Opinion - Trump must resist WHO's pandemic power-grab
The World Health Organization is still not doing enough to stop another pandemic. Last month, the UN body adopted a new pandemic treaty by consensus at its annual meeting, but the accord merely doubles down on the WHO's previous failed policies. President Trump has rightly pledged to oppose this treaty, but he must now take further steps to protect Americans from the WHO's counterproductive approach.
The COVID-19 pandemic was a seminal era for the world, and the WHO was created for such crises. It should have rallied the international community to respond aggressively and discover the pandemic's cause. Instead, the organization allowed the Chinese Communist Party to conceal China's role in the outbreak, partnering with Beijing to release a now widely discredited report that labeled a lab-leak origin as 'extremely unlikely.'
On Trump's Inauguration Day in January, he rightly issued an executive order withdrawing the U.S. from the WHO. He had started this process in his first term, but President Joe Biden reversed it immediately upon taking office.
The WHO did not respond with reforms or distance itself from China in the intervening four years. Instead, at China's behest, the organization continued to deny Taiwan a seat at its annual meeting. The WHO also welcomed Russia and Syria to its Executive Board in 2020 and 2021, respectively, for three-year terms, even though the regimes of both countries at that time had a history of bombing hospitals and indiscriminately killing civilians.
North Korea also joined the board in 2023, where it will remain until 2026, even as it continues to starve its population to pay for its illegal nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs.
Rather than push for new WHO leadership, the Biden administration voted to allow Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to serve a second five-year term, which ends in 2027. These developments, and now the pandemic treaty, showed that the WHO had lost its way.
An effective pandemic treaty would focus on China's two core mistakes during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, Beijing lied about the emerging outbreak and pressured the WHO to mute its response. Second, the Chinese Communist Party refused to cooperate with a full investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
However, the 30-page treaty fails even to mention China or its response to the COVID-19 pandemic and merely expands the WHO's bureaucracy in a way that does not address the problem.
The agreement creates a new Conference of Parties that will meet at least annually with additional subsidiary meetings. But public health officials do not need more glitzy meetings in Geneva. They should instead be streamlining their organization and sending money back to countries that can use it to prevent and detect the next disease outbreak.
The treaty also mandates that vaccine, therapeutics, and diagnostics manufacturers conclude legally binding contracts with the WHO to provide rapid access to 20 percent of their real-time production. Half of the allotment will be a donation, while the other half must be made available at affordable prices. But given the WHO's ineffective leadership and Beijing's control over the organization, American companies should not be forced to send public health materials funded by U.S. taxpayers.
The treaty's inadequate provisions fail to recognize that it was America that saved the world from the pandemic. Operation Warp Speed, a World War II-style engineering and production effort, was one of the greatest achievements of Trump's first term. The Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense pledged $13 billion toward the development and manufacturing of a vaccine. In just seven months, vaccines were created for a novel disease.
By the end of 2020, the U.S. was distributing 14 million doses of the vaccine to Americans. But a U.S. president should decide whether any of the production should be exported moving forward. Under the pandemic treaty, however, the WHO would have been entitled to almost 3 million doses from the United States with no input from America's elected leaders, who would be unable to determine whether the organization will use them responsibly.
Trump should go further than simply withdrawing from the WHO and pledging not to sign the pandemic treaty. He should amend his current executive order or issue a new one mandating that federally funded or supported vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics cannot be provided, sold, or transferred to the WHO unless it allows Taiwan to attend the World Health Assembly, bars Russia and North Korea from seats on the Executive Board, holds China accountable for the COVID-19 pandemic, and ensures the reliable distribution of vaccines.
Congress should support the administration by codifying such executive actions into law, thereby ensuring that a new Democratic administration cannot reverse them in the future.
The WHO said the pandemic treaty is a victory for public health. But it's not. Trump must act to protect Americans from the WHO's power grab.
