Here's how the 2025 MN Legislature impacted Ramsey, Washington, Dakota counties
Bonding project requests for Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties didn't end up in this year's bonding bill, but each county still expects some impacts from the 2025 Minnesota Legislature.
Ramsey County officials were able to avoid some cuts and cost shifts this year, such as those involving disability waivers, that could have impacted county levies, said County Manager Ling Becker.
Ramsey County officials note that the $55 million state investment in replacing the Miller Building, located on the campus of the Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center, the state's largest psychiatric hospital, will benefit area metro counties. The new 50-bed psychiatric residential treatment facility will alleviate pressure on the overall system, Becker said.
Other statewide projects that county officials see as positives include $35 million for the modernization of the Social Services Information System.
'We really have a system that's really old and hard to work with, and so we've been really fighting hard with all the counties in the state for this,' said Mary Jo McGuire, District 2 Ramsey County Board Commissioner at Tuesday's board meeting.
Washington County officials made seven individual capital projects requests to lawmakers for this year. Because none were included in the bonding bill, the county board plans to resubmit them next year.
Nevertheless, several regional and statewide funding initiatives included in the bonding bill may indirectly benefit Washington County, according to county officials. That includes the Local Road Improvement Program which received $47 million and the Local Bridge Improvement Program which received $31 million. County officials were also happy to not see cuts to county program aid, said Jan Lucke, deputy county administrator.
'There's certainly important projects for the county to complete, we'll continue to work on finding the funding. Hopefully there's a state commitment to do projects in 2026 and some of these we'll just re-ask for,' said Washington County Administrator Kevin Corbid.
Some changes in the state budget modestly impact the county in human services, Corbid said. As Congress prepares the federal budget, additional impacts on human services that could trickle down to the county are also on the radar of county officials, Corbid said.
Meanwhile, three projects in Dakota County received $4.7 million in funding through the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund.
They include preservation and restoration projects at Lake Byllesby Regional Park, Thompson County Park and Cannon River.
MN Legislature: Xcel Energy Center shut out of bond funding for renovations
MN Legislature: Measure to divert transportation funds from counties dropped
MN Legislature passes $66B budget, cuts undocumented immigrant insurance
Letters: It's unfortunate that we can't have certain conversations
Gov. Tim Walz calls for special session for Legislature Monday
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NYC Democratic mayoral debate 2025: Cuomo, Mamdani exchange blows ahead of primary
The Brief Democratic candidates for New York City mayor took the stage to debate each other. Zohran Mamdani found himself the target of jabs, along with former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Early voting begins on Saturday and continues through Sunday, June 22. The primary is Tuesday, June 24. NEW YORK CITY - Seven Democratic candidates for New York City mayor took the stage on Thursday night to debate each other for the second and final time. What they're saying "Experience matters and I think inexperience is dangerous," former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said. Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic socialist, found himself the target of jabs, along with Cuomo. "He's never dealt with the City Council. He's never dealt with the Congress. He's never dealt with the State Legislature. He's never negotiated with a union. He's never built anything. He's never dealt with a natural emergency. He's never dealt with a hurricane, with a flood, et cetera. He's never done any of the essentials. And now you have Donald Trump on top of all of that," Cuomo said. MORE: NYC mayoral race: List of candidates, latest polls The 67-year-old former governor took a shot at Mamdani, who wore his inexperience as a badge of honor. "I have never had to resign in disgrace," he said. "I have never cut Medicaid. I have never stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from the MTA. I have never hounded the 13 women who credibly accused me of sexual harassment. I have never sued for their gynecological records, and I have never done those things because I am not you, Mr. Cuomo." Mamdani continued, chiding Cuomo for mispronouncing his name: "And furthermore, the name is Mamdani. M-A-M-D-A-N-I." "The problem is we do not get to address the issues that New Yorkers care about because we're talking about his past." State Sen. Zellnor Myrie City Comptroller Brad Lander also hammered Cuomo over the sexual harassment allegations that drove him from office. Meanwhile, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie lamented the fact that the debate had devolved into a referendum on Cuomo's history. "The problem is we do not get to address the issues that New Yorkers care about because we're talking about his past," Myrie said. The race appears to be between Cuomo and Mamdani, but former City Comptroller Scott Stringer says – don't forget about me. "My experience and my vision, when you combine it, is the third lane to win this race," Stringer said. Former hedge fund executive Whitney Tilson criticized not Cuomo, but Mamdani, and predicted that his plan to raise taxes would have dire consequences: "Lead to an exodus of businesses and jobs and crush our city." At one point, moderators allowed the candidates to ask questions of each other. Adrienne Adams, the speaker of the New York City Council, directed her question at Mamdani, first detailing her long work experience and then asking: "Given what I've just laid out, do you think you're more qualified than me to lead the city?" Mamdani smiled and praised Adams' leadership, but said he believed he was the most qualified "because I believe the most pressing crisis we're facing here is one of affordability, and that is something that my campaign has been laser-focused on," before touching on some of his policy points. What's next Early voting begins on Saturday and continues through Sunday, June 22. The primary is Tuesday, June 24.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom's approval rating suffers a slight loss in new California survey. How is Trump doing?
