Children's Ombudsman accuses Government of ‘letting down' child victims of domestic and sexual violence
Children's Ombudsman
has accused the
Government
of letting down child victims of domestic and sexual violence, and of disrespecting his office.
Dr Niall Muldoon's
remarks came after it refused to fund the monitoring of how the Government's landmark 'zero tolerance' domestic abuse strategy affects children. The role fell apart during a 'shameful' three-year row which left Dr Muldoon 'very angry'.
The Department of Justice has confirmed the ombudsman will now have no role in monitoring the third national plan, which was the first to identify children as domestic abuse victims in their own right rather than witnesses.
Before it was launched with much fanfare in 2022, the government asked Dr Muldoon to monitor whether the plan was upholding children's rights.
READ MORE
But Dr Muldoon's office spent the following three years unsuccessfully asking the Department of Justice and the Department of Children to fund the role his office was asked to do. Both departments claimed the other was responsible for funding the role.
From 2022 on, Dr Muldoon sent a series of letters to then justice minister Helen McEntee, expressing increasing frustration.
In the correspondence with the Department of Justice, released under Freedom of Information laws, Dr Muldoon said the ombudsman 'did not seek' the position, but government officials had been 'very eager for us to take [it] up'.
In early 2023, Dr Muldoon asked for the role to be funded by January 2024, 'even if it is 18 months late'.
By October 2023, Dr Muldoon expressed exasperation to have received 'not one single reply' in a year.
Despite 'long, drawn-out engagement' between government officials, Dr Muldoon said, 'for the second budget in a row – your department has reneged on the promises given'.
'The actions of your department have been disrespectful of this office. However, my biggest concern and one that makes me very angry, is the impact this will have on the children who are being subjected to domestic or sexual and gender-based violence. These children have been let down. That is shameful behaviour,' Dr Muldoon said.
He formally asked for any reference to the ombudsman to be removed from the strategy.
'The good name of this office has been used by your department to offer credibility and substance to the actions in relation to children that are outlined in the strategy, but I cannot let that continue,' he said.
In January 2024, Dr Muldoon tried to secure funding again, arguing that 'while discussions continue over who pays for what, it is the children impacted by domestic, sexual and gender-based violence who will suffer'.
In March of this year, Dr Muldoon wrote to newly-appointed Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan, seeking a meeting to talk about 'key areas', including the 'essential' funding of the role overseeing the national strategy.
[
Better-off families 'sailing away from the have-nots', warns Ombudsman
Opens in new window
]
'The strategy rightly identifies children and young people as both witnesses and victims/survivors, and their needs must be fully considered,' Dr Muldoon said.
But the Department of Justice has now confirmed 'it was not possible to reach agreement on the precise parameters of this policy advice role and the resources that would be required'.
The third national strategy on domestic, sexual and gender-based violence (DSGBV) was due to run from 2022 to 2026. The last implementation plan for the strategy, which covers 2025 to 2026, was launched last month and includes no reference to the ombudsman.
A spokesman for the department said 'further consideration will be given to how the needs to children are best met under the fourth national strategy on DSGBV, as it is developed'.
A Department of Children spokeswoman said that, as the ombudsman was no longer mentioned in the national domestic violence plan, 'the query you have raised is no longer relevant'.
