170 Premises Involved In Power Theft In Lahad Datu
In a statement, Sabah Electricity said that the joint operation with the Royal Malaysia Police found that 100 houses were involved in illegal electricity connections, while 70 premises were found to have tampered with meter installations.
'During Op Martabat in Lahad Datu, the estimated revenue loss due to illegal electricity use was approximately RM273,000 per month. These illegal activities not only endanger lives but also result in significant financial losses to the country and disrupt electricity supply to legitimate consumers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
27 minutes ago
- Barnama
AI Must Remain As An Assistive Tool, Not Decision Maker
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 20 (Bernama) -- Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) that impacts individuals' rights must only be deployed after rigorous testing and with clear oversight, says former Federal Court judge Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal. He said while AI had the potential to transform human endeavour, it must remain an assistive tool and not a decision-maker, particularly in the criminal justice system. "AI should be an assistant, not a decision maker. In Sabah, where AI sentencing tools were piloted, the model once recommended a 10-month imprisonment with a probability of 54 per cent for an offence under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, but the magistrate imposed 12 months instead. "The message is clear, AI can assist, but human judgment must prevail,' he said during a plenary session titled 'Criminal Justice Reforms: Ensuring Ethical AI in Criminal Justice Proceedings' held in conjunction with the ASEAN Law Forum 2025 at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre today. Harmindar, who is also chairman of the Criminal Law Review Committee, emphasised the need for proper rules, safeguards and a clear risk-based approach before adopting AI in judicial processes. "Singapore has already issued guidelines for AI use in courts, and the Philippines is drafting an AI governance framework for its judiciary. Malaysia and other ASEAN member countries must follow suit. "We need a framework for ensuring responsible use of AI. This includes an assessment of risks, mitigation measures, and ensuring AI use cases are tested for bias, reliability and transparency before adoption,' he said while cautioning that while AI was a powerful technology, its application in criminal justice should be approached with vigilance. 'We must always remain accountable. If AI is to be used in the justice system, we must approach it with our eyes wide open, ready to address the risks in order to reap the benefits,' he added. Speaking from Singapore's perspective, counsel Colin Seow of Colin Seow Chambers said the Singapore Police Force had incorporated AI into digital forensics, enabling investigators to automatically sift through seized devices for child sexual abuse material and significantly improve the speed and accuracy of investigations.
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Court for Children closed-door sessions protect minors in Malaysia
KUALA LUMPUR: Court for Children proceedings in Malaysia are conducted behind closed doors to safeguard minors' welfare and ensure fair trials. Only immediate family members, lawyers, deputy public prosecutors, and court staff can attend these sessions. The public and media are denied access to protect children's safety and confidentiality. Former Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Yaacob Md Sam explained the court's establishment under Section 11 of the Child Act 2001. 'Children accused of committing criminal offences will face charges under laws such as the Penal Code,' he stated. 'Cases will be registered and tried in accordance with Act 611, the Child Act 2001.' He emphasized that revealing child offenders' identities constitutes an offence under the Act. Former Magistrate Ahmad Shamil Azad highlighted Section 15 restrictions on media reporting. 'Section 15 prohibits the media from reporting names, addresses or personal details of child offenders,' he said. Media cannot publish photographs of children under 18 involved in court cases. Section 12 requires cases to be held behind closed doors with limited attendance. 'The public is not permitted to enter to protect the identity and safety of the children,' he added. Media cannot cover proceedings inside the courtroom during sessions. Journalists typically wait for statements from family or lawyers after proceedings conclude. Section 90(1) requires charges to be explained to children in simple language. 'If the child is represented by a lawyer, the responsibility may be delegated,' Ahmad Shamil noted. This ensures children understand charges and available options. The court will inquire about the child's plea preference during proceedings. For unrepresented children, the court may assist by asking trial-related questions. Children must be accompanied by their mother or guardian throughout court proceedings. Failure to appear may result in punishment under Section 88(2) of the Act. Penalties include a maximum fine of RM5,000 or imprisonment up to two years. Former Magistrate Nur'Aminahtul Mardiah Md Nor addressed media ethics. 'Ethical journalists must refrain from photographing child offenders,' she stated. Disclosing identifying information constitutes an offence under Section 15(1). Violations carry a maximum fine of RM10,000 or imprisonment up to five years. Former Deputy Public Prosecutor Abdul Khaliq Nazeri discussed offence types. 'Child offenders face charges including drug use, theft, and sexual crimes,' he said. Special procedures ensure children are not handcuffed and do not sit in the dock. - Bernama
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Chinese student ordered psychiatric exam for attempted murder charges
KAJANG: The Sessions Court has mandated a psychiatric evaluation for a foreign student facing multiple violent charges. Liu Ting, a 24-year-old Chinese national, must undergo one month of assessment at Hospital Bahanga Ulu Kinta. Sessions Court Judge Normastura Ayub and Magistrate Fatin Dayana Jalil approved the prosecution's application for examination. Deputy Public Prosecutor Faelly Jeffrey Lanjungan noted the accused appeared confused during proceedings. Prosecutor Siti Nur Alia Safri stated Liu seemed not to understand the charges read against her. Bail was denied due to the serious and non-bailable nature of the accusations. The case mention is scheduled for September 19 following the psychiatric review. Liu pleaded not guilty to three charges of attempted murder in the Sessions Court. These charges involved two men aged 19 and 21 and a 35-year-old woman. Section 307 of the Penal Code applies, carrying potential 10-year imprisonment and fines. Causing injury under this section increases maximum sentencing to 20 years. Two additional charges involve causing grievous hurt with a knife. A 60-year-old woman suffered slashing wounds to her right arm. A 27-year-old man was stabbed in the stomach during the incident. Section 326 of the Penal Code governs these charges with 20-year maximum imprisonment. The Magistrate's Court heard three further charges of causing injury. Two men aged 21 and 49 were allegedly attacked with a knife. A 53-year-old woman was also injured in the same series of events. Liu remained silent when these three charges were read through an interpreter. Section 324 of the Penal Code applies to these final charges. This section allows for up to 10 years imprisonment, fines, or whipping upon conviction. All eight offenses occurred on August 13 between 11:39 AM and noon. Locations included Jalan Besar and Semenyih Persimpangan Metropoint junction. Additional incidents took place at premises within the Metropoint Complex. A viral social media video previously showed the initial accident scene. Footage depicted a woman exiting her vehicle while holding a knife. Several injured motorcyclists were visible in the circulated recording. Bystanders attempted to restrain the woman during the unfolding incident. - Bernama
