logo
Qatari jet that could be new Air Force One will ‘probably' cost less than $400 million to retrofit, Air Force Secretary says

Qatari jet that could be new Air Force One will ‘probably' cost less than $400 million to retrofit, Air Force Secretary says

CNN05-06-2025
Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers on Thursday that it will 'probably' cost the Air Force less than $400 million to retrofit a luxury Qatari plane that President Donald Trump has said he is getting from the Qataris as a gift to use as the new Air Force One.
Meink was grilled about the plane's cost by Democratic Rep. Joe Courtney during a hearing before the House Armed Services Committee.
'You can't retrofit a plane that is built for another purpose for Air Force One and expect it to be a free plane,' the Connecticut congressman said, adding that the Qatari plane will require encrypted communications technology, hardened defenses and countermeasures. 'It's clear that this is going to be a drain on the Air Force's budget.'
Meink would not discuss details of how the plane will need to be retrofitted, noting that much of that information is classified. But he said estimates that it will cost over $1 billion are high, and that 'we believe the actual retrofit of the aircraft is probably less than $400 million.'
The Pentagon announced last month that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had accepted the Boeing 747 from Qatar that Trump will use once the Pentagon upgrades it to include 'proper security measures and functional-mission requirements.'
A the time, a person familiar with the discussions, however, countered that the deal had not yet been finalized and that the talks between the legal teams are ongoing.
The aircraft is currently parked in San Antonio awaiting upgrades, and the Air Force told CNN last month that 'as directed by the Secretary of Defense, the Air Force is preparing to award a contract to modify a Boeing 747 aircraft for executive airlift. Details related to the contract are classified.'
Retrofitting and installing the required security and communications equipment on a second-hand plane from another government, even a friendly one, is a monumental task, CNN has reported. US spy and security agencies tasked with the overhaul will need to essentially strip the aircraft down to its frame and rebuild it with the necessary equipment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: S&P Sets Fresh Record; US-Vietnam Trade Pact
Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: S&P Sets Fresh Record; US-Vietnam Trade Pact

Bloomberg

time23 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: S&P Sets Fresh Record; US-Vietnam Trade Pact

A rally in several big tech companies fueled gains in US stocks, with the market extending its advance as President Donald Trump said he reached a trade deal with Vietnam. Treasuries fell as a selloff in UK bonds underscored deficit worries. Following earlier losses driven by weak jobs data, the S&P 500 rose to fresh all-time highs. In the run-up to the jobs report, economists forecast employers added 110,000 jobs in June — the fewest in four months — amid a slight rise in the unemployment rate to 4.3%. The Bureau of Labor Statistics report is due Thursday, a day earlier than usual because of the Independence Day holiday. We get reaction to the day's market moves from Brian Krawez, President at Scharf Investments. Plus - the trade truce between Washington and Beijing may be holding for now, but China is increasingly wary about what's happening elsewhere: US efforts to forge deals that could isolate Chinese firms from global supply chains. Ahead of a July 9 deadline, US officials are deep in talks with major trading partners in Asia and Europe, pushing for new agreements that would include restrictions on Chinese content, or secure commitments to counter what Washington sees as China's unfair trade practices. In the first such deal, President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a tiered tariff agreement with Vietnam. Exports to the US from the Southeast Asian nation will be charged a 20% rate, Trump said in a social-media post, with 40% levied on any goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. We get the latest from Jill Disis, Bloomberg News Desk Editor in Hong Kong. She speaks with Bloomberg's Shery Ahn and Haidi Stroud-Watts on The Asia Trade.

CNBC Daily Open: Wall Street disregards job losses to focus on cheaper shoes from Vietnam
CNBC Daily Open: Wall Street disregards job losses to focus on cheaper shoes from Vietnam

CNBC

time37 minutes ago

  • CNBC

CNBC Daily Open: Wall Street disregards job losses to focus on cheaper shoes from Vietnam

