GNU kicked off with newbie DA ministers told they do not just represent their party
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni says political parties have learned from one another in the government of national unity.
ANC ministers had to clarify that ministers, especially from the DA, do not just represent their party.
On Thursday, Ntshavheni addressed a press conference in Cape Town.
In the first year of the government of national unity (GNU), experienced ANC Cabinet ministers had to constantly remind their DA colleagues that they do not only represent their political parties.
'We had to clarify this is not a DA ministry, it's a government ministry,' Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said on Thursday.
But one year into the GNU, the Cabinet has gotten over that hurdle and was 'now moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all', added Ntshavheni when she addressed a post-Cabinet briefing in Cape Town on Thursday.
Asked how the GNU was working out, she said it was a huge transition for opposition parties.
Ntshavheni added they had to go from criticising the government to finding solutions to the country's challenges.
'It's easier to be in the opposition than to be in government because your job is to criticise when you're in opposition. When you're in government, your job is to find solutions to the country's challenges. That realisation made quite an impact on all of us and a commitment for all of us within the government of national unity to find solutions.
'Coalition governments have fallen in their first year, and through the Budget, we almost went there. But like South Africa and our resourcefulness, we worked it out. We now all agreed on the Budget, what it means, and the work that still needs to be done,' she said.
Ntshavheni added that ministers also challenged each other about the pace of implementation.
'In the first year, we had to deal with a lot of DA ministers, and we had to clarify … that [you] are not a DA minister, it's a government minister. We are now getting over that; we are moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all and that there's no one department that is insular from the others. No one department can work outside the support of others,' she said.
The GNU was seriously jeopardised in February after the ANC and DA disagreed on the Budget.
The ANC rejected a DA proposal in which the parties agreed on shared economic policy management.
For the DA, which had pinned its support for the Budget on securing such an agreement, the rejection effectively ended talks on the Budget.
The DA had told the ANC that if it passed the Budget, it would effectively end the GNU without its support.
The ANC openly said it was shopping for votes among other GNU parties and non-GNU ones in Parliament.
Despite the hurdles, Ntshavheni said there were several positives.
'We have had to learn to do the consultation, [we looked at] how do you strengthen the mechanisms of engaging both formally in Cabinet and outside of government, but what I can assure all of you is that decisions in Cabinet have never been on a vote. They've been on a consensus basis to show solidarity,' she added.
Ntshavheni said although parties worked in the GNU, she knew they were still competing.
'Next year [in the 2026 local government elections] and by-elections, we will continue contesting each other. We win and lose some, but we are all committed to ensuring we grow South Africa. We are committed to ensuring our parties achieve victory in our different parties,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Time To Reinvent U.S. Critical Minerals Strategy
While the Trump administration has prioritized critical minerals, several obstacles stand in the way ... More of engaging partners to build a supply chain independent from China. For the Trump administration, critical minerals are a global policy priority. President Donald J. Trump is trying to get China to relax bans on rare earth minerals desperately needed for American industries, including defense and tech. From Greenland to Ukraine, the U.S. is signaling interest and engagement, be it intent to acquire or a comprehensive energy and minerals agreement. In Africa, the U.S. brokered a peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, amid conflict over critical minerals on the border of the two countries. This presents opportunities for American investment, driven by a global security strategy by from a president who has notably scaled back from U.S. engagement abroad. This is because critical minerals are key inputs into advanced technologies, healthcare, defense, energy, and other sectors, and have become a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy (what oil used to be in the 20th century). President Trump has made the development of a critical mineral supply chain to decrease dependence on China for these materials a priority, taking significant steps toward this goal through a March executive order. While mineral agreements have become a key tool of American diplomacy in the modern era, unclear and inconsistently enforced legislation has limited their effectiveness. The Inflation Reduction Act's Limits to Mineral Investment These self-limiting policies predate the current administration and are a bipartisan policy failure. The Inflation Reduction Act, which aimed to build a clean energy supply chain through 'friendshoring' associated materials by offering tax credits for clean energy products manufactured with components sourced from countries with a free trade agreement with the U.S. This excludes several key producers of critical minerals, like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Vietnam, and the that do not have FTAs. Although several waivers have been signed to make exceptions to this provision, this is insufficient to create a reliable investment landscape in these countries. Unsurprisingly, investors are hesitant about investing in a place that requires yearly congressional action. IRA tax credits prioritize 'friendshoring' components for green technologies, only allowing these ... More credits to be viable if inputs like critical minerals are sourced from countries with which the U.S. has a free trade agreement. Another