HeyDude releases new collegiate collection ahead of college football season 🏈
It's not the first time HeyDude has released an NCAA collection, including styles in their popular Wally shoe for men and Wendy shoes for women. But, they did step up their game with the new Wendy release for the Tennessee Vols, Texas Longhorns and Alabama Crimson Tide.
Here's what you need to know to shop the HeyDude's collegiate collection:
Rep your team all season long: Shop the HeyDude x NCAA collection:
What makes HeyDude sneakers different?
HeyDude shoes are known for their comfortable fit and lightweight design. The company aims to create shoes that make you feel like they're an essential part of your wardrobe.
Shop HeyDude deals
Does HeyDude offer any discounts?
HeyDude offers a discount of 20% off all regular-price footwear to all healthcare professionals and seniors 65+, a discount of 25% off to military personnel, first responders and teachers, and a discount of 30% off to students. This discount includes shoes and accessories. You will need to verify your discount status through ID.me, then you will receive a unique discount code to shop at HeyDude.com. It does exclude collaborative styles and other specified items, and the discounts cannot be combined with other offers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
2025 SEC football predictions: Will Texas rise to the top? Is Alabama ready to bounce back?
The entirety of college football outside of the SEC derived much joy last season from watching the SEC land only three College Football Playoff berths and none of its teams reach the national championship. This year, I predict, the SEC will come storming back. The league's offenses last year largely stank. No team averaged 30 points in conference games. Not coincidentally, many of the SEC's highest-profile QBs in 2024 — Georgia's Carson Beck, Alabama's Jalen Milroe, even Texas' Quinn Ewers — regressed from the year before. Advertisement This year's group should fare better. It's a strong cast, led by Texas' Arch Manning, South Carolina's LaNorris Sellers, LSU's Garrett Nussmeier, Florida's DJ Lagway and Oklahoma's John Mateer, all of whom rank in the top 10 of The Athletic's preseason QB Tiers. Oh, and Vanderbilt's Diego Pavia. But a couple of the prime contenders will need a new guy to deliver. I'm betting on Alabama's Ty Simpson. I'm selling Georgia's Gunner Stockton. SEC championship: Texas over Alabama Texas: Manning is going to be good. How good? We'll see. But the Longhorns, who won 13 games last season, should have a much more potent rushing attack with the tandem of Quintrevion Wisner and a healthy CJ Baxter. The front seven will be dominant. If Texas flops, it will be because a less-experienced offensive line took a significant step back. Alabama: Kalen DeBoer's 9-4 debut was a disaster, particularly on offense. But it's a big deal that he's reuniting with his former Washington offensive coordinator, Ryan Grubb. Bama has a great receiving corps led by Ryan Williams, a huge offensive line and a defense teeming with vets like linebacker Deontae Lawson and defensive tackle Tim Keenan III. I'm all in on a Tide bounce-back. LSU: Brian Kelly has the pieces. Nussmeier threw for 4,052 yards last season, and he has targets galore in Aaron Anderson, Kentucky transfer Barion Brown and breakout tight end Trey'Dez Green. And the defense could be significantly better with all the transfer upgrades, to go with returning stud linebackers Whit Weeks and Harold Perkins. Texas A&M: This is my SEC sleeper team. The Aggies quietly fielded the league's top scoring offense in conference play (29.4), and dynamic QB Marcel Reed figures to be more advanced. The backfield is deep, led by Le'Veon Moss. Yes, the defense has questions. But I like the Aggies to go on the road in Week 3 and upset Notre Dame. Advertisement Georgia: Although it won the SEC last year, Georgia did not meet the standard of Kirby Smart's previous teams. The Dawgs should have a strong rushing attack with Nate Frazier and Josh McCray, but how will OC Mike Bobo best utilize Stockton? Even the defense has questions for once. I've got the Dawgs straddling the CFP bubble. Oklahoma: It's a make-or-break year for Brent Venables. With exciting ex-Washington State QB Mateer and his former OC, Ben Arbuckle, last year's miserable offense should be light-years better. But I still don't have full confidence in Venables, who has finished below .500 in two of his first three seasons. Would 8-4 be good enough to earn Year 5? Florida: Billy Napier earned a reprieve after November upsets of LSU and Ole Miss propelled the Gators to an 8-5 finish. Lagway is bursting with talent. But those now mentioning Florida as a CFP candidate may be overreacting. All of the Gators' best performances were at home. This year they visit LSU, Miami, Texas A&M and Ole Miss. South Carolina: I feel bad bursting Gamecocks