Grocery Outlet's CMO wants to challenge people's perception of the discounter
The company's stores are filled with a wide assortment of low-price items and signage touting all the money shoppers can save. The exteriors of its stores are emblazoned with the phrase "Grocery Outlet Bargain Market."
But sometimes that reputation can have its drawbacks, according to the discounter's top marketing executive.
"It's not always a blessing to have 'bargain' and 'outlet' in a grocery store name," Layla Kasha, Grocery Outlet's chief marketing officer, said in an interview. "Some people are like, 'I don't know what's going to be in there.' To get them to even try shopping at Grocery Outlet is a hurdle."
Even as many consumers are focused on keeping their grocery bills down, quality and assortment are still top of mind, and Grocery Outlet is looking to leverage its private label, unique assortment and fresh offerings as it markets the value of its treasure hunt experience.
Kasha, who has spent nearly a decade at the discounter in top marketing roles, said she remembers seeing the rise of portfolio shopping - visiting multiple retailers in search of low prices and deals - during the 2008 recession. The COVID-19 pandemic served as another catalyst for people to shop multiple retailers in search of deals, she said. That cross-shopping has further propelled shopper interest in discounters, like Grocery Outlet.
Kasha's "zigzaggy road" to Grocery Outlet started with working for her father, who owned a bodega-style store along with a few restaurants, she said. She went on to work in sales and marketing positions at Stone Creamery and Arby's.
"I grew up in the restaurant business. … I did kind of everything in the restaurant you could imagine: I worked in the kitchen, I worked in the front, I managed. I did all that, and then when I owned my own restaurant, I started marketing [to bring in customers]," she said.
Kasha landed at Grocery Outlet in 2017 after a friend connected her to an open marketing role at the discounter.
Kasha spoke with Grocery Dive about how consumer trends have shifted recently, how the discounter approaches marketing to new and existing consumers and what role the discounter's nascent private label plays in its strategy to entice shoppers.
Editor's note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
GROCERY DIVE: Recently, there seems to be a shift with consumers moving away from traditional grocers to buy groceries from two ends of the spectrum: low-price retailers and specialty grocers. Are you seeing a similar pattern? What changes in consumer habits is Grocery Outlet noticing?
LAYLA KASHA: We are absolutely seeing that. COVID-19 changed shopping behaviors radically. Like every recession, everything in the environment tweaks people's shopping a little bit.
So a lot of people changed their shopping habits during the recession, and then once you get through the recession, you're still like, "I'm still not going to pay full price for something I know I can get if I just make one more stop, right?"
It's a really interesting time to be an extreme retailer and a marketer. What we're seeing in the store is a lot of different customers. We have to be able to serve somebody that shops us twice a week, and serve somebody that shops us once a week, and serve somebody that shops us once a month. There's those folks that stock up on a budget and then there's people going in to see what's in there.
Grocery Outlet's reputation is built around low prices and the treasure hunt. Can you speak to how the discounter approaches marketing to its customers?
We're not the chore. We are the fun shop that people get to do and want to do. So we lean into the fun. The item you don't expect you're gonna find, the organic, the high-end brands - we're super proud of that.
You might find OPI nail polish. It's my favorite find: OPI nail polish for $1.99. I think for us, we really focus on "What are you going to find?"
I've heard Grocery Outlet executives on earnings calls talk about the "treasure hunt experience." How much of that treasure hunt experience are you pointing people to versus letting them discover those deals on their own?
A lot of that is organic. Once you find the one thing that you're like, "I did not know I could get this for that price," then in your brain it triggers the thought, "I wonder, what else is in here?" Then you go up and down every aisle. When you get a couple really good deals in your cart, you're sold. That is the magic.
I had a friend of mine that would say to me - and this is not somebody that needed a bargain - "I can never drive past one of your stores, because it haunts me to know: What did I drive past? What's in there that I missed this week?" She would hit all three Modesto, California, stores weekly, because she was like, "I just know there's something in there."
The treasure finds tend to happen a lot in the wine department, the beauty aisle and the natural, organic, specialty and healthy department. When you find an item you didn't expect to see, it creates a tremendous amount of excitement.
What is the company's messaging for people who might not be familiar with Grocery Outlet?
It's definitely more challenging in new markets. We are part of the community, so every store is locally owned and operated. The person that's going to own that store and be in that store lives there, so they know their communities. We do a tremendous amount of marketing, billboards, TV, radio, but one of the ways we do it, too, is we tap into local influencers and really use the digital space to get an organic shop.
