Stay alert against security risks: Paul Lam
Paul Lam, left, and Chris Tang launch the exhibition at the Museum of History marking five years since the promulgation of the National Security Law. Photo: RTHK
Secretary for Justice Paul Lam said on Thursday the public needs to be vigilant against national security risks at all times as the country and the SAR are subject to constant foreign attacks.
In the opening of an exhibition marking the 5th anniversary of the promulgation of the National Security Law, Lam said the public should never forget the painful lessons of 2019 when national security was under serious threat.
The justice chief stressed that as stated in the security law, every Chinese – including those in Hong Kong – are obliged to safeguard the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
"Chinese people attach importance to walking the walk and not just talking the talk," Lam said.
"As national security is closely related to the personal well-being of all of us, it's only natural that we take up the responsibility of safeguarding national security."
Speaking at the same ceremony, Secretary for Security Chris Tang said there have been 326 arrests in national security-related cases as of the end of May, of which 165 people were convicted.
He said it's encouraging that officers have received more than 920,000 reports of suspected national security breaches on a hotline.
Separately, in an interview with Ta Kung Pao and Wen Wei Po, Lam stressed that the legal regime safeguarding national security will need to be improved constantly to guard against new types of potential risks.
The justice secretary went on to say that public awareness of national security has clearly increased.
Meanwhile, Tang told Sing Tao Daily and Ta Kung Pao that as the SAR is relatively inexperienced in terms of safeguarding national security, members of the disciplined forces must strengthen their awareness, knowledge and a sense of responsibility in this regard.
He said they'll go on exchange tours on the mainland and learn more from their counterparts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
3 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Why Trump shouldn't attend Xi's 'Victory Day' parade
As rumors swirl about President Donald Trump possibly attending China's 'Victory Day' parade this September, it's worth sounding an alarm. Such a visit to Beijing would be a strategic blunder that undermines Washington's Indo-Pacific posture, undercuts American allies and sends a troubling message to the wider world. On its face, this kind of diplomatic invitation may be tempting at this delicate juncture in bilateral relations. Trump has long shown an affinity for grand displays of military prowess, high-stakes diplomacy and face-to-face theatrics. A handshake with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in front of goose-stepping soldiers might make for dramatic television. If Beijing officials dangle the promise of a new trade agreement, it might even be a transactional win. But the costs would far outweigh the optics. First, there is the history and symbolism of Victory Day itself. China's September 3 commemoration is not merely a celebration of the end of World War II. It's a well-worn anti-Japanese ritual. While framed as a tribute to China's role in defeating fascism, the parade often serves as a thinly veiled nationalist spectacle aimed at disparaging modern Japan and legitimizing the Communist Party's historical narrative. This is not to suggest that Japan's actions during World War II were innocent or justified — far from it. But China's Victory Day parade is more about nationalist messaging and historical revisionism than sober remembrance, and ultimately aims to serve Beijing's current strategic goals. The irony is that most of the conventional resistance to Japan came not from Mao Zedong's Communist forces, but from Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist army — the same Nationalists who later fled to Taiwan. By standing alongside Xi and possibly even Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump would risk endorsing this misleading version of history. That, in turn, would alienate two of America's strategic partners in East Asia, namely Japan and Taiwan. Taiwan, in particular, would have reason to feel betrayed. Its very identity is rooted in the struggle against the same Chinese Communist Party that now seeks to erase its role, and seemingly its existence, from the annals of history. South Korea, too, would draw the wrong conclusions. Lee Jae-myung, the left-leaning president, has reportedly decided not to attend the same ceremony as a quiet signal of the importance of maintaining his country's alignment with Washington. Trump's presence could undercut this calculation, emboldening voices within Seoul that favor a tilt toward Beijing. It would surely sow confusion among American allies in East Asia at a time when Washington is demanding their deeper support for its Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China. There is also precedent to consider. In 2015, then-President Park Geun-hye of South Korea attended the same parade as the only US ally to do so. While she sought to strike a delicate diplomatic balance, the visit spectacularly backfired. Her decision raised significant eyebrows in Washington and Tokyo, and the political backlash at home was even greater. To this day, her appearance standing between Putin and Xi atop Tiananmen Tower is remembered not as a diplomatic gambit but as a major miscalculation. The stakes in 