Gov. Gavin Newsom has suffered a loss in his approval ratings, a new survey found, as a majority of Californians disapprove of President Donald Trump's handling of his presidency. The Public Policy Institute of California released its June statewide survey, revealing where Californians stand on state officials, the federal government, and key issues. The survey of 1,591 adults and state residents, conducted from May 22-29, follows heightened fears of economic uncertainty due to ping-ponging tariff policies and has been released amid a rise in protests in California and nationwide over immigration enforcement sweeps. Among the many takeaways of PPIC's latest survey is that 70% of Californians disapprove of Trump's handling of his job, with 29% in approval and 1% who don't know. It's just a slight uptick from the nonpartisan nonprofit's February survey, in which 69% disapproved of Trump's job performance. Trump's approval ratings weren't too dissimilar to those of the U.S. Congress; 78% disapprove of how Congress is handling its job, with 20% who approve and 3% who don't know, according to the PPIC survey. But negative sentiments weren't solely fixed on Trump or Congress. The survey also found an uptick in Californians who don't approve of Newsom's handling of his job as governor, or 54%. That's seven percentage points up from the February survey. That said, Newsom's approval ratings have hovered in the 40% to low 50% range in recent months, according to a graph of PPIC's survey results, showing that opinions on the governor go slightly up and down. The California governor has long been the subject of ire from some of his consistiuents and political opponents — and in recent days, he's been repeatedly criticized by Trump over his handling of protests in Los Angeles as the state and the administration remain locked in a battle over the mobilization of the California National Guard and the Marines. Respondents appeared to have a less favorable perspective on California's future, with 60% saying that the state is generally going in the wrong direction. This is up from the 54% who said the state was going in the wrong direction several months ago. However, about a year ago, 62% said the state was going in the wrong direction, so these sentiments aren't new. Californians were asked to select the most important problem facing the nation. Among a slew of options such as education, health care, foreign conflicts was one problem that took some lead over the others: 35% selected political extremism or threats to democracy. Reuters/Ipsos poll: A nationwide poll that surveyed 1,024 U.S. adults from May 16-18 found 42% approved of Trump, a slight dip from the 44% of Americans who approved of Trump a week earlier, Reuters said. Quinnipiac poll: 38% of voters approve of Trump's handling of his presidency in a survey of 1,265 self-identified registered voters nationwide from June 5-9, down three percentage points from a poll in April. Meanwhile, 54% disapproved of the president's handling of his job. Gallup poll: The latest figures from a poll from May 1-18 show 43% approve of Trump's handling of his job, while 53% disapprove and 5% have no opinion. The disapproval rating has remained consistent over several periods since March, Gallup's figures show. The Economist: 44% approve of Trump, while 51% disapprove and 5% don't know, according to The Economist's polling figures, which was last updated on June 10. Civiqs: As of Thursday, June 12, 43% approve of Trump's handling of his presidency and 53% disapprove, while 4% selected neither approve nor disapprove, according to Civiqs ongoing approval rating tracker. These figures have largely remained the same for weeks. Paris Barraza is a trending reporter covering California news at The Desert Sun. Reach her at pbarraza@ This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Trump approval rating: Is California satisfied with Trump, Newsom?
