UPS white paper casts shade on e-commerce gig delivery providers
As traditional parcel carriers face rising competition from an increasingly diverse array of carriers, UPS has published a white paper aimed at discrediting last-mile delivery companies that utilize gig drivers even though it owns a crowdsourced delivery platform. Not discussed is the possibility that shippers are looking for delivery alternatives because of frustration over the size and frequency of rate increases from FedEx and UPS.
The paper, published on Monday, serves as a promotional vehicle for UPS Capital's InsureShield Shipping Insurance, which the company says can help merchants mitigate last-mile risks. However, it also offers valuable insights for merchants into the habits of e-commerce buyers.
Online merchants are struggling to meet customer expectations for ultra-fast, reliable delivery and control over their delivery experience, while containing costs, but gig logistics providers have not proved to be a reliable solution, UPS Capital, the financial services division of UPS, said in the paper.
Sixty-two percent of merchants reported an increase in damage, theft or delays tied to gig-driven deliveries. Only 12% of respondents expressed confidence in gig carriers' service quality compared to 69% in 2022 who believed gig services provided superior customer satisfaction over traditional carriers, according to the research by Dynata commissioned by UPS Capital.
Dynata polled 500 e-commerce vendors and 1,000 U.S. consumers for the survey.
'Brands that fail to proactively manage shipping visibility, customer communication, and risk mitigation will bear the brunt of consumer dissatisfaction,' the white paper said.
Consumer sentiment has also shifted from 63% preferring retailers that offer same-day gig delivery to 55% now favoring traditional carriers, with just 20% actively choosing gig-powered delivery. The most common consumer complaints about gig delivery companies and apps – like Uber Courier, Shipt (a Target company), Postmates and Dispatch – include delayed packages, lack of timely communication, and missing or damaged shipments, the paper said.
UPS owns Roadie, a delivery platform with independent drivers that use their own automobiles to provide last-mile, on-demand and same-day delivery services.
Nearly a third of consumers rated delivery speed as their top shopping priority, over cost and product selection. Demand for speed is even more pronounced among younger consumers, with 51% of Gen Z respondents prioritizing quick shipping compared to only 15% of people age 62 and older.
Personalization is also a key consideration, with 44% of shoppers surveyed wanting the ability to customize their shipping preferences and 84% saying they're more likely to buy from merchants that offer the ability to set delivery options. Consumers are more likely to purchase from a merchant that offers the ability to track packages in real time, pick the package arrival day and time, and guarantee insurance coverage for all packages in case of mishap, according to the white paper.
Nearly all surveyed merchants agreed that the negative delivery issues – late or missed deliveries, packages left in unsafe locations, or lack of real-time tracking – can heavily influence future purchasing decisions. If a brand fails to resolve a shipping issue, a quarter of surveyed consumers hesitate to shop with them again, and nearly 44% of Gen Z respondents demand issue resolution before considering a repeat purchase, the paper said.
The rise in popularity of shopping directly through platforms like Instagram, TikTok and Facebook is transforming e-commerce, but only 19% of surveyed shoppers trust social media storefronts for deliveries and 39% have never attempted a social commerce purchase at all.
Consumers no longer solely blame carriers when things go wrong, UPS Capital and Dynata said. In 2022, 83% of surveyed consumers blamed delivery providers for delivery mishaps. This year, that number has dropped to 39%, as more shoppers now hold merchants accountable for ensuring a seamless delivery experience.
UPS Capital said merchants can regain control of last-mile logistics by using advanced tracking technologies for real-time shipping status, conducting regular performance reviews and feedback loops to ensure service quality, and gathering customer feedback through satisfaction surveys. It also recommended choosing reliable carriers that ensure quality and secure delivery, as well as leveraging comprehensive shipping insurance – like its own InsureShield – to protect against financial losses.
More than 40% percent of surveyed merchants report that 2% to 5% of their shipments suffer from damage, loss or theft each quarter. Larger enterprises with revenues exceeding $50 million face even steeper losses, the paper said.
The insurance offered by UPS Capital protects shippers against lost or damaged shipments, allowing them to cover their cost to refund or replace a purchase when this occurs, said John Costanzo, who heads parcel and freight consultant LDK Global Logistics.