[
Child homelessness a 'national shame', TDs and Senators told
Opens in new window
]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Ministerial phones are off and the bags are packed. You couldn't begrudge them the holiday
'He's away,' came the reply from the Minister's number. 'I have his phone.' Wise man. Time to pack up for a few weeks. Leinster House is already a ghost town. There'll be a 'fairly perfunctory' Cabinet meeting on Tuesday with a few bits and that's it. With an election looming, the political class didn't get much of a break last summer. At Christmas, there was a government to be formed. So lots and lots of people in all parties and none, and the people who work for them, are looking forward to the summer break. It got under way this week and will definitively start this weekend. For many, it'll be the first proper holiday in two years. No wonder they're leaving the phones behind. READ MORE It has been a peculiar, frazzled political term since the Coalition was formed six months ago. Its genesis was bathed in controversy over the role of Michael Lowry and the nature of the deals – including changes to the Dáil standing orders – cut with the Independents . At the time, there was much hyperventilating about the threat to Irish democracy presented by the new administration. Those claims look a little hysterical in hindsight. How much time and effort did we all waste on them? Other charges laid against the new administration hold more water. It could hardly be said that the new Government hit the ground running; at times it barely seemed to have managed more than a leisurely stroll. Despite early promises to take 'difficult decisions', there has been no step change in housing . In fact, many indicators are going in the wrong direction. A series of moves by the new Minister for Housing James Browne, including changing apartment design standards to make them smaller and cheaper , may bear fruit in the future. But the Government does not look – yet anyway – like it is turning the housing crisis around. Despite much talk about a housing emergency, there is no real sense that the Government has moved to an emergency footing. You could say the same about pressing infrastructure needs in water and energy. To be honest, you could say the same about a lot of things. Relations between the two parties are businesslike, but not warm. The important business is done at leader level and there is an undercurrent of disharmony between them – if it's not mistrust, it's something approaching that. It is certainly not the case that there is sense of unambiguous common purpose. The strong and co-operative relationship between Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers covers a lot of the cracks. [ National Development Plan: €275bn to be spent over next 10 years, with housing receiving biggest boost Opens in new window ] It has hardly been a period of unbridled joy for the Opposition, either. Sinn Féin responded to the disappointment of the election result by reverting to a hyper-combative stance, turning the dial up to 10 on every issue. There were signs of a more united approach among the various parties, with some TDs hailing the emergence of a united left-wing opposition which could serve as the basis for a left-wing government in the future. For a time, especially during the rows over the changes to Dáil procedures, the leaders of the smaller Opposition parties looked like Mary Lou McDonald's supportive frontbenchers. Some of them looked happier at this role than others. There are audible rumblings in the Labour Party , not just because of its historic antipathy to Sinn Féin (not shared by the Social Democrats), but because many Labour people suspect that Sinn Féin's growth will come at the expense of other left-wing parties, not Fianna Fáil or Fine Gael . Meanwhile, there is semipublic wondering about the future of its own leader going on in Sinn Féin at the moment – a most unusual state of affairs for that party. Seldom have international affairs weighed so heavily over an Irish administration. The economic impact on Ireland of the unpredictable and destructive policies pursued by Donald Trump is the biggest challenge – and the greatest unknowable – facing the Government and the country this summer. A trade deal between the EU and the US reportedly hangs in the balance this weekend – but even that may deliver a general tariff of 15 per cent. No deal means a trade war, and higher tariffs on both sides. For a start, that would tear up the Government's budget numbers, even before it began making itself felt in the real economy. The outlook is more threatening for the Irish economic model, and the prosperity it has delivered, than at any time since the financial crisis. It may yet dwarf all the other challenges facing the Government. The other international issue that was a staple of our politics every week – there cannot be a parliament in Europe that saw Gaza discussed more than the Dáil – and will require decisions in the autumn is the Occupied Territories Bill . Both Opposition and Government politicians are increasingly appalled by Israel's actions in Gaza; only the Government has to decide what to do about it. [ Irish public's caution on Occupied Territories Bill reflects 'considered' view – Taoiseach Opens in new window ] The bill will shortly emerge from pre-legislative scrutiny. In the autumn, the Government will have to decide what it's going to do with it, and specifically if it will include services in its scope. This is in the face of an increasingly vigorous campaign against it – confirmed by two senior multinational executives – by the Israeli lobby in the US. You don't have to like that to take it seriously. A cold, hard reading of how exactly Ireland's interests and values should balance will be necessary: that is something to which many people in Government are very much not looking forward. For leaders, ministers, TDs, advisers, mandarins and officials of all stripes, on the beaches, golf courses, sun loungers and poolsides, up the airy mountain and down the rushy glen, the holidays are deserved and needed. Seldom have they felt so much like the calm before the storm.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Irish pensions will suffer without access to private markets, says Elkstone
