
Thai rice farmers brace for impact of US tariffs: ‘We won't survive'
Thai farmer Daeng Donsingha was already worried for her family of nine when rice prices crashed this year as the world's second-largest exporter of the staple faced a resumption of Indian exports.
Advertisement
Now, she is also worried about tariffs unleashed by US President Donald Trump that could slash demand for Thai rice in the nation's most valuable foreign market and create turmoil in an export industry worth billions of dollars.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
36 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Lutnick says US-China trade talks could spill into a third day
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said trade talks with China, under way in London since Monday, may spill into a third day. Advertisement 'We're working on all sorts of trade issues, and I think the talks are going really, really well,' he told reporters gathered outside Lancaster House, the UK government mansion where the talks are taking place. 'We're … spending time and effort and energy. Everybody's got their head down, working closely through it,' he said close to 8pm local time. 'I hope they end this evening, but if need be, we'll be here tomorrow.' The talks are the latest attempt to defuse tensions between the world's two largest economies over a slew of trade and technology issues, which remain at boiling point despite the two sides agreeing a temporary deal to scale back tariffs on each other's goods last month. The meeting in London comes just days after a phone call between President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump, during which the two leaders agreed to push forward with negotiations aimed at resolving their ongoing economic disputes. Advertisement Lutnick, US Treasury Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer also attended what was described as 'the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism'.


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hegseth grilled over Trump's LA troop deployment, estimated to cost US$134 million
UD Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed back against Democrats' criticism of the decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles, telling Congress that the Trump administration wants to protect immigration agents and keep demonstrations there from getting out of control. Advertisement Asked by congresswoman Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, how much the deployment would cost, Hegseth criticised Governor Tim Walz's handling of protests that erupted after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis 2020. US President Donald Trump recognises 'a situation like that, improperly handled by a governor like it was by Governor Walz, if it gets out of control – it's a bad situation for the citizens of any location', Hegseth said. He said Immigration and Customs Enforcement 'has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country, especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration'. Hegseth's comments during the hearing, which at times turned combative, echoed Trump's remarks on Monday in which he said he 'watched Minneapolis burn'. Officials also gave more detail on the scope of the deployment and the role the Marines will play. Advertisement Hegesth said the deployment would last 60 days, as detailed in a presidential memorandum over the weekend.


South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
In the Indo-Pacific, ‘America first' looks like American unpredictability
Within around 10 days in late May, three top US leaders – US President Donald Trump , US Vice-President J.D. Vance and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – delivered speeches that together outlined the administration's evolving foreign policy vision. Taken separately, each speech reaffirmed the US' commitment to strength and strategic deterrence. Yet when considered as a whole, they exposed a deep tension at the heart of America's global posture – especially in the Indo-Pacific . For America's allies and partners in the region, these mixed messages raise questions about reliability, strategic clarity and long-term alignment. At West Point on May 24, Trump reiterated his 'America first' doctrine, denouncing foreign entanglements and 'absurd ideological experiments'. He asserted that under his leadership, the military will refocus on core missions: 'crushing America's adversaries, killing America's enemies, and defending our great American flag'. This was paired with an aggressive military posture. Trump emphasised overwhelming strength, boasting of new planes, tanks, drones and the creation of a Golden Dome missile defence shield . For regional allies, this blend of retrenchment and military escalation signals a shift from global stewardship to transactional power projection. A day earlier at the US Naval Academy, Vance presented similar realist rhetoric to Trump's, adding a bureaucratic lens. He said past leaders abandoned hard power for soft power and praised the administration's use of force in Yemen as a model of clarity and decisiveness. The US vice-president also spoke of great-power competition, especially with China, and advocated maintaining a technological edge through investment in hypersonics, drones and battlefield innovation. This fusion of restraint and readiness further muddies the message: Is America stepping back from global policing or simply recalibrating how it asserts dominance?