Consumer Choice Center Advocates for Significant Revisions to WHO Governance and Operations Amidst Approval of Increased Mandatory Membership
NEW DELHI, June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing intense scrutiny following the approval of a 20% increase in mandatory membership dues, amounting to an additional $120 million per year extracted directly from taxpayers worldwide. The Consumer Choice Center joins critics in questioning whether the organization truly deserves this financial boost, citing significant issues with transparency, accountability, and the allocation of funds. In a country like India, where over 60% of health expenditure is out-of-pocket and public health systems remain severely underfunded, questions around the WHO's spending priorities resonate deeply.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently announced an increase in its mandatory membership dues-known as assessed contributions—by 20%. For 2026 and 2027, this will amount to an additional $120 million per year, drawn straight from taxpayers around the globe. The WHO allocates funding through both voluntary contributions, which are earmarked for specific health programs, and assessed contributions. Assessed contributions provide the WHO leadership, including Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, with greater discretion in how the funds are utilized. These funds are directed into flexible funding streams. This occurs while global healthcare systems experience challenges related to underfunding, growing waitlists, and staff shortages.
Funds are being allocated to various initiatives, including upgrades to the WHO's Geneva headquarters. Senior staff benefits include education allowances of $33,000 per child. The total annual cost for the WHO's 301 most senior staff is approximately $130 million, averaging $432,000 per person, inclusive of benefits and allowances.
Sharing his thoughts on the potential utilisation of these additional funds, Fred Roeder, Managing Director, Consumer Choice Center said, 'The $120 million being extracted in new dues each year could directly fund healthcare for 15,000 Germans, 40,000 Poles, 82,000 Georgians, 100,000 South Africans and 500,000 Indians. In India, $120 million annually could fund cancer treatment for 40,000 patients under Ayushman Bharat or cover the full immunization of over 2 million children. That same amount could also strengthen tobacco cessation services across the country, which remain vastly under-resourced despite India having over 260 million tobacco users. Even more troubling, this shift toward 'core funding' is part of a deliberate WHO strategy: to move away from specific, donor-driven initiatives and toward general budget increases it can spend at will—on salaries, travel, and yes, real estate. These are not funds being poured into pandemic preparedness or child vaccination programs. They are being funnelled into a top-heavy administrative structure with minimal transparency and questionable accountability.'
The WHO's defenders argue that the organization needs more freedom to respond to global health threats. But freedom without scrutiny leads to mission drift and misallocation. The organization already has a poor record of pandemic response and a reputation for political entanglements. Its handling of tobacco control in India reflects this too—offering ideological prescriptions rather than collaborative, evidence-based support that balances public health, trade, and economic development. The last thing it needs is a blank check. The world needs a lean, targeted health response team. Let's refocus the WHO on solving global health crises, prioritizing impact over institutional expansion.
National governments should refuse further increases to assessed contributions until the WHO commits to radical transparency reforms, trims senior compensation packages, and rededicates itself to programmatic funding that puts patient care first. We owe that much to the people who are actually sick—and not just those with corner offices in Geneva. India, as a G20 leader and a major player in global health diplomacy, should demand accountability before committing more taxpayer funds. It must condition future WHO funding on results-driven support for local challenges—like modernizing tobacco regulation, enabling farmer transitions, and enforcing traceability to combat the illicit trade that harms both public health and revenue.
Consumer Choice Center
The Consumer Choice Center is an independent, non-partisan consumer advocacy group championing the benefits of freedom of choice, innovation, and abundance in everyday life. Through research and educational outreach, we advocate for smart policies that promote growth, lifestyle choice, and tech innovation. We empower consumers to raise their voice and fight for their right to choose—whether it's the products they buy, the technologies they use, or the lifestyle they live.