aspect of the IRA that limits opportunities for critical mineral investment is its overly broad definition of 'Foreign Entities of Concern', which includes organizations considered 'an entity owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a foreign government' or 'an entity that is engaged in conduct detrimental to U.S. national security or foreign policy.' While these definitions may seem reasonable at first glance, they can preclude companies with even a tiny stake of Chinese ownership, or doing business in Russia, from receiving American investment. Considering the history and location of Central Asia, clearly that may affect many U.S. partners there. This prevents companies looking to diversify and receive American investment from doing so, pushing them further into the orbit of competitors. It also enables China to weaponize our own laws against us by strategically investing in locales or companies Beijing has no interest in but wants to keep Western counterparts out. Opportunities for Critical Mineral Partnerships Despite these investment-stifling measures, there are several willing partners prepared to build a lucrative relationship in the minerals sphere. One partner that has displayed significant interest is Kazakhstan, which holds reserves of several critical minerals and is already pursuing several avenues of cooperation. In a recent meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Kazakh Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu emphasized critical minerals as a key avenue of cooperation between the two countries. American educational institutions are also growing their presence in the country, with the Colorado School of the Mines partnering with a local university to train a skilled workforce for Western mining companies. Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Kazakh Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu this June, discussing ... More opportunities for partnership in the critical minerals sector. This demonstrates a new dimension of cooperation with the U.S., fostering relations while producing tangible results and expanding the workforce eligible to work in the specialized mining industry. Such a model can also be applied outside of Kazakhstan, both in Central Asia and beyond. The Risks of Opaque Legislation While these steps are promising, they do not offset the skepticism towards American investment prompted by regulations that exclude too many countries from productive engagement in the mining and refining of the rare earth elements. For example, secondary sanctions against companies or economies dealing with Russia, while not imposed on Kazakh mineral producers, remain a looming threat, having been levied against other entities in Central Asia, a region that was a part of the USSR and now has close ties with its former colonial master. In addition, Astana has been subject to scrutiny by Washington before, having been investigated under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act regarding the national security implications of its uranium exports to the U.S. The first Trump Administration ruled that no quotas or other trade measures were to be placed on Kazakhstan as a result of the investigation, yet it sent signals to investors that they may incur political risk by investing in Kazakhstan. Now, a global Section 232 investigation is ongoing, despite the dire need for the U.S. to secure sources of uranium imports. Kazakhstan is the number one exporter of uranium in the world. The United States has made clear its appetite for partnerships in the critical minerals sector and is keen to compete with China and create a supply chain that Beijing does not control. Washington's actions stretching back through multiple administrations, however, create a difficult environment for mineral-rich countries that seek investment but are not amongst the partners of the U.S. with a free trade agreement. Even as the country pursues a secure mineral supply chain, establishing trust and clarity with potential partners must be a top priority. The current state of affairs, where the United States keeps a close circle of trade partners, keeps many potential partners out, and issues random exemptions for others, is untenable. The U.S. cannot afford legislative and policy uncertainties, delays, and confusion when America's national security is on the line.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Dozens killed in Central African Republic school stampede
At least 29 school students were killed in a stampede in the Central African Republic as they took their exams, authorities said on Thursday. The incident occurred as more than 5 300 pupils sat their baccalaureate exams at Barthelemy Boganda High School in the capital, Bangui, on Wednesday. An electrical transformer exploded and sparked panic, leading to a stampede. Some students were seen jumping from the first floor of the school. Most of the victims - including 16 girls - died at the scene, according to the Health Ministry. At least 260 other students were treated for injuries. 'The hospital was overwhelmed by people to the point of obstructing caregivers and ambulances,' a Health Ministry source told the AFP news agency. President declares 3-day mourning period Central African President Faustin Archange Touadera responded to the news while attending a vaccine summit in Brussels, Belgium. He announced three days of national mourning. 'I would like to express my solidarity and compassion to the parents of the deceased candidates, to the educational staff, to the students,' he said in a video posted to Facebook. Meanwhile, Education Minister Aurelien-Simplice Kongbelet-Zingas said in a statement that 'measures will be taken quickly to shed light on the circumstances of this incident.' He said a date would be announced later for students to resume their exams.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
It's Déjà Vu for South Africa's Perpetually Teetering Alliance
By and Paul Vecchiatto Save Welcome to Next Africa, a twice-weekly newsletter on where the continent stands now — and where it's headed. Sign up here to have it delivered to your email. South Africa's year-old ruling alliance is teetering on the edge — again.