fans' bubbles with a 6-6 pick. I realize excitement is through the roof thanks to Heisman contender Sellers. But it's asking a lot of Shane Beamer to turn around and reload after losing defensive stalwarts like Bronko Nagurski winner Kyle Kennard, All-American safety Nick Emmanwori and All-SEC RB Raheim Sanders. Hugh Freeze: I'm not sure Auburn can afford a third head-coach buyout in five years. I'm not sure it has a choice if Freeze finishes below .500 again. But he and ex-Oklahoma QB Jackson Arnold should help salvage each other's careers. Auburn was an explosive offense last season when it wasn't giving away the ball (which was often). Sam Pittman: Arkansas improved from 4-8 to 7-6 last season, but Pittman's program still feels like it's treading water. QB Taylen Green is decent but hardly spectacular, and the cast around him is ever-changing. And this year's schedule is brutal: Notre Dame, Texas A&M, at LSU, at Texas, at Ole Miss. Even on the road in Memphis is tricky. Advertisement Mark Stoops: The winningest coach in UK history isn't in trouble — yet. But he will be if this season goes as poorly as I'm predicting. The program has been struggling to keep up in the portal/NIL era, and Stoops has been struggling to find an offensive identity. But maybe journeyman QB Zach Calzada will make me look foolish for 3-9. (Photos of Arch Manning, left, and Kalen DeBoer: Brett Davis / Imagn Images; Gary Cosby Jr. / Imagn Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mandel's Mailbag: Wrapping up the Michigan scandal and Week 0 Big 12 stakes
Are you ready for some football? Good, because on Saturday, we have a Week 0 big-network tripleheader. Noon ET on ESPN: No. 17 Kansas State vs. No. 22 Iowa State in Ireland 6:30 ET on Fox: Fresno State at Kansas 7:30 ET on CBS: Stanford at Hawaii But first, let's put a bow on the whole Michigan-NCAA thing. (Note: Some questions have been lightly edited for length and clarity.) Advertisement With Michigan's light-tap-on-the-wrist 'penalty,' why don't more major programs just cheat and dare the NCAA to do anything about it? — Mia-Do' A Call me crazy, but I don't consider a $30 million-plus fine to be a tap on the wrist. In fact, if you gave Michigan AD Warde Manuel truth serum, he'd probably tell you he'd rather be banned from the Citrus Bowl this year than add that considerable expense to an athletic department already projecting a $15 million deficit in the first year of revenue sharing. But I get it. If you're someone who wanted blood over the sign-stealing scandal, you've been conditioned for decades to expect postseason bans and vacated wins when a school gets in trouble. Personally, I'm glad the membership has finally realized that the people most affected by postseason bans are athletes who weren't even on the team at that time and had nothing to do with the infractions. Some of the players on the 2010 and '11 USC teams who got banned over Reggie Bush's extra benefits were in junior high when Bush played there. Which is why USC fans — and Ohio State fans, and Miami fans, and any other fan base that suffered through a postseason ban — may be furious Michigan didn't get one. However, even though I think an eight-figure fine is plenty punitive, it's not exactly a deterrent. That money is not coming out of Jim Harbaugh's, Sherrone Moore's or Connor Stalions' pockets. And generally speaking, it's not 'programs' that cheat, it's individuals. I wonder how differently this would all feel if Harbaugh weren't already long gone to the NFL. The guy is effectively banned from college coaching for 14 years. That's unheard of. In this case, it doesn't matter because the guy wasn't coming back to college regardless. But if this were a college-only guy (Dabo Swinney, Kalen DeBoer, Josh Heupel) or someone still early in their career (Dan Lanning, Marcus Freeman, Kenny Dillingham), it would be devastating for them. Advertisement As for Stalions himself, if you read that report, he is the clumsiest saboteur since the 'Home Alone' burglars. I can't say his eight-year show cause will be a deterrent to fellow GAs and analysts as much as it will be comical reading material around their offices. Stewart, why can't Michigan's fans understand why we all think they have no integrity left anymore? They all claim to be so much better than every other team when they obviously aren't. Signed, your friends in SEC country. — Bob D. No idea what you're talking about, Bob. Haven't most Michigan fans accepted the punishment and expressed ample disappointment in the stain this story brought on their university? Do you and The Athletic refer to the Michigan 'situation' as the sign-stealing scandal to sensationalize and draw engagement, or because it is easy (and a bit lazy)? — Todd D. Oh, I see. Several prominent coaches have the 'can't win the big game' label, like James Franklin. However, it would seem that if you keep getting