Hong Kong democracy activist granted asylum after fleeing to Australia
Mr Hui, a former Hong Kong parliamentarian, fled the city four years ago and first arrived in Europe in December 2020. In March 2021, he became the first Hong Kong politician to be granted a special travel exemption during coronavirus restrictions to enter Australia.
In 2022, Mr Hui was convicted in Hong Kong in his absence on charges of taking part in a pro-democracy protest and was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in jail.
On Saturday, Mr Hui said he had 'received formal notification from the Australian Department of Home Affairs that I have been granted asylum in Australia'.
In an emotional post, he said: 'When people around me say 'congratulations' to me, although I politely thank them, I can't help but feel sad in my heart. How to congratulate a political refugee who misses his hometown?"
"If it weren't for political persecution, I would never have thought of living in a foreign land. Immigrants can always return to their home towns to visit relatives at any time; Exiles have no home."
Mr Hui, who is now an Adelaide-based lawyer, said he identifies more closely with Australia today than he did when he arrived four years ago, and said he 'believe[s] asylum also carries responsibility'. 'My family and I are determined to give back to Australia in every way we can—through our work, our civic engagement, and our commitment to the values of democracy and freedom,' he said.
The Australian government's 'decision reflects values of freedom, justice, and compassion that my family will never take for granted,' he added.
The 42-year-old father, a prominent critic of both the Hong Kong government and Beijing, was one of several overseas activists hit with Hong Kong police bounties of HK$1m (about £94,281) each in 2023.
While these bounties have drawn condemnation from Western governments, they are largely viewed as symbolic gestures, since most of those targeted live in countries with little prospect of extradition to Hong Kong or mainland China.
In Adelaide, where Mr Hui is based, the campaign against him has taken a more personal turn. Earlier this year, his colleagues received an anonymous letter offering $203,000 Australian dollars for information about his movements and family.
Around the same time, fake pamphlets portraying Mr Hui as a pro-Israel lawyer bent on 'waging war' against Islamic terrorism were reportedly circulated to local mosques, apparently in an effort to threaten and discredit him.
At that time, Mr Hui blamed 'the Chinese regime's long arm' for harassing him internationally.
Mr Hui concluded his post by requesting the Australian government not to forget those still suffering in Hong Kong's prisons, mentioning a number of activists including Jimmy Lai, the media mogul and British citizen who is currently on trial in the city.
'Australia must do more to rescue them and to speak up for their humanity,' Mr Hui said. 'Its stance matters internationally, and its protection of Hongkongers sets a precedent for other democracies.'
The Hong Kong government said in a statement that it was 'against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country'.
Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese visited Beijing last month as part of his administration's years-long push to improve ties with China, Australia's number one export market. The relationship suffered a number of blows during the pandemic as both countries hit each other with punitive trade tariffs.
During the visit, Xi Jinping said the China-Australia relationship 'has risen from the setbacks and turned around, bringing tangible benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's national security trial
A Hong Kong court began hearing final arguments Monday in the landmark national security trial of former pro-democracy newspaper founder Jimmy Lai, who could be sentenced to up to life in prison if he is convicted. Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical against Hong Kong's government. His high-profile case — which has already stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days — is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub. Prosecutors allege that Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing 'under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy.' On the first day of his testimony, he denied he had asked then-Vice President Mike Pence and then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests. Later, when Lai's lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the U.S. government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded. But Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. The closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Lai's health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison. The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first. After Friday's hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Lai's medical care. It said a medical examination of Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate. It is unclear when the verdict will be delivered. Lai's yearslong detention, especially in solidarity confinement, has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups. U.S. President Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Lai's release: 'One hundred percent, I will get him out.' In a Fox News radio interview released last Thursday, Trump denied saying he would '100%' save Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up. 'I've already brought it up, and I'm going to do everything I can to save him,' he said. China has accused Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs. Dozens of people waited in the rain Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Lai. Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Lai's health as he looked visibly thinner, and she would continue to pray for him. 'I wanted to let him know we are still here,' she said. When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city's civil liberties for 50 years. But critics say that promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city's stability.
