
Criminal justice forensics professor teaches Jeanie Childs murder case: "You have to look at everything"
It's been 32 years since the brutal murder of Jeanie Childs in Minneapolis. The case went unsolved for decades until DNA and new technology led cold case investigators to her killer.
The crime is the subject of "A WCCO Original: Footprint to Murder," and it's a case that also caught the attention of college professor Lisa Andrews, who teaches forensics in criminal justice. Senior investigative reporter Jennifer Mayerle uncovered why this case is a good study for students.
Andrews is a hands-on professor in forensic exploration at Concordia University in St. Paul, Minnesota, teaching students about evidence collection and preservation. Part of that is introducing students to real cases, like Childs' 1993 murder.
"If you can give them something local, then they go, 'local cops worked on this, local cops solved this,' then that's what I try and do and show them how it starts from scene all the way to courtroom," Andrews said.
Jerry Westrom's bloody footprint from the 1993 crime scene, and Jeanie Childs.
WCCO
When investigators arrested hockey dad Jerry Westrom in her killing decades later, Andrews took notice. She was familiar with the case from her 25 years working as a death investigator with metro medical examiners' offices.
"The way they're able to solve these with DNA is because some cop or some crime scene person packaged that evidence so well all those years ago that it didn't deteriorate. So that's kind of was my interest initially," she said. "But we also have this footprint, which is very rare. So I teach that in my class, so I'm like, 'here's a real-life case that we'll probably never see again like this,' and how our footprints are just as unique as our fingerprints."
In "Footprint to Murder," WCCO takes viewers through the case, talking to investigators who uploaded unknown DNA from the crime scene to a genealogy website. A hit led them to Westrom, whom they followed to a hockey game and fished a napkin he wiped his mouth with out of a garbage can to get his DNA.
Investigators arrested Westrom in 2019 and were able to match his footprint to a bare, bloody footprint at the crime scene.
"It's good for me for printing and for DNA, but it's also important because the convicted killer is local, and it's good for us to know this could be somebody that's nearby you," she said. "And going back to Jeanie, the victim herself, I think it's good to show that cops don't give up on these cases."
She encourages students to go to court to watch a case in person. Some did watch testimony in Westrom's murder trial. In class, Andrews says she routinely uses WCCO's interview with jury foreperson Derek Fradenburg following the guilty verdict. He says it all boiled down to Westrom's police interview, the DNA and the bloody footprint.
Jerry Westrom during his murder trial in 2022.
WCCO
"[Westrom] said he wasn't there, his DNA proves that he was there. His footprint puts him there at the time of the murder," Fradenburgh said.
"Here he is telling exactly what it took for them to come to that decision," Andrews said. "That gives them a little light bulb, right? Like, OK, if I'm a crime scene person, I collected this evidence, now I'm seeing the result of this."
And the ability to collect evidence meant everything in Childs' case.
"This floor is almost kind of a perfect ... what if she had had carpet? What if there hadn't been this floor?" she said. "I mean, this is like a perfect setting point for it: nice, hard, firm, smooth."
She hopes her class opens students' minds.
"You have to look at everything. Everything is not always how it appears to you at first, so you need to be that person and make those calls as to which way you're going to go," she said. "And I hope this opens their mind to that."
Andrews also teaches at Hennepin Tech. She says those students are new officers learning skills like booking, fingerprinting and crime scene investigation.
You can watch the full documentary, "A WCCO Original: Footprint to Murder," here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Search for missing Azle fisherman at Eagle Mountain Lake enters third day
Search and rescue crews are on Day 3 of looking for a missing Azle fisherman last seen at Eagle Mountain Lake. On Friday, Texas Game Wardens joined the Tarrant Regional Water District in the search for 41-year-old Ruben Fausone. CBS News Texas obtained surveillance footage showing Fausone at Augie's Sunset Café and Marina just hours before he disappeared. Timeline of disappearance Ruben Fausone, 41 Surveillance Video According to his wife, Amy Fausone, Ruben texted her around 8 p.m. Tuesday, saying he was going night fishing at the lake. Surveillance video shows him inside Augie's around 9:30 p.m., interacting with customers and playing pool. Employees said they were unsure when he left. "Around 11:45 p.m., I woke up and he still wasn't home," Amy said. She checked his location and saw his phone was still at Augie's. Witnesses later reported seeing Ruben talking with another man on the dock around 1:30 a.m. Boat found adrift, phone left behind Ruben Fausone, 41 Fausone family "Came back out and the boat was gone. Thirty minutes later, about 2 a.m., it was in the middle of the lake just floating out there. It seems fishy," said eyewitness Jeff Hunter. On Wednesday morning, Amy went to the lake and found Ruben's phone on the dock. Authorities later located his boat on the opposite side of the lake. As the search continues, Amy said her concerns are growing. "I am just hoping somebody finds him," she said.


CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
Massachusetts optician harassed for "FRAMED" license plate during Karen Read trial
A Middleboro optician thought her vanity license plate was a cute tongue-in-cheek ode to her job until it became a rallying cry from for Karen Read supporters. Now the owner of the license plate "FRAMED" is getting shouted at and her car vandalized. "I've had people like literally speeding up to me on the highway, to like catch up to my driver side window to give me the thumbs up and stuff," said Lauren Downey. She has had the vanity plate for three years now, but during the Karen Read trial, her supporters have started to have her plate put on banners and wearable merchandise. One man in New Hampshire got the same plate for that state, and he wears it around his neck outside the courthouse. Supporters of Karen Read gather before the murder trial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court, Friday, June 13, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Mark Stockwell / AP "My husband is over there, and he couldn't believe it," Downey said. "He's seeing the plate in real life. We saw it on t-shirt." The plate has also been all over social media. Car keyed twice The controversy surrounding the trial has carried home with Downey. Twice now, someone has keyed her car because of the plate. She has had people screaming obscenities at her or even run across parking lots to praise her plate. At times, her children are in the car. "People are giving me the middle finger in a parking lot or at an intersection," said Downey. "I would love to think they are that excited over glasses that would be great." Lauren Downey's "FRAMED" license plate. CBS Boston Downey put in for the license plate three years ago. It was supposed to be a play on her job as an optician who helps people find the correct eye glass frames. It also wasn't the only name she submitted. "When you sign up for a vanity plate, you submit for three different options and then the registry chooses which one you receive," said Downey. "I can change my plate, but that may not make sense at this point." The retrial of Karen Read is now in the jury's hands. Downey is waiting until the trial is over before fixing the damage to the car in case something else happens.

Associated Press
36 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___