Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting
The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal.
In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks.
Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire.
Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war.
The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal.
A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza.
Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March.
The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said.
Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza.
Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks.
"The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters.
"There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags."
After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops.
The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid.
The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive.
Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins.
Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas.
Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
13 minutes ago
- Canberra Times
Protest crackdown creates 'culture of fear' on campuses
The University of Melbourne ordered protesters to leave its Parkville campus in May 2024 after they occupied a building they named 'Mahmoud Hall' in honour of Mahmoud Alnaouq, a young Palestinian man killed in the Israel-Gaza war who had been set to begin his studies at the university.
Perth Now
13 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Protest crackdown creates 'culture of fear' on campuses
Staff and students describe a pervasive "culture of fear" at one of Australia's top universities following a furore over pro-Palestine encampments. University policies had led to self-censorship, restricting their ability to speak openly about pro-Palestinian movements on campus, they told an inquiry convened by Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, the National Union of Students, the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network and others. Encampments sprung up at university campuses around the world, with students calling on their institutions to cut ties with weapons manufacturers and condemn Israel's war in Gaza. The University of Melbourne ordered protesters to leave its Parkville campus in May 2024 after they occupied a building they named 'Mahmoud Hall' in honour of Mahmoud Alnaouq, a young Palestinian man killed in the Israel-Gaza war who had been set to begin his studies at the university. At the time, deputy vice-chancellor Michael Wesley said protesters had crossed a line and police had advised on how to end the indoor demonstration. Sophie Rudolph, a senior lecturer at the university, told the inquiry there was an "atmosphere of fear" among staff members. "We had a number of concerns over the actions the university has taken that (have) repressed speech and action around solidarity with Palestine, and with the universities' links with weapons manufacturers," she said. Dr Rudolph cited an example of a staff member who was not allowed to display posters supporting Palestine on their office door or wear symbols that expressed their support. "These are minor but they are part of the insidiousness of the repression and they contribute to other staff members who may not feel as confident," she said. "(They) are self-censoring and they are thinking about when they can and cannot have these conversations." Dozens attended the inquiry on Wednesday, while security guards patrolled the building where the gathering took place. A Melbourne University spokesperson said protesting on campus must be conducted peacefully and respectfully. The university said it did not support protest activity that "unreasonably disrupts activities or operations of the university" or the safety and wellbeing of staff and students. "Freedom of speech, and the right to lawful peaceful protest, are respected and supported at the University of Melbourne and are central to our values and identity," the spokesperson said. Organiser Jos Downey detailed conditions protesters faced during their encampment at Monash University, claiming intimidation, abuse and threats from campus security and opposing groups. Jasmine Duff, a leader of the Deakin University encampment, told the inquiry she had been tipped off that gardeners were instructed to disrupt the protesters' sleep, including one incident where they were woken at 2am. Ms Duff, the co-convenor of Students for Palestine, testified that universities had been "extraordinarily repressive" towards students who wished to protest. "Students have been put through serious disciplinary procedures, risking their degrees, for participating in peaceful protests against the genocide in Gaza," she said. "Universities should be havens of free speech and debate, but instead those who speak out against the brutal onslaught in Gaza are punished." The inquiry comes shortly after the federal government received recommendations from a major anti-Semitism report. The nation's special envoy against anti-Semitism, Jillian Segal, called for the defunding of universities and cultural institutions that enable or fail to prevent anti-Semitism.
