Conservatives lose control of council by one seat
The Conservatives have lost control of Buckinghamshire Council after Reform UK and the Lib Dems made gains at the local elections.
Historically, Buckinghamshire has been a strong Conservative county but while it has a majority on the council of 48 seats it needed to secure one more to keep control.
However, Conservative leader at the authority Martin Tett, has put a loss of seats down to the rise of Reform UK.
Voting turnout for the county was 37%.
The unitary authority will now be made up of 48 Conservative councillors, 27 Liberal Democrats, 11 Independents, four Labour, three Reform UK councillors, two for Wycombe Independents and two councillors from the Green Party.
The Conservatives have held control over the county council since 1973 and the new unitary authority since 2020.
Martin Tett, leader of the authority's Conservatives says in this election "great" council leaders and councils had been lost.
"Here in Buckinghamshire we have bucked the trend a bit. We haven't been wiped out, we are pretty well neck-and-neck between the Conservatives and all of the other parties added together.
"I think we really just need to spend a little bit of time over the next two days to decide what to do.
"The people of Buckinghamshire deserve a good council - well run with a good majority... we need time to assess what that might look like."
He put the loss of seats down to Reform UK who he said had "cannibalised our vote seat after seat after seat".
Until the election, Reform UK had just one seat on the authority in councillor Paul Irwin.
There are now three Reform UK councillors but before the election Mr Irwin spoke of his hopes for more.
He had said: "I'd like to get the minimum of six to 10 councillors - we can make a real difference with that - anything else will be a bonus."
Buckinghamshire Council becomes the latest authority where the Conservatives have lost full control, and again Reform UK has played its part.
The Tories - who have controlled both the unitary council and the previous county council for many years - ended up one short of the 49 seats required for a majority, after the Liberal Democrats picked up a councillor in the Missenden Ward, which in 2021 had been a safe Tory seat.
Martin Tett, the Conservative group leader on the authority, will now have to work with his fellow councillors to find a smaller party to form a coalition with over the next couple of days.
Tett attributed Reform UK's vote share in some seats as playing a part with his party's losses, although the party only picked up three seats in the county it perhaps stopped the Tories in several wards around the county.
The Liberal Democrats have also increased its number of councillors on the authority and return to being the second largest party.
The Green Party has also doubled its number of councillors, but Labour have dropped to four, with 11 Independents and two Wycombe Independents making up the council, which was reduced from 147 councillors to 97 by the Boundary Commission for England.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Could it be a year for change in Buckinghamshire?
Buckinghamshire Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom finally finds a cause: taking on Trump
The Democratic governor of liberal California has welcomed Donald Trump to his state, cosied up to Conservative podcasters, and slashed healthcare provisions for illegal immigrants this year. But the reinvention of Gavin Newsom as the sort of Democrat who might be able to win back Republican voters came to a shuddering halt during a weekend of riots. With Mr Trump ordering troops onto his streets, Mr Newsom hit back, accusing the president of intentionally inflaming a difficult situation. It leaves Mr Newsom with no choice but to halt his drift Right-ward, said Hank Sheinkopf, a Democratic strategist. 'If not, he loses his entire constituency,' he said. 'In other words, there's a toleration level for moving to the centre, but not when it comes to massive chaos in Los Angeles.' Mr Newsom has put himself at the front of Democrat efforts to examine how they lost the 2024 election so badly. He launched a podcast in March in which he picks the brains of leading figures in Trump world. And Mr Newsom angered liberals with the very first episode, in which he interviewed Charlie Kirk, the controversial Conservative, when he said it was unfair that transgender athletes could compete in women's sport. He also said Democrats simply could not compete with the likes of Mr Trump and Elon Musk when it came to online reach. 'We're toast,' he said. Last month, facing a budget crunch, the telegenic governor back-pedalled on a promise of healthcare for all. He announced a freeze in enrolment for undocumented adults in the state's public health insurance programme. He has also urged cities to ban encampments for homeless people, cracking down on the tent cities that have blighted so much of California. And in January, he thanked Mr Trump for federal help in rebuilding after devastating wildfires that swept through Los Angeles. 'I've been always a hard-headed pragmatist,' he told reporters recently when quizzed about his shifting positions. 'I'm not an ideologue.' That all seems a long time ago after immigration raids around Los Angeles on Friday sparked three days of riots, and an order by Mr Trump to send in 2,000 National Guard troops. Tom Homan, the president's border tsar, threatened to arrest the California governor if he got in the way. 'Come and get me, tough guy,' was Mr Newsom's pithy response on X. After Mr Trump agreed the governor should be arrested, the governor shot back saying it was 'a line we cannot cross as a nation'. Credit: MSNBC He threatened to sue the federal government for its illegal act and called the president a 'stone cold liar' for failing to bring up his plan to send the National Guard when they spoke by telephone. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation while simultaneously depriving the state from deploying these personnel and resources where they are truly required,' he wrote in a letter. That puts him at the centre of the news headlines, said James Carville, the veteran Democratic strategist and former adviser to Bill Clinton, even if it was too early to say that the party had finally found a national figurehead to oppose Mr Trump. But he said Mr Newsom's full-blooded reaction to Mr Trump and his tsar did not mark a reversal of his shift to the Right, but were compatible with his rejection of progressive totems such as identity politics. 'I don't think we should say we can render a verdict after 48 hours, but his actions have been totally what he would expect,' he said after Mr Trump had 'invaded' his state with troops. At the same time, he added, the crackdown on illegal immigrants remained a popular part of the platform that helped Republicans reclaim the White House last year. That leaves the governor and Democrats with a fine line to straddle: taking on Mr Trump over his decision to send in troops but without being painted as soft on illegal immigration or unrest in the streets. 'I think Trump sees all kinds of trouble on the horizon,' Mr Carville said. 'What he's very good at is just doing something to dominate the news.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump budget's caps on grad school loans could worsen doctor shortage
