logo
RAF CEO intends to appeal against suspension ruling in court battle

RAF CEO intends to appeal against suspension ruling in court battle

IOL News04-07-2025
Collins Letsoalo, suspended RAF CEO will appeal the judgment not lifting his suspension
Image: File
Suspended Road Accident Fund (RAF) chief executive Collins Letsoalo has hit back at the judge who refused to lift his suspension, citing nearly 40 points in which he claimed the judge had erred in his judgment.
Letsoalo has applied for leave to appeal against last month's judgment in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria.
In a scathing judgment, Judge Nasious Moshoanathe said Letsoalo's application was deemed vexatious. He found Letsoalo's suspension effected by the RAF Board earlier this month to be lawful, rational, and reasonable.
While the judge had some harsh words regarding Letsoalo's earlier urgent application, the suspended CEO will again have to face the judge in court, as Judge Moshoanathe will have to decide on whether to grant him leave to appeal or not.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
In slapping Letsoalo with the legal costs, the judge last month said: 'The present litigation is aimed at protecting pecuniary interests as opposed to protecting a constitutional right. This court takes the view that the present application is frivolous and vexatious. Mr Letsoalo, for very selfish reasons, it seems, disavowed adequate and substantial remedies available to him in terms of the LRA (Labour Relations Act).'
In his leave to appeal application, Letsoalo remarked that the judge was biased from the start, and Letsoalo had the reasonable apprehension that the judge was assisting the respondents, being the RAF and its board.
He said most of the issues the court had decided upon in its judgment were raised by the court itself and not by the respondents.
In his notice for leave to appeal, Letsoalo made an issue of the fact that the court did not find that there was no resolution by the RAF Board to appoint the firm of attorneys which had represented them in court. His counsel during legal arguments in the main application said the matter should have proceeded on an unopposed basis.
In one of his many points where he felt the court had erred in turning down his application, Letsoalo said the judge chose to ignore his entire version as to why his suspension was unreasonable and irrational.
He also objected to the judge slapping him with the legal costs and for not accepting the argument made by his counsel that this was a constitutional matter, thus he should not face the financial consequences of losing the legal battle.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka placed on suspension over R800m oxygen tender
IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka placed on suspension over R800m oxygen tender

TimesLIVE

time3 days ago

  • TimesLIVE

IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka placed on suspension over R800m oxygen tender

The board of trustees of the Independent Development Trust (IDT) has placed its CEO Tebogo Malaka on precautionary suspension with immediate effect. The decision on Friday follows the board's receipt and consideration of a final forensic report this week relating to procurement irregularities in the R800m pressure swing adsorption (PSA) oxygen plant tender. The investigation, ordered by public works and infrastructure minister Dean Macpherson, recommended disciplinary action against Malaka, general manager for supply chain management Dr Molebedi Sisi and other officials. The IDT said its precautionary suspension was aligned with internal policies and the Labour Relations Act and was instituted to allow for an independent and unhindered investigation into the serious matters raised. 'The board emphasises this is not a disciplinary sanction. Ms Malaka remains an employee of the organisation and has not been found guilty of any misconduct.' To ensure continuity and organisational stability, the board asked Macpherson to second a senior official to serve as acting CEO. The minister seconded Carmen-Joy Abrahams to the role with immediate effect.

Tshwane's cleansing levy faces legal challenge as city plans to appeal court ruling
Tshwane's cleansing levy faces legal challenge as city plans to appeal court ruling

IOL News

time4 days ago

  • IOL News

Tshwane's cleansing levy faces legal challenge as city plans to appeal court ruling

