New House committee will study how to modernize South Carolina's transportation agency
South Carolina's consistent ranking as one of the fastest-growing states in the nation, coupled with aging infrastructure, has put a strain on roads and bridges across the state.
Now, a committee led by Rep. Shannon Erickson (R-Beaufort) and Rep. Heather Crawford (R-Horry) will be tasked with examining ways to improve efficiency and streamline operations at the South Carolina Department of Transportation.
'As South Carolina continues to grow, it is critical that our infrastructure keeps pace,' said House Speaker Murrell Smith (R-Sumter). 'This committee will take a comprehensive look at how SCDOT can better serve the needs of our citizens—today and in the future. From innovation and technology to organizational structure and long-term planning, no idea is off the table.'
New law bans kratom sales to minors in South Carolina
The committee is expected to solicit feedback on the state's transportation infrastructure during a series of public hearings starting this summer, which officials said will be used to drive policy recommendations.
'South Carolinians deserve a transportation system that works as hard as they do,' said Erickson. 'This committee will begin by listening to our communities with the aim of delivering solutions that modernize SCDOT and make a meaningful difference in the daily lives of our citizens.'
A primary focus will be placed on how to update SCDOT's permitting process, speed up timelines for project funding and completion, and expand road capacity to help alleviate congestion.
'We're at a pivotal moment for South Carolina's infrastructure,' said Crawford. 'By engaging the public and working closely with local and state partners, this committee will help drive reforms that lead to faster project completion, better service, and a stronger foundation for future growth.'
The rest of the committee members have not yet been announced, but the Speaker's office said they would be a 'bipartisan and geographically diverse group' of state representatives.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Failed New Mexico candidate gets 80 years in shootings at officials' homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A failed political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker. Prosecutors, who had sought a 90-year sentence, said Peña has shown no remorse and had hoped to cause political change by terrorizing people who held contrary views to him into being too afraid to take part in political life. Peña's lawyers had sought a 60-year sentence, saying their client maintains that he is innocent of the charges. They have said Peña was not involved in the shootings and that prosecutors were relying on the testimony of two men who bear responsibility and accepted plea agreements in exchange for leniency. 'Today was a necessary step toward Mr. Peña's continued fight to prove his innocence,' said Nicholas Hart, one of Peña's attorneys. 'He looks forward to the opportunity to appeal, where serious issues about the propriety of this prosecution will be addressed.' The attacks took place as threats and acts of intimidation against election workers and public officials surged across the country after President Donald Trump and his allies called into question the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Prosecutors said Peña resorted to violence in the belief that a 'rigged' election had robbed him of victory in his bid to serve in the state Legislature. The shootings targeted the homes of officials including two county commissioners after their certification of the 2022 election, in which Peña lost by nearly 50 percentage points. No one was injured, but in one case bullets passed through the bedroom of a state senator's 10-year-old daughter. Two other men who had acknowledged helping Peña with the attacks had previously pleaded guilty to federal charges and received yearslong prison sentences.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Skipping Mike Johnson
House Speaker Mike Johnson 's right flank is trying to bypass him repeatedly next month by forcing votes on releasing the Epstein files and banning congressional stock trading. Why it matters: The tool these members plan to use — the discharge petition — has been the source of growing controversy in the House. A discharge petition allows the House rank-and-file to force a vote on any piece of legislation if at least 218 members sign on. Top Republicans have discouraged the use of the maneuver, arguing it would effectively turn over control of the House floor to Democrats, but GOP populists have increasingly ignored that guidance. State of play: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) wants to force a vote on Rep. Tim Burchett's (R-Tenn.) bill to ban members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children from trading or owning stocks. Tamping down congressional stock trading has been a cause célèbre for lawmakers in both parties for years, but congressional leaders have largely stonewalled their efforts to secure a vote. Another discharge petition from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on forcing the release of the Justice Department's