If I had to choose between having a job and paying less for Nike shoes, you'd see me run barefoot to the office. Wednesday's market moves, however, suggested that Wall Street preferred the cheaper shoes. The U.S. economy lost private sector jobs in June, the first time hiring had contracted since March 2023, according to payrolls processing firm ADP. It's even more startling because a Dow Jones survey of economists had pegged job numbers to expand by 100,000. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump announced on his social media site Truth Social that the country had made a trade deal with Vietnam, in which the Southeast Asian nation will face a 20% duty on imports to America. That means companies that rely heavily on Vietnam for manufacturing, such as Nike, Crocs and Lululemon, will face less onerous costs and might not hike prices as much, compared with the original tariff rate of 46%. After weighing both pieces of news, investors decided the good news was more important and lifted the S&P 500 to a new closing high. Granted, the ADP report has had a spotty track record in predicting the official job figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But it's still worth thinking about how that's a sign financial markets could be slightly disconnected from the real economy: Who can afford to buy shoes and pump up stocks if they don't have jobs? Vietnam strikes a deal with America. Imports from the Southeast Asian nation to the U.S. will be subject to a 20% tariff, while the U.S. gets tariff-free access to Vietnam's market, Trump announced Wednesday. The S&P 500 rises to close at a fresh record. The index also scored an intra-day high, while the Nasdaq Composite notched a record close. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index added 0.18%. U.K. bond yields jumped on turmoil in the Labour Party. The U.S. lost private sector jobs in June. Job losses amounted to 33,000, reported ADP on Wednesday. Economists polled by Dow Jones had expected an increase of 100,000 jobs for the month. Tesla reports a fall in second-quarter deliveries. The Elon Musk-led company delivered 384,122 vehicles in that period, a drop of 14% from a year ago. But Tesla shares still rose as the numbers were better than some investors had feared. [PRO] A weak jobs report could trigger a sell-off. If the numbers for June's nonfarm payrolls, out Thursday, is anything like the ADP report, the JPMorgan trading desk thinks U.S. stocks could tumble. A slowing economy meets a fast future Life in China these days is a story of stark contrasts. If in one conversation, my counterparts are wringing their hands over a sluggish economy, the next reveals how quickly artificial intelligence is revamping industries. While China's biggest cities are yet to see a return to the pre-Covid boom days, there are signs that smaller ones are experiencing rapid growth. Augmented reality glasses startup Xreal invested in its own factory in the southeastern "tier 2" city of Wuxi and earlier this year announced a new glasses product running Google's XR operating system.

Republicans round up votes for a ‘big, beautiful' blur
Republicans round up votes for a ‘big, beautiful' blur

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans round up votes for a ‘big, beautiful' blur

