HSE admits ‘shortcomings' in care of baby who died an hour after birth
'The hospital acknowledges the shortcoming in the obstetric care provided during Ailbhe's delivery and we sincerely apologise in this regard,' it said.
University Hospital Galway (UHG) has apologised for 'shortcomings in the obstetric care' provided during the delivery of a baby girl who died just one hour after her birth.
The loss of baby Ailbhe Gilligan five years ago, the High Court heard, has left a deep gap in the Gilligan household.
Her parents Anna and Gerard Gilligan of Oranmore, Co Galway had sued the HSE over the death on October 27, 2020.
The family's counsel Doireann O'Mahony Bl with John O'Mahony SC told the court it was a very tragic and devastating case.
Counsel said it was their case that CTG monitoring of the baby's heart rate was deficient and at times there was no monitoring of the baby's heart rate and the little girl allegedly suffered a hypoxic ischaemic insult which is a brain injury caused by a lack of oxygen.
Ailbhe, counsel said, died an hour after her birth when attempts to resuscitate her failed.
A letter from UHG was read out as the Gilligan family settled their action against the HSE over the baby's death.
In the letter, the general manager of the hospital Chris Kane expressed sincere condolences to the Gilligan family on his behalf and that of the hospital.
'The hospital acknowledges the shortcoming in the obstetric care provided during Ailbhe's delivery and we sincerely apologise in this regard,' it said.
It added: 'We understand that this statement cannot change or negate your loss, but wish to convey our deepest sympathies to you and to Ailbhe's extended family.'
In the proceedings it was claimed that the CTG monitoring was allegedly grossly inadequate and it was alleged that at times there was no monitoring of the foetal heart.
It was further claimed that as a result of the delay in reacting to ongoing abnormal CTG readings and an alleged failure properly to monitor CTG, the baby suffered a hypoxic ischaemic insult.
Ailbhe could not be resuscitated and she was pronounced dead about one hour after her birth.
It was contended if she had been delivered earlier resuscitation would have been successful and she would not have died but would have survived.
It was claimed there was a failure to have in place proper continuous CTG monitoring and that lapses in the CTG monitoring had been allegedly caused so that at times there was no foetal heart monitoring.
Early warning signs of foetal distress had been allegedly overlooked.
The HSE admitted a breach of duty in the management of the mother's labour and delivery of Ailbhe in failing to repeat a foetal scalp blood sample on three occasions or to expedite delivery based on the CTG tracing.
However, the HSE denied that the death was caused solely and entirely by the admitted breach of duty.
Approving the settlement Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was a very sad and tragic case and he conveyed his deepest sympathy to Ailbhe's parents and the extended family.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Disturbing revelations by RTÉ Investigates about nursing homes
The revelations in the RTÉ Investigates programme about the standard of care in some private nursing homes were deeply disturbing. Readers may be aware of some of the cases of neglect cited in those investigations, of vulnerable elderly people being abandoned or ignored, left at risk of dangerous falls, or in some cases left in unchanged incontinence pads. Little wonder that David Robinson, a consultant geriatrician at St James's Hospital in Dublin, described the situation as such : 'It's abuse — there's no other word for it.' He is absolutely correct. It would be grimly fascinating to hear someone make a counter-argument that the treatment shown somehow does not constitute abuse. It is no slight on the journalists involved, however, to say that while these specific instances are shocking, they are hardly surprising. On a regular basis, we are reminded that whether it is young children in creches, teens reported as missing from Tusla care, and now the abuse of the elderly, our citizens are regularly betrayed by the systems and structures set up to care for them. In the specific area of elder care, older readers may remember other shocking revelations 20 years ago in the case of the Leas Cross nursing home, revelations which led to calls for legislation and enforcement to ensure that never happened again. Judging by this week's revelations, nothing has changed, That is not the only question facing the State. The bland apologies of the corporate owners of the homes are as meaningless as they are predictable, but it has emerged that Hiqa inspected the homes concerned repeatedly in recent years — with the most recent inspection of one home finding that the institution was 'short-staffed', with some residents who were at a high risk of malnutrition. It seems surprising that swifter action was not taken in this particular instance. Then again, the impending excavation of the Tuam babies' burial ground this week reminds us that the State can fail its citizens no matter what age they are. Shameful obstruction of Leona Macken Earlier this week, the HSE apologised to Leona Macken in court over 'failings' which occurred in caring for her. Ms Macken and her husband Alan had taken an action against the HSE, and the court heard evidence which indicated that her 2016 and 2020 smear tests by Quest Diagnostics should not have been reported as negative. The court concluded that the delay in identifying pre-cancerous abnormalities led to her cancer diagnosis. A mother of two young daughters, she now has incurable metastatic cancer. This is clearly a nightmare for the Macken family, and huge credit is due to Leona Macken for her bravery — not only in pursuing this action, but in advocating strongly that other women go for smear tests. She has pointed out in interviews that while those tests did not work for her, they can work for other people. Minister for health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill also apologised to Ms Macken this week, and added: 'She should not have had to fight for her records. 