logo
Glenorchy dubbed the 'slot machine capital' of Tasmania as mayor calls for gambling reform

Glenorchy dubbed the 'slot machine capital' of Tasmania as mayor calls for gambling reform

Sue Hickey
We have what is colloquially known as the 'Golden Mile' and certainly two former mayors were strong advocates for dealing at the state government level with this issue. And we do have a statement of commitment on gambling, which only gives us the authority to advocate or partner and engage with our community organisations and service providers, because as a local government, we literally do not have any power to police any of this.
Kylie Baxter
Do you think that a pre-commitment card would be an effective way to address the harm in your town, mayor?
Sue Hickey
Well, I really like the suggestions put forward by Tim Costello. He's obviously all across this and I don't care what form of harm removal or harm measures that they use, whether it's cashless gaming, $1 bets, slower spin speeds, pre-commitment technology, something has to be done about it because, I think, we as a nation and as a state have to ask ourselves, what is the social and economic cost of not dealing with this issue? I personally know of the destruction of gambling to a friend of mine's life and livelihood and then the breakdown of the family and just horrendous outcomes from that. But over my life in politics, I've come across so many people who have been broken by their gaming addiction. So we need the government, whoever this is going to be, to invest in harm minimisation, urgently. And we've got to stop doing the talking, and we've got to do some action.
Kylie Baxter
The data tells us there are 240 pokey machines in Glenorchy. Would you like to see a reduction also in the number of machines available for use?
Sue Hickey
Absolutely. That's from a personal perspective. Obviously, other people would have different perspectives. If I had my way, there'd probably be none. But, you know, there are lots of people who can gamble safely. You know, Nana who goes there and spends $5 or $10 on a Sunday with her friends, obviously can handle it. But there are other people who might be in a pit in their lives of some sort, and it suddenly becomes an escape. And then next thing you know, it's an addiction, and then it's a tragedy. So this is where I think there needs to be some controls around the electronic gaming machines.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Court says Australian women can sue Qatar Airways over airport body searches
Federal Court says Australian women can sue Qatar Airways over airport body searches

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Federal Court says Australian women can sue Qatar Airways over airport body searches

The Law Report speaks to one of the Australian women who won the right to sue Qatar Airways after being subjected to invasive searches at a Doha airport in 2020. And what does the International Court of Justice say about Australia's responsibility to combat climate change? Guests: Anna (pseudonym), one of the five Australian women taking legal action against Qatar Airways Damian Sturzaker, Partner, Marque Lawyers Prof Margaret Young, Director, Institute for International Law and the Humanities, Melbourne Law School Full Federal Court decision summary: DHI22 v Qatar Airways Group QCSC (No 1) [2025] FCAFC 91 (24 July 2025) DHI22 v Qatar Airways Group QCSC (No 2) [2025] FCAFC 92 (24 July 2025) ICJ: Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change - ADVISORY OPINIONS Vanuatu ICJ Initiative

Annabel Digance launches $2.3m lawsuit against South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas
Annabel Digance launches $2.3m lawsuit against South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Annabel Digance launches $2.3m lawsuit against South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas

Former Labor parliamentarian Annabel Digance has dropped a bombshell $2.3m lawsuit on South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her. The lawsuit, filed with the SA Supreme Court, alleges Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to prosecute Mrs Digance in order to crush her political future and prevent a parliamentary inquiry she supported on alleged bullying in the Labor Party. The police arrested and charged Mr and Mrs Digance for blackmail in April 2021 for alleged conduct against Mr Malinauskas. The conduct centred on secret recordings between Mr Malinauskas and Mr Digance in February 2020 and Mr and Mrs Digance in March 2020. The blackmail charge was dropped in 2023 after the Digances agreed to refrain from any further contact with Mr Malinauskas. The claim, submitted by Carroll and O'Dea Solicitors, states the arrest and prosecution caused Mrs Digance 'injury, loss, damage and harm'. 'The circumstances giving rise to the causes of action immediately caused the cancellation of Mrs Digance's employment, permanently damaged Mrs Digance's prospects of further employment, required Mrs Digance to incur substantial legal expenses in defending herself against the prosecution and required Mrs Digance to incur medical expenses,' the claim states. The lawsuit is directed against both the premier and the South Australian police. 'The members of SA Police conducting the arrest, the search and seizure, the detention, the first bail decision and pursuing the malicious prosecution knew each action was unnecessary, unjustified, unlawful,' the claim states. Mrs Digance is asking for $2.3m in damages. In separate defence claims, both Mr Malinauskas and the SA Police and Prosecution deny Mrs Digance is entitled to the relief claimed and request the court dismiss her suit and cover costs of the proceedings. Mr Malinauskas' defence statement flatly denies allegations that he 'requested' the police pursue a prosecution or that he was acting to suppress the parliamentary inquiry. 'The first respondent (Malinauskas) admits only that on or about April 9, 2021, he contacted SA Police and told them that if SA Police were of the view that a prosecution of the applicant (Digance) and or her husband was justified, he would co-operate to the extent necessary in that prosecution whenever it was to occur,' the defence claim states. The claim submitted on behalf of the SA Police also rejects Mrs Digance's assertions. 'The investigation undertaken by SAPOL into the blackmail offence was appropriate,' the claim states. The blackmail offence was laid based on information available to SAPOL including the complaint made by the first respondent, the recorded conversations … and other witness and documentary evidence obtained by SAPOL during the course of its investigation. 'The sole purpose for initiating and maintaining the blackmail offence was the proper invocation of the criminal law.' The matter will be heard at the South Australian Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Queensland teachers preparing to strike over pay negotiations, nurses angered by 'swift' police pay deal
Queensland teachers preparing to strike over pay negotiations, nurses angered by 'swift' police pay deal

