logo
Who Are the Cardinals Selecting the Pope?

Who Are the Cardinals Selecting the Pope?

Catholic cardinals from around the globe have gathered at the Vatican, retreating from the outside world to deliberate in secrecy on who will succeed Pope Francis.
The Sistine Chapel has been sealed and the cardinals and Vatican staff have sworn an oath of secrecy.
To chose the new pope, two-thirds of the 133 cardinals must agree on a name, meaning the winner will need at least 89 votes.
Here is a breakdown on the cardinals who are voting.
How many cardinals chose the new pope?
There are 252 cardinals in total, but only those under the age of 80 can take part in the conclave.
While that means that 135 cardinals are eligible to vote, two have announced they will not travel to Rome, leaving 133 cardinals to participate in the conclave.
During the 2013 conclave that chose Francis, there were 207 cardinals—117 of whom were eligible.
Like this year, two cardinals were unable to vote, and thus there were 115 cardinals who entered the conclave.
What countries do the cardinals come from?
According to the Vatican, the cardinals who will elect the new Pope are from 70 countries.
The majority are from Europe, with 52 cardinals, 17 are from Africa, 16 are from North America, 4 are from Central America, 17 are from South America, 23 are from Asia and 4 are from Oceania.
This will be the first papal conclave in which fewer than half the voting cardinals are European, showing a shift away from Europe-centricism in the Catholic church. In fact, it will be the most geographically diverse conclave in history, a legacy in part brought about by Pope Francis—the first Latin-American Pope, who consistently emphasized the importance of this diversity, and dismissed the idea that nationality or geography should determine who became Pope.
He elevated cardinals from several underrepresented countries, including Myanmar and East Timor. Some of Francis' appointees are from countries that will be represented for the first time in a conclave, including the aforementioned two, Cape Verde, Paraguay, Haiti and South Sudan.
According to the Pew Research Center, after Pope Francis, Europe is still 'over represented' in the College of Cardinals, but less so than during his election as Pope in 2013. The most underrepresented region based on population, they calculate, is Latin America, with 41% of the worldwide Catholic population as of 2022 but has only 18% of the voting cardinals.
The country with the most cardinals is overwhelmingly Italy with 17 voting cardinals, followed by the United States with 10, and Brazil with 7. Many countries are only represented by one voting cardinal—including Peru, Serbia, Nigeria, and Sri Lanka.
The selection process
Pope Paul VI ruled in 1970 that cardinals above 80 years old cannot vote for the Pope.
Cardinals are elected by the Pope and hold their position for life. 108 of the cardinals eligible to elect were appointed by Pope Francis to the College of Cardinals, and the remainder were appointed by the previous two Popes, Benedict XVI and John Paul II.
During the 2013 conclave, just 67 cardinals had been elevated by the previous Pope Benedict XVI to compare, and 48 had been elevated by John Paul II, who had been Pope until 2005.
How long have other conclaves taken?
If a conclave does not produce a new pope after 13 days of voting, a runoff election between the two leading candidates is held.
The longest conclave ever took place in the 13th century when the Church took almost three years—over 1,000 days—to elect Pope Clement IV.
Since 1831 however, the process has usually have latest less than a week.
As for more recent papal elections, Pope Francis was elected on the third ballot in 2013, his predecessor Pope Benedict XVI was elected in two days.
Generally, the length of time depends on the first few votes. One vote will be held on the first day of voting. If no candidate receives the necessary 89 votes, four votes will occur over the next two days— two votes each morning, and two votes each afternoon.
These ballots are then burned—and the color of the smoke shows the outside world whether a Pope was chosen or not.
If the smoke emerging from the Sistine Chapel chimney is black, it means no decision was made. If the smoke emerging is white, the public will know a new Pope has been chosen. The ballots are burned each two rounds of voting, unless a Pope is chosen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illegal immigration hit a record-high of 14 million in the US in 2023, Pew report finds
Illegal immigration hit a record-high of 14 million in the US in 2023, Pew report finds

San Francisco Chronicle​

time25 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Illegal immigration hit a record-high of 14 million in the US in 2023, Pew report finds