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the public lands fight means for Maine
Maine is about as far away as you can get from the bulk of America's federal public lands, the vast majority of which are concentrated in a dozen states west of the Mississippi River — a result of the nation's history of westward expansion. Whereas states like Utah, Nevada and Alaska are each between 60 and 80 percent federal land, just 1.5 percent of Maine is federally managed. But Mainers have as much of a stake in the current political fight over the future of federal resources as anyone else. Public lands, waters and wildlife are part of our birthright as American citizens, a public domain that we all collectively own, regardless of our proximity. Over the last five months, the Trump administration has worked to slash funding for federal land management agencies and conservation programs; open up more public lands to fossil fuel drilling, mining and other extractive development; and lay off or force out thousands of park rangers and other civil servants. The words 'protect' and 'conserve' have been largely absent from the administration's vocabulary, as it prioritizes dismantling environmental safeguards in its quest for so-called 'energy dominance.' Meanwhile, Congress is considering federal land sales to help offset Trump's tax and spending cuts — a contentious proposal that House lawmakers ultimately yanked from that chamber's version of Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' budget package, but that Senate Republicans resurrected this week. During a recent congressional hearing to outline the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum invoked Maine and other East Coast states to argue that Western states with large amounts of federal land are at an economic disadvantage. 'We've got states in the East, including the 13 states that were part of the original colonies, none of them have more than 2 percent of federal land,' he said. 'I don't think any of them would stand up and say, 'We need more federal ownership in our states.'' Burgum's statement is both inaccurate — nine of the original 13 states have more than 2 percent federal land, with New Hampshire on top at 14 percent — and casts aside the history of the nation's East-to-West settlement. David Feinman, vice president of government affairs at the Conservation Lands Foundation, said it also seemed designed to pit regions of the country against each other. 'Americans across the political spectrum in every state support public land protections, whether it's Maine or Utah or anywhere else,' Feinman said. 'Regardless of the secretary's narratives, these lands do belong to everybody.' Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), Feinman and others The Maine Monitor spoke to encouraged Mainers to pay close attention to the battle taking place in Washington, as it will likely impact everything from visits to national parks to our ability to stave off the worst impacts of climate change. 'It does impact all of us,' Pingree said. 'If there's one thing that the changing climate has taught us it's that we're all in this together, that overheating in one part of the country impacts another part of the country, that our weather is all impacted, that we need land to sequester carbon. There's just a whole variety of reasons that we need undeveloped lands in this country wherever it may be.' Pingree worries what the current turmoil inside the National Park Service and other federal agencies will mean not only for federally managed sites in Maine, including Acadia National Park and Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, but parks, monuments and wildlife refuges around the country. Since Trump took office, NPS has lost 13 percent of its workforce, according to the National Parks Conservation Association, and the administration's budget proposal calls for slashing more than $1 billion from NPS next year, approximately one-third of its entire operating budget. Current staffing shortages have already created numerous operational issues and public safety concerns at America's national parks. 'It's a real crime what they've done to these precious jewels,' Pingree said. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) echoed that sentiment during a budget hearing on Tuesday, telling Burgum 'it's hard for me to understand how gutting 'America's best idea' isn't America's worst idea.' Trump's agenda also threatens to stymie future conservation, outdoor recreation and forest protection efforts here at home. Among other things, Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, froze $68 million in funding for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Legacy Program, which focuses on protecting private forest lands through conservation easements and land acquisitions. The program is one of several funded through the Land and Water Conservation Fund, or LWCF, which uses offshore oil and gas drilling royalties to buy land and establish and protect parks, trails, wildlife refuges, forests and important wildlife habitat. In Maine, the FLP has been key to safeguarding more than 700,000 acres of forested land, according to the LWCF Coalition. As for LWCF as a whole, Trump's 2026 budget request proposes diverting $387 million from the fund to pay for deferred maintenance at the National Park Service and other federal land management agencies — a move that Amy Lindholm, director of federal affairs at the Appalachian Mountain Club and a national coordinator at the LWCF Coalition, said would 'rob Peter to pay Paul.' Over the last five decades, Maine has received more than $220 million in LWCF funding, which has helped boost protection for places like Acadia and the Appalachian National Scenic Trail as well as supported hundreds of conservation projects via state grants. 'It's really important that we have these tools fully funded, because there's always going to be developers with deep pockets who want to acquire pieces of land,' Lindholm said. 'We just have to balance that out a little bit with access for the local community and for growing and diversifying rural economies.' Andy Cutko, director of the Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands, said cuts to federal conservation funding could impede progress toward Maine's goal of conserving 30 percent of its land by 2030, part of Maine's four-year climate plan. 'Programs like the Land and Water Conservation Fund and Forest Legacy protect forests, strengthen the forest products sector, support rural communities, and expand outdoor recreation,' Cutko said in an email. 'They are vital tools for protecting the natural resources that are the essence of Maine.' In the absence of more public land — just 7 percent of Maine is owned by federal, state and local governments — a network of land trusts has become a model for conservation and for meeting the growing demand for outdoor access in the Pine Tree State. More than 80 land trusts have collectively safeguarded nearly three million acres, almost 15 percent of all land in the state, primarily through conservation easements on private land, according to a recent report from the Maine Land Trust Network. 'Apart from what's happening out West, the Maine model works,' said Jeff Romano, public policy director at Maine Coast Heritage Trust, which runs the Maine Land Trust Network. 'Hopefully we can push back some of these cuts to agencies and conservation programs because we do rely on that collaboration with those entities to do some good work here.' At the end of the day, public demand for open space and protecting nature isn't going anywhere, Lindholm said. 'Everybody loves the outdoors,' she said. 'It's the thing that brings people together across the political spectrum.'
