Households to receive up to £2,000 compensation for water service failures
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the move marked the first increase in compensation rates in 25 years in recognition of the 'urgent need' to bring payments in line with inflation and properly compensate households for poor service.
Severe issues such as flooding will see customer compensation double from £1,000 to up to £2,000, while households suffering consistent low water pressure will be automatically eligible to receive up to £250, up from the previous compensation rate of £25.
Payments will automatically be credited to the accounts of eligible customers with immediate effect.
The announcement comes as the Government attempts to grapple with the problems engulfing the water sector in the face of high public anger over the degraded and polluted state of rivers, lakes and coasts, rising bills, bosses' bonuses and shareholder payouts.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: 'Too many water companies are letting down their customers – with leaking pipes, poor water supply and low water pressure.
'The Government is holding water companies to account by making them put money back into people's pockets when they fail their customers.'
Defra said it was working with water companies to expand the list of circumstances that would trigger compensation payments.
Compensation for when customers are asked to boil their water due to contaminated supply will come into force later this year, it said.
The standards, outlined in the Guaranteed Standards Scheme, set out a baseline for customer service in the water sector and include providing timely restoration of water supply following an interruption, responding to written complaints and managing the risk of sewer flooding.
Action already announced to cut sewage spills and attract investment in the sector includes: strengthening regulation to ensure polluting water bosses who cover up their crimes now face two-year prison sentences; the banning of 'unfair' bonuses for bosses of six polluting water companies; and 81 criminal investigations into sewage pollution.
Mike Keil, the chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), said: 'Customers expect to be treated fairly when their water company lets them down, so we're delighted the Government has moved at pace to strengthen service standards.
'This should give people peace of mind they now have far stronger protection from a much broader range of water company service failures – from the slow installation of water meters to the mishandling of debt recovery.
'As well as bolstering payments for thousands of customers, these changes mark an important step towards restoring trust in the water sector which is at an all-time low.'
Ofwat chief executive David Black said: ''We welcome these improvements to guaranteed standards and payments for customers.
'When customers suffer from problems like low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding, they can experience major stress and inconvenience, and payment amounts must recognise the disruption to their lives when standards are not met.
'These new changes are another way to make sure customers are protected when companies get it wrong.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Realising the benefits of investing to achieve long-term goals
Tom Ham | Supplied Tom Ham, Group CEO at Calton, on moves to incentivise Cash ISA savers to go into investment Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Well, the UK Government is rushing to get everything off its desk in a mad scramble to get out the door for the summer holiday. The long-awaited draft legislation on Inheritance Tax changes for pensions and agricultural and business property has been released. Spoiler – neither are going away, so more on the technicalities of these soon. More exciting, however, is the new stuff being lobbed over the transom. There's the Pensions Commission, and a raft of reforms designed to funnel money out of cash savings and into investments. Here's some context to help separate the signal from the noise. The government is looking for growth and to inject capital into the UK markets. Fund flows into London-listed mandates have been declining for months, and new listings in the UK's IPO space have dropped to their lowest level for a half-year since records began in 1995. No-one wants to use the word bleak at midsummer, but this does not signal health or confidence. At the same time, global trends in personal finance show that people are holding a significant proportion of their wealth in cash. Vanguard reports this month that an estimated £1.7 trillion is sitting in cash savings across the OECD; the same report suggested that in the UK there is potentially £242 billion that could be turned towards both the government's and individual citizens' long-term financial goals. Do the markets have a right to people's money? Of course not. But we should ask why and how we might nudge this cash into investment and consider who might benefit. The savings cash-pile has accumulated because of policy, regulation and broad economic patterns on one hand, and financial education and behaviour on the other. Cynics might say the government has just identified a new reservoir of money to tap. Banks and building societies have pointed out that this money isn't inactive, it circulates through their lending activities too. That said, the Treasury has two motives for seeking to turn savers' money towards the market. First, the government – and surely everyone else – wants to reinvigorate the economy, to foster growth and instil confidence, though the jury is out on how much this will move the dial. Second, individuals holding money in cash accounts are not getting the same long-term return they might realise if they invested instead. This is a problem as personal savings, and taking responsibility for maximising them, become increasingly important as public finances deteriorate and defined contribution pensions are now the norm. To be clear, holding assets in cash isn't intrinsically bad – we frequently advise clients to do so. Your emergency fund of three to six months of living expenses needs to be in an easy-access account. As clients approach retirement, we increase the amount they hold in cash – often within pension or other investment wrappers – to protect from market events as they approach drawdown or the purchase of an annuity. At this stage we suggest having 12-18 months of living expenses available – not a small amount of money. But the Cash ISA is a subject of speculation. They are vastly popular because they are useful for short-term saving goals – easy to set up, easy to withdraw from, and a low-risk tax-wrapper shielding profits from Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax. If changes come, they will be to the annual tax-free allowance. Since ISAs arrived in 1999 the allowance for adult account holders has risen from £4,000 per annum to a grand £20,000. This can be shared amongst all members of the ISA family – the Stocks and Shares ISA, the Lifetime ISA and the Finance ISA, each with different rules, risks and rates of return. The most straightforward change to divert savings towards investment would be to reallocate the allowance across other types of ISA, stipulating a certain portion must go to an Investment ISA. However, this is when you slam into the two major barriers to investment – risk and cost. For example, opening a Stocks and Shares ISA involves declaring your awareness of the risk, being comfortable with it, and paying a percentage fee to your ISA provider. While you can make withdrawals from a Stocks and Shares ISA instantly, exposure to market falls means you are more likely to realise expected returns over a longer period – most experts advise a minimum five-year investment, but this is the kind of decision you might wish to seek more reassurance and advice on. So far, the Cash ISA remains untouched; it's now incumbent upon government and the advice profession to make the case for investment to help people with their long-term goals, and to show the benefits rather than be accused of making another cash grab.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall
The FTSE 100 rose to new highs once again last week, tipping the scales well above 9,100 points after a particularly strong day on Thursday which saw the likes of BT Group rise ten per cent. The British companies index is up more than 11 per cent this year, outpacing the key US benchmarks. Meanwhile, key upcoming UK economy data this week includes mortgage approvals and the Nationwide House Price Index. Additionally, there is likely to be more news emerging on how the government may tackle pension reform, amid debate over what age the state pension should be and whether the tax relief rate on pension contributions may be altered. In other markets, bitcoin fell towards the end of last week, from the highs above $123,000 down to around $115,000, with gold also retreating as investors took a risk-on approach once more.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Radical tax and retirement proposal that could affect every Aussie: What you need to know
Public servants within Anthony Albanese 's own government have suggested access to the age pension needs to be wound back for wealthy baby boomers because it's too costly. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, who were living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test. 'Low-and-middle income taxpayers are subsidising the retirement incomes of seniors with significant wealth in addition to their homes,' it said. The departmental brief, prepared independently of the new Labor minister's office, noted couples could still receive the age pension even as they continued to earn six-figure annual incomes from their investments. 'Age pension continues to be payable to couples with income of almost $100,000 a year or assets of almost $1.05million, in addition to their principal home of unlimited value,' it said. The department said this was unfair compared with the treatment of the unemployed, who had to wait 13 weeks to receive JobSeeker if they had more than $11,500 in the bank. A spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek said the government had no plans to impose a stricter assets test for the age pension. 'The government appreciates independent, frank and fearless advice from its agencies,' she told Daily Mail Australia. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek (pictured) - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test 'The government has no plans to include the family home in the pension assets test.' This is despite Treasury forecasting an 'expected increase in the number of age pension recipients as the Australian population ages'. More than $109billion is set to be spent on aged care in 2025-26 as government spending as a proportion of the economy hits the highest level since 1986 outside of Covid. Capital gains tax discount Ahead of the government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month, Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis has suggested scrapping the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, introduced in 1999, because it fuelled property market speculation and made houses unaffordable. 'There is a lot of prior work pointing out the incentives to speculate in property created by discounted CGT,' she told Daily Mail Australia. 'The issue is that discounting CGT, as currently, means that people would rather have capital gains than cash income from an investment. 'So it means people are better off from a tax perspective buying an existing property than investing in a business or some other productivity-enhancing investment.' Ms Ellis, a former assistant governor at the Reserve Bank of Australia, has proposed replacing the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount with indexation fixed at 2.5 per cent, or the mid-point of the RBA's two to three per cent inflation target. 'This is easier to calculate and doesn't require people to know the history of inflation to calculate their tax liability,' she said. 'My proposal to instead charge full marginal tax rate on CGT will eliminate the incentive to favour capital-gains-producing investments over productivity-boosting ones.' Ms Ellis' call to axe the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, on behalf of Westpac Economics, is shared by grassroots group Labor for Housing and the Greens. She put that view last week to teal MP Allegra Spender's tax roundtable in Canberra, but Labor had ruled out that option in Opposition after losing the 2016 and 2019 elections with that policy. Her call on the capital gains tax is not the view of the Westpac Banking Group, which is this week putting in a separate submission to the government's Economic Reform Roundtable. With only deficits forecast in coming years, the Department of Social Services noted funding welfare for the elderly would be a financial challenge, with the proportion of Australians older than 65 increasing by 31 per cent since 2000. Almost two-thirds, or 65 per cent, of people aged 65 and over receive income support payments, with 92 per cent of them getting the age pension. Australians can access the age pension at 67. 'Australia's demographics are evolving and will have broader implications for fiscal and social policy and demands for services,' the department said. 'Life expectancy is rising, and fertility rates are declining, reducing the working age population and influencing family composition and structures.' The department also suggested Australia would continue relying on high immigration so there was tax revenue from a working age population to support older Australians. 'Overseas migration is expected to continue to support population growth, offsetting demographic and economic challenges to some extent, as higher immigration correlates with higher tax revenue and increases in working-age population,' it said. Unaffordable housing was likely to see younger generations become increasingly reliant on their parents for housing. 'Concerns of intergenerational inequalities are growing, and young people's circumstances are falling short of their expectations,' the Department of Social Services said. 'As more rely on family for financial support and/or housing well into adulthood, they experience delayed milestones including education, employment, family, and home ownership. 'Many also struggle with compounding and competing responsibilities of paid employment and unpaid care. 'This has implications on household incomes, workforce participation, gender equality, and may have greater social, economic, and intergenerational ramifications.'