2025 are even higher. The world is witnessing the most dangerous moment for the global order since the end of the Cold War. China is waging an economic war against the West and flirting with military adventurism in the Taiwan Strait. Russia, meanwhile, remains entrenched in a war of aggression in Ukraine. For Trump to attend a parade that implicitly legitimizes both of these regimes would hand Beijing and Moscow a propaganda victory. Even more troubling is the message it would send about America's military posture in the Indo-Pacific. Chinese military parades prominently feature missiles and weapons systems explicitly designed to threaten US bases, forces and partners, including in Guam, Japan and Taiwan. Trump's attendance at the celebration could be interpreted as tacit approval of Beijing's growing ambitions and invite serious doubt about Washington's security resolve. There is also the potential domestic political cost. Trump built his election campaign on confronting China, restoring American strength, and putting 'America First.' Attending a parade that glorifies communist China's military might would hand his critics a damning visual contradiction. To national security conservatives and China hawks, it could look like a compromise of the very principles Trump claims to represent and defend. It would likewise undercut the recent efforts of Republican foreign policy voices such as Elbridge Colby and Brian Mast, who have been urging America's East Asian allies to take on a more assertive role in Washington's broader efforts to counterbalance China. Trump would thus be well advised to stay home on September 3. Kenji Yoshida is a Seoul-based correspondent for JAPAN Forward
AllAfrica
6 hours ago
- AllAfrica
China fears Nvidia chips could track, trace and shut down its AIs
Beijing has asked Nvidia to explain whether its H20 artificial intelligence chips have backdoors that could allow the United States to position and remotely shut them down. Chinese pundits said similar probes could be extended to other American-made chips. The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) stated on July 31 that it summoned US tech giant Nvidia over security risks related to its H20 AI chip, which had been sold to China. 'Nvidia's AI chips have been alleged to pose serious security risks, and some US lawmakers have called for advanced chips exported abroad to be equipped with 'tracking and positioning' functions,' said the CAC. The CAC said in a press release that American AI experts have confirmed that the 'tracking and positioning' and 'remote shutdown' technologies of Nvidia chips have matured. It requested that Nvidia explain and submit relevant proof materials regarding this issue. On the same day, Nvidia said its chips do not contain backdoors that would allow anyone to access or remotely control them. It said cybersecurity is critically important to the company. Beijing's summoning of Nvidia came after Reuters reported on July 29 that Nvidia had placed orders for 300,000 H20 chipsets (worth about US$3.6 billion) with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) a week earlier. It also followed the trade talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Sweden on July 28-29. In April, the US government stopped Nvidia from shipping its H20 products to China. When Republican US Senator Tom Cotton introduced the 'Chip Security Act' on May 9, the bill received little to no significant media attention at the time. The bill requires AI chips to be subject to export regulations and mandates that products containing these chips be equipped with location-tracking systems to aid in detecting diversion, smuggling or other unauthorized use. It received support from bipartisan lawmakers in the House of Representatives. 'As Congress's chip designer, AI programmer and PhD physicist, I know we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands,' said Congressman Bill Foster. 'With advanced AI chips being smuggled into China and posing a national security risk, Congress must act.' Following meetings between US and Chinese officials in London on June 9, China agreed to resume shipments of rare earth minerals to the US. In return, the US agreed to allow Chinese firms to use its electronic design automation (EDA) software and resume the shipment of H20 chips and C919 flight engine parts to China. Some commentators said the strong demand for H20 from Chinese firms may hurt Huawei Technologies' Ascend AI chips' market share. Wang Xinxi, a columnist specializing in the technology, media and telecommunications (TMT) sector, says in an article that the Ascend 910B has already surpassed H20 in terms of computing power. He says Chinese technology firms still use the H20 only because of its higher bandwidth and software support on the CUDA platform. 'Although the US Congress has not yet passed the Chip Security Act, Nvidia may have already added location-tracking functions in its chips,' he writes. 'All Nvidia computing chips have private data areas where the data is encrypted, so it is technically possible to add a backdoor.' Citing Qihoo 360 Chairperson Zhou Hongyi's recent comments, Chen claims that malicious code can be implanted in a chip during the wafer manufacturing, packaging and testing processes. He says it's difficult for Chinese end-users to identify these unsafe products within the global supply chain, which involves numerous suppliers and distributors. 'If there is any security loophole, Chinese firms must stop using H20,' he adds. 'In the end, companies that use Chinese AI chips will win.' 