Four years of medical education costs $286,454 at a public school, on average, and $390,848 at a private one, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical school graduates leave with an average debt of $212,341, the association found. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The price of a four-year program in osteopathic medicine is $297,881 at a public school, on average, and $371,403 at a private school, according to the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. The average indebtedness of their graduates is $259,196. Advertisement The proposed loan caps 'will either push students and families into the private loan market, where they take on more risk and have less consumer protection, or simply push people out of higher education altogether,' said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, a nonprofit advocacy group. Private student loans are also not eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness programs, which many students rely on to manage their debt. Students from low-income families may have difficulty qualifying for private loans. Advertisement In a letter to congressional leaders, the American Medical Association asked lawmakers to carve out exceptions in the law for medical education, saying that the current bill would deter good candidates from applying to medical school, discourage physicians from working in underserved areas, and make medical school unaffordable for all but the very wealthy. Critics said it could also drive more doctors away from lower-paying primary care fields, an area of acute need, and into more lucrative specialties. Conservatives have argued for decades that the availability of federal student loans allowed tuition costs to balloon — a proposition rejected by the Association of American Medical Colleges, which instead blames the rising cost of living. Studies examining the relationship between loans and tuition have varied in their conclusions. Sara Robertson, press secretary for Republicans on the House Education and Workforce Committee, said the proposed loan limits 'will drive down the cost of medical school and thus reduce the need for students to borrow in the first place.' She said private lenders would offer students lower interest rates than the government's Grad PLUS program would. The private market, though, has shrunk markedly since the Great Recession, according to Lesley Turner, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Chicago and an author of an unpublished paper that linked loans to rising tuition. In an email, Turner said it wasn't clear that 'the same level of nonfederal funding would be available today.' Because of inflation, she noted, the $150,000 limit for medical students is 'substantially reducing the amount these students can borrow, even compared to the status quo before the Grad PLUS program.' The program was started in 2006. Advertisement Robertson said schools could also help close the gap. 'Nothing in the bill prevents colleges from providing additional financial aid to low-income students pursuing medical school,' she said. That is not an option for schools of osteopathic medicine, most of which are private and not attached to universities with foundations, and which currently enroll almost one-third of the nation's future doctors, said David Bergman, senior vice president of government relations and health affairs for the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. And many academic medical centers, which have lost millions of dollars in research grants abruptly pulled by the Trump administration, are facing severe financial strain. A vast majority of medical students rely on loans, not just those from low-income backgrounds, Bergman noted. Ending federal involvement in administering and subsidizing student loans was one of the goals laid out in Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's conservative blueprint for overhauling the government. It argued that leaving student loans to private lenders and ending federal loan forgiveness programs would 'allow for market prices and signals to influence educational borrowing.' Trump's policy bill would allow medical residents to defer not only their loan payments but also the interest on those payments, a provision that many medical professionals have supported. But the legislation would prohibit residents from counting those low-paid years of training as public service, limiting their eligibility for a popular loan forgiveness program that encourages young doctors to work in underserved areas. As a result, 'access to much-needed medical care for patients in rural and underserved communities will be diminished,' the American Medical Association's CEO, Dr. James Madara, wrote in the letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, and House Democratic leader Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York. Advertisement The changes will disproportionately affect low-income students with backgrounds that are underrepresented in medicine, who may face more difficulty obtaining private loans, said Dr. Virginia Caine, president of the National Medical Association, which represents Black physicians and which advocates for health equity. In turn, she said, it will limit those students' ability to return to serve in their communities. By 2037, the United States is expected to face a shortage of 187,130 physicians, including 87,150 primary care physicians such as internists and pediatricians who play a pivotal role in the early detection and management of chronic disease, according to the federal Health Resources and Services Administration. (There are currently 933,788 professionally active physicians.) About 75 million Americans live in areas where it is difficult to get access to primary care. The ratio of primary care providers is projected to decline to 76.8 per 100,000 people by 2037, from 81.6 per 100,000 in 2022. This article originally appeared in
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada plans huge boost in defence spending to hit NATO target by year's end, Carney says
