The Iran, Israel and U.S. conflict, explained
Ceasefire between countries is fragile but holding
⭐️HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW⭐️
Israel attacked nuclear facilities in Iran with missiles on June 13.
Iran has retaliated with its own strikes, and people on both sides have been killed.
On June 21, the United States joined the fighting and bombed a nuclear facility in Iran.
Israel and the U.S. said they attacked because Iran is close to building nuclear weapons, which Iran denies.
A ceasefire deal reached on June 23 is shaky but appears to be holding.
Read on to find out why experts are concerned. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
For almost two weeks, Israel and Iran — two countries in the Middle East — have been at war.
It started when Israel said it fired missiles into Iran on June 13 to destroy its nuclear facilities.
These are places where a metal called uranium is enriched and turned into a concentrated energy source that could be used to create nuclear weapons, the world's most powerful bombs.
Israel said it attacked out of fear that Iran would create those weapons.
Iran denies this, saying their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, like generating power.
On June 21, the U.S. got involved by bombing three nuclear sites in Iran. Iran later fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar.
A few days later the three countries agreed to a ceasefire, which appears to be holding for now.
The conflict in the Middle East as of November 2024
What's a nuclear weapon?
You may be wondering— what exactly is a nuclear weapon? Where did they come from, who has them, and why are they such a threat?
Read this explainer on nuclear weapons — it may help you better understand the rest of this article and how we got here.
Why did Israel attack Iran?
Iran's leadership has long called for the destruction of Israel.
There's been tension between Iran and Israel for many years, and they've exchanged fire as recently as 2024, though that escalation didn't last long.
But on June 13, it once again came to a head.
Israel claimed that Iran was very close to making nuclear weapons which could be used against Israel.
Israel is widely believed to have its own nuclear weapons, but has denied this.
'In recent months, Iran has taken steps it has never taken before to weaponize this enriched uranium,' said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the initial attack.
But was their attack justified?
Some have criticized Israel for acting without enough proof.
'There was no evidence that Iran was about to attack Israel,' Mira Sucharov, professor of political science at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, told CBC Kids News.
A recent report from the International Atomic Energy Agency — which monitors nuclear programs around the globe — concluded that Iran likely does not currently have nuclear weapons.
But they also concluded Iran is likely hiding parts of its nuclear program from inspectors.
They also said Iran isn't following all of the rules that many countries around the world have agreed to that prevent the development of more nuclear weapons.
Iranian missiles are seen over Israel on June 13. At least 28 Israelis have been killed and more than a thousand wounded, according to Israel's Health Ministry.
Still, Sucharov said Israel may have broken international laws that require a country to provide clear evidence of a threat before attacking another country.
Others think it was justified regardless.
'Some think Israel's attack was ethical, that they are protecting themselves and protecting the world from a future Iranian nuclear threat,' said Sucharov.
Why did the U.S. get involved?
Some of Iran's nuclear facilities were buried deep underground, and Israel didn't have the weapons to destroy them.
But the U.S. — their close ally — has those weapons. The U.S. has expressed worry about Iran obtaining nuclear weapons for years.
'The U.S. has said for 20 years they could possibly bomb Iran, but no president has ever done so. Here, Trump saw an opportunity,' said Christian Leuprecht, a military expert and professor of political science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario.
U.S. President Donald Trump said U.S. strikes were necessary to destroy Iran's progress in building a nuclear weapon. (Image credit:)
Leuprecht said that opportunity presented itself after Israel weakened Iran over the past year through, among other factors, dismantling some of Iran's key allys.
Trump has been negotiating with Iran this year to sign a deal that would limit Iran's nuclear programs in exchange for the U.S. lifting sanctions.
Sanctions are penalties that can cost a country lots of money and have weakened Iran's economy.
But those negotiations haven't been successful.
Leuprecht said Trump may have bombed Iran's nuclear facilities to force them back to negotiations, this time with less leverage.
That said, Iran has insisted it will not give up its nuclear program.
Despite U.S. strikes hitting three Iranian nuclear sites, it's not clear how much their overall nuclear program has been set back.
What's happening now?
On Monday, Iran launched attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle Eastern countries of Qatar and Iraq.
Early Tuesday morning, Trump announced that the U.S. and Israel had reached a ceasefire deal with Iran.
Later that day however, Israel and Iran accused one another of breaking the ceasefire through missile strikes.
On Wednesday, the ceasefire appeared to be holding and Trump said that U.S. and Iranian officials would reenter talks next week.
Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
With files from The Associated Press and Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Iranian officials are banned from Canada — but this former regime member landed in April
Mahdi Nasiri let the world know he was on his way to Canada in April. The former high-profile Iranian official posted a series of farewell photos — including a goodbye hug — on Instagram for his more than 250,000 followers and anyone else to see. He has been in Canada ever since. But now, according to a source, his name has been reported to the RCMP. And Canadian security authorities are facing calls from the public to investigate why he was allowed to enter in the first place — and if he should be kicked out. "To see that he can easily come to Canada and in fact celebrate it, and post pictures from the airport saying 'I've arrived,' it sets off alarm bells among a lot of Iranians," said lawyer and human rights activist Kaveh Shahrooz. Nasiri has been described as an important hardliner in Iran during the 2000s. He didn't deny his past roles to CBC News, but also said he's been critical of Iran's regime for the past six years and now supports the country's liberal opposition leader. The Trudeau government promised in 2022 to crack down on current and former senior Iranian regime officials living in Canada after mounting public pressure and safety concerns. Iranian Canadians had reported harassment, intimidation and surveillance they believed was tied to Tehran. Canada's spy agency verified death threats from Iran were real. And an explosive U.S. indictment revealed an Iranian plot to kidnap Canadians. WATCH | Fighting to keep the Iranian regime out: 'They're terrorists': Fighting to keep the Iran regime out of Canada 2 years ago Duration 8:00 Canadians of Iranian descent are worried members and affiliates of the Islamic Republic of Iran may continue to come to Canada as pressure mounts on the regime. They say Canadian officials aren't acting fast enough to stop it, and some are taking matters into their own hands. In response, the government designated the leadership of Iran's government, security and intelligence agencies as inadmissible to Canada in 2022 for allegedly engaging in terrorism and systemic and gross human rights violations. That designation expanded last year to ban anyone from Canada who served as a senior official with Iran's government anytime since June 2003. But Nasiri is the latest case raising questions about how effective Canada's crackdown is. So far, only one senior Iranian official has been removed from the country. Nasiri's role in the 2000s Nasiri is well known for his role as managing director of the most conservative Iranian newspaper, Kayhan, in the 1990s — funded by Iran's supreme leader. "He was very prominent in state-owned media, which is often the platform that the regime itself used to go after dissidents, to create charges against people that are outspoken," said Shahrooz, who is critical of the regime. Nasiri was then appointed to a key role as political deputy of the policymaking council of Friday imams across the country from 2001 to 2005. "The Friday prayers are the main platform that Iran delivers its talking points and propaganda to supporters, and is a job entrusted to people closely tied to the regime," Shahrooz said. "The fact that he had that role indicates to me that he was part and parcel of this regime." Nasiri went on to be appointed a senior representative of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's office in the United Arab Emirates until 2009, according to Iranian media reports. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) says, broadly, senior Iranian officials who served from 2003 onward are inadmissible to Canada. But it won't say if it's looking into Nasiri's case. Nasiri defended himself when contacted by CBC News for comment. "I have repeatedly explained my professional background in media interviews and have openly criticized that period," Nasiri said in a written statement. "There is nothing hidden in my past." "Moreover, I have never held any military, security or intelligence position. My role at Kayhan newspaper was journalistic and my position within the organization of Friday imams was religious and devotional." Nasiri wouldn't confirm if his last job with Iran's government was in the UAE when asked by CBC News. Visitor visa issued in 2023 Nasiri said it only took him a few days in 2023 — before the ban was expanded — to get a visitor's visa attached to his passport from the Canadian consulate in Istanbul. His son is a Canadian citizen who invited him and his mother to visit, he said. A visitor visa can be valid for up to 10 years. When asked if he disclosed his time with Iran's government to Canadian officials, Nasiri said he didn't have to. "I was asked only about my activities over the past 10 years, during which I have held no government positions," Nasiri said. CBC News asked Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada why it allegedly didn't ask Nasiri about his earlier work experience. The department said it can't comment on specific cases, but said visa applicants are "carefully assessed." "Senior officials subject to the regime designation could have their visa cancelled, lose their temporary or permanent residence status and be removed from Canada," said IRCC spokesperson Jeffrey MacDonald. Kelly Sundberg, a criminology professor at Mount Royal University who specializes in border security, says it's not surprising Nasiri wasn't asked more questions. He says Canada's immigration screening and enforcement is "at a point of crisis." Speaking broadly about the system, Sundberg said "the CBSA and federal departments have been well aware of this neglect and have often intentionally turned a blind eye." Nasiri said he'd "prefer not to answer" if he's facing an immigration hearing, but confirmed he's not aware of any CBSA investigation into his visa. Calls to investigate