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, ‘worried' productivity chief warns
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, the nation's productivity chief has warned. Danielle Wood, chair of the productivity commission, said young people are facing a future of lower wages, increased costs and the impacts of climate breakdown without major government action to tackle major economic challenges. Wood also urged the government to not put new regulations on AI, claiming existing rules on fraud, safety and discrimination are already sufficient – an argument running counter to human rights experts and unions calling for greater protections against abuse and for workers. On the eve of the Albanese government's economic reform summit, with its key focus on productivity, Wood will address the National Press Club in Canberra on Monday. She said Australia must adopt a 'growth mindset' and boost productivity to solve looming problems for future generations, saying it was 'the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time'. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too,' Wood will tell the Press Club, according to a speech notes released ahead of the address. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Wood's speech blames recent Australian governments for key challenges facing young people, pointing to 'policy choices' for house prices growing faster than incomes, and claiming politicians have 'for so long avoided the lowest cost policy choices' in dealing with climate change. Wood will say that productivity comes from better skills and training, new technologies, and policy settings making it easier to switch jobs or run a business. The commission has, in the lead up to the roundtable, released several major reports suggesting changes to tax settings, workforce issues and training, and technology among others. Amid criticism of the summit before it had even been held, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, maintained the exercise had already been a success, claiming it had helped focus Australians' attention on productivity and the economic challenges faced by the government. A YouGov survey of 1,500 people, conducted for community organisation Amplify, last week found 73% of Australians either did not know or were unsure about the summit, and only 29% were confident it would lead to meaningful change. Around two-thirds of people surveyed believed productivity increases would mean people had to work harder, with the benefits going to bosses, but the same percentage believed it would lead to more job opportunities. 'We've focused the country on the productivity challenge. We've gotten people accustomed to dealing with the economic and fiscal trade‑offs that governments deal with every day,' Chalmers said on Sunday. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Among the key issues to be discussed through the roundtable is AI. Business and tech groups have urged the government to embrace a light-touch approach to legislating it, saying over-regulation could stunt the productivity benefits associated with the new technology. The government is still debating how best to respond to AI, with a diversity of views among Labor voices. The former industry minister Ed Husic had set out plans for a standalone AI act to regulate the field, while the new minister, Tim Ayres, has spoken about regulation and legislation among plans still to be decided. It is unclear what Labor will settle on. The commission has set out proposals for how tech, including AI, could be regulated and treated in Australia, suggesting it could add up to $116bn to Australia's GDP. However, the commission was strongly criticised last week for suggesting big tech companies be allowed to mine Australian copyright content – including music, literature, art and journalism – to train their AI models, an idea advanced by the Tech Council of Australia and its chair, the Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquharson. The Tech Council on Monday released its submission to the roundtable, where it again called for 'copyright reform' including 'narrowly tailored text‑and‑data‑mining exceptions and increased access to high‑quality Australian datasets' to help train AI models. 'Australia's current copyright frameworks are restricting frontier AI innovation. Training foundation models depends on text and data mining,' the submission read. Wood's speech notes contain no repeat of the PC's controversial suggestion for a copyright carveout, but she will again call on the government to not over-regulate AI. 'While managing the risks is important, we do not think that a new and overarching regulatory framework for AI is the way to go. That's because the risks posed by AI are mainly existing risks,' she will say. 'AI may make it cheaper, easier and faster for bad actors to create harms, but most of these harms – from product safety, to discrimination, to fraud – are already covered by regulatory frameworks.'
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
The roundtable is a test of Labor's courage and vision. Will it rise to the occasion?
Remember when governments took bold steps – deregulating the dollar, introducing the GST, freeing up trade and rolling out the NDIS? Not any more, even though the need is greater than ever. Treasury explicitly advised Jim Chalmers in its post-election advice that the budget settings are 'unsustainable', that personal and company tax are too high and that 'indirect taxes' are a solution for reform. Addressing the intergenerational inequity in our tax system requires courage and vision. At this rate, we will be passing on a lower standard of living, diminished health and education outcomes, and a degraded environment to younger Australians. The most recent federal election was defined by embarrassing small-mindedness from the major parties – promises of $7 off your weekly fuel bill or a $5 tax cut. These are not serious solutions to the structural challenges we face. When you combine these small target strategies with the increasing need to show an electoral 'mandate' before tackling any policy issue, how will we ever address the big challenges? Sign up: AU Breaking News email There are two schools of thought about how reform happens: one argues that it requires a strong majority government; the other believes it will take a minority government pushed by a principled crossbench. The fact that overall support for the major parties fell again with 33.6% of voters supporting community independent or minor party candidates demonstrates increasing frustration at the major parties' unwillingness to confront Australia's long-term challenges. The election of independents to the crossbench was driven by two decades of gridlock on economic reform, coupled with a lack of a coherent approach to climate change mitigation. During the 2022 election campaign and immediately after, I spoke of the urgent need for broad tax reform. In the last parliament, I raised this issue in the house 10 times. Allegra Spender spoke about it 21 times. The major parties avoided the topic entirely. I was heartened by the treasurer's decision to expand the agenda for the economic reform roundtable to include tax reform. Could this be the moment when the government finally confronts the structural challenges in our budget and the demographic shifts ahead? It was refreshing to hear the treasurer push back against the 'rule in, rule out' game that has stifled meaningful debate for years. But unfortunately, the prime minister is managing our expectations down to tinkering. The case for tax reform is compelling and GST provides an opportunity. Our current tax system disproportionately burdens younger Australians. Bracket creep – the stealthy tax increase on workers – is our only plan for addressing the deficit. We need to explore alternatives with productivity in mind. The economist Chris Murphy has shown that, per extra dollar of revenue raised, the GST causes the least economic harm, followed by personal income tax, and then company tax. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Yet our GST is among the narrowest and lowest in the OECD. It applies to just 7.5% of the economy, compared to an OECD average of over 11%, and its rate is half the OECD average. Broadening the base and increasing the rate could allow us to shift the tax burden from those who work to those who spend. In anticipation of the roundtable, the economist Richard Holden and I revisited our 2023 work and asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to model a 'progressive GST' – a way to relieve pressure on personal income tax while protecting low and middle-income earners. Under our model, the GST rate would increase to 15% and exemptions would be removed. To ensure equity, every Australian adult would receive a $3,300 annual payment, effectively making the first $22,000 of spending GST-free. PBO modelling shows that this could leave the bottom 60% of income earners better off, even before accounting for the personal income tax cuts enabled by the additional $24bn in revenue. This is the test. The Labor government has a 19-seat majority. If a comfortable margin is truly a prerequisite for reform, now is the time to act. If we see no action now and the major parties decide an electoral mandate is required, they are now on notice. The voters are on to you. You have three years to build community support for a bold and viable plan to fix our tax system. Any party that wants to be taken seriously as a contender for government in 2028 must come to the election with a tax plan that is fair, future-focused, and fit for the demographic changes ahead. The small target game is over. Australians are ready for courageous action to secure a prosperous future for our children. Kate Chaney is the independent member for Curtin