close consistently, you eventually break through (e.g. Ryan Day last year). Tom Osborne couldn't win the big game … until he did. Now we only remember the dominance and the titles. Are there any coaches who have consistently had winning top-10 programs yet never broken through? — Cullen The first guy that comes to mind in my time covering the sport was Georgia's Mark Richt. For most of his 15 seasons (2001-15), you could count on the Dawgs to field a top-10 team and compete for SEC titles. However, they never climbed that last rung to the national title game and suffered some pretty bad luck along the way. The 2002 team went 13-1, but it just so happened Miami and Ohio State were undefeated. In 2007, they were No. 4 heading into championship Saturday. No. 1 and No. 2 both lost, but they got passed by LSU when the Tigers won the SEC title game. And in the 2012 SEC championship game, they were four yards and six seconds short against Alabama from advancing to the BCS title game and playing overmatched Notre Dame. Advertisement Most of all, his bad luck was that only two teams reached the 'playoff' back then. Contrast that with successor Kirby Smart, who began his tenure with a 'can't win the big one' run, specifically with Nick Saban and Alabama. There was a second-and-26 in the 2017 national title game, the infamous Justin Fields fake punt in the next year's SEC title game, a blowout loss in 2020 and the inexplicable 2021 SEC title game meltdown. Then the Dawgs won the rematch, and all anyone mentions about Smart now is the back-to-back championships. (And lots and lots of player arrests.) I do believe the 'getting close consistently' theory is correct. Franklin is a particularly extreme case, though, as his big-game record is truly atrocious (1-15 against top-five teams), and even with five top-10 finishes in 11 seasons, even after reaching the CFP semifinals last year, it doesn't feel like he's come close to the top yet. The Nittany Lions have been consistent, but not dominant. However, in most, if not all, of those top-10 losses, he did not have the better team. Simple as that. This year, he may well have the best team in the country. How does a Farmageddon loss this weekend shape either Iowa State's or Kansas State's season outlook? — Jon S. It'd be bad! We're only one season in the expanded CFP era, but I think you can assume for now that anyone other than the Big 12 champ is going to face tall odds to be a CFP participant. The loser of this game will not have the same margin for error as the losers of Texas-Ohio State or LSU-Clemson. An 8-1 Big 12 record likely gets you to Arlington, but it's asking a lot to win eight straight in a conference with more parity than any of the other P4 leagues. However, you could also have a situation like last year, where everyone goes 7-2 and it's tiebreakers galore. Advertisement I've noticed over the years that these big Week 0 games tend to foreshadow the rest of the teams' seasons. Nebraska's season-opening loss to Illinois in 2021 was the moment you began to realize, this isn't getting better, is it? And the 2022 loss to Northwestern, coupled with a Week 2 loss to Georgia Southern, led to Scott Frost's firing. (That was also Pat Fitzgerald's last Big Ten win at Northwestern before he, too, was fired the following offseason amid a hazing scandal.) In 2023, Sam Hartman threw it all over Navy in his Notre Dame debut. The Irish went 10-3, the Midshipmen 5-7. And Georgia Tech running all over Florida State last year was the most telling Week 0 precursor yet. Doubtful either Matt Campbell or Chris Klieman will lose their job anytime soon, but they need this win. And whoever loses might become a bit nervous about the rest of the season. The coverage of Michigan's sign-stealing scandal has been bad journalism all around. Michigan has been the victim of at least two known instances where their previous week's opponent deciphered all of their signals by game's end and then handed that information over to the next opponent. On a scale of 1 to 10 in the cheating department, this is a 10, and what Michigan did is a 3. — Adam L. Oh, those poor victims. Will no one think of the innocent children whose signs were stolen? Which do you think is the most likely reason for the Big Ten/Tony Petitti pivoting to their new proposed 28-team Playoff? A. They think it's the best way to maximize revenue. B. It's a ploy to make the original 16-team proposal seem better or C. Spite for everyone making fun of him for his last proposal. — Tyler S. At this point, I'm beginning to think it's D: Petitti is making his own elaborate Borat-style troll documentary and we're all unwitting subjects in it. Behind the scenes, folks are insistent this latest version is just an 'idea,' not a formal proposal. However, many important people around the sport are still ticked about it, given that they found out through the media and the entire operation looks buffoonish by association. 