As Republicans scrounged for House votes to pass their far-reaching tax and spending bill on Wednesday, hours ahead of the presidentially-preferred July 4 deadline, they pointedly avoided getting into some details of what exactly they'd passed. 'Our Country will make a fortune this year, more than any of our competitors, but only if the Big, Beautiful Bill is PASSED,' President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social. Republicans found themselves promoting pieces of the bill that had already been taken out or watered down. They defended its reductions to Medicaid funding, on the basis that they might get reversed by a future Congress; they lauded its breaks for Social Security, even though they were relegated to simply offering a tax deduction to people who happen to also receive Social Security. GOP leaders pushed into the night to get the votes needed for final passage, which could still come as soon as the late hours of Wednesday. In the meantime, Democrats who might have supported parts of the bill in a vacuum instead tried to sort fact from hyperbole, and were set on voting against all of it. 'The taxes for the wealthy and special interests are permanent, but the new tax cuts aren't,' said Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Del. 'It's just ridiculous.' Beneath the confusion is a familiar reality for Trump: His 'big, beautiful bill,' which would extend a suite of 2017 tax cuts, add new ones, and cut health care spending to make up some of the difference, does not achieve some of what he ran on. That has not stopped him — or GOP lawmakers — from saying it does. One promise, of 'no taxes on Social Security,' had been bent into a four-figure tax deduction — $4,000 in the House's version of the bill, $6,000 in the Senate version that may replace it. But a fact sheet shared by House Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday repeated the claim the bill simply ended Social Security taxes outright. Another Trump promise, to not cut Medicaid, morphed into work requirements designed to remove people from the program, on the assumption that they might find jobs and get insurance coverage that way. Republicans like Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who had inveighed against Medicaid cuts, dropped their opposition. To sell the bill, Republicans separated Medicaid recipients into two camps, as delineated by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. Republicans distinguished between the 'truly disabled and needy,' whom they argue the 60-year-old program was designed to help, and those who should be paying or working for their health care. That second group includes noncitizens covered by state health care programs, as well as people in states that had adopted the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. But the Senate-passed version of the bill did not actually cut off Medicaid for noncitizens — another source of confusion. A memo from the House Freedom Caucus that urged party leaders to add back 'protection against illegals getting Medicaid,' linked to a study of noncitizens receiving nutrition assistance, not Medicaid. And a House proposal to create savings funds for children — first named MAGA accounts, now named TRUMP accounts — lost a requirement that the parents have a Social Security number on the way to Senate passage, theoretically allowing undocumented parents to take advantage. 'I don't like that,' South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, one of the House Freedom Caucus members who wanted more changes in the bill, told Semafor of that change. 'Illegals shouldn't get a paycheck.' Several of the changes that House Republicans obscured — and lamented, at turns — on Wednesday came thanks to the Senate's nonpartisan parliamentarian, a referee who has similarly trimmed Democratic ambitions in the past. Yet that didn't help party leaders' case as they kept pushing into Wednesday night. As in 2017 and 2021, the party with full control of government in Washington was using the budget process to pack as much as it could into a package that only needed 51 votes to get through the Senate. Like the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and the 2021 American Rescue Plan, it would transform the country with a mix of cuts, benefits, and incentives — and by undoing the opposition party's most recent work. Republican resistance to final passage on Wednesday was largely about whether the bill would do enough to undo former President Joe Biden's legacy. 'They jammed in the provision that guts the Green New Scam reforms that we put in place,' Texas Rep. Chip Roy told Steve Bannon, bemoaning that the final bill might not wipe out the Biden-era clean energy projects and tax credits that Republicans had overwhelmingly opposed. Led by the president, Republicans advertised the parts of the bills that polled the best — tax cuts, including an end to a tax on tips that began as a bipartisan effort to shore up Social Security in the 1980s. The bill could achieve a decade-long goal of rolling back the Affordable Care Act, but the president preferred to talk about it as a zero-cost reform. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' he said at the White House last week. No congressional Democrat was considering a vote for the bill; House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a Wednesday rally that his party would vote 'hell no.' Outside of Washington, Democrats were pre-emptively warning that any benefit cuts voters might face would be Trump and Republicans' fault, not theirs. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are going to lose their health care if this gets signed into law,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said on Tuesday. 'The state of Illinois can't cover the cost. No state, in the country, can cover the cost.' Democrats, frequently distracted by fights inside the party or by other Trump decisions, had spent weeks trying to bring the national conversation back to Medicaid. That effort even included Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral nominee in New York City, who responded to Trump's musing about whether he could deport him by accusing him of trying to distract from the GOP bill. 'I fight for the same people that he said he was fighting for,' Mamdani told reporters. The Trump administration started with a multipart premise that was always going to be impossible to meet: The 2017 tax cuts could be made permanent. New tax cuts could be delivered for blue-collar workers. And this could be paid for by repealing the 'Green New Scam' and getting rid of government waste. 'How much do you think we can rip out of this wasted, $6.5 trillion Harris-Biden budget?' future Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick asked Elon Musk at Trump's pre-election Madison Square Garden rally. 'Well, I think we can do at least $2 trillion,' said Musk. By DOGE's own estimate, it fell 90% short of that goal, finding $190 billion in spending cuts — a number that's been frequently disputed. An updated argument, which you could hear on the House floor this week, was that extending the 2017 tax cuts prevented a budget-busting recession. Tax cuts are free; health care is expensive, and anyone who might lose their health care coverage could be taken care of by the private sector. This has been a hard sell, even in a media environment where the president's critics on the right struggle to break through. Pro-Trump groups have found that voters support new tax cuts; other pollsters have found a lot of agreement with Democrats' criticism that Republicans are cutting benefits to pay for tax cuts for the rich. And the rapid process of moving this bill has led to confusion about what's actually in it. Whatever passes — if it passes — will achieve generational Republican goals, lowering taxes (most for wealthier Americans) and curtailing the post-Obama welfare state. But the Trump campaign had previously suggested that it could cut taxes without curtailing much of , besides tax credits for solar panels and Medicaid fraud. Before he quit the administration, Musk suggested that Americans might get a $5,000 DOGE dividend check from all the savings — an idea that still circulates in GOP fundraising emails. How popular is the reality of all this? I was struck at a Tuesday night rally for Virginia's GOP statewide ticket helmed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin that there was no mention of the mega-bill moving through Congress, 15 miles away. Just two months earlier, Youngkin joined most Republican governors on a letter that urged passage of whatever ended up being in the 'big, beautiful bill.' In the New York Times, Jacob S. Hacker and Patrick Sullivan the liberal case against the bill: 'Americans have yet to fully understand the special alchemy of inegalitarianism that defines it.' In Quartz, Joseph Zeballos-Roig the 'TRUMP Accounts' change. In the Wall Street Journal, the editorial board that the 'meh' bill 'has to pass,' despite some issues. 'The bill is more than anything the triumph of GOP political necessity, and the end of tax uncertainty is its main virtue.' For the progressive watchdog group Media Matters, Matt Gertz that since Trump took office again, Fox News mentioned 'Medicaid' only as frequently as it mentioned Joe Biden. 'While Fox personalities have at times defended or downplayed the bill's proposed Medicaid cuts, our data shows that the network is largely trying to avoid discussing them altogether.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store