Photo: https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2704962/Consumer_Choice_Center.jpg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
4 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Lingering shadow: Why Covid-19's return demands vigilance, not panic
Just when we thought the coast was clear, the familiar shadow of Covid-19 has returned. Just when we thought the coast was clear, the familiar shadow of Covid-19 has returned, uninvited, to our headlines and our communities. For months, we've enjoyed a semblance of normalcy – masks tucked away, social calendars full, and the virus relegated to a footnote. But recent reports from Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and the US, all echoing the World Health Organization's (WHO) warnings, deliver an urgent, undeniable message: the pandemic's final act hasn't been written yet. This new surge, born from a cocktail of public fatigue, fading immunity, and viral evolution, demands a rapid recalibration of our approach. Not panic, but a sharp, intelligent focus on risk-based vigilance. The numbers are speaking volumes. Thailand's astonishing nearly 66,000 new cases in six days; Singapore's over 14,000 in a similar period; and Malaysia's consistent weekly average of 600, leading to over 11,000 cases in early 2025 – these are not minor fluctuations. The WHO's global confirmation of an 11% test positivity rate, a level not seen since mid-2024, signals a widespread upward trend, particularly across Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific. This resurgence is happening because people have become lax. Our reduced masking increased social mixing, and critically, the natural waning of both vaccine and infection-acquired immunity has created the perfect storm for transmission. The primary driver of this current surge is the NB.1.8.1 variant, now officially a WHO Variant Under Monitoring. Its defining characteristic is high transmissibility, allowing it to outcompete previous variants quickly, and now represents over 10% of global sequences. However, and this is a crucial point to understand amidst the alarm, NB.1.8.1 does not appear more virulent. Medical experts confirm there's no clear evidence it leads to higher hospitalization or death rates than its predecessors. Moreover, our existing vaccines are still holding strong, especially in preventing severe disease. Grasping this distinction – easily transmissible but not more severe – is key to a calm, effective response. So, what's the urgent takeaway for you? It's about shifting from a generalized 'over' mindset to informed, risk-based action. While the general, vaccinated population may experience symptoms akin to a bad cold, vulnerable groups face significantly higher risks of severe complications. If you or someone you care for falls into categories like the elderly, young children, pregnant individuals, or those with underlying health conditions (diabetes, heart disease, etc.), immediate heightened precautions are non-negotiable. For these vulnerable individuals, the action plan is simple and crucial: · Mask Up: In crowded indoor areas, or if you feel unwell. · Monitor and Test: Be acutely aware of symptoms. With flu, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and adenovirus also circulating, prompt Covid-19 antigen testing is vital for proper diagnosis and management. · Consult Your Doctor: Seek early medical advice. High-risk individuals might need additional evaluations. Crucially, if you have chronic conditions, maintain strict adherence to your medication. · Stay Vaccinated: Ensure your boosters are current. The vaccines remain effective against current strains.
Malaysian Reserve
a day ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Consumer Choice Center Advocates for Significant Revisions to WHO Governance and Operations Amidst Approval of Increased Mandatory Membership
NEW DELHI, June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing intense scrutiny following the approval of a 20% increase in mandatory membership dues, amounting to an additional $120 million per year extracted directly from taxpayers worldwide. The Consumer Choice Center joins critics in questioning whether the organization truly deserves this financial boost, citing significant issues with transparency, accountability, and the allocation of funds. In a country like India, where over 60% of health expenditure is out-of-pocket and public health systems remain severely underfunded, questions around the WHO's spending priorities resonate deeply. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently announced an increase in its mandatory membership dues-known as assessed contributions—by 20%. For 2026 and 2027, this will amount to an additional $120 million per year, drawn straight from taxpayers around the globe. The WHO allocates funding through both voluntary contributions, which are earmarked for specific health programs, and assessed contributions. Assessed contributions provide the WHO leadership, including Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, with greater discretion in how the funds are utilized. These funds are directed into flexible funding streams. This occurs while global healthcare systems experience challenges related to underfunding, growing waitlists, and staff shortages. Funds are being allocated to various initiatives, including upgrades to the WHO's Geneva headquarters. Senior staff benefits include education allowances of $33,000 per child. The total annual cost for the WHO's 301 most senior staff is approximately $130 million, averaging $432,000 per person, inclusive of benefits and allowances. Sharing his thoughts on the potential utilisation of these additional funds, Fred Roeder, Managing Director, Consumer Choice Center said, 'The $120 million being extracted in new dues each year could directly fund healthcare for 15,000 Germans, 40,000 Poles, 82,000 Georgians, 100,000 South Africans and 500,000 Indians. In India, $120 million annually could fund cancer treatment for 40,000 patients under Ayushman Bharat or cover the full immunization of over 2 million children. That same amount could also strengthen tobacco cessation services across the country, which remain vastly under-resourced despite India having over 260 million tobacco users. Even more troubling, this shift toward 'core funding' is part of a deliberate WHO strategy: to move away from specific, donor-driven initiatives and toward general budget increases it can spend at will—on salaries, travel, and yes, real estate. These are not funds being poured into pandemic preparedness or child vaccination programs. They are being funnelled into a top-heavy administrative structure with minimal transparency and questionable accountability.' The WHO's defenders argue that the organization needs more freedom to respond to global health threats. But freedom without scrutiny leads to mission drift and misallocation. The organization already has a poor record of pandemic response and a reputation