documents on Jeffrey Epstein is set to trigger a vote within days of the House's return in September. Between the lines: The Epstein petition is widely expected to obtain 218 signatures, with most Democrats and several right-wing Republicans likely to sign on. Luna's petition may be more contentious, sources said, as there have already been months of bipartisan negotiations around carefully crafting a stock trading bill that can pass with support from leadership. Several Democrats told us Luna may not get the support she needs to pass her bill unless she coordinates with that bipartisan group. Luna previously secured 218 signatures this spring for a vote on allowing House members who are new parents to vote by proxy for up to three months, but the vote never came to pass. Johnson failed to procedurally kill the petition, then scrapped House votes until Luna agreed to a compromise. One House Republican involved in that saga, speaking on the condition of anonymity, predicted Johnson would have a tougher time trying to spike the Epstein and stock trading discharge petitions due to broad public interest. Zoom out: The Epstein push is a clear revolt against both President Trump, who has dismissed the matter, and Johnson, who has called for transparency but quashed several rogue efforts to release the files. Johnson has indicated his support for a stock trading ban, but it's unclear if he would support doing so through a discharge petition that could undermine his authority. Trump has indicated support for a stock trading ban in theory, but opposed a bipartisan Senate bill that would have extended the ban to future presidents and vice presidents. A spokesperson for Johnson did not respond to a request for comment. The bottom line: Both measures could also run aground in the Senate, which is less given to populist passions than the House and has a 60-vote threshold that makes it harder to pass legislation.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
GOP populists plot to repeatedly bypass Mike Johnson
House Speaker Mike Johnson 's (R-La.) right flank is trying to bypass him repeatedly next month by forcing votes on releasing the Epstein files and banning congressional stock trading. Why it matters: The tool these lawmakers are planning to use — the discharge petition — has been the source of growing controversy in the House in recent years. A discharge petition allows the House rank-and-file to force a vote on any piece of legislation if at least 218 members — a majority of the chamber — sign on. Top Republicans have discouraged the use of the maneuver, arguing it would effectively turn over control of the House floor to Democrats, but GOP populists have increasingly ignored that guidance. State of play: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) wants to force a vote on Rep. Tim Burchett's (R-Tenn.) bill to ban members of Congress, their spouses and dependent children from trading or owning stocks. Tamping down congressional stock trading has been a cause célèbre for lawmakers in both parties for years, but congressional leaders have largely stonewalled their efforts to secure a vote. Another discharge petition from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) on forcing the release of the Justice Department's documents on Jeffrey Epstein is set to trigger a vote within days of the House's return to session next month. Between the lines: The Epstein petition is widely expected to obtain 218 signatures, with most Democrats and several right-wing Republicans likely to sign on. Luna's petition may be more contentious, sources said, as there have already months of bipartisan negotiations around carefully crafting a stock trading bill that can pass with support from leadership. Several Democrats told Axios that Luna may not get the bipartisan support she needs to pass her bill unless she coordinates with that bipartisan group. Flashback: Luna previously secured 218 signatures this spring for a vote on allowing House members who are new parents to vote by proxy for up to three months, but the vote never came to pass. Johnson slipped a provision into an unrelated procedural measure to kill the discharge, but it failed. He then scrapped House votes until Luna agreed to a compromise. One House Republican involved in that saga, speaking on the condition of anonymity, predicted that Johnson would have a tougher time trying to spike the Epstein and stock trading discharge petitions. That is "much harder to do on these issues since they've had a lot more national attention," the lawmaker told Axios, "Epstein especially." Zoom out: The Epstein push is a clear revolt against both President Trump, who has dismissed the matter, and Johnson, who has called for transparency but quashed several rogue efforts to release the files. Johnson has indicated his support for a stock trading ban, but it's unclear if he would support doing so through a discharge petition that could undermine his authority. Trump, for his part, has voiced support for a stock trading ban in theory, but opposed a bipartisan Senate bill that would have extended the ban to future presidents and vice presidents. A spokesperson for Johnson did not respond to a request for comment.