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump made MAGA a promise on the Epstein files. They are holding him to it
We may have just arrived at a line MAGA seems unwilling to follow Donald Trump over. It used to be that when politicians went back on their word, the people who elected them noticed, cared, reacted and pulled support and so the decision is sometimes reversed. For the President of the United States it is unchartered territory. Routinely, when he breaks a promise, his devout MAGA base has been inclined to forgive and selectively forget. Trump was the law and order presidential candidate who was also a felon. He said the United States wouldn't get involved in foreign wars and then bombed Iran. He said he would end the war in Ukraine in one day and then he announced he'll send Kyiv more Patriot missiles, albeit this time with an invoice. But he also taught his supporters to love conspiracy theories and hate the politicians who star in them. Perhaps without the humility to wonder if he'd one day be centre stage. The Epstein files are American conspiracy theory lore and the loudest voices in the most right-wing factions of the MAGA movement want them released to the public. Donald Trump used that momentum during his campaign, promising to release all documents compiled during the investigation into Epstein. It would be easy to say MAGA heavyweights would never accept anything less, but so many of them have tied themselves in knots to justify Trump's broken promises in the past. But the past few days have suggested the Epstein files might be different. After attempting to downplay the documents, Donald Trump tried convince his base to forget about them, only to then insult those who wouldn't and eventually perform somewhat of a backflip — ordering his Attorney General Pam Bondi to release all "pertinent" grand jury testimony related to the case. It remains to be seen whether that will be enough, but the move itself suggests the president may know the answer to a question that's been playing on repeat in the minds of Washington watchers since day one: Is there anything Donald Trump could do that would shake MAGA's love for him? Perhaps the president now believes crossing the line and becoming one of the powerful figures who keep the secret of the Epstein files could well have been it. That's the thing about dabbling in conspiracies — many are indeed theories, but some are true. Or more potent still, they start with something that is true. In 2008, high-flying financier Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges in Florida of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. He was listed as a sex offender, but avoided a possible life sentence, instead serving 13 months in a work-release program. Epstein was later charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan for nearly identical allegations in 2019, but he took his own life while in federal custody as he awaited trial. Years later, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. During her trial, some names came up. For example, pilots took the witness stand and dropped very well-known names — Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump — who flew on Epstein's private jets. From the available evidence, theories have grown. And there has long been a theory that Epstein's "client list" not only existed but was being buried by the state. From opposition, that was a convenient theory to jump on for Trump. It played into the character he'd created for himself because it allowed him to style himself as the president that would get to the bottom of it . But earlier this month, Donald Trump's Department of Justice, as well as the FBI, released a memo saying their review found there was no "incriminating client list" and "no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions". This is not what MAGA expected to hear from their president and try as he might to distract them, they were not showing any signs of forgiving or forgetting. At a conservative conference held just days ago, commentators Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk discussed the memo and the actions of the Trump administration. "One of the main reasons that we voted Trump in was because we wanted real answers on real stories and we didn't want to be BS'ed anymore with a bunch of nonsense from our government that treated us like a bunch of stooges," Kelly said. "I believe Trump is still loyal to that mission and maybe the people who are behind that memo are loyal to that mission, too, but this ain't it." She said those in charge knew "the base has been led ... with a trail of breadcrumbs to believe something else for years". The pair called for all files, excluding those containing child sexual assault material, to be unsealed and released. "I think every file should be released to the public the same way as the JFK files. Let the American people decide," Kirk said. Donald Trump tried to tell his base the Epstein list didn't exist — just as he's tried to tell them what to believe in the past. But this story is well and truly in show, not tell, territory. It's not so much about what, or who, is on the list, as it about the transparency Trump promised and the base demands. Let us remember, that just one month after Donald Trump was elected for the first time, and still weeks before he would be sworn in as president, a man drove himself from North Carolina to Washington DC and stormed a pizza shop with an assault rifle. That man believed the Comet Ping Pong pizzeria on the capital's leafy Connecticut Avenue was actually a front for a child sex ring led by Hilary Clinton. This man was so adamant the former secretary of state was involved in crimes against children, he drove hours to "self-investigate" the conspiracy theory. What he found was a line up of wood-fired thin crusts and a terrified employee caught up in what is now known as "pizzagate". The idea that children are preyed upon by a ring of powerful people and that the government is involved in its cover-up has proven to be incredibly powerful in the past. It has compelled people to bear arms. It is not the sort of thing those with conspiratorial minds easily forget or can be talked out of with a few lines in a Truth Social post. When Donald Trump said the Epstein client list didn't exist, he really just added fuel to a conspiracy theory's fire. It might have been a surprise for the president who largely enjoys being believed by his base. But the political capital you can derive from conspiracy theories about the deep state becomes more of a liability when you are the person in charge and promised you'd be different. Trump has bigger fish to fry as the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal alleges further ties between him and Epstein, but his base has not been moved by his association with the sex offender in the past. Nor has it been swayed by criminal convictions or a civil jury that found Trump did sexually abuse E Jean Caroll in the 1990s. Donald Trump can be a criminal, but the reaction from MAGA over the past week tells us he cannot be seen to be protecting them, theoretical or not.