The number of people in the United States illegally surged to an all-time high of 14 million in 2023, a research group said Thursday, a major increase that still falls well short of estimates from President Donald Trump and some critics of immigration. The Pew Research Center's closely watched gauge rose from 11.8 million a year earlier and surpassed the previous high of 12.2 million in 2007. The increase was driven by some 6 million who were in the country with some form of legal protection. Trump has stripped many of those protections since taking office in January. Pew, whose estimates date back to 1990, said that, while 2023 is its latest full analysis, preliminary findings show the number rose in 2024, though at a slower rate after then-President Joe Biden severely restricted asylum at the border in June of that year. The number dropped this year under Trump, but is still likely above 14 million. The overall U.S. immigrant population, regardless of legal status, reached an all-time high of more than 53 million in January 2025, accounting for a record 15.8% of the U.S. population. The number has since dropped, which Pew said would be the first time it has shrunk since the 1960s. While the findings are unlikely to settle debate, Pew's report is one of the most complete attempts to measure illegal immigration. Nearly all the increase came from countries other than Mexico. Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and India accounted for the largest numbers after Mexico. Totals from Venezuela, Cuba, Colombia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Ukraine and Peru each more than doubled in two years. Trump said in an address to Congress in March that 21 million people 'poured into the United States' during the previous four years, far exceeding estimates from Pew and what figures on border arrests suggest. The Federation for American Immigration Reform, a group largely aligned with his policies, estimated 18.6 million in March. The Center for Immigration Studies, a group that favors immigration restrictions, reported that there were 14.2 million people in the U.S. illegally last month, down from a peak of 15.8 million in January. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem touted the reported drop of 1.6 million in six months. 'This is massive,' she said in a press release last week. Noem's own department, through its Office of Homeland Security Statistics, estimates there were 11 million people in the U.S. illegally in 2022, its most recent count. The Center for Migration Studies, author of another closely watched survey, most recently pegged the number at 12.2 million in 2022, topping its previous high of 12 million in 2008. Pew's findings, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau survey and Department of Homeland Security, reflect an increase in people crossing the border illegally to exercise rights to seek asylum and Biden-era policies to grant temporary legal status. Those policies included a border appointment system called CBP One and permits for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans. Trump has ended those policies and also sought to reverse Biden's expansion of Temporary Protected Status for people already in the United States whose countries are deemed unsafe to return to. Mexicans were the largest nationality among people in the country illegally, a number that grew slightly to 4.3 million in 2023. The increase came almost entirely from other countries, totaling 9.7 million, up from 6.4 million two years earlier. States with the largest numbers of people in the country illegally were, in order, California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois, though Texas sharply narrowed its gap with California. Even with the increases in recent years, six states had smaller numbers in 2023 than in the previous peak in 2007: Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Oregon. Pew estimated that a record 9.7 million people without legal status were in the workforce, or about 5.6% of the U.S. labor force in 2023, with Nevada, Florida, New Jersey and Texas having the largest shares. ___

Filmmakers claim late ‘Superman' actor Christopher Reeve would have opposed Donald Trump
Filmmakers claim late ‘Superman' actor Christopher Reeve would have opposed Donald Trump

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Filmmakers claim late ‘Superman' actor Christopher Reeve would have opposed Donald Trump