Significant pension reforms in the US as well as UK initiatives to funnel funds to growth mean Ireland is now in danger of falling even further behind. Elkstone's Brian Merriman said he is relatively pessimistic of action in the coming Budget but argued long-term thinking is required – including leadership from Government – or future pension provision is going to fall significantly short in Ireland. He was commenting as the Trump administration is expected to sign an order that will allow the 401(k) pension plans used by millions of ordinary American workers access investment in private markets, including private equity, real estate, infrastructure schemes and higher return forms of lending. In Britain, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced this week that she is reviving a pension commission to tackle what she described as a coming 'tsunami of pensioner poverty' after her department found people due to retire from 2050 are on track to be poorer than those retiring today. Brian Merriman said there is now an expectation that returns from Irish pension savings will decline over time, if the current restrictive investing regime remains in place that in effect box most ordinary pensions savers into public investments like equities and bonds. Facilitating access to private markets would allow pension savers to benefit from higher returns, he said. Private market investments – hedge funds, private equity, venture capital investment in start-ups and private companies – have exploded in scale globally since the financial crisis of the late 2000s, while the role of traditional public assets has been in relative decline. Pension rules here have not reflected the shift, Mr Merriman said. Personal Retirement Savings Accounts (PRSA), a popular savings option, restrict investments in assets where fees may be higher or valuations are less transparent. High fees may well be justified where returns are higher, while the net return to investors should be the key consideration, Mr Merriman argues. Private capital investments are less liquid, which comes with less valuation transparency, but are suitable for long-term pension investing, he said. While high returns generally reflect higher risks, Mr Merriman said failing to open pensions to diverse investment opportunities creates its own problems. 'It is riskier not to be investing in private markets,' he said. ADVERTISEMENT A shift to facilitate Irish savers would benefit the domestic economy too, he said. 'The UK is also grappling with this question of do you force people to invest in the UK economy. In Ireland we should at a minimum have it as an opt out, so you'd have to make a decision not to put 5pc or 10pc of your investment into Irish investments.' He cited housing and infrastructure as areas where the Irish economy needs investment and where Irish savers are not active. Pointing to the push happening in the US and UK to funnel pensions into growth opportunities he said Ireland needs to be more agile and should look to get ahead rather than just catch up with other regimes. Elkstone's investments include a string of Irish tech start-ups as well as housing and student housing schemes. It advises wealthy families and individuals on their long-term investments. Opening such schemes to ordinary pensions would allow more people to access higher returns, Mr Merriman said.
Irish Examiner
9 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: Public patience has limits — especially when their tax cut is on the line
Like Christmas, it feels like the budget comes around earlier every year. Part of that is the fallow summer period during which the idle hands of the country's political journalists are searching for work. Without the day-to-day Punch and Judy show of the Dáil, there has to be a focus somewhere, though ask ministers at doorsteps and press conferences about the budget any time pre-August, and you will find them rolling their eyes to heaven and asking has it gotten earlier this year and repeating a mantra about the "budgetary process". Given that much of the mid-summer choreography focuses on the summer economic statement and the release of the Tax Strategy Group papers, it is no wonder that those idle hands drift towards budget speculation. This year, the focus has started early on one key issue, not just because it is being speculated upon, but because its actual merit is being discussed, which is novel at least. Usually, budget measures are seen as something of a fait d'accompli and in recent, more prosperous, times everything was on the table because everything was possible within reason. Of course, there were competing interests, but with huge economic surpluses the last government was well able to cater to everyone even a little. However, while Tuesday's announcement of the summer economic statement brought with it news of another surplus, there is a serious question about how it is going to be deployed. Contained in the document was the news that the overall tax package in the October 7 budget is due to be around €1.5bn. Over a billion and a half euro to spend solely on cutting taxes