Nasiri told CBC News he understands Iranian Canadians are concerned about current and former regime officials in Canada. He said "they are justified in their concerns" and called the Islamic Republic of Iran "a dictatorial and repressive regime." "However, I have been an active critic and, indeed, an opponent of the Islamic Republic for the past six years," Nasiri said in his statement to CBC News. He said he has a "liberal stance" now and supports Iranian opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, a proponent of liberal democracy and member of the dynasty that ruled the country before the 1979 revolution. Nasiri has an active YouTube page where he frequently posts his interviews critical of the regime, including on the BBC. WATCH | H ow Iran threatens people in Canada: Exposing how Iran tracks and threatens people in Canada 3 years ago Duration 7:44 CSIS recently confirmed there are multiple 'credible' death threats from Iran aimed at people in Canada. CBC News's chief correspondent Adrienne Arsenault meets with several Iranians who describe their experiences of being monitored and intimidated on Canadian soil. Iranian analyst and journalist Babak Taghvaee says he wants Canadian security officials to look into Nasiri's case because of what he calls "red flags." Taghvaee published an article with American think-tank the Middle East Forum about how Iran's regime officials allegedly rebrand themselves as opponents of the regime to stay in Canada — and named Nasiri as an example. He said Nasiri was once one of the "most important hardliners" in Iran. Taghvaee says his role as an editor at Kayhan suggests he could have had the highest levels of clearance from Iranian intelligence and was co-operating or even collaborating with them. He also said his role with Friday prayer imams was important because they are known to receive directives from the regime. "They receive orders to speak about the specific topics during Friday prayers," he said. "About politics, about military security and economies and anything related to what the regime wants for the purpose of psychological warfare and propaganda." Taghvaee says former Iranian regime members who are trying to settle in Western countries commonly criticize the regime and side with opposition parties to create evidence for a future refugee or asylum case. "Sometimes these individuals are afraid to get deported or arrested. They go into survival mode," said Taghvaee, who has been critical of the regime. Nasiri says he has not applied for refugee status and hopes to return to Iran soon, but didn't say when. Regardless of his stance publicly, Vancouver lawyer Mojdeh Shahriari points out that existing Canadian law should prevent senior Iranian officials like Nasiri from ever entering the country. "Whether or not he has genuinely changed is not for me to judge, and doesn't really concern the law," said Shahriari. 'It's almost laughable' CBSA says since 2022, more than 130 suspected Iranian regime officials' visas were cancelled, 20 people were reported inadmissible and three cases have made it through immigration hearings resulting in deportation letters. "It's almost laughable, unfortunately," said Shahriari. Shahriari is a former member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and now runs a grassroots group she says is investigating more than 375 suspected Iranian regime members, their families and businesses on Canadian soil. She says the CBSA numbers are "miniscule" compared to the evidence Shahriari passed on to Canadian authorities about nearly 100 suspected Iranian officials already in Canada. She won't say if Nasiri is one of them, citing confidentiality.
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Israel-Iran war highlights Asia's dependence on Middle East oil, and slow progress on clean energy
HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Asia's dependence on Middle East oil and gas — and its relatively slow shift to clean energy — make it vulnerable to disruptions in shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic weakness highlighted by the war between Israel and Iran. Iran sits on the strait, which handles about 20% of shipments of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas, or LNG. Four countries — China, India, Japan and South Korea — account for 75% of those imports. Japan and South Korea face the highest risk, according to analysis by the research group Zero Carbon Analytics, followed by India and China. All have been slow to scale up use of renewable energy. In 2023, renewables made up just 9% of South Korea's power mix — well below the 33% average among other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, or OECD. In the same year, Japan relied more heavily on fossil fuels than any other country in the Group of Seven, or G7. A truce in the 12-day Israel-Iran war appeared to be holding, reducing the potential for trouble for now. But experts say the only way to counter lingering uncertainty is to scale back reliance on imported fossil fuels and accelerate Asia's shift to clean, domestic energy sources. 'These are very real risks that countries should be alive to — and should be thinking about in terms of their energy and economic security,' said Murray Worthy, a research analyst at Zero Carbon Analytics. Japan and South Korea are vulnerable China and India are the biggest buyers of oil and LNG passing through the potential chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz, but Japan and South Korea are more vulnerable. Japan depends on imported fossil fuels for 87% of its total energy use and South Korea imports 81%. China relies on only 20% and India 35%, according to Ember, an independent global energy think tank that promotes clean energy. 