Anthony Ruggiero is an adjunct senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and former White House National Security Council senior director for counterproliferation and biodefense.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ThinkCareBelieve: Week 20 of America's Comeback Led by President Trump
Washington, DC, June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Link to ThinkCareBelieve's Article: has published an article on Week 20 of America's Amazing Comeback under the Trump Administration. New investment in America manufacturing and business is bringing jobs roaring back. These are all positive indicators of solid work to put America in a good position. Despite criticism, America is getting stronger and the American people are more hopeful than they have been in a very long time. The Congressional Budget Office released a report stating that President Trump's tariffs would decrease the U.S. budget deficit by $2.8 Trillion and the trade deficit has been reduced to half. The price of eggs are 61% less, the price of gas fell again, and the stock market is strong. The border is secure and the murder rate is dropping. Inflation has evaporated, and companies are flocking to come and invest in America. The article has the latest on the return of El Salvadoran criminal Kilmar Abrego Garcia who will stand trial for heinous crimes of human trafficking and crimes against women and children. The article also has an extensive explanation of the One Big Beautiful Bill and how it will help Americans. It covers the codifying of three of President Trump's Executive Orders and DOGE being given access to the Social Security database. The article also covers the Remove Act and the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act introduced by Senator Marsha Blackburn. The extensive work of ICE hunting down criminal aliens and taking down trafficking networks is explained. Many criminal aliens came to America to commit crimes and terrorist acts, so ICE is focused on finding them and removing them. Also covered in ThinkCareBelieve's article is President Trump's travel ban, which countries are on it and how it will be used. Also covered is the visit from recently elected German Chancellor Merz, the D-Day Celebration and the autopen investigation. is an outlook. ThinkCareBelieve's mission for Peace advocacy facilitates positive outcomes and expanded possibilities. To achieve Peace, we will find the commonalities between diverse groups and bring the focus on common needs, working together toward shared goals. Activism is an important aspect of ThinkCareBelieve, because public participation and awareness to issues needing exposure to light leads to justice. Improved transparency in government can lead to changes in policy and procedure resulting in more fluid communication between the public and the government that serves them. America needs hope right now, and Americans need to be more involved in their government. ### CONTACT: CONTACT: Joanne COMPANY: ThinkCareBelieve EMAIL: joanne@ WEB: in to access your portfolio

Epoch Times
27 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Panel at Capitol Spotlights CCP's ‘Silent War' Against US
WASHINGTON—Experts and advocates on June 6 spotlighted the Chinese regime's invisible war to manipulate the West and suppress dissidents outside China's borders. The panel, hosted by The Epoch Times at the U.S. Capitol, focused on Beijing's escalating suppression of dissent in the United States, particularly targeting faith group Falun Gong. The spiritual practice, which includes meditative exercises and teaches the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance, has been a major target of the Chinese communist regime since Beijing launched an extensive persecution 26 years ago. Millions have been put in Chinese jails, where they went through Even outside of China, Falun Gong practitioners have experienced 'Strike on All Fronts' The communist regime is deploying information and legal warfare to attack Falun Gong and entities affiliated with the group in the United States, said panelists. The goal, they said, is to disrupt Falun Gong's influence in the international community and its calls to end the 26-year-long persecution in China. Yuan Hongbing, a legal scholar who has high-level contacts in the Chinese state apparatus, first disclosed the Chinese regime's campaign to The Epoch Times in December 2024. Related Stories 6/5/2025 5/29/2025 Speaking virtually at the panel, Yuan broke the regime's efforts down to 'one central focus and two directives.' According to Yuan, the campaign is focused on character assassination of Falun Gong's founder, Li Hongzhi, in a bid to shake the foundation of the spiritual group. Then the party uses information and legal warfare by mobilizing Western mainstream media, deploying disinformation, and other tactics to diminish Falun Gong's influence. The regime will 'strike on all fronts,' Yuan said. The Epoch Times' CEO Janice Trey described the campaign as a 'silent war.' By co-opting the Western legal system, regulatory agencies, and legacy media outlets in the West to reshape global opinion, she said, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is directly challenging the foundation of a democratic society. 