N.S. gov't signals possible shift on keeping environmental racism report private
Amid ongoing public pressure, the Progressive Conservative government is signalling that details about a report on environmental racism in Nova Scotia could be shared.
The panel that produced the report delivered it to the government a year ago, but its contents have remained unknown. Public calls from Mi'kmaw chiefs and opposition MLAs for its release had gone unheeded, until Thursday afternoon.
A statement from Becky Druhan, the minister responsible for the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism, said a public report was not part of the panel's mandate, but it is understandable that people would be interested and the government wants to be transparent.
"Out of respect for the panel, we want to meet with members before sharing any further details publicly. As minister, I have directed staff to reach out and arrange this meeting. I look forward to that discussion."
Druhan's statement followed several of her cabinet colleagues earlier in the day saying they've not read the report and others standing behind the decision not to make it public.
Public Works Minister Fred Tilley said he's not seen the report or asked to see it. Health Minister Michelle Thompson told reporters that she has access to the report but has not had a chance to read it.
Environment Minister Tim Halman said he's been briefed on the report "at a high level," and that he anticipated being involved in a meeting with panel members when it's scheduled.
African Nova Scotian Affairs Minister Twila Grosse told reporters she has reviewed the report, but said she would not share her views on its contents because the report sits with the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism and not her department.
"We want to ensure that we collaborate and we move forward together with this," she said.
Earlier this week, Membertou First Nation Chief Terry Paul said he and the rest of the Mi'kmaw chiefs in the province agree that the report needs to be shared publicly as a matter of accountability. Paul said none of the chiefs have seen the report.
Speaking to reporters prior to Druhan's statement, Liberal MLA Iain Rankin questioned how much of a priority the document and its recommendations are for the government.
The Office of Equity and Anti-Racism was created by Rankin during his brief tenure as premier and he said he did that to put the issue "at the centre of government."
Rankin said elected officials must push ahead on such issues because there can be resistance within the bureaucracy. When he was environment minister, Rankin said he went against advice from public servants when he used the term "environmental racism" to describe certain situations.
"We need to tackle institutional racism and, honestly, this is a reflection of institutional racism within government itself," he said.
Report informing government policy
NDP MLA Susan LeBlanc renewed her party's call for the report to be made public. It was an amendment to Progressive Conservative environmental legislation in 2022 by LeBlanc's caucus colleague, Suzy Hansen, that led to the creation of the panel.
On Wednesday, Premier Tim Houston said he hasn't seen the report, but he's been briefed on it.
The premier told reporters that government officials are working on some of the recommendations while others are still being reviewed. The document is being used to develop government policy, he said.
"I think it served the purpose. We had a bunch of good people, they did some work and they made some recommendations and government is taking it seriously."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
27 minutes ago
- CBC
Input wanted on large-scale nuclear power plant in northern Alberta
A significant nuclear power proposal in northwest Alberta is one step closer to reality as the project progresses to its public input phase. The Peace River Nuclear Power Project would see the construction of two twin Candu Monark nuclear reactors at one of two proposed sites, both about 30 kilometres north of the town of Peace River. Calgary-based Energy Alberta, the company proposing the project, said it would cover 1,424 hectares and operate for about 70 years. It would also generate about 4,800 megawatts of energy per year. If approved, it would be the first plant of its kind in the province. Since learning of the project, five local jurisdictions in the region have created a joint committee to advocate for nuclear power. This includes the Town of Peace River, the Municipal District of Peace, Northern Sunrise County, the Town of Grimshaw and the County of Northern Lights. Town halls, workshops and information sessions are being held in and around those communities so people can learn about nuclear power and ask questions to officials about the project. Comments can also be submitted online until late July. "We see this as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to see a real huge economic development in our region at a time when all dollars as a tax assessment dollars really matter," said Northern Lights County Reeve Terry Ungarian, who also chairs the Peace Regional Energy Committee, at a town hall meeting on Tuesday. "[We have] the common goal of bringing probably the biggest economic development that the province would ever see, for sure that this region would ever see." Currently, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission are in the planning phase of the impact assessment process, to determine if an integrated assessment