Scrapping two-child benefit cap may be harder after welfare U-turn, minister says
The education minister said Labour was still committed to tackling child poverty but, when asked if the backbench rebellion that resulted in about £5bn of annual savings on welfare being scrapped had diminished the chances of the cap being removed, she said there was an impact.
'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make future decisions harder,' she told BBC1's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.'
She added on: 'The mission that we're driving across government is about making sure that background doesn't determine success, because for far too many children in our country, the family that they're born into, the town that they're born into, will absolutely determine their life chances.'
Asked the same question on Sky's Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Phillipson said: 'The changes in the last week, of course, have come at a cost, and we have been upfront about that.'
She added that a child poverty taskforce she was leading with the work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, was 'looking at every way that we can lift more children out of poverty'.
Measures already taken included an expansion of the eligibility for free school meals, plus the plan announced on Sunday for one-stop family hubs across England to offer parents advice and support, intended to in part replace the Sure Start system introduced under the previous Labour government and then hugely cut back by the Conservatives.
Phillipson said she had heard the views of the many Labour backbenchers and child poverty charities who want the two-child benefit cap removed.
The cap, which limits families claiming many means-tested benefits to their first two children, apart from in very limited circumstances, was introduced under the Conservatives.
Experts say scrapping it would be the single most effective way of reducing child poverty. They say about 100 children are pulled into poverty every day by the limit.
Phillipson said: 'But they will appreciate, as we all do, that any change we set out in this area or in any other area, we've got to be clear about what the cost is and how we make sure that the numbers add up.'
The taskforce, she said, was 'considering all of the ways in which we can make sure that we have a fairer and more equal society and a country where children are not scarred by child poverty'.
She added: 'My message to my colleagues, to parents, to campaigners and to everybody watching this morning, is that this Labour government is serious about tackling child poverty.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Inquiry launched into government handling of Harry Dunn's death, Lammy announces
David Lammy has launched an independent inquiry into the way the Foreign Office officials handled the death of Harry Dunn in an accident involving a member of the US intelligence community. The 19-year-old was killed when a car driven by Anne Sacoolas hit his motorcycle near the exit to RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire in 2019. Ms Sacoolas, who was the wife of a CIA operative working near the airbase, was allowed to leave the country with claims that she was covered by diplomatic immunity. Requests for extradition were initially rejected by the first Donald Trump administration, although the president met Dunn's parents. Sacoolas would later provide videolink evidence but did not return to the UK for trial because it was unlikely to result in a prison sentence. There was criticism over the way the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCDO) handled the case, and whether more could have been done to ensure Sacoolas returned to the UK. The review will be led by Dame Anne Owers DBE, who will examine actions taken by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in support of the family of Harry Dunn in the period between 27 August and the end of December 2019. Having promised to undertake a review while sitting as an opposition MP, Mr Lammy has met twice with family members since becoming foreign secretary and committed the government to learning lessons from the tragedy. He said: 'I have the deepest respect for the resolve Harry's family have shown since his tragic death and in launching this independent review, we are honouring the commitments we have made to them. 'I am confident the review into how the case was handled by the previous government has the remit required to properly address the family's concerns and to ensure lessons are learned. 'Having worked previously with Dame Anne Owers on the Lammy Review in 2017, I don't believe anyone is better qualified to undertake this important piece of work.' The mother of Harry Dunn, Charlotte Charles, said: 'We welcome today's formal announcement by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office that a full review into the handling of Harry's case will now take place. 'We now look forward to working with Dame Anne Owers and doing all we can to support her in this important task. It is our sincere hope that her work will help ensure that no other family is ever treated in the way that ours was. This review is yet another step in our long journey towards ensuring that Harry's loss was not in vain and that the World is a better and safer place.'