The City of Tshwane will appeal the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, ruling setting aside its R194 monthly cleansing levy. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers The City of Tshwane will appeal the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, judgment declaring the R194 monthly cleansing levy unlawful, invalid, and of no force and effect, as well as setting it aside. Acting Judge George Avvakoumides on Thursday said the declaration of unlawfulness and setting aside of the cleansing levy included relevant portions applicable in various council documents. In the matter brought by lobby group AfriForum, the court also prohibited the municipality from having the by-law published and compelled it to take all reasonable measures to ensure that it would not be published. "To the extent that the publication has taken place, the city is ordered to take immediate steps to retract the publication by way of a further publication in which the previous publication, City of Tshwane metropolitan municipality waste management by-law, is forthwith withdrawn," reads the judgment. Acting Judge Avvakoumides also ruled that in the event the city has activated its billing systems to render accounts to residents and businesses with a cleansing levy, and take all reasonable measures and steps to ensure that residents and businesses are not billed for the cleansing levy. "To the extent that the city has already proceeded with the billing systems and has rendered accounts to residents and businesses with the cleansing levy, the city is ordered to forthwith take all reasonable steps and measures that the accounts of the affected residents and businesses who have been billed for a cleansing levy are credited with an amount equal to the cleansing levy during the following billing cycle," the acting judge ordered. City of Tshwane Environment and Agriculture Management MMC Obakeng Ramabodu said the municipality noted the judgment of its cleansing levy of R194 per month for customers using private refuse collection and will take the court's decision on appeal in pursuit of a safe and clean city for all. "The City of Tshwane will appeal this judgment as we remain steadfast in our belief that a cleansing levy aimed at improving the maintenance of our landfills is a step in the right direction, and necessary to ensure a safe and clean city for all," said Ramabodu. He added: "Much has been made of this cleansing levy, and it must be noted that a cleansing levy is not unique to the City of Tshwane. "A cleansing levy was introduced in Tshwane between 2016 and 2021 by the erstwhile government, which now claims to take exception to it." According to Ramabodu, this is disingenuous and does not put the environmental health and cleanliness of the city at the centre of discussions. AfriForum's district coordinator for Greater Pretoria South, Arno Roodt, said the implementation of the levy was nothing more than a fundraising ploy aimed at covering up years of poor planning and mismanagement.

Cleansing levy: Court rules against the charge
Cleansing levy: Court rules against the charge

The Citizen

time4 days ago

  • The Citizen

Cleansing levy: Court rules against the charge

The metro's attempt to enforce a cleansing levy on residents and businesses has been declared unlawful and invalid, and has been set aside by the Gauteng High Court. The judgment, made on July 31, follows an urgent court application launched by civil organisation AfriForum. AfriForum argued that the metro failed to follow due process when introducing the R194.37 monthly levy, including a failure to consider public input and non-compliance with legal requirements. During court proceedings, the civil organisation asked the court not only to scrap the levy but to prohibit the metro from publishing the by-law supporting it, and to reverse all billing to date. The court ruled in AfriForum's favour, stating that the metro's actions fell short of its legal obligations and that any attempt to recover funds through the levy must cease immediately. It ruled that any residents or businesses already billed must be credited in the next billing cycle. 'This decision followed a special motion hearing held on July 24, allocated by the Acting Judge President, following an urgent request for judicial case management,' the ruling read. AfriForum contended that the cleansing levy, imposed as of July 1 for the 2025/26 financial year, was unlawful, irrational, and effectively amounted to an illegal tax. It argued that many affected residents and businesses do not receive municipal waste collection services and have, for years, had to arrange and pay for private disposal methods. 'In its defence, the metro relied on a 2016 Waste Management By-law and Section 75A of the Municipal Systems Act, but the court found this argument lacking in substance,' the court ruling stated. 'The by-law was never promulgated and, therefore, had no legal force.' AfriForum further argued that the metro failed to publish or follow the required steps when determining the levy, failed to consider submissions from the public, and could not identify the residents or businesses that receive the services the levy was intended to fund. The metro's blanket justification that 'many ratepayers' benefit was dismissed by the court as 'vague and unsupported'. ALSO READ: Complex residents cry foul over new waste levy charges Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store