logo
Attorney general scandal adds to Spanish government woes

Attorney general scandal adds to Spanish government woes

Irish Timesa day ago

The unprecedented legal action being taken against
Spain
's attorney general which could see him go on trial and has fuelled calls for his resignation is just the latest in a litany of scandals which have left the Socialist-led government of
Pedro Sánchez
struggling for stability.
This week, a supreme court investigating judge recommended that the attorney general, Álvaro García Ortiz, should face trial for his alleged role in leaking secret information to the media about a tax fraudster.
In March 2024, Spanish media reported details of a plea deal which Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of the conservative president of the Madrid regional government Isabel Díaz Ayuso, had proposed to the general attorney's office.
The tax office had found that González Amador had avoided paying about €350,000 from earnings made from importing healthcare material during the Covid-19 pandemic.
READ MORE
The media reports corrected a false claim made by Díaz Ayuso's team that the attorney general's office had been the one to offer a deal. The investigating judge, Ángel Luis Hurtado, has now accused the attorney general himself of being the source of the reports.
According to the judge, the leak aimed 'to make clear that, according to [García Ortiz], the attorney general had not offered any deal of this kind'.
Díaz Ayuso, a prominent figure on the right, has been a fierce critic of the government.
If he does go on trial, which now looks likely, and were to be found guilty, García Ortiz could receive a jail sentence of up to four years. However, the most damaging allegation, as far as the government is concerned, was that the attorney general, who it proposed for the post, was acting on the orders of the prime minister's office.
The left-wing coalition government has staunchly defended the attorney general and justice minister Félix Bolanos flatly denied the claim the government was involved in the leak.
[
Catalan amnesty expected to get court blessing amid political turmoil
Opens in new window
]
'I regret very much that the supreme court should make such a serious assertion without any evidence, because that never happened,' he said.
However, the opposition says García Ortiz cannot remain in his post.
'The situation regarding the attorney general is unprecedented in our democracy, you must demand his resignation,' Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the leader of the conservative Popular Party (PP), told Sánchez in Congress on Wednesday.
The opposition leader has cast this as the latest in a series of scandals to affect the government. Sánchez's wife, Begona Gómez, has been investigated for possible business irregularities and his musician brother, David, is due to go on trial for alleged influence peddling in being appointed to a public post.
A former Socialist minister, José Luis Ábalos, is being investigated on suspicion of profiting from a kickback scheme when he was in government. Meanwhile, a former Socialist party official, Leire Díez, has been caught on tape offering favourable treatment to a businessman in exchange for incriminating information on the police unit carrying out investigations into several cases affecting the government.
Many judicial experts have said the attorney general's position is untenable. However, a large number have also expressed concerns about the judge's investigation, pointing to an apparent lack of evidence against García Ortiz.
Tensions between the government and the judiciary have been escalating since Sánchez's administration introduced an amnesty law for Catalan nationalists last year. Many on the left see the ongoing investigations as part of a campaign by magistrates with right-wing allegiances.
Government spokeswoman Pilar Alegría said that 'at this point certain judges are doing things which are difficult to understand'.
A recent poll by the national statistics institute found that 78 per cent of Spaniards do not trust the impartiality of their justice system in cases involving political parties.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian embassy denies ‘pathetic' accusation Moscow is deliberately targeting Ukraine civilians
Russian embassy denies ‘pathetic' accusation Moscow is deliberately targeting Ukraine civilians

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Russian embassy denies ‘pathetic' accusation Moscow is deliberately targeting Ukraine civilians

Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has said Ireland remains 'steadfast' in its support for Ukraine in a statement that has caused a reaction from the Russian embassy. Mr Harris accused Russia of escalating the war in Ukraine with more than 2,000 drone and missile attacks on Ukraine since June 1st. In response, the Russian embassy accused Mr Harris of 'pathetically' suggesting Russia is deliberately targeting civilians. In a statement issued after a week of heavy bombardment of Ukraine, Mr Harris said Russian attacks have been predominantly against civilian targets including a maternity hospital. READ MORE 'I condemn them completely, as I do Russia's ongoing war of aggression,' he said. 'I extend my condolences to the families of those who have been killed and injured. Our solidarity with Ukraine remains steadfast. 'Russia started this war. As the aggressor, it is for Russia to demonstrate a genuine commitment towards peace by halting its brutal attacks. It can do so at any time,' he said. Last week the Russian ambassador to Ireland Yuriy Filatov accused Ireland of supporting 'state terrorism by the Kiev [sic] regime' and being 'de facto accomplices' in the blowing up of a train bridge near the Russian city of Bryansk that killed seven civilians. He warned the Irish Government Russia would hold it and other European governments responsible for Ukraine's actions and they 'should be aware that the day of reckoning will inevitably come'. In a follow-up statement issued on Thursday, the embassy accused Mr Harris of 'anti-Russian propaganda which distorts reality and misleads the public'. [ Russia attacks Kyiv with missiles and drones 'in response' to Ukraine actions Opens in new window ] Despite video and photographic footage that shows Russian attacks on residential buildings and a maternity hospital in the last week, the embassy claimed Russia 'never' targets civilians and is only interested in military installations in Ukraine. These include missile, armour and shipbuilding industry enterprises in Kyiv, command posts, military equipment of Ukrainian formations and factories producing long-range drones. The embassy claimed that Russia is committed to a peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian war and had sought diplomatic ways to avoid war in 2014, 2021 and 2022. The West's plans, the embassy concluded, has 'always been not peace in Ukraine but imposition of war on Ukrainian and Russian peoples. Now the West reaps what it sows, trying to shift the blame to Russia. The world and the large part of the Irish public are not buying that.'