'We sound like immature children throwing garbage against the wall,' a CFP executive told CBS Sports. Advertisement Somehow, the lesson Petitti took from the 4-4-2-2-1 backlash wasn't 'people hate the idea of predetermined Playoff berths'; it's 'maybe they'd accept it if we just gave out more of them.' Rather than 'Jeez, people aren't as fired up about play-in games as I thought they'd be,' it's 'OK then, what if we just did more of them?' Whatever his motives, it's clear Petitti views college football not as a fixer-upper but a full-on teardown project. Where most of us see a wonderfully unique and charming home with room for improvement, Petitti sees an archaic structure in desperate need of a refresh. The same guy who put the final nail in the Pac-12's coffin would apparently be fine doing the same to the 120-plus-year tradition of bowl games. Bye-bye, college football. Hello, NFL Junior. To be clear, he's not on a total island. There are pockets of ADs and coaches around the country, including in the SEC, that quietly love the idea of their 8-4/7-5-type programs becoming annual CFP contenders. They likely assume there's a golden pot of TV revenue waiting for them as well. (In reality, TV doesn't want this, either.) Fortunately, there are far more people in important positions who don't want any part of this tomfoolery. Because they happen to think college football is pretty great as it is. Will you refund my subscription money? The Athletic CFB coverage is becoming an outrage click farm. Ironic that you are lambasting Michigan about lacking integrity. Surely it isn't lost on you. — Ian S. @Ian S.: Because the trending questions are all Michigan-related. Michigan has a huge fan base because it's a great school *and* the all-time winningest program, so anything Michigan-related gets eyeballs and anti-UM outrage provokes engagement. Stew's strategy is Internet Trolling 101. —Steve S. Stew's strategy is to write about the topics readers care about most. And the readers have universally told me, 'It's not the sloppy espionage and the cover-ups that interest me about this Michigan story; it's their academic reputation and all their wins from 1902.' In the last 40 years, no coach has gone more than six years between two national titles (Barry Switzer is the last coach to do so, winning his third title in 1985 after winning his second a decade earlier). Dabo Swinney last won a title in 2018. Has his window closed? — Brian I think so. But many, many people disagree. Advertisement It feels like the entire narrative around Clemson's program has shifted over the past eight months, starting with, strangely, a two-touchdown loss to Texas in the CFP first round. The Tigers head into this season with the sixth-best odds to win the national championship, and they got the second-most votes in The Athletic's staff survey predictions behind only Texas. While that wasn't my vote (I cast one of the three Penn State ballots), I did have Clemson No. 3 in my post-spring Top 25. That was because Dabo has more high-level players returning than at any time since the last Trevor Lawrence-Travis Etienne team in 2020. Quarterback Cade Klubnik, receiver Antonio Williams, defensive linemen T.J. Parker and Peter Woods and cornerback Avieon Terrell are all projected first-round picks. And new defensive coordinator Tom Allen should be a big upgrade from Wes Goodwin. But once it came time to make 'official' picks, I backed off a little. I picked the Tigers to win the ACC, but with an 11-2 record, including a home loss to LSU in the opener. Which would put them more like the low top 10. The main reason: What evidence has Clemson given us recently to suggest it can still compete at the highest level? Clemson got drilled by Georgia 34-3 to open last season. The Tigers went on to lose to two more SEC foes, South Carolina (17-14) and Texas (38-24). To their credit, the Tigers beat CFP team SMU in the ACC title game, but no one thought SMU could win the national championship. Over the past four seasons, Clemson has had one 'big' non-conference win: at home against Notre Dame in 2023. And as those struggles mounted, many others and I criticized Dabo for stubbornly steering clear of the transfer portal. He relented a little this offseason, landing a couple of possible key contributors, but his lineup will still be comprised almost entirely of homegrown guys
Wall Street Journal
8 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
College Football's Brain Drain: Has America's Wildest Sport Run Out of New Ideas?
For decades, the start of a new college football season meant you were about to see something you'd never seen before. Every fall, some new offensive scheme seemed to turn the entire sport upside down, propelling a smaller school to new heights while the traditional powers stood around and scratched their heads.