is needed. Information sessions key In a recent interview with CBC's Edmonton AM, Peace River Mayor Elaine Manzer said she has been told the project would bring about 3,500 full-time jobs once the reactors are up and running. She said the project would also created about 5,000 local construction jobs. "There are usually some questions will it affect our water? Will it affect our air or our environment in some ways like that? What are the possible effects on our community in terms of infrastructure or housing? Some of those are hard to have an answer at this point in time until they happen," she said, adding she understands the regulatory process could take about three years. "These information sessions provide the regulators with more questions that they can ask of the company." According to Energy Alberta, if approved, the regulatory process is expected to be complete by 2028 and move into construction by 2029. "We are at the stage were we are out there really talking about it, providing information, getting early feedback to incorporate into our planning," said spokesperson Ali Hounsell. "There's lots of opportunity for the public and nation to participate, both inside and outside the regulatory process as we move forward, with the planning stage." The hope is the first reactor would be in operation by 2035 and all four units would be up and running by 2043, Hounsell said. Candida Cianci, the director of review panels at the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC), said public input is needed on the project. "We're out here because we really want to hear from the communities and concerned citizens what their views may be on the proposed project, what their concerns are," she said. "The council and the communities that we've heard from the last two days have indicated they really have a lot to learn and we have a lot to learn about what their views are." After the process is complete, the company will gather information and undertake studies based on feedback, while engaging with stakeholders and Indigenous communities. "We're going to take that feedback. We're going to incorporate it, and we're going to let participants know how we reflected what we heard from them and we are going to finalize those documents," said Cianci. If an integrated assessment is needed, the project will then be referred to a review panel. The second public comment period runs until July 23.
CBC
32 minutes ago
- CBC
B.C. Premier David Eby says he supports the tanker ban on the province's North Coast
Despite Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's push to pump crude oil to British Columbia, B.C. Premier David Eby says his government backs the federal tanker ban that prohibits oil tankers from stopping, loading, or unloading at protected area ports on the province's North Coast. "This is a pristine ecological area that produces huge benefits for British Columbia and also is an increasing corridor, generally speaking, for cargo," Eby told CBC's Daybreak North on Tuesday. "That's why we support the existing oil tanker ban." The tanker ban prohibits oil tankers plying B.C.'s North Coast from carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude oil or persistent oil products as cargo. But Eby won't directly say if he is against a future pipeline to the area, something Smith has said she's actively searching for interested private sector companies to fund. While the premier has said he's open to a discussion with the Alberta premier if a private proponent came to the table, he says he's more interested in the $50 billion in resource and energy projects already under development in B.C. "The challenge for me is that the conversation has been almost exclusively about a project that doesn't actually exist. There's no proponent; there's no money," Eby said. "I would prefer very much that we stay focused on what actually exists, what's ready to go through environmental assessment processes, or nearly." Marilyn Slett, chief councillor of the Heiltsuk First Nation and president of the Coastal First Nations/Great Bear Initiative, says she wants clarity on Eby's commitment to protect the area. "Certainly there's a contradiction, you know, in terms of supporting privately funded oil pipelines on the North Coast and that direct contradiction of his, you know, supposed support to the oil tanker moratorium," said Slett. "We need to know whether or not he's changed his stance, you know, on protecting the coast," Slett said. Eby says there are other projects apart from a potential pipeline that can benefit both British Columbia and Alberta. When asked by a CBC reporter whether his support of an oil tanker ban on the North Coast ruled out the idea of a northern pipeline, the premier sidestepped the issue, replying: "I think that if we're talking about benefiting Canada's economy, if we're talking about growing British Columbia's economy and opportunities, and Alberta's too, let's focus on the projects where there are actually proponents and we're ready to go," said Eby. 'Federal radar' LNG Canada began producing liquefied natural gas, a fossil fuel often extracted from northeastern B.C. and Alberta, for export at its facility in Kitimat, B.C., on Sunday. According to the B.C. government, the facility is expected to export 14 million tonnes of LNG a year, creating close to 300 ongoing jobs worth an estimated $575 million annually for 40 years. In May, a new 44-square kilometre gold and silver mine officially opened in the province's central Interior, southwest of