'This tactic threatens free speech, religious liberty, and national security,' Trey said. Epoch Times CEO Janice Trey speaks during an event about escalating transnational repression by the Chinese Communist Party, on Capitol Hill on June 6, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times Varied Tactics A fire alarm cut short the event just as panelist Mark Yang, advocacy officer for the nonprofit Falun Dafa Information Center, expounded on how the regime's campaign on U.S. soil was playing out. The U.S. Capitol Police later told The Epoch Times there was 'an electrical issue that has been fixed.' Over the past year, the New York-based center has documented more than 100 instances of Some threats targeted Shen Yun's hosting venues. A fake bomb threat at the Kennedy Center in February forced the venue to hold an 'This escalation that we are seeing right now is a result of a top-down decision,' said Yang. 'Unfortunately, we are really witnessing these tactics unfold right now.' He cited two Chinese agents who tried to use More than 1,500 Shen Yun performers and family members signed a petition to denounce the articles' portrayal of the organization, describing it as ' Eric Patterson, Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation President and CEO, speaks during an event about escalating transnational repression by the Chinese Communist Party, on Capitol Hill on June 6, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times Such manipulation of legacy institutions in the West struck Eric Patterson, a panelist and president of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. 'What was amazing is how many stories there were with this negative bent when against this one group, when there was no similar reporting, to my knowledge, against any other international performing group or any performing group in the United States,' Patterson told The Epoch Times. 'What that suggests is that a place like the New York Times and other U.S. media outlets have to be extremely careful, and perhaps they have just been gullible in being manipulated by the CCP.' The regime, in leaked internal documents, has used 'The Chinese people are not our enemy, but the leadership of the Communist Party and its many, many organs and institutions, they are saying that they are our enemy.' Mark Yang, researcher and advocacy officer at the Falun Dafa Information Center, speaks during an event about escalating transnational repression by the Chinese Communist Party, on Capitol Hill on June 6, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times 'Consider the Implications' Yang said that in the case of Shen Yun, the CCP has 'demonstrated the ability to weaponize the American media, bait our government agencies, and take advantage of our judicial system.' 'Consider the implications,' he wrote in his prepared remarks that were cut short, 'if the CCP can target one group effectively, what prevents it from targeting other individuals or institutions it doesn't like?' The Epoch Times's commitment to exposing the communist regime's abuses has made it one of Beijing's key targets since the publication's founding in the United States in 2000. Not long after, Chinese authorities arrested dozens of people in China who were involved in the publication, sentencing several to as long as 10 years in prison. In March, the Justice Department Be it Falun Gong or other groups that the regime has sought to stifle, 'the reason that they are targeted first and foremost is because they stand for something that cannot be controlled by the CCP,' Patterson said. 'They stand for an authority structure, for beliefs, for values that are outside of the control of the communist party, and that is a threat.' Sherry Dong contributed to this report.

Wall Street Journal
36 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How the Cybertruck Came to Embody Tesla's Problems
The bromance between Elon Musk and President Trump is ending at a difficult time for Tesla TSLA 3.67%increase; green up pointing triangle. The electric-vehicle maker lost roughly $150 billion of market value Thursday—its biggest ever drop—after the Tesla CEO and Trump traded insults. Sales of Teslas have slumped this year. Tariffs could disrupt the supply of key components. The sprawling Republican tax-and-spending bill would end tax credits for EV buyers. And Tesla's Cybertruck has been a disappointment. Musk set high expectations for the Cybertruck, telling investors it would be Tesla's 'best product ever.' The angular, stainless steel pickup was supposed to generate buzz for Tesla by showcasing new technology and unlocking the lucrative truck market. Instead, it has become synonymous with Musk's polarizing stint in politics, exposing some owners to graffiti or middle fingers from other drivers. And its reputation has been tarnished among Tesla fans because of a spate of recalls and manufacturing issues that have resulted in cycles of repairs. In the U.S., the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks in 2024—well below Musk's ultimate goal of 250,000 a year. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla sold around 7,100 Cybertrucks in the U.S., according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility. Ford's F-150 Lightning pickup outsold it. In an effort to boost sales, Tesla has rolled out lower-price versions of the truck and started offering buyers incentives such as 0% financing and free upgrades. Almost as soon as the $100,000 Cybertruck hit the road, quality problems began to multiply. Reports on social media cited cracked windshields and spotting from so-called rail dust, orange discoloration similar to rust. In its first year, Tesla recalled the truck seven times to fix dangerous defects. In March, with large metal panels falling off the trucks, the tally rose to eight. Some of the quality problems were known and documented internally before the truck went on sale, including issues with the accelerator pad and windshield wiper that later triggered recalls, said former employees who worked on the Cybertruck. But there was pressure inside Tesla to get the truck to market quickly, according to these employees. Tesla didn't respond to requests for comment. 