for political entanglements. Its handling of tobacco control in India reflects this too—offering ideological prescriptions rather than collaborative, evidence-based support that balances public health, trade, and economic development. The last thing it needs is a blank check. The world needs a lean, targeted health response team. Let's refocus the WHO on solving global health crises, prioritizing impact over institutional expansion. National governments should refuse further increases to assessed contributions until the WHO commits to radical transparency reforms, trims senior compensation packages, and rededicates itself to programmatic funding that puts patient care first. We owe that much to the people who are actually sick—and not just those with corner offices in Geneva. India, as a G20 leader and a major player in global health diplomacy, should demand accountability before committing more taxpayer funds. It must condition future WHO funding on results-driven support for local challenges—like modernizing tobacco regulation, enabling farmer transitions, and enforcing traceability to combat the illicit trade that harms both public health and revenue. Consumer Choice Center The Consumer Choice Center is an independent, non-partisan consumer advocacy group championing the benefits of freedom of choice, innovation, and abundance in everyday life. Through research and educational outreach, we advocate for smart policies that promote growth, lifestyle choice, and tech innovation. We empower consumers to raise their voice and fight for their right to choose—whether it's the products they buy, the technologies they use, or the lifestyle they live. Photo:
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Hamas says ready for ‘serious' Gaza truce talks, as rescuers say 37 killed
GAZA CITY, PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES: Hamas's lead negotiator said the group was ready to enter a new round of talks aimed at sealing a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, where rescuers said Israeli strikes killed at least 37 people on Thursday. Negotiator Khalil al-Hayya made the declaration in a speech marking the start of Eid al-Adha festivities, typically a joyous date on the Muslim calendar, but one many Gazans say they will not be able to celebrate this year amid crushing shortages. 'We reaffirm that we are ready for a new, serious round of negotiations aimed at reaching a permanent ceasefire agreement,' Hayya said, adding the group was in contact with mediators. Talks aimed at brokering a new ceasefire have failed to yield a breakthrough since the last brief truce fell apart in March with the resumption of Israeli operations in Gaza. Israel and Hamas appeared close to an agreement late last month, but a deal proved elusive, with each side accusing the other of scuppering a US-backed proposal. - Stepped-up Gaza campaign - The Israeli military has recently stepped up its campaign in what it says is a renewed push to defeat Hamas, whose October 2023 attack sparked the war. Gaza civil defence official Mohammed al-Mughayyir said that '37 people have been martyred in Israeli strikes on the Gaza Strip' as of Thursday afternoon, reporting attacks up and down the length of the territory. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment. International calls for a negotiated ceasefire have grown in recent weeks, particularly as the humanitarian situation in the devastated Palestinian territory has worsened. The World Health Organization warned Thursday that Gaza's 'health system is collapsing', pointing to the risks faced by the Nasser and Al-Amal medical facilities -- the 'last two functioning public hospitals in Khan Yunis', where many displaced Gazans are sheltering. 'What is happening in Gaza is not a war. It's a genocide being carried out by a highly prepared army against women and children,' said Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who has previously used the legal term to describe the conflict. French President Emmanuel Macron, who has declined to use the term himself, vowed at a joint appearance with Lula to 'ramp up pressure in coordination with the Americans to obtain a ceasefire'. France is due later this month to co-host with Saudi Arabia a United Nations conference in New York on a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday warned Israel of 'further concrete actions' over its Gaza offensive and restrictions on aid. - 'Rejoice over flour' - Israel has faced mounting international pressure to allow more aid into Gaza, after it imposed a more than two-month blockade that led to widespread shortages of food and other essentials. On a normal Eid al-Adha, Gazans would be preparing for large family gatherings, traditionally centred around the sacrifice and eating of a sheep. But this year, 'one kilo of meat has become a dream', said Mohammed Othman, 36. 'We just hope to find bread to feed our children on the day of Eid, and they will rejoice over flour as if it were meat.' Israel recently eased its aid blockade and has worked with the newly formed, US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to implement a new distribution mechanism via a handful of centres in south and central Gaza. But since its inception, GHF has been a magnet for criticism from the UN and other members of the aid world -- which only intensified following a recent string of deadly incidents near its facilities. The United Nations and other aid groups have declined to work with GHF, citing concerns it serves Israeli military goals. GHF shut down its distribution centres on Wednesday for what it called 'reorganisation' to improve its work, but said it had reopened two of them on Thursday. The group said it had distributed more than 8.4 million meals' worth of food since opening a little over a week ago. Gaza rescuers and eyewitnesses implicated Israeli troops in instances of deadly gunfire near a GHF centre in Rafah. Israel's military has maintained it does not prevent Gazans from collecting aid, but army spokesperson Effie Defrin said after one such incident on Tuesday that soldiers had fired towards suspects who 'were approaching in a way that endangered' the troops. He added that the incident was under investigation. - Hostage bodies recovered - During their October 2023 attack, militants abducted 251 hostages, 55 of whom remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the remains of two Israeli-Americans killed on October 7 -- Judy Weinstein Haggai and Gad Haggai -- had been recovered in 'a special operation' in Gaza and returned to Israel. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said their return was 'a stark reminder of the enduring cruelty' faced by the families of hostages still in Gaza. Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. According to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, at least 4,402 people have been killed since Israel resumed its offensive on March 18, taking the war's overall toll to 54,677, mostly civilians.