'When you bring that together — the share of energy coming through the strait and how much oil and gas they rely on — that's where you see Japan really rise to the top in terms of vulnerability,' said Worthy. Three-quarters of Japan's oil imports and more than 70% of South Korea's oil imports — along with a fifth of its LNG — pass through the strait, said Sam Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Both countries have focused more on diversifying fossil fuel sources than on shifting to clean energy. Japan still plans to get 30-40% of its energy from fossil fuels by 2040. It's building new LNG plants and replacing old ones. South Korea plans to get 25.1% of its electricity from LNG by 2030, down from 28% today, and reduce it further to 10.6% by 2038. To meet their 2050 targets for net-zero carbon emissions, both countries must dramatically ramp up use of solar and wind power. That means adding about 9 gigawatts of solar power each year through 2030, according to the thinktank Agora Energiewende. Japan also needs an extra 5 gigawatts of wind annually, and South Korea about 6 gigawatts. Japan's energy policies are inconsistent. It still subsidizes gasoline and diesel, aims to increase its LNG imports and supports oil and gas projects overseas. Offshore wind is hampered by regulatory barriers. Japan has climate goals, but hasn't set firm deadlines for cutting power industry emissions. 'Has Japan done enough? No, they haven't. And what they do is not really the best,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, citing Japan's program to increase use of hydrogen fuel made from natural gas. South Korea's low electricity rates hinder the profitability of solar and wind projects, discouraging investment, a 'key factor' limiting renewables, said Kwanghee Yeom of Agora Energiewende. He said fair pricing, stronger policy support and other reforms would help speed up adoption of clean energy. China and India have done more — but gaps remain China and India have moved to shield themselves from shocks from changing global energy prices or trade disruptions. China led global growth in wind and solar in 2024, with generating capacity rising 45% and 18%, respectively. It has also boosted domestic gas output even as its reserves have dwindled. By making more electricity at home from clean sources and producing more gas domestically, China has managed to reduce imports of LNG, though it still is the world's largest oil importer, with about half of the more than 11 million barrels per day that it brings in coming from the Middle East. Russia and Malaysia are other major suppliers. India relies heavily on coal and aims to boost coal production by around 42% from now to 2030. But its use of renewables is growing faster, with 30 additional gigawatts of clean power coming online last year, enough to power nearly 18 million Indian homes. By diversifying its suppliers with more imports from the U.S., Russia and other countries in the Middle East, it has somewhat reduced its risk, said Vibhuti Garg of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. 'But India still needs a huge push on renewables if it wants to be truly energy secure,' she said. Risks for the rest of Asia A blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could affect other Asian countries, and building up their renewable power generating capacity will be a 'crucial hedge' against the volatility intrinsic to importing oil and gas, said Reynolds of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis Southeast Asia has become a net oil importer as demand in Malaysia and Indonesia has outstripped supplies, according to the ASEAN Centre for Energy in Jakarta, Indonesia. The 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations still exports more LNG than it imports due to production by Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Myanmar. But rising demand means the region will become a net LNG importer by 2032, according to consulting firm Wood Mackenzie. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. Use of renewable energy is not keeping up with rising demand and production of oil and gas is faltering as older fields run dry. The International Energy Agency has warned that ASEAN's oil import costs could rise from $130 billion in 2024 to over $200 billion by 2050 if stronger clean energy policies are not enacted. 'Clean energy is not just an imperative for the climate — it's an imperative for national energy security,' said Reynolds. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
U.S. and Pakistan discuss ‘durable peace between Israel and Iran'
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif held a call on Thursday in which they discussed promoting 'a durable peace between Israel and Iran,' the State Department said in a statement. U.S. President Donald Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between U.S. ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. Trump met Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last week where they discussed Iran, which Trump said Pakistan knew about better than most other countries. A section of Pakistan's embassy in Washington represents Iran's interests in the United States, as Tehran does not have diplomatic relations with the U.S. 'The two leaders acknowledged the importance of working together to promote a durable peace between Israel and Iran,' the U.S. State Department said in a statement. 'Secretary Rubio emphasized Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon.' Andrew Coyne: Bomb Iran's nuclear sites? You can't separate the mission from who's in charge of it Iran's Khamenei makes fiery statement as Trump says talks to continue next week The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region that was already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The U.S. struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced an Israel-Iran ceasefire. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while Israel is not. Pakistan condemned Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran even as it said earlier this month it was nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in bringing a four-day India-Pakistan conflict to an end last month.
