logo
France has banned smoking in parks, beaches and bus stops — but not restaurant patios

France has banned smoking in parks, beaches and bus stops — but not restaurant patios

CBC02-07-2025
Depending on who you ask, France's decision to exclude restaurant patios and terraces from its outdoor smoking ban is either a gross oversight, or a necessary preservation of French culture and liberty.
On Saturday, the country enacted a new ban on outdoor smoking at parks, sports venues, beaches, bus stops and outside schools, with fines of between 90 and 135 euros ($144 to $216 Cdn).
The government aims to curb cigarette use anywhere children gather in public, in line with President Emmanuel Macron's goal of ushering in the country's first "tobacco-free generation" by 2032.
Anti-smoking advocates welcomed the new rules, but derided the exclusion of restaurant and cafe patios and terraces, places they say are popular with families.
"These places regularly expose children to second-hand smoke and contribute precisely to the normalization of tobacco consumption in public spaces," the National Committee Against Smoking said in a statement.
But those who work in the food and drinks industry have vowed to do everything they can to keep the ban from reaching their outdoor tables.
"We really want to protect these last spaces of liberty, of freedom, where people — I mean smokers and non-smokers — are able to enjoy together a friendly and free atmosphere with a lot of pleasure," Franck Trouet, executive director of hospitality association Hotels and Restaurants of France, told As It Happens host Nil Köksal.
"It is one of the last spaces in France where you can have a cohabitation between smokers and non-smokers, and people are asking for that."
The goal is 'denormalization'
Philippe Bergerot, president of the French League Against Cancer, says the new restrictions are designed to promote the "denormalization" of smoking.
That's a huge challenge in a country where smoking is baked into the culture, romanticized in the media and seen to many as a symbol of liberty.
"In people's minds, smoking is normal," Bergerot said. "In France, we still have this mindset of saying, 'This is a law that restricts freedom.'"
But Health Minister Catherine Vautrin says the freedom to smoke "ends where children's right to breathe fresh air begins."
While second-hand smoke in enclosed spaces poses a greater risk, a number of studies have linked second-hand smoke in outdoor spaces to increased nicotine exposure and other negative health effects.
"Where there are children, tobacco must disappear," Vautrin told Ouest-France ahead of the ban.
Smoking has been declining in France steadily over the last decade, according to government data.
It's been illegal to smoke inside restaurants, bars and public buildings since a series of bans in 2007 and 2008, and taxes on cigarettes have risen sharply over the years.
But more than 30 per cent of French adults still smoke cigarettes, most of them daily. That's one of the higher rates in Europe and globally.
The Health Ministry says more than 200 people in France die each day of tobacco-related illness, adding up to 75,000 deaths a year.
The ministry says it's particularly concerned that tobacco remains popular among young people, citing public health statistics showing that 15 per cent of 17-year-olds smoke.
Parisians divided
French residents, meanwhile, remain divided.
Parisian Natacha Uzan said she welcomed the end of smoking in restaurants, but she believes the new rules have gone too far.
"Now outside, in parks, I find it becoming a bit repressive," she said.
Parisian Anabelle Cermell, on the other hand, welcomed the rules, which she says will protect her three-year-old son.
"I tell myself, oh, it's really not ideal for him, but there's not much I can do about it, or I would have to ... not take the bus, not go to parks," she said.
Trouet worries that banning cigarettes in parks and beaches is just the first step, and that terraces and patios will be targeted next.
If that happens, he says customers who smoke will be forced onto the streets, causing a nuisance for passersby and littering the city.
Still, he acknowledged that some non-smoking customers are irritated by the second-hand smoke on patios and terraces.
"I see that sometimes, and I always answer the same thing: It belongs to the owner of the cafe or the restaurant to decide if he wants to ban smoking on his terrace. He has the right," Trouet said. "It is a question of freedom, of liberty, as we say in France."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boil water order issued for Moncton neighbourhood
Boil water order issued for Moncton neighbourhood

CTV News

time8 hours ago

  • CTV News

Boil water order issued for Moncton neighbourhood

A boil water advisory is in effect for part of Moncton. An undated photo of a running water faucet. (File photo/CTV News) A boil water order has been issued for a neighbourhood in Moncton. Those living in Elmwood Drive, north of the Trans-Canada highway. This includes residents and businesses along Granite Drive, Royal Oaks Subdivision, and civic addresses including and above 759 Elmwood Drive are being told to boil their water for at least one minute before consuming. According to a news release from the City of Moncton, the order was issued as a result of high water flows from ongoing fire suppression efforts in the area that has resulted in high turbidity levels. 'Contaminated water may cause illness in humans, including diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symptoms,' states the release. The city notes residents may experience discoloured water or air in their plumbing systems and residents who completely lose water pressure should turn off the circuit breaker for their hot water heaters to prevent damage to the heating elements. The city says they are evaluating all available information and is currently working with the Department of Health. The release states testing will continue over the next 72 hours and an advisory will be issued when the boil water advisory is rescinded. For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.