'They'd make a better case if they could show how using well established carriers like UPS reduced delays and damages, in addition to a more consistent delivery experience. That would tie their value proposition to the main elements identified in the survey – cost, visibility and speed of delivery. Shipper insurance really only is a protection for when last mile delivery fails in a pretty dramatic way,' he said by email.
But the incentive to partner with gig logistics companies could be growing as legacy express carriers take a more aggressive pricing approach.
Parcel carriers no longer are announcing rate increases on a predictable, annual cadence with plenty of advance notice. Over the past 18 months, FedEx and UPS have introduced more frequent, subtle price changes that take effect more quickly as the fight for revenue in a low-demand environment intensifies, said AFS Logistics and investment bank TD Cowen in their freight index report last week.
During the first quarter, UPS announced new ZIP code zone alignments, new fees on print and paper invoices, fees for check and wire payment, an increase to the late payment fee, and a new payment processing fee. Both carriers have also continued to make fuel surcharge changes, the net result of which is the UPS ground fuel surcharge increasing 15% and the FedEx equivalent rising 12% from Q1 2024 to Q1 2025 — even as the price of diesel fuel fell 8.4% over the same period, according to the analysis.
'These latest changes introduce even more complexity for shippers to digest and negotiate. If they overlook any one of these subtle updates, they can find themselves subject to punitive provisions like a blanket payment processing fee that's in effect a 2% price hike,' said Mingshu Bates, chief analytics officer and president of parcel at AFS. 'If you look at the state of the market, these changes fit the carriers' stated aims of prioritizing network efficiency and revenue quality. Competition from the Postal Service and regional carriers has FedEx and UPS looking to defend their slice of a soft market while trying to shift away from the discount-heavy dynamics of the past year and a half.'
Ground parcel pricing remained extremely strong, as the cost per package rose 4% quarter over quarter to a record-high average, driven by rate increases, surcharge adjustments and higher billed weight. The ground parcel rate-per-package index is expected to decrease from 31.3% in the first quarter to 29.5% in the second, which still represents a 2.6% increase year over year.
Express parcel pricing grew in line with seasonal trends in the first quarter, with general rate and fuel surcharge increases powering a 5.2% sequential quarterly increase in cost per package. But volume growth remains a challenge in the domestic express parcel market, which is partly due to carriers' own success in optimizing ground networks, enabling shippers to shift volume to less expensive ground service for similar performance.
But, said AFS/TD Cowen, volumes have also been challenged by competition from an increasingly diverse carrier landscape. The U.S. Postal Service, for example, recently launched priority next-day service in 54 markets.
Click here for more FreightWaves/American Shipper stories by Eric Kulisch.
FedEx begins its first direct Singapore-US air cargo service
Hongkong Post to stop handling US-bound packages amid tariff conflict
UPS hires Delta Air Lines to maintain Boeing 757 engines
The post UPS white paper casts shade on e-commerce gig delivery providers appeared first on FreightWaves.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
10 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI could replace interns — but there's still hope for Gen Z
Entry-level jobs as we know them could soon be a thing of the past. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says AI can now effectively do the same work as junior-level employees, and its skillset is only expected to get even better in the coming months. He predicted that AI will eventually rival the skills of even an experienced engineer, all while being uniquely capable of operating continuously for days on end without breaks. 'Today [AI] is like an intern that can work for a couple of hours but at some point it'll be like an experienced software engineer that can work for a couple of days,' Altman told a panel this week alongside Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy at Snowflake Summit 2025. Altman added that in the next year, we could see AI solving complex business problems autonomously. 'I would bet next year that in some limited cases, at least in some small ways, we start to see agents that can help us discover new knowledge, or can figure out solutions to business problems that are very non-trivial," he said. It's a bold prediction we've heard echoed by other tech CEOs like Nvidia's Jensen Huang, who warned that those who hesitate to embrace AI may find themselves at the unemployment office. 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI," he said at last month's Milken Institute conference. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Generative AI stands poised to make entry-level jobs obsolete at a time when Generation Z is solidifying its place in the workforce, but that hasn't stopped Gen Z from embracing the technology. A recent Resume survey found that while one in 10 workers reported using ChatGPT regularly, Gen Z workers were twice as likely to use the tool. The same study found that the vast majority of workers at any age see ChatGPT as a helpful tool. But over half of Gen Z workers considered it the equivalent of another co-worker or assistant, compared to 40% of millennials and 35% of older generations. Altman has broken down the generational differences in AI usage before: '[It's a] gross oversimplification, but like older people use ChatGPT as a Google replacement. Maybe people in their twenties and thirties use it as like a life advisor, and then, like people in college use it as an operating system,' he said at Sequoia Capital's AI Ascent event in May. Even as Gen Z embraces AI, some tech leaders have been sounding the alarm bells about the economic fallout of an AI-driven job market. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently told Axios that AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white collar jobs, causing unemployment to skyrocket by 10% to 20%. OpenAI owns ChatGPT, a revolutionary chatbot AI that, since its release in 2022, has quickly become one of the most advanced and widely used AI tools in the world. Powered by OpenAI's latest model, GPT-4o, ChatGPT can help you plan your weekend, write a term paper, or any number of other tasks. It supports everything from real-time speech interaction to multimodal content creation — and you can get many of its most powerful features for free. If you're curious, be sure to check out our guide on how to use ChatGPT, as well as these tips to get the most out of ChatGPT.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 Magnificent S&P 500 Dividend Stock Down 24% to Buy and Hold Forever
UPS shares are down 24% over the past six months, boosting the dividend yield to record highs. The company is focusing on higher-margin business and trimming low-profit contracts, especially with leading client Amazon. UPS is taking smart steps to position itself for the next economic upswing. 10 stocks we like better than United Parcel Service › Shares of freight service veteran UPS (NYSE: UPS) are diving these days. The stock is down 24% in the last six months, building on a longer downturn that started in the inflation panic of 2022. The steep price drop brought two investor-friendly qualities to UPS. First, this world-class company is hanging out in Wall Street's bargain bin at the moment. Second, the same stock price pressure drove UPS' dividend yield to record-breaking levels. Read on to see why you should consider buying some UPS stock on the cheap in June 2025, locking in a great purchase price and a fantastic dividend payout. It's fair to say that UPS has experienced some financial trouble recently. The pandemic e-commerce boom faded out. The inflation crisis accelerated the package-shipping slowdown. More recently, trade tensions between Washington and Beijing pose new threats to the shipping industry. UPS thrives on high consumer confidence and healthy global trade trends. The company suffers when those market qualities are headed in the wrong direction, as they are in 2025. So yes, UPS is having some trouble. However, it is well equipped to handle these challenges. Even in a painful downswing, UPS remains a very profitable business. The company generated $5.9 billion of net income over the last four quarters, converting 92% of the paper profits into free cash flows. UPS spent all of the cash profits on dividend checks. That's hardly ideal, and the company doesn't have much room for dividend increases in this economy. At the same time, UPS has $5.1 billion in cash reserves and a rock-solid credit rating. The dividend looks safe from cash-preserving cuts in the foreseeable future. And UPS isn't resting on its laurels. The company plans to boost its profitability over the next year by taking on a smaller number of low-margin shipments. The long-standing partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is the main target for this cost-cutting effort, with shipments under the contract halving by the summer of 2026. The move will let UPS close 73 shipping centers and reduce its annual operating time by 25 million hours. "Amazon is our largest customer but it's not our most profitable customer," CEO Carol Tom said in January's fourth-quarter earnings call. "Our contract with Amazon came up this year. And so we said it's time to step back for a moment and reassess our relationship. Because if we take no action, it will likely result in diminishing returns." In other words, UPS is taking action to solidify its bottom-line profits. The helpful moves it makes in this challenging economy should translate into stronger earnings in the next macroeconomic upswing. Investing is a marathon, not a sprint. UPS stock is cheap right now for short-sighted reasons. The company should thrive in the long run, equipped with a world-class shipment system and a proactive management team. By focusing on more profitable services, UPS could get back to generous dividend increases in 2026 and beyond. And in the meantime, the dividend yield stands at an eye-popping 6.7%. It's nearly an all-time record for UPS, and one of the 10 most lucrative yields found in the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index. Furthermore, UPS shares are valued at just 14.3 times trailing earnings and 0.9 times sales. These multiples are about half of their long-term averages and nearly equal to the all-time lows seen in the subprime mortgage meltdown of 2008. Taken together, the rich dividend yield and affordable stock price add up to a great long-term investment. The UPS shares you buy in this temporary dip can help you build wealth in the long run. Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and United Parcel Service. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Magnificent S&P 500 Dividend Stock Down 24% to Buy and Hold Forever was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
The sneaky new friendship divide between millennials and Gen Z
Whether to share your location is a heated topic, especially among millennials and Gen Z. As a Gen Zer, I share with 18 people, which my older friends may view as excessive. Gen X is indifferent, seeing both pros and cons, as social connections evolve post-pandemic. Do you want to share your location with me? Eighteen of my closest friends and family already do. On a Tuesday evening in early June, I can map a digital town square of that real-life network. One friend is still at the office; two are at Central Park; another is at home hundreds of miles away from me. These are people who share their location with me, not just for directions, but in perpetuity through the Find My Friends app. I think it strengthens our bonds to observe each other's routines and special outings — even when there's no practical need for it. To others, location sharing is a nightmare. They see it as an extension of the surveillance state, with their college roommate, jealous partner, or overbearing parent acting as Big Brother. The Washington Post proclaimed that it's "making us miserable." How you feel about your friends and loved ones being able to see where you are at any given time may represent your current lifestage, how friendships evolve, and technology's role in our relationships. "This is brand new culturally, historically," Anna Goldfarb, the author of "Modern Friendship: How to Nurture Our Most Valued Connections," told me of the confluence of friends and location-sharing technology. "And it makes sense that people are like, 'what does this mean?' This is something we haven't ever had that technology to do before — much less the space and freedom to do it." While it's impossible to generalize entire generations' attitudes toward anything, I wanted to find out how location sharing shakes out across the age spectrum. So, I spoke to seven people spanning three generations to get a sense of their feelings about sharing their location. Gen Zers were chill about it; so are Gen Xers. But as millennials approach middle age, location sharing highlights how their friendships are growing — or growing apart. The location sharing debate represents the journey of growing up in a digital age. As a geriatric Gen Zer, I'm still at a stage in life where the majority of my friends are single or unmarried, and pretty much none of them have kids. We're living similar lifestyles, often out and about, and I don't encounter many issues with my friends knowing my whereabouts at all times. That mid to late 20s uncoupledness and childlessness aligns with historical trends: On average, each generation gets married and has kids later in life. For Aiden Lewis, a 26-year-old Ph.D. student in the Boston area, sharing his location with his family is a matter of convenience. "The positives really far outweigh the negatives," he said, adding that while it's unlikely he'll be in danger, if he is, his parents would know his whereabouts. "But otherwise, the only risk on my part is minor embarrassment that they saw me out late drinking too much." A 2022 Harris Poll found that Gen Z, born 1997 to 2012, was the most likely generation to say it was convenient to share their location. For folks like Lewis, location sharing is just another digital tool in their belt. As Goldfarb, on the border between Gen X and the millennials, said, "When I was younger in my 20s, I would've absolutely loved to know where all my friends are at all times." As I've progressed through my 20s, location sharing has shown me some shifts that are harbingers of what's to come in the next decade: Couples are together more often. My higher-earning friends, or those in more corporate roles, might show up at nice hotels on a work trip or a more upscale vacation. Others might still be on campus for their graduate degrees. And it felt symbolic when I revoked a former college friend's location-viewing privileges — a sort of closure for a specific period in my life. Millennials, born 1981 to 1996, are in a life stage that's as bifurcated as their views toward location sharing. Meranda Hall, a 33-year-old in Brooklyn, operates more like a Gen Zer in this realm. She doesn't have any married friends, and she said she never plans to marry. She and her friends have no qualms about sharing their locations. "All the people that I