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Queensland teachers preparing to strike over pay negotiations, nurses angered by 'swift' police pay deal

Thousands of Queensland's teachers are preparing to hold a 24-hour strike next Wednesday, August 6 as negotiations with the state government over pay remain at a stalemate. A spokesperson for the Queensland Teachers' Union (QTU) said the strike action was voted on during a two-week ballot as a last-ditch attempt to seal a "fair" pay deal. It would be the first time teachers have undertaken strike action since 2009. Negotiations over a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (EBA) for the state's teachers were referred to the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) for conciliation by the government on Monday when no deal could be reached. "The QTU looks forward to presenting its claim before the commission and urges all community members to support resourcing and funding state schools appropriately," the union spokesperson said. The strike will affect roughly 570,000 students at state primary and high schools. The union has urged parents to keep their children at home on Wednesday, but said no child would be left unsupervised if they had to attend school. No official curriculum will be taught that day. Hundreds of teachers rallied outside Queensland's parliament in Brisbane after school hours on state budget day last month, calling for better pay and conditions. The union has rejected a pay offer from the Department of Education which would have delivered teachers a 3 per cent pay rise next financial year, and a 2.5 per cent increase in 2026 and 2027. The union had been seeking an extra student-free day as well as "nation-leading salaries and conditions". Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek said the government had met with the teachers' union 17 times over the past five months and it remained committed to finalising an agreement. Of the strike, he said "student safety will remain the priority" and school principals would have more information to provide parents. News of the strike comes as Queensland Nurses and Midwives' Union (QNMU) hit out at the government's "swift EB agreement" with the Queensland Police Service (QPS). The state government announced on Tuesday it had reached an in-principle agreement with QPS which would give officers a minimum pay rise of 3 per cent from July 1 this year, followed by a 2.5 per cent hike in 2026 and 2027. An $8,000 retention bonus was also agreed on. QNMU Secretary Sarah Beaman said it was impossible to ignore the differences in the way Queensland police and Queensland's predominantly-female frontline nurses and midwives had been treated. She said union members were angry with the government, accusing it of prioritising an agreement with the "male-dominated" service, while not going as far as calling the government sexist. "It's actually quite outrageous that nurses and midwives have been fighting for months and months to defend even the conditions we currently have in our agreement when the government is quick to do a better deal with the police. "What are we missing here? Is it because we are predominantly women? Is it because our workforce is larger? Either way, there's no good excuse for nurses and midwives to be disadvantaged. Ms Beaman said the union did not begrudge police officers for getting a pay deal, but said the government coming to such a fast agreement with the police would further "fuel" anger amongst nurses. "I am at a loss as well because this is a government that told us they did not want a fight," she said. "For a government that did not want a fight, they certainly picked one". She said the union had "wrangled for six long, long months" to secure double time on overtime, but police had seemingly easily "secured this for all staff, shift workers or not". "We are not being difficult, nor are we asking for anything excessive," Ms Beaman said. In a statement, Health Minister Tim Nicholls said the government "remain[ed] at the table to finalise an agreement" with the QNMU, adding Queensland offered "nation-leading wages". "Positive steps forward have been achieved through conciliation with the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission, and the latest meeting was held [on Tuesday]," he said. A new pay agreement for nurses has also been sent to the IRC, while a new agreement with firefighters also needs to be brokered.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store