'Imagine if such 'backdoor' probes were expanded to other major American chip manufacturers in China like Micron, Wall Street investors would quickly sell their semiconductor stocks,' Chen Kai, a Fujian-based writer, says in an article. 'The H20 under probes is a 'freak' from the beginning as it is the downgraded version of the H100,' he writes. 'The Trump administration thought China would thank the US for relaxing its chip export control, and it would easily obtain the Chinese rare earth. It did not expect Nvidia to face security probes.' In 2019, the US banned Huawei routers due to concerns about backdoors. The US Department of Commerce added Huawei to its Entity List in May 2019. In May, Nvidia's Chief Executive Jensen Huang said that tracking massive AI servers or accelerators weighing several tons should not be difficult. However, he said, finding the AI chips after they are sold is impossible. Joseph Hoefer, a Washington, D.C.-based government relations strategist focused on AI, said the intent behind the Chip Security Act is understandable, but its approach creates more problems than it solves. 'First, real-time location tracking of chips is simply not feasible at scale,' Hoefer said. 'Attempting to derive meaningful national security insights from hardware geolocation data would require vast infrastructure, reliable international cooperation, and intensive verification protocols. That level of control does not exist in today's global tech ecosystem.' Secondly, he said, any system tracking chip locations would become an immediate cybersecurity vulnerability. Lastly, he said the compliance burden would fall on responsible US chip makers, which would have to spend time and money implementing unproven tracking systems, navigating regulatory ambiguity, and reporting false positives. Some IT experts have said that, technically, Nvidia can utilize its ecosystem of software and tools, such as the Nvidia Management Library (NVML) and Data Center GPU Manager (DCGM), to identify the locations of its AI chips, each of which has a unique serial number. It would be similar to what Google does to track and manage its AI chips. Google has centralized inventory and asset management systems that track every component, including custom chips such as Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), from manufacturing to deployment. Google's datacenter orchestration and resource management (Borg) can track the real-time performance of every chip. Others argue that even if a chip management software can determine the location of a suspicious AI chip cluster, it will be too late, as it means Chinese firms have already obtained and deployed the chips. Alphabet's Google has already started tracking the location of its in-house AI chips and others in its vast network of data centers for security purposes, Reuters reported on May 6, citing two sources familiar with the matter. Read: Chinese worry Nvidia H20 chips are poisoned wine for AI industry
HKFP
7 hours ago
- HKFP
Man found guilty of desecrating Chinese, Hong Kong flags seeks to overturn conviction at city's apex court
A Hong Kong man with autism who was found guilty of desecrating flags on National Day three years ago has sought to overturn his conviction at the city's top court. Wong Chun-lok, who was 19 at the time, was said to have publicly and intentionally desecrated a national flag and four Hong Kong flags on October 1, 2022, in Sham Shui Po by bending the flagpoles. The defendant denied the charges and said he had been triggered by the bright colours of the flags, InMedia reported. He was sentenced to a rehabilitation centre in June 2023, after a magistrates' court ruled that he was guilty, saying he 'chose' to desecrate the flags and that it was a 'serious' offence. Rehabilitation centres are for young offenders between the ages of 14 and 20 who have not previously been sentenced to institutions, including prisons, training centres, or detention centres. The maximum sentence is nine months. Wong is now attempting to appeal his conviction at the Court of Final Appeal (CFA). According to the CFA's website, Wong has submitted an application to challenge the verdict, but no date for the hearing has yet been scheduled. Previous appeal attempt In March, Wong tried to challenge his conviction at the High Court, where his legal representative argued that the trial magistrate had not properly considered Wong's 'special conditions' and how they might have affected his intention to commit the offence. His representative also said Wong's previous lawyer had not requested the court to accommodate Wong's needs, such as asking him to give testimony at a slower pace, given his language level was estimated to be only at a primary four level. High Court Judge Frankie Yiu shot down the legal challenge. The judge said that the magistrate took into account Wong's mental disorder but did not accept his testimony because Wong said in court that he was targeting the flagpoles, yet in his earlier statements before the trial, he said he wanted to tear apart the flags. 'There is nothing wrong with the magistrate refusing to accept his evidence because [the defendant] gave completely different explanations,' Yiu wrote in Chinese, explaining his reasons for dismissing the appeal. Hong Kong amended the National Flag and National Emblem Ordinance in September 2021, which outlaws the desecration of the Chinese national flag and national emblem on the internet. The offence carries a maximum penalty of a HK$50,000 fine and three years behind bars.