is the stuff of dreams for many governments and one to which this coalition has become quite accustomed. Where does the money go? Last year's €1.6bn income tax package was aimed squarely at low- and middle-income earners with the main tax credits; the personal employee and earned income tax credits increased by €125. On top of that, the standard rate cut-off point was increased to €44,000 and the USC was cut to 3%. Across the board, there were increases in carer tax credits, in credits for renters, in benefit in kind, in capital acquisitions and and with it an extension of mortgage interest tax relief. This year, however, the landscape is somewhat different. With €1.5bn to play with, the Government has already tacitly pledged a large chunk of that away. While a commitment to cut the Vat rate for the hospitality sector is not in the programme for government, despite what some have said this week, it was agreed as part of government formation talks and was taken as a win by Fine Gael, which had pushed hard for the reduced rate. The problem with the reduced rate for restaurants and hotels comes with its costs. In the Tax Strategy Group papers published on Thursday, the authors outlined that cutting the Vat rate for the hospitality sector, including pubs, restaurants, hotels, and hairdressers, would cost €867m per year. While that is lower than the estimated figure put out by finance minister Paschal Donohoe of between €950m and a billion euro, it is a sizable chunk of the tax package available to the government in just two-and-a-half months. Political and social choices On Tuesday, as the government announced a €30bn capital plan alongside the summer economic statement, which warned of moderated spending, it was put to Mr Donohoe that the commitment to one industry could come at a cost to workers. This he accepted, but said that every budgetary decision comes with trade-offs. While the idea of sacrificing tax cuts for workers in order to aid one specific industry is an argument which has been carried out all week, it was refreshing to hear Mr Donohoe say explicitly that the budget is a mechanism of political and social choice. Too often it has been framed as a winners and losers argument, but what it is in actuality is an argument of priority, a statement of intent and the positioning of where we are at any given moment. It is a series of political choices, not a mere shopping list. In a radio debate on Wednesday, economist Barra Roantree argued against a blanket Vat cut, saying that the biggest beneficiaries would be the biggest chains. Why, he questioned, should McDonald's get a Vat cut at a time when its profits have jumped almost 17%? The counterargument, of course, is that the real beneficiary of a cut is the customer. It will come as no surprise that the cost of eating out has risen alongside the cost of food in supermarkets. In my house we use the crudely designed and implemented Spice Bag Index. Through the miracle of food delivery apps keeping receipts, we are able to track the cost of a spice bag in our local Chinese in the years since we bought our home. In that seven-year stretch, the price has jumped from €6.40 to €10.20, though it must be said that the quality remains excellent. There is no question that hospitality, like every other industry, is facing a crunch. The sector has come through covid lockdowns only to face rising costs, constrained supply lines, and a public less willing or able to spend money on entertainment. Divisions But hearing Fianna Fáil junior minister Niall Collins on radio this week saying that he did not believe a blanket cut in the Vat rate was justified, while Fine Gael's enterprise minister Peter Burke "unequivocally" backed it, shows that there will be friction in the run-up to the budget on the issue. Government sources questioned on Thursday whether Mr Collins had gone on something of a solo run given that he had somewhat contradicted his party leader Taoiseach Micheál Martin on the issue. But those in government who want to see the cut in the books that Jack Chambers and Paschal Donohoe hold up on the steps of Government Buildings in 10 weeks, might be minded to listen to the message of Mr Collins. Speaking to Limerick's Live 95, Mr Collins said that there was no evidence that a previous reduction in the Vat rate to 9% was "actually passed on to the consumer" and that there was price gouging in the sector. While the budget will lay out a statement of priorities, the passage and success of this particular measure will depend on public buy-in. Convincing stretched middle-income earners to forego tax cuts, which would put somewhere in the region of €75 a month back in their pockets in favour of an industry which many believe has been too expensive for too long will require some finesse in its messaging. While the row has focused on the differing opinions of coalition partners, the consumer has been left out of the discussion. If the Government is faced with a list of choices that are broken down into binary winners and losers, the average person will always choose to win. But if a Vat cut can be sold as a net good for employment, for tax take and for those who just wish to eat out once a month, then it has a chance of resonating with the public. Simply telling members of the public that businesses are a Vat cut away from viability is not a communications strategy, because it doesn't hold up to any scrutiny. If the public sees nearly €700 million spent, they will want to know what's in it for them, be it affordability or the greater good. Otherwise, it will be back to splitting a €10.20 spice bag. Read More Government to invest €102bn in infrastructure by 2030 under revised National Development Plan
