hezbollah has yet to respond forcefully, and anti-Hezbollah politicians have used increasingly bold rhetoric.
'If there is a cost to be able to centralise the weapons with the … Lebanese armed forces, [it may be] better like that,' Elias Hankash, a Lebanese MP with the anti-Hezbollah Kataeb party, said.
President Joseph Aoun and Salam will have to navigate US pressure and domestic support for disarming Hezbollah with opposition from the group and its supporters, who are reeling from Israel's war.
The World Bank has said Lebanon needs $11bn for reconstruction and recovery, the vast majority of which is needed in southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley and Beirut's suburbs, where most of Hezbollah's support is based.
Have any Hezbollah members expressed discontent with disarmament?
Plenty of discontent has been expressed.
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the idea, saying the group's disarmament would make Lebanon vulnerable to attack and would serve only Israel.
Ali Mokdad, a Hezbollah MP, also dismissed the decision, calling it 'ink on paper'. Another Hezbollah MP, Mohammad Raad, said the decision could never be implemented and compared Hezbollah giving up its weapons to 'suicide'.
What are things like right now?
Tensions were heightened on Saturday when six Lebanese soldiers were killed while inspecting an alleged Hezbollah weapons site.
Hezbollah reportedly booby-trapped sites in southern Lebanon during the war in case invading Israeli soldiers came upon them.
Many from Lebanon's south are antagonistic towards Beirut, feeling the government has not been able to defend the south, which continues to suffer from daily Israeli attacks. Residents also lament the lack of public statements about the deaths from those attacks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US sanctions DR Congo armed group over illicit mining, ceasefire tested
US sanctions DR Congo armed group over illicit mining, ceasefire tested

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US sanctions DR Congo armed group over illicit mining, ceasefire tested

The United States has sanctioned an armed group accused of illicit mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as both the army and the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group traded accusations of violating a recently reached US-mediated ceasefire deal by attacking each other's positions. The US Department of the Treasury said on Tuesday that it was blocking all interests and restricting transactions with Pareco-FF, an armed group that it said controlled the key coltan mining site of Rubaya from 2022 to 2024, and which has opposed the M23 group. The administration of President Donald Trump has been pushing for US access to the region's minerals, as it has done in other parts of the world, including Ukraine. It also slapped sanctions on the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals that were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya and two Hong Kong-based export companies, East Rise and Star Dragon, which have been accused of buying minerals from the armed group. 'The United States is sending a clear message that no armed group or commercial entity is immune from sanctions if they undermine peace, stability or security in the DRC,' State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said in a statement. Rubaya is currently under the control of the M23 group, which is already targeted by US sanctions. The mine there produces 15 to 30 percent of the world's supply of coltan, a mineral used in electronics such as laptops and mobile telephones. Many Pareco rebels integrated into the DRC military in 2009, but Pareco-FF emerged in 2022 in response to the M23 gains. The sanctions come as Congolese army spokesman Sylvain Ekenge said in a statement that the M23 group's 'almost daily' attacks constitute an 'intentional and manifest violation' of the declaration of principles, which the two parties signed in mid-July in Doha, whose terms include a 'permanent ceasefire'. It followed a separate peace deal between the Congolese and Rwandan governments, signed in Washington, DC, the previous month, which also helped the US government and US companies gain control of critical minerals in the region. The Congolese army said it was ready to respond 'to all provocations from this [M23 group] coalition, accustomed to violating agreements', the statement said. M23 spokesman Lawrence Kanyuka said in a post on X on Monday that DRC's government was continuing 'its offensive military manoeuvres aimed at full-scale war'. The eastern DRC, a region bordering Rwanda with abundant natural resources but plagued by non-state armed groups, has suffered extreme violence for more than three decades. A new surge of unrest broke out early this year when the M23 group captured the key cities of Goma and Bukavu, setting up their own administrations, with thousands killed in the conflict. Violence has continued on the ground despite the US and Qatar-brokered peace deal, with fighting becoming more intense since Friday around the town of Mulamba in South Kivu province, where the front line had been relatively stable since March. The M23 attacked positions between Friday and Monday held by pro-Kinshasa militia and army forces, and pushed them back several kilometres, after clashes using light and heavy weapons, local and security sources said. The DRC government and the M23 rebels have agreed to sign a permanent peace deal by August 18, but the renewed fighting has threatened this effort.

What's happened in Gaza since Al Jazeera staff were killed?
What's happened in Gaza since Al Jazeera staff were killed?

Al Jazeera

time5 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

What's happened in Gaza since Al Jazeera staff were killed?

What's happened in Gaza since Al Jazeera staff were killed? NewsFeed Israel has silenced the voices of six journalists in Gaza in a deliberate assassination, but the bombing across the city has not stopped as the Israeli military pushes to occupy the Strip. Video Duration 01 minutes 37 seconds 01:37 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 04 minutes 23 seconds 04:23 Video Duration 02 minutes 30 seconds 02:30 Video Duration 02 minutes 51 seconds 02:51 Video Duration 00 minutes 41 seconds 00:41 Video Duration 00 minutes 28 seconds 00:28

How can Israel kill journalists with impunity?
How can Israel kill journalists with impunity?

Al Jazeera

time5 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

How can Israel kill journalists with impunity?

More media workers killed in Gaza genocide than in previous conflicts in history. Israel's murder of four Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza has sparked international condemnation. And it's not the first time. Although Israel has killed at least 237 media workers since its war began, these and other killings have gone unpunished. What does this impunity mean for journalism? Presenter: Nick Clark Guests: Ahmed Najar – Palestinian writer and political analyst Dominique Pradalie – President of the International Federation of Journalists Omar Rahman – Fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs in Washington, DC

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store