'They need a resolution to their case, and they do not need additional stress through going through the court process,' she said. This was a reference to Ms Macken having to fight for an audit of her records, something which — as pointed out by the minister — was bound to cause additional stress at a severely testing time for the family. This unwillingness to co-operate with individuals seeking answers has uncomfortable echoes in a case which was in the headlines last week. The O'Farrell family, of Monaghan, spent almost 15 years seeking information from several State agencies about the man who killed their son and brother Shane in a hit-and-run incident, only to be stonewalled by many of those agencies. This form of reflexive obstruction is shameful and seems driven by an overwhelming urge to protect institutions at all costs, irrespective of the stress that that puts on individuals. Ms Macken's grace and dignity this week, and her attitude, should embarrass those who placed that stress on her. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here True community pub in Kerry The story coming out of deepest south Kerry has something of the Ealing comedies about it. A community is downhearted by the prospect of losing its pub, only to rally to the cause and buy it. Things looked grim when Humphrey Ó Conchuir and Noreen Uí Chonchuir, towners of the Inny Tavern (Tábhairne na hÚine) in Dromaid, south Kerry, decided to retire. A lack of prospective buyers seemed to doom the establishment to dereliction but Forbairt na Dromoda Teo — the local community social enterprise organisation — stepped in. It raised enough funds for a deposit, as well as securing a bank loan for the property. When there was a shortfall, they launched a GoFundMe campaign, which has generated almost €107,500 to date. Some of that support has come from ex-pats, but some has also come from people who have seen similar facilities disappear in their own part of Ireland and who don't want the same to happen elsewhere. Not every community has that kind of support — or an organisation with the drive of Forbairt na Dromoda Teo — but it is good to see a rural area make a stand against decline and depopulation. Read More Irish Examiner view: Scene of shame at Tuam may give closure
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cork woman with stage 4 cervical cancer urges women to continue screening and get vaccinated
A Cork woman with stage 4 cervical cancer, following two misdiagnosed smear tests, says she still urges women to attend regular screenings and get vaccinated. Mother-of-two Leona Macken received an apology from the HSE at the High Court on Tuesday after two of her smear tests — first in 2016 and again in 2020 — were misread. The 38-year-old hairdresser said she has since been overwhelmed with messages of support from the public, and that the apology meant 'the world' to her. She told the Irish Examiner: 'I still want women and young girls to get their vaccinations and to have their smears done. 'I paid privately for my first smear at 21 years old. I was always conscious of this'. She said taking the case to the High Court was about more than her personal experience — it was to highlight that the national cervical screening programme is 'not working properly' and must be 'properly examined.' 'This happened to me two years after Vicky Phelan, this is not ok, things need to be properly examined, how did this happen again?'. Leona Macken settled her legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts Following the High Court apology on Wednesday, Ms Macken appeared on Newstalk Breakfast and RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne before heading to hospital for chemotherapy. 'They (the HSE) has publicly said they have failed me, there were failures in the system that led to my stage 4 diagnosis' she said. 'I read the apology before it was read in court, and I was really happy with that. But I know it's not easy to get an apology and it's rare and that was really so important to me and my husband and our children and our family'. Ms Macken has been documenting her journey on social media in recent months. 'Having a smear is so important' she said. 'I get so many messages from women telling me they had a smear and are now having a biopsy or laser treatment because they have abnormal cells. 'I wish I had that opportunity' she continued. 'But I didn't, and instead I discovered I was at stage 1, then stage 3 and now stage 4. 'My abnormal cells were missed and I missed a chance to treat them. I really wish I had that chance to have stopped it in its tracks that's why I say to people, get your smear done." She added: 'I will make sure my daughters get their vaccines, I am speaking for them and for the other women who are going to be possibly missed in the system too. 'I trusted the system, but it let me down. Someone needs to investigate why it's going wrong'. Leona Macken and her husband Alan settled their legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts Medical negligence solicitor Cian O'Donnell, who has represented several women affected by screening failures, supported her call. 'Leona Macken is right to encourage people to use the system, because screening does work. 'It didn't work for her, unfortunately, but Leona is clear in her message to other women and that is to engage with regular screenings and look after your health." He added: "The Minister for Health and the HSE and those in charge need to be honest with themselves and not to have this blind insistence that this programme is working. 'Not a single patient in the cervical screening programme has been investigated – Vicky Pelan's screen was never investigated. 'We need to look at the individual screeners and follow the patterns and audits must be done, but that has not happened and that is not norm in laboratories.'
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. READ MORE Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.
