
Denmark votes for defence bill giving US access to its airbases
Denmark has voted overwhelmingly in favour of a new defence agreement giving the US sweeping powers on Danish soil, including 'unhindered access' to its airbases.
The deal, which has been strongly criticised by politicians and human rights experts, means US soldiers in Denmark will remain under US jurisdiction. It gives US soldiers access to Danish airbases in three Danish cities – Karup, Skrydstrup and Aalborg – and grants American soldiers and military police powers over Danish civilians at these locations and outside them.
If US soldiers were to commit a crime in Denmark, they would be punished under the US, not Danish, legal system in the first instance. The US will also be able to carry out military activities in and from Denmark – including stationing personnel, storing military material and equipment, maintenance, training and exercise activities.
Despite heightened tensions between the US and Denmark amid Donald Trump's unprecedented push to acquire Greenland – a strategically vital part of the Danish kingdom – and reports US intelligence agencies were ordered to increase espionage in the territory, a broad majority of the Danish parliament (Folketinget) voted in support of adopting the agreement. A total of 94 MPs voted for the bill and 11 against.
Just before the vote, the leader of the Unity List party, Pelle Dragsted, said the agreement was 'harmful to the country'.
'It is an agreement that means that we will have areas in Denmark that are under American jurisdiction. Where Danish authorities cannot exercise control. And where mistreatment of prisoners can occur,' he said. 'It is a gigantic failure towards the Danish population.'
The agreement was signed under the Biden administration in December 2023. Since Trump's return to office, relations between Copenhagen and Washington DC have altered dramatically.
Some politicians believe the new agreement could surrender Danish sovereignty and even be a violation of the Danish constitution. The Danish government has said this is not the case.
The Danish prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, said the situation between the two countries made it even more necessary to maintain close ties. 'The problem is not too much involvement from the US in Europe. On the contrary, the risk is that the US will withdraw and move troops away or stop donations to Ukraine,' she said.
At a consultation on Tuesday, the Danish justice minister, Peter Hummelgaard, said Danish authorities will have 'primary safety responsibility both on and off the facilities covered by the agreement'.
The Danish Institute for Human Rights has said the bill risks giving US soldiers the right to stop demonstrations outside their bases and would prevent Denmark from prosecuting them if they used excessive force.
Peter Vedel Kessing, a senior researcher at the Danish Institute for Human Rights, told the Guardian in May: 'If the bill is passed and American soldiers carry out illegal acts in Denmark, it will be beyond Danish control and outside the reach of the Danish legal system to prosecute such actions.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Rubio says US not involved in Israeli strikes against Iran
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday the United States was not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran while also urging Tehran not to target U.S. interests or personnel in the region. "Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel," he added.


Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's Greenland acquisition plans could be squashed for a very simple reason, reveals Republican
An independent-minded Senate Republican poured cold water on a far-fetched idea that was floated early in the second Trump administration. Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski told the Daily Mail that she doesn't 'think the Trump administration would like to buy Greenland once they realize what the price of Greenland would be.' Murkowski's remarks came after the Daily Mail asked the senator at an event in Washington Thursday if she thinks a deal to acquire the self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark was still viable. She was delivering a keynote address at an event on 'Restoring Arctic Exceptionalism' organized by The Arctic Institute. An estimate from the American Action Forum (AAF) - a center-right policy institute - found that the price of Greenland, including the island's 'critical mineral and energy assets would be worth approximately $4.4 trillion.' When removing oil and natural gas from the calculation, Greenland's value would drop to $2.7 trillion, AAF found. Trump's Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told members of Congress Thursday that the P entagon has drafts of plans to invade Greenland, as well as Panama if the Administration chose to make such an audacious move. Democrat Adam Smith of Washington state asked Hegseth at a Thursday hearing of House Armed Services Committee if the Department of Defense would be willing to 'take Greenland and Panama by force.' Hegseth responded by articulating American concerns regarding Chinese influence in Panama and Greenland. 