Alberta 811 health line hits milestone in redirecting non-urgent calls
Alberta 811 health line hits milestone in redirecting non-urgent calls

CBC

time18 hours ago

  • CBC

Alberta 811 health line hits milestone in redirecting non-urgent calls

Public health officials are celebrating a milestone for a provincewide health hotline. Two years ago, Alberta Health Services created a program that lets 911 operators offload non-urgent calls to Health Link 811, a separate health line that lets people speak with a registered nurse and other health-care providers. AHS reported on Wednesday that the program had now redirected more than 50,000 calls. " It's all about helping to free up those ambulances," said Edith Friesen, a manager with Health Link. She said it's been a priority to make sure people receive the right kind of response, in order to properly manage resources. According to AHS, the program is meant to help take pressure off of emergency responders and helps people with health issues who aren't sure what to do. When the program started, AHS estimated that up to 20 per cent of 911 calls didn't require an ambulance. On top of nurses, Friesen says Health Link is also equipped with mental health professionals, social workers, and teams that deal with dementia, rehab and Indigenous health. The 50,000 milestone comes slower than initially thought. When the program launched in February 2023, the provincial health provider said the program would transfer over 40,000 calls each year. While it took longer to reach the 50,000 milestone, Friesen said the program has been making a difference in saving up ambulances for life-threatening calls. "It really has been successful," Friesen said. "In terms of we know right now that over 50,000 ambulances were used for life-threatening emergencies and not for situations where it wasn't."

Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital
Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital

CBC

timea day ago

  • CBC

Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital

As animal-loving Londoners express "horror" at a local hospital's use of dogs in scientific studies, medical professionals say there are ethical ways to reduce harm and death in animal-based research. A story published Wednesday by the Investigative Journalism Bureau, in partnership with Postmedia, found that dogs are being used in a heart study at St. Joseph's Health Care's Lawson Research Institute. Researchers are secretly inducing three-hour heart attacks in dogs and puppies, the investigative report said, before euthanizing them and removing their hearts for further study. The hospital has kept the research under wraps, wheeling in the animals in blanket-covered crates and playing loud music to drown out the barking, according to the report. "I was absolutely horrified and I was really, really angry," said longtime Londoner Orreanna Douglas. "The sting of this shock is basically like the stun these poor, suffering dogs are getting. I'm livid that this is going on here. Douglas, whose children were born at St. Joseph's and who has been getting physiotherapy at the hospital for the last four months, said she cancelled her latest appointment at the hospital due to her frustrations. "I can't go back now, nor will I until the situation is rectified," she said. St. Joseph's has refused interview requests. In a statement to CBC News, officials confirmed that dogs, rodents, fruit flies and other large mammals are used in research. Other Londoners have taken to social media to express their outrage and non-profit organization Animal Justice Canada is planning a Saturday vigil for the dogs outside of the hospital. Meanwhile, medical experts have differing opinions on the use of animals in scientific study and the ethics that surround the practice. "[Animals] are needed because they're complex systems," said Pierre Verreault, the executive director of the Canadian Council of Animal Care (CCAC), which develops standards for the ethical use and care of animals in science. Different types of animals are used to try new medical treatments, ensure medical products are safe to sell, and teach veterinarians different procedures, Verreault said, adding that dogs are often used for regulatory testing purposes. Research projects must be approved by a panel before being granted funding, Verreault said, and part of that includes presenting a protocol to an animal care committee which conducts an ethical review. The core of animal research ethics is referred to as the Three Rs: Replacement, reduction and refinement. "Is there an alternative method? If yes, you shouldn't use an animal. Reduction is, 'Do you need to use that amount of animals to conduct research?" Verreault said. The principle, refinement, aims to minimize pain and distress by using pain medication if possible and giving the animal comfort. St. Joseph's officials have been on the defensive since the report came out. In a note sent to staff and volunteers on Thursday, obtained by CBC News, officials said they "acknowledge how difficult this story is" and that it "evokes strong feelings," but that hospital is "committed to ethical research at every stage of the discovery and innovation process." "The care, treatment and welfare of animals involved in Lawson research is taken extremely seriously and every possible step is taken to ensure their comfort and minimize suffering," the note to staff said. However, other experts say there are no ethical methods to animal testing. "There are [ethics] that are written on paper and there are ones that are actually practiced in a laboratory," said Charu Chandrasekera, executive director of the Canadian Centre for Alternatives to Animal Methods, who previously worked in a lab that studied heart failure using animals. "The three R's have become rather unjustified. They've become a box-ticking formality in a system more focused on paperwork than real accountability," she said. "Humans are not 60 kilogram mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, cats, dogs or monkeys. We are not equivalent biologically…The differences are immutable," she said, adding that scientific facilities should look at alternatives to animal testing now that technology has developed. Alternatives exist, experts say "Justifying the use of animals because it has worked in the past at a time when new technologies weren't available is like praising the telegraph in the age of Zoom," Chandrasekera said. In a statement, St. Joseph's said the purpose of its dog research is to look at post-heart attack injury and healing, which cannot be done using other methods. "These techniques are essential for providing clinical teams with tools that permit proper diagnosis and treatment for heart attacks and heart failure, one of the leading causes of death in Canada," the statement said. Both experts say there are ways to reduce or rid animal testing in a scientific setting, and the technology is developing daily. Chandrasekera say there is a "toolbox" of alternatives, but recommends scientists who want to advance their research refer to already-published human studies that contain MRI and PET images. Verreault's suggestions for testing include developing cells to do research experiments, simulating experiments on chips, or reusing tissue from animals who were used in previous experiments. "Sometimes it can completely replace the animals in certain types of research, but sometimes it may only replace a certain part of it because an animal is like a human being. It's a very complex system that's still hard to replace," Verreault said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store