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney tore up Canada's timelines for boosted military spending on Monday and replaced them with an aggressive pledge of $9.3 billion to finally hit Canada's long-standing commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization within a year — half a decade faster than previously promised. The new funding is on top of $53.4 billion in already-expected defence spending in the current 2025-26 fiscal year, and will — among other things — boost military salaries, replace and repair aging equipment, and increase the ranks of the short-staffed Canadian Armed Forces, Carney said. It will also lift Canadian defence spending past the equivalent of two per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), the prime minister said, a threshold the country has failed to achieve since all NATO members agreed to meet it in 2014. Carney said his government would continue increasing defence spending even further as NATO prepares for a summit later this month, where leaders like U.S. President Donald Trump and the alliance's secretary general have forecast talks towards a new defence spending target of five per cent of GDP. In a speech at the University of Toronto on Monday, and later at a news conference at Fort York, Carney declared the new track to hit the NATO target is needed in a world made more dangerous by Russia's aggression in Ukraine, rising competition between great powers and a less reliable United States. Billions of new spending earmarked for the military over the past decade is 'still not close enough to face these mounting risks,' Carney said. 'The brave women and men who are protecting our sovereignty do not have the resources they need for a risker world,' he added, describing how only 'one of our four submarines is seaworthy' and 'less than half our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational.' The Department of National Defence (DND) reported last year that 51 per cent of its maritime fleet, 56 per cent of its 'key land fleets' and 54 per cent of its air fleets met their definition for operational readiness in 2022-23. In the House of Commons, Conservative MP James Bezan accused the Liberals of 'breaking our military' through underinvestment, and charged that 'nobody believes them' when they talk of boosting defence spending. Jill McKnight, the Liberal veterans affairs minister, responded that defence spending fell below one per cent of GDP in 2014, when the Conservatives were in power. In recent years, Canada has come under intensifying political pressure to hit the NATO target. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 prompted calls across the West to rapidly rearm with the return of Cold War-era tensions. Canadian military officials and the federal government have also pointed to China as a potential threat, especially in the Arctic, where the advance of climate change is widely expected to open trading routes and access to resources. Last summer, at the NATO summit in Washington, Canada came under fire from Republican politicians over its relatively low ratio of defence spending. As the Star reported at the time, the government arrived at the meetings without a clear plan to demonstrate how it would hit the NATO spending target. On the final day, then-prime minister Justin Trudeau promised Canada would achieve it by 2032, but did not provide details of how. He also criticized the idea of the spending target, dismissing it as a ' crass mathematical calculation ' that doesn't reflect Canada's true contribution to the military alliance. Trump has railed against NATO members he sees as taking advantage of the huge American military to spend less on their protection — criticism he has levied at Canada and European allies alike. On Monday, Carney repeated his pledges to deepen partnerships with like-minded democracies, including by seeking to participate in the European Union's defence industrial plan, ReArm Europe. He also said DND will 'immediately design a new defence policy' barely one year after it released the last one, which earmarked $8.1 billion in fresh spending over five years — less than the $9.3 billion in a single year that Carney unveiled Monday. The new spending includes $2.63 billion to help recruit and retain soldiers, as the CAF grapples with a persistent personnel shortfall of 13,000 it aims to overcome by 2030. It also includes $2.1 billion for a new 'defence industrial strategy' to build more munitions in Canada, and explore ways to development critical minerals, energy, and communications infrastructure the military needs, according to officials who briefed journalists. On top of that, the government pledged $2 billion to 'diversify' defence partnerships beyond the U.S., with money to be spent on new defence policy advisers who will be sent abroad as part of a diplomatic push, officials said. The $62.7 billion now expected for defence spending in the current fiscal year is mostly budgeted for DND, officials said, but also includes spending from 13 other government departments — like Veterans Affairs and Global Affairs Canada — that is counted toward the NATO target. The government also announced Monday that the Canadian Coast Guard will be used for some defence purposes. Officials said Monday that the government doesn't plan to arm Coast Guar boats, but will use the agency to boost the military's maritime surveillance, especially in the Arctic. Alluding to the ongoing trade war over Trump's tariffs, which Canada deems illegal and unjustified, Carney argued the rapid increase in defence spending is necessary in a world changing so dramatically. The once-reliable U.S., he said, is 'monetizing its hegemony' amidst other threats that require Canada to bolster its military. But Carney also said Monday that there is still room for Canada to deepen its military ties with the U.S., pointing to ballistic missile defence as a possible example. In recent weeks, Carney confirmed Canada is in talks with the U.S. to join Trump's $243-billion 'Golden Dome' missile defence system, although the government has not said how much money it might spend to do so. 'There are many, many reasons for very close, if not enhanced, co-operation between Canada and the United States,' Carney said. The prime minister also defended the new spending, which comes as the new Liberal minority government delays its first budget — normally presented each spring — until the fall sitting of Parliament. Carney said part of the reason to wait is for clarity on Canada's defence commitments. That will come up at this months' NATO summit in The Hague, where leaders are expected to agree to a new spending target. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte predicted the alliance will endorse a threshold of five per cent of GDP, with more than three per cent on 'hard' defence spending and the rest for 'defence-related' investments. Carney said Monday that he's confident Canada can get there, stating that defence industrial spending on areas like artificial intelligence, critical minerals and quantum computing are already 'in the zone' of 1.5 per cent of GDP. 'Defence, it literally is to keep our citizens secure, and we'll do what's needed,' he said.