'Panama is very key terrain that we've focused on and we've been willing to focus on, as is Greenland,' Hegseth noted. When Smith pressed Hegseth on the question of force, Hegseth replied it was prudent for the Department of Defense to prepare options. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth replied. 'So let's just be clear,' Smith continued: 'You have plans to take Panama and Greenland by force?' 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth said. When GOP Rep. Mike Turner attempted to throw Hegseth a lifeline on Greenland plans, Hegseth only adjusted his words slightly. "I sure as hell hope that it is not your testimony," Turner said, glaring at Hegseth. The Pentagon head replied that the plan was to ensure Greenland was protected from any threats. Buying Greenland has been an obsession of the Trump administration ever since the president took office for his second term. Trump first floated the idea of buying Greenland as far back as 2019, tweeting an artificially generated image of a golden Trump tower planted in a local Greenland village. Col. Susannah Meyers, commander of the US military's Pituffik Space Base, was removed from command on April 10, 2025, according to a statement released by the Space Operations Command. Vice President JD Vance visited the island early in his term, along with his wife Usha. The Vance's visit was marred in controversy. Colonel Susannah Meyers, the commander of the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland, was removed from her role in April after she publicly disagreed with remarks made by the Vice President during the trip.


The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Trump pulling US personnel from Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran
Donald Trump said he was withdrawing some of the American personnel deployed in the Middle East because it could be a 'dangerous place' amid rising tensions. The State Department said it had ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel and their dependents from its embassy in Baghdad. Simultaneously, a US official said, defence secretary Pete Hegseth had authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents from countries across the region, including Bahrain and Kuwait. American soldiers in the region were not affected by this order, however. The decision comes amid heightened tensions as Mr Trump's push to reach a deal with Iran to halt its nuclear programme is deadlocked and intelligence suggests Israel is making preparations for a strike against Tehran's nuclear facilities. 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens,' Mr Trump told reporters on Wednesday. 'We've given notice to move out.' Asked if anything could be done to de-escalate tensions in the region, particularly with Iran, the president said: 'They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple – they can't have a nuclear weapon.' News of the Baghdad evacuation drove oil prices up by more than 4 per cent. Oil futures climbed $3, with Brent crude futures at $69.18 a barrel. The US maintains a military presence across the oil-rich region, with bases in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE. A US official told Reuters that the State Department was 'set to have an ordered departure for the embassy in Baghdad'. 'The intent is to do it through commercial means, but the US military is standing by if help is requested,' the officials said. Iraq 's state news agency reported, citing a government official, that Baghdad hadn't recorded any security indication warranting an evacuation. Sources in Iraqi and US governments did not explain what security risks had prompted the decision, although heightened tensions with Iran were widely speculated to be a reason. The sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the US is scheduled to happen over the weekend in Oman, with Tehran expected to hand over a counterproposal after rejecting an offer by Washington. Iran says it does not plan to build a nuclear weapon and is only interested in peaceful use of its nuclear programme. The US, though, wants Tehran to stop uranium enrichment entirely. Speaking on the Pod Force One podcast on Monday, Mr Trump said he was growing 'less confident' about getting a deal with Iran. It wasn't clear, he said, that Tehran would accept the key US demand to stop enriching uranium. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more – less confident about it,' the president said. Iranian defence minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that 'the situation may escalate into conflict' if negotiations with the US failed. 'If a conflict is imposed on us,' he warned on Wednesday, 'all US bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries'. Tensions in the Middle East are also rising due to Israel 's war on Gaza. Israel and Iran exchanged fire twice last year – the first direct attacks between the region's most entrenched enemies – with missiles and war drones hurtling across Iraqi airspace. Strategic experts and former officials said Israel could consider taking matters into its own hands if nuclear talks with the US didn't yield a favourable outcome. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly warned that a flawed agreement would be more dangerous than no deal at all. Mr Trump recently revealed he had cautioned Mr Netanyahu against taking unilateral action, such as a military strike, which could jeopardise the ongoing negotiations with Tehran.