Dáil spending watchdog to examine civil service and ministerial pension errors
Dáil spending watchdog to examine civil service and ministerial pension errors

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Dáil spending watchdog to examine civil service and ministerial pension errors

The Dáil's public spending watchdog is to examine errors in pension payments for civil servants and ministers. It has agreed to issue an invitation to the national office at the centre of the controversy to be quizzed by TDs. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) wants representatives of the National Shared Services Office (NSSO) to face questions on the matter as early as next month. On Tuesday, it was revealed that a pool of 13,000 retired civil servants who were on work-sharing arrangements are to have their pension deductions checked for underpayments. Current Government ministers may also either owe or be owed money running into the thousands as a result of incorrect pension deductions, while former ministers are believed to be impacted as well. READ MORE There is also an issue in relation to the pensions of 30 retired senior civil servants. One of them could owe as much as €280,000 as a result of NSSO errors. Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers has announced an external audit of NSSO systems and processes and a broad external review of its capacity and structures. Social Democrats TD Aidan Farrelly, a member of the PAC, said there is 'really significant worry' over the issues that have arisen. At a committee meeting on Thursday, he proposed that representatives of the NSSO be brought in alongside the Department of Public Expenditure (DPER), which already is due to appear at the PAC on July 10th. Mr Farrelly told The Irish Times the committee has questions about how far back the issues go and which civil service grades are affected. PAC chairman, Sinn Féin TD John Brady, said the invitation is to be issued to the NSSO 'given the emergence of serious issues' there. Separately, the PAC also agreed to invite the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) as well as the Department of Health and the Health Service Executive (HSE) to appear before them next month to be asked about oversight of private nursing homes. This follows on from an RTÉ Investigates programme last week that showed undercover footage at two private nursing homes . Distressing scenes included older people allegedly being manhandled as well as residents being ignored when they pled for help to go to the toilet. Mr Brady said the PAC 'has serious concerns' in the wake of the programme. The PAC agreed to invite Hiqa – which inspects nursing homes – to appear before it following requests for this to happen from Labour Party TD Eoghan Kenny and Fine Gael's James Geoghegan.

Puska family trial: jury to continue deliberations on Friday
Puska family trial: jury to continue deliberations on Friday

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Puska family trial: jury to continue deliberations on Friday

A Central Criminal Court jury will continue their deliberations on Friday in the trial of four family members charged with offences relating to obstructing the arrest of the man who murdered schoolteacher Ashling Murphy . Jozef Puska murdered 23-year-old Ms Murphy by stabbing and slashing her neck after attacking her while she exercised along the canal towpath outside Tullamore on the afternoon of January 12th, 2022. A jury later convicted him of that murder and he is serving a life sentence. His brothers, Lubomir Puska jnr (38) and Marek Puska (36) are charged with withholding information. Their wives, Viera Gaziova (40) and Jozefina Grundzova (32) are charged with impeding the apprehension or prosecution of Jozef Puska by burning his clothes. READ MORE All the accused were living with Jozef Puska, his wife Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly, when the offences are alleged to have occurred in January 2022. All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges. The jury originally began its deliberations on Wednesday, but an amendment was made to the indictment on Thursday. The amendment relates to the charge that the accused knew that Jozef Puska had committed the offence of murder or some other arrestable offence. The amended indictment now reads that they knew he had committed the murder of Ashling Murphy or some other arrestable offence. In her closing speech earlier this week, prosecutor Anne-Marie Lawlor SC told the jury that Marek and Lubomir jnr knew what Jozef had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder because Jozef told Marek. Despite this, Ms Lawlor said Marek and Lubomir jnr failed to disclose vital information when they spoke to gardaí. Their wives burned Jozef's clothes to impede his arrest or prosecution, she said. The jury had previously heard from defence counsel Karl Finnegan SC, who said in his closing speech that Marek Puska was entitled to remain silent to avoid incriminating himself. Mr Finnegan said there was a real risk that the information his client had could implicate him in an offence of assisting his brother after the murder. He said the legislation regarding withholding information was introduced following the Omagh bombing to force people with knowledge of that atrocity to come forward. However, Mr Finnegan said, the legislation does not remove a person's right to remain silent if they believe that they could incriminate themselves. At the time, Mr Finnegan said, there was a real risk that his client would be arrested for assisting Puska after the murder by arranging to get him out of Tullamore or because he knew of the plan to burn Jozef's clothes. The jury of seven men and five women will continue their deliberations on Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store