share mine with, they're super open about it, and no one is ever anywhere particularly interesting for it to be too much of a debate," Hall said. For her peers of similar ages but a different life stage, like Goldfarb, location sharing might be more fraught. After age 30, Goldfarb said, friendships start falling off a cliff; people move, have kids, take on different jobs, or prioritize relationships relevant to their careers. "When you get older, you tend to have different perspectives on your friendships," she said. "You don't need your friends to know where you are at all times when you're older, because you probably have children, spouses, in-laws, there's just different relationships that bubble to the surface in my opinion," In my informal surveying, which also included several coworkers, millennials were the most likely to have very strong thoughts on location sharing. Some outright hated it, although still shared with one or two friends, and others felt no need for it, unless they were happily coupled and shared with spouses. Some said they found it to be strangely intimate. Olivia Bethea, 31, said she only shares with four people. She said she's noticed location sharing coming up more in regular conversations, with people offhandedly referencing that they checked where someone else was. She doesn't see herself expanding her location-sharing circle more. "A lot of people end up sharing where they are anyway on Instagram and stuff, but I'm finding myself to be a little bit more protective over it," she said. "People can make a lot of inferences from your location, and I just don't want to invite those inferences." Millennials grew up before everyone carried an always-on GPS device at all times. A concern that I heard repeatedly was about surveillance and willingness to constantly reveal where they were, which doesn't seem to bother the always-tracked and always-online Gen Zers. "Millennials, it wasn't something that we always had. I guess if you're Gen Z, it's kind of always been a thing," Hall said, adding, "I guess it's just something to be skeptical about." When I spoke to Gen Xers about location sharing, I was met with a proverbial shrug. The forgotten generation, born 1965 to 1980, doesn't seem to be too pressed about location sharing, although they're not eager to adopt the practice either. Meredith Finn, a Gen Xer in her 50s in Maine, said she thinks she missed the location-sharing bandwagon completely. It would've been more fun in college, on a night when all her friends were out at different bars. "I remember nights when we'd go from bar to bar looking for some of our friends, and we'd just miss them," she said. "And it just would've been kind of nice to be able to see where everybody was hanging out. Of course, we didn't have anything like that. We didn't even have cellphones when I was in college." She said that she'd probably be willing to share her location with a few friends. But if anyone came up to her and asked to share her location, "I think I would say, 'Why? Just send me a text and ask me where I am.'" Leslie Lancaster, a 47-year-old in California, felt similarly — she said she's shared location when she's navigating somewhere difficult to find on a map, or trying to find friends in rural locations. Lancaster said she can see the benefits of it, but also how it could become controlling in the wrong hands. "For myself, my husband and I, I don't need to know where he's at all the time. So that's why I probably wouldn't share my location with him, unless I were potentially off on a vacation or a trip where I was not with him," she said. Both Gen Xers said they could see its utility in a time when folks are struggling to connect or feeling more isolated. Lancaster said she could understand the impulse to see where your friends are, even if you're not actively communicating. "People are so isolated now. I mean, since the pandemic and a lot of work from home, a lot of people are just in their little bubbles," Finn said, adding that it's rarer to pop into your regular coffeeshop and run into five friends. "It doesn't happen the way it used to." Like many technological advances, your thoughts on location sharing are a reflection of your own situation. It's at a crossroads of issues facing our social lives: The lack of third spaces has put them into our phones, social circles are shrinking, and we've had to use technology to fill the gaps. I'm sure Gen Alpha, born 2010 to 2024, will come up with something that horrifies and shocks me (they're already back on Snapchat). As I creep toward age 30, I am thinking about the ways the social contours of my life have changed; in speaking with other Gen Z peers, we all realized we had a few friends we'd fallen out of touch with who were still lingering on Find My Friends. Right now, though, it feels mean to pull the cord. "I predict that this is something that you're going to change your relationship with," Goldfarb told me. She added, "I think that it's more likely that it's going to be a more concentrated friend group that will need to know this about you." Do you have strong thoughts or feelings about location sharing? Contact this reporter at jkaplan@ Read the original article on Business Insider