'Elon Musk will tell you the biggest professional mistake was the falcon doors on the Model X,' said David Fick, a longtime Tesla owner who got his Cybertruck in March. He referred to the complex door design that opens upward and hinges at the roof. 'I believe that the Cybertruck is going to go down as an even bigger corporate stumble.' The retired banker in Boynton Beach, Fla., chose to wait more than a year to buy his Cybertruck, hopeful that many of the biggest issues would be identified before he drove his off the lot. 'They do a lot of bleeding-edge stuff where they rush to the market and then you're a beta tester as an owner,' Fick said. He paid about $72,000 for the car, plus $7,300 for window tinting and a custom wrap for exterior trim panels known as cant rails, covering his new car in a metallic maroon color. Soon after, Tesla recalled cant rails because they could become unglued. 'I've had tons of recalls on my Teslas over the years,' said Fick, who added that the cars are worth the hassle. 'Eighty percent were fixed by [software] updates, but these are physical things we are dealing with now.' Musk unveiled the prototype for the Cybertruck in 2019. At the time, he said it would cost $39,900, with a battery range of up to 500 miles—an ambitious combination that would be a stretch for any EV maker. Work on the vehicle was delayed a couple of years, leaving engineering and manufacturing teams with only a few months to do final testing before the trucks went to customers, former employees said. Musk tried to temper expectations around how quickly Tesla could increase production, given its unique design. 'There is always some chance that Cybertruck will flop, because it is so unlike anything else,' he wrote on social media in July 2021. Still, he promoted some of its most unusual features, including his dream of making the car amphibious. Former employees said they took Musk's social posts as orders, but the engineering proved difficult. By 2022, it was clear internally that Cybertruck wouldn't be able to meet all Musk's criteria, so engineers scrapped an early design and started over—developing a smaller, landlocked version of the truck, the people said. After about a year and a half of testing, Tesla delivered the first Cybertrucks to a dozen or so customers in late November 2023. An early version of the truck started at $100,000 and had an estimated range of 318 miles. Two months later, Tesla issued its first recall on the vehicle: a software update that required the company to increase the size of the font on a warning system used across its fleet. It was the first of three recalls that Tesla addressed on the Cybertruck through over-the-air updates to its software. Cybertruck's problems couldn't be fixed by software updates alone. In April 2024, Tesla issued a recall for the accelerator pedal. The company had received a notice from a customer complaining that the accelerator had gotten stuck. Tesla found that the pad attached to the long pedal could dislodge and get stuck in the trim above the pedal, causing the car to accelerate. An internal investigation found the issue was the result of an 'unapproved change,' in which Tesla employees used soap as a lubricant to attach the pad, according to the recall notice. Inside Tesla, the accelerator pad had been a known issue starting with the prototype, according to an employee who worked on the part. The manufacturing team also identified the part as problematic, this person said. Tesla also had problems with the Cybertruck's expansive windshield, which measured nearly 6 square feet. Sometimes the heavy glass would break, two employees said. The glass either arrived cracked from the supplier in Mexico or from handling at the Austin, Texas, facility, they said. Some owners took to social media to describe the glass cracking as soon as they drove off the lot, or while they wiped the inside of their windshield. The windshield required a large windshield wiper measuring 50 inches long. In June 2024, Tesla issued a recall on the wipers, whose motors Tesla found had been overstressed by testing. The wiper had been flagged nearly a year before, two people who worked on the Cybertruck said. It was one of the first issues identified on the vehicles, at which point it was classified as a 'gating issue,' which meant that it needed to be resolved before production could move forward. Reid Tomasko, a 25-year-old YouTube creator, took his Cybertruck on a cross-country trip, during which it performed perfectly, he said. Then came winter in New Hampshire. He was driving near his home in Lebanon, N.H., in February when a metal panel flew off the side of his truck. In March, Tesla issued a recall affecting most of the Cybertrucks it had produced—more than 46,000. The problem involved adhesive that could become brittle in extreme weather, causing exterior trim panels called cant rails to dislodge. Inspecting his truck, Tomasko said he found loose connections on almost every panel that used the adhesive, including the large pieces of stainless steel over the rear wheels, the front fender and the front doors. 'I was wondering, why are they not recalling the other panels?' Tomasko said. After replacing several panels, Tesla offered to buy back Tomasko's truck for nearly all of the $102,000 that he paid, he said. He accepted. 'I am planning on getting a newer one for cheaper soon,' he said. Write to Becky Peterson at