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour opens door to wealth tax
Downing Street has opened the door to introducing a new wealth tax following pressure from Labour's union paymasters. No 10 repeatedly refused to rule out a new levy on wealthy taxpayers after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' it. In a briefing with journalists on Monday, the Prime Minister's spokesman initially appeared to suggest a wealth tax was off the table, pointing back to past comments from the Chancellor ruling it out. However, he failed to explicitly repeat that commitment, instead saying repeatedly that Sir Keir Starmer stood by his position that 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. It will raise suspicions that Rachel Reeves is considering a new raid on the rich to plug the hole in Britain's finances left by the Government's dramatic reversal on welfare cuts. The Prime Minister is facing mounting pressure to consider the move. On Sunday, some of Labour's biggest union paymasters, including Angela Rayner's former employer Unison, backed calls for a wealth tax. One union source told The Telegraph they would raise the idea with the Prime Minister and lobby Labour MPs. Asked on Monday if Sir Keir would back a wealth tax, his spokesman said: 'We have repeatedly said that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that… But as you know, I'm not going to write the next Budget for you right now.' He went on to point out that 'the Chancellor has said in the past that we're not going to be bringing in a wealth tax', but repeatedly failed to repeat that commitment. Asked if those words reflected the Government's current position, the spokesman said: 'The existing position is what I've just said a couple of times, which is that we have repeatedly said, as the Prime Minister has said, that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that.' He added: 'The Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in society pay their fair share of tax. And that's why the Chancellor announced a series of reforms in the last Budget to help fix the public finances in as fair a way as possible.' In an interview with The Telegraph earlier this year, Ms Reeves said there would be no increases to wealth taxes in her Autumn Budget. 'We're not interested in a wealth tax,' she said. 'Our priority is to grow the economy and that's the way that you make working people better off and secure better public finances. 'But there was lots of speculation ahead of the Spring Statement, including in your paper, about all the taxes I was going to raise. What taxes did I raise in the Spring Statement? None.' Asked on Monday if the position had now changed, the spokesman said: 'The position is as it's always been, and as I say, the Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in our society pay their fair share of tax, but I'm just not going to write future Budgets here, as is our long-standing position.' Economists have warned that a new wealth tax would trigger a fresh exodus of the rich from Britain. However, the Prime Minister's spokesman insisted that finance leaders still see the UK as the 'best place in the world to invest in'. It comes after Cabinet ministers were warned taxes would have to rise following Sir Keir's capitulation on benefits. The gutting of the welfare cuts package last week has required the Treasury to find an extra £4.6 billion a year but has emboldened hard-Left Labour backbenchers to push for more policy changes. Speaking on Sky News on Sunday, Lord Kinnock, who led the Labour Party between 1983 and 1992, said of Sir Keir's Government: 'The appearance has been given that they are bogged down by their own imposed limitations. 'There are ways around that, ways out of it, pathways that I think people are willing to explore and actually would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public. 'They include, for instance, asset taxes in a period in which for the last 20-odd years in the United Kingdom, like quite a lot of other Western economies, earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. They've just gone through the roof and they've been barely touched. 'Now, you wouldn't have to touch assets of under £6 million or £7 million, so people's houses would be secure. But even by going for an imposition of 2 per cent on asset values above £10 million, say, which is a very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10 billion or £11 billion a year.' Five trade unions have told The Telegraph that they will pressure the Prime Minister to pursue wealth taxes, while Labour rebels threw their weight behind the demands.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
France and UK expected to announce joint plan on small boat crossings
Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron are expected to announce plans for French police to do more to block small boats crossing the Channel at a summit in London this week, but a wider deal on returning asylum seekers is still up in the air. While details remain limited, with French officials still believed to be finalising what action the country can take with boats that are already in shallow waters, an announcement on new plans is expected on Wednesday. It is also still possible that Starmer and the visiting French president could set out plans for a 'one in, one out' returns scheme for asylum seekers who make it to Britain, although UK officials say this is less likely. This latter scheme would allow for the return of small boat arrivals in exchange for the UK accepting another asylum seeker from France who is seen as having a clearer right to claim asylum in Britain, such as through family ties. Macron arrives on Tuesday for a state visit, which will involve events with royals and other pageantry, but is also scheduled to include an Anglo-French summit, and other meetings with Starmer. France is expected to announce that it will allow police to intervene in shallow waters up to 300 metres from shore in order to stop small boats leaving. This will need changes to existing protocol that do not contravene the UN convention on the law of the sea, which bars any intervention at sea that is not an actual rescue. It is understood that a French review of such tactics has been completed, with French and British officials continuing talks about what more could be done. On Friday, French police used knives to puncture a boat in shallow seas near Boulogne, in northern France, although it is not known if this was a sign of new protocols or a one-off. Downing Street declined to comment on possible announcements before the visit, although Starmer's deputy spokesperson indicated that there was likely to be concrete progress on small boat crossings. He told reporters: 'We expect to make progress on a wide range of issues and joint priorities, and that includes migration. I'm not going to get ahead of the summit this week, but there are a range of maritime tactics that we have been discussing and have secured agreement with the French over. 'It is operationally and legally complicated, but we expect these tactics to be operationalised soon. 'It's for French authorities to make operational decisions for themselves, but as I say, it's a complex area, but we are working extremely closely with the French. Our relationship with them is better than it has been for a long time.' The hope of the 'one in, one out plan', in combination of a greater likelihood of boats being stopped in the water, is that this could dissuade people from paying people-smugglers to try to get them across the Channel. It is still not known if that plan will be ready to be announced in time for Macron's visit, with UK officials saying there were still 'lots of moving parts'. One UK government source said: 'We want to get it right. Signing it during the visit would be ideal, but it would be even more ideal to make sure it works properly.' Starmer and Yvette Cooper are facing sustained political pressure to reduce the number of people arriving across the Channel. Despite a government promise to 'smash the gangs' organising crossings, more than 20,000 people have crossed to the UK in the first six months of this year, up 48% on the equivalent period in 2024.