The key is getting more people organically talking about the store: "I went to the store. This is my haul. Oh my gosh. The store was gorgeous. The people were friendly. The produce was really fresh."
People get really excited about things like fresh salmon, because they don't expect it. They don't expect to see organic produce. A lot of times, people put it on their page, and we didn't even ask them to go in. What we'll often do is called user-generated content, so we'll send them a note and say, "Hey, can we share this?" And people are thrilled to have that happen.
What marketing opportunities are you currently excited about?
I would say the really exciting thing right now is really digging back into the customer themselves. We're going through that work. COVID, inflation, everything's changed. What are [consumers] doing now? And how are we going to stay relevant?
We're really playing with this idea of … crafting the message to specifically speak to each person. What we say and how we say it might change depending on who I'm talking to. A Gen Xer is going to hear something a certain way, where a millennial or a Gen Zer is going to hear it in a different way. What's always fun is to craft messages and do A/B testing to see what's landing.
How do you factor private label into marketing? What has the reception been like to the private label?
It's early days. We've got a few hundred SKUs. It's going really well. Second Cheapest Wine is a really big hit. It's a clever name, and people really are like, "I gotta try it."
We have other categories: deli, baking, sugar, all that kind of stuff. We've got some staples coming through. We've got butter, sugar, mustard, cheese, wine, ketchup and condiments. There's a lot of SKUs in the deli area. We're going to launch more SKUs this year.
Something we heard from customers was, "Man, I love shopping there, but it's really hard when I get there and I need butter, and you guys don't have it," because we source opportunistically.
The operators can order whatever they want and feel the community needs, but private label tends to be pretty much in all the stores. We're being strategic about what we're putting out. We're not putting out SKUs just to put out SKUs. We're putting out thoughtful SKUs that our customers are looking for, that is going to be a value add for them.
Copyright 2025 Industry Dive. All rights reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Starbucks To Change How Long It Takes To Make Your Drink
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Starbucks has set a new goal for how long it should take for drinks to be made, seeking to have ordered beverages in customers' hands in four minutes. Why It Matters Starbucks is the largest coffee chain in the world and has stores on every continent barring Antarctica. There are more than 40,000 Starbucks stores worldwide, according to Statista. Despite its ubiquity, the chain has faced struggles on various fronts since the COVID-19 pandemic and a series of worker strikes. After a difficult 2024, the brand decided to close several locations in the United States. In February, the company announced a restructuring initiative that included the elimination of 1,100 corporate roles. In July, Starbucks reported its sixth straight quarterly drop in U.S. same-store sales. The Starbucks logo is displayed outside one of its coffee shops in San Diego on August 2. The Starbucks logo is displayed outside one of its coffee shops in San Diego on August To Know Led by CEO Brian Niccol, the coffee chain seeks to speed up service under a new operating model called "Green Apron Service." The model outlines a goal for baristas, saying no custom order should take longer than four minutes to make. In response to a request for comment, Starbucks directed Newsweek to a news release that said in part, "In just eight weeks of piloting Green Apron Service in 1,500 stores, we've seen faster service, stronger customer connections, and more engaged partners. This isn't just a new way of working—it's a return to what makes Starbucks special: human connection." Niccol took the reins of the coffee chain in September and has since been trying to revamp the company. He was previously the CEO of Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and has held key positions at Taco Bell and Pizza Hut. In a September news release, Niccol said: "Today, I'm making a commitment: We're getting back to Starbucks. We're refocusing on what has always set Starbucks apart—a welcoming coffeehouse where people gather, and where we serve the finest coffee, handcrafted by our skilled baristas. This is our enduring identity. We will innovate from here." The chain has since introduced a new dress code, reduced the menu in the hope of improving customer service, and issued new orders for corporate staff—including ordering remote staff to relocate to Seattle or Toronto and instructing corporate employees to be in the office a minimum of four days a week. What People Are Saying A Starbucks news release about the initiative said: "It's all about making every visit feel personal, whether it's a friendly smile, remembering your name, or making your day just a little bit better. We're giving our partners the time, tools, and support to hone their craft and connect with customers." What Happens Next The Green Apron Service initiative has been rolled out across stores this week and is set to be implemented at all Starbucks locations.


UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Qantas ordered to pay record fine over COVID-19 layoffs
Qantas has been ordered to a nearly $60 million fine over mass layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic. File Photo by Brent Winstone/EPA-EFE Aug. 18 (UPI) -- An Australian court on Monday fined national flag carrier Qantas nearly $60 million for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground workers and then outsourcing their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia's Transport Workers Union said in a statement that it was the largest employer penalty in Australian corporate history. "Against all odds, TWU members have sent a $90 million warning to corporate Australia: you can't break the law and get away with it," the union said, referring to the amount Qantas was fined in Australian dollars. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said a little more than half of the penalty should be paid to the TWU, while the recipients of the remaining sum will be decided at a later hearing, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported. Lee said that while Qantas has expressed "genuine regrets" about the situation, he believes that "this more likely reflects the damage this case has done at the company rather than unique remorse for the damage done to the affected workers." He said that the airline "resisted until it could resist no more." Qantas said the Monday judgement holds the company "accountable for our actions." "We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result," Qantas Group Chief Executive Officer Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. "The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families. The impact was felt not only by those who lost their jobs, but our entire workforce." The ruling brings an end to a five-year fight by the TWU over Qantas's firing of some 1,800 workers and then outsourcing their jobs in 2020. Qantas appealed through the Australian court system, with the High Court affirming that the airline had acted illegally by outsourcing the employment. The Monday fine is on top of the roughly $78 million that Qantas agreed to pay eligible workers in December, after its failed bid arguing that it should not have to offer workers compensation. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over loudspeaker in the lunch room. It was not sorry when it dragged them all the way to the High Court, or when it argued it should have to pay them no compensation at all," TWU National Secretary Michael Kaine said in a statement. "Qantas is only sorrow now that it has to pay the larges penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history." The announcement comes about 14 months after Qantas reached a settlement with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to pay a multi-million-dollar fine for booking flights that had previously been canceled.


CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
Qantas to pay record fine of $58 million for pandemic sackings criticized by judge
A court ordered Australia's largest airline, Qantas Airways, on Monday to pay a record fine of A$90 million ($58.64 million) for illegally sacking 1,800 ground staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and criticized it for a lack of contrition. In imposing the penalty, the largest ordered by a court on a company in the history of Australia's labor laws, Federal Court Judge Michael Lee also inveighed against the airline's litigation strategy. While Qantas made changes to its board and management team, Lee said subsequent expressions of regret seemed more aligned with "the damage" the case had done to the company than remorse for the harm caused to workers. "I accept Qantas is sorry, but I am unconvinced that this measure of regret is not, at least in significant measure ... the wrong kind of sorry," he added. Lee said the size of the penalty, about 75% of the maximum he could have set, was important to ensure it "could not be perceived as anything like the cost of doing business". He said A$50 million of the fine would be paid to the Transport Workers' Union, which brought the case against Qantas. After the decision, Michael Kaine, the national secretary of the TWU, said, "Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth ... that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won." Monday's decision follows a December agreement on a compensation fund of A$120 million struck by the airline and the sacked workers. During the pandemic in 2020, Qantas' senior management decided to lay off 1,820 ground staff and shift their work to contractors. Qantas said it was a commercial decision, but the Federal Court in 2021 held the move to be "adverse action", preventing staff from exercising their workplace rights and unionising, in breach of Australia's Fair Work Act. Assessing Qantas' actions, Lee said he was unconvinced it was truly contrite and criticized its culture, public relations approach and litigation strategy. For example, he said Qantas had announced it would appeal to the High Court against the 2021 court decision "without any time passing", to consider the 431-paragraph judgment. When its appeal failed, Qantas issued a statement "spinning" the outcome, however, and overlooking findings on its unlawful conduct, he added. He also criticized Qantas' conduct during litigation, such as opting to keep out of the witness box, Vanessa Hudson, its current chief executive and former chief financial officer. "It is one thing for the 'Qantas News Room' to issue press releases by a CEO saying sorry; it is quite another for written assertions of contrition, recognition of wrong and cultural change to be tested in a courtroom," Lee said. The penalty was the largest ever ordered by a court for violations of Australia's labor laws, said Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, which represented TWU. "This record-breaking penalty reflects the monumental scale of Qantas' wrongdoing," the firm's principal, Josh Bornstein, said in a statement. The fine also reflected the unprecedented finding of adverse action against so many workers, said Shae McCrystal, a labor law professor at the University of Sydney. "Adverse action cases are risky," she said. "It signals a message to employers that if they break the law, then trade unions may receive those penalties in order to assist them in enforcing the act." Qantas said it would pay the fine as ordered. "We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families," Chief Executive Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. Qantas shares were down 0.4% at A$11.58 in early trading.