Late 'Superman' star Christopher Reeve would have spoken out against President Donald Trump if he were alive today, according to the filmmakers behind his documentary. 'Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story' directors Peter Ettedgui and Ian Bonhôte spoke to The Hollywood Reporter on Tuesday about the actor's activist work, particularly for disability rights, after his tragic horse-riding accident that left him paralyzed from the neck down. Ettedgui pointed out that even prior to his accident, Reeve spoke on behalf of other issues, such as artistic expression and housing. 'There was a certain property developer in New York who wanted to develop a horrific modern-town plan, and Reeve led the objections to it,' Ettedgui said to The Hollywood Reporter. 'The property developer was, of course, Donald Trump.' The filmmakers added that actor Jeff Daniels, who worked with Reeve on Broadway in 1980, told them Reeve would have gone so far as to run against Trump. 'But he wouldn't have entered it for his own gain,' Bonhôte said. 'The way he was engaged with people was not just for alliance and power; he saw that things could be changed for the better for the American people.' 4 'Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story' directors Peter Ettedgui and Ian Bonhôte said that actor Jeff Daniels, who worked with Christopher Reeve on Broadway in 1980, told them Reeve would have to run against Trump. IPA / 4 Christopher Reeve starred as Superman in the 1978 hit film 'Superman: The Movie.' Warner Bros/Dc Comics/Kobal/Shutterstock Ettedgui added, 'He grew up in a privileged, possibly even slightly entitled background, but he was a very kind man. He realized that he had certain advantages in life, and I think he always evinced that kindness and empathy with other people. But it took on a whole new nature after the accident.' Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Fox News Digital reached out to the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation for comment. During his life, Reeve regularly endorsed Democratic candidates such as Bill Clinton and Al Gore. He gave a speech at the 1996 Democratic National Convention, one year after his accident. 4 Reeve criticized Trump in the late 1980s over his development plans, calling them 'the American dream gone berserk' in a speech. AFP via Getty Images 4 Reeve regularly endorsed Democratic candidates such as Bill Clinton and Al Gore, and gave a speech at the 1996 Democratic National Convention, one year after his accident. WireImage Reeve was also critical of Republican presidents such as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. Prior to his death in 2004, Reeve spoke out against Bush for his opposition to embryonic stem cell research. Reeve also criticized Trump in the late 1980s over his development plans, calling them 'the American dream gone berserk' in a speech.

Witkoff calls Trump the ‘Michael Jordan' of dealmaking amid Russia-Ukraine talks
Witkoff calls Trump the ‘Michael Jordan' of dealmaking amid Russia-Ukraine talks

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Witkoff calls Trump the ‘Michael Jordan' of dealmaking amid Russia-Ukraine talks

U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday recounted the Alaska summit last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling President Trump the 'Michael Jordan' of dealmaking. In a radio interview on the 'Cats & Cosby Show,' Witkoff described to hosts John Catsimatidis and Rita Cosby what he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio witnessed behind closed doors ahead of Trump's high-stakes meeting with the Kremlin's leader. 'When the doors closed, John and Rita, in Alaska, I and Marco got to witness the great master, master dealmaker-in-chief, Donald J. Trump,' Witkoff said. 'And it was quite extraordinary to watch.' 'We've all grown up in New York and we've all done deals, but President Trump is, you know, he's the Michael Jordan of this business. In fact, he's the Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods and Albert Einstein all put together,' Witkoff continued. Witkoff has held several sessions with Putin in recent months as the Trump administration has sought to broker a diplomatic end to the war between Russia and Ukraine. While his own talks with Putin were constructive, Witkoff said in the interview that Trump has 'got this uncanny ability to get to the right place' and was able to make significantly more progress in his meeting with the Russian leader last Friday. 'I think he felt that we made a lot of progress in a one-on-one with Putin,' Witkoff said. 'What we were able to determine, and I hope it holds, that the Russians are prepared to be accommodating — more accommodating than we had seen in five or six sessions that I had with him, with President Putin.' 'They were positive and constructive sessions,' Witkoff said about his own meetings with Putin, 'but the president was able to extract more concessions in that Alaska summit — significantly more — with regard to the regions, with regard to the territories, with regard to security protocols.' 'A lot of things were given or were offered up as a compromise, as an accommodation, by President Putin. That is a really big deal because… that's the deal making business,' Witkoff said, 'Narrowing the issues between the parties. And that's what happened, by the way, in Alaska, we narrowed the issues and the divide.' Trump emerged from the meeting Friday with no concrete wins but touted the progress made behind closed doors. He then met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders at the White House on Monday to discuss next steps. Trump has said the next step is for Zelensky and Putin to meet for a bilateral meeting, after which Trump said he would join for a trilateral meeting. Witkoff said during the interview he expects a trilateral meeting, if it takes place, would produce the most progress. 'The next move is going to be very telling as to whether Zelensky and Putin meet together. And I think ultimately, if that happens, if that meeting happens — and I believe it will, I'm certainly hopeful it will — that will, in my view, potentially lead to a trilateral between the three, and there, I think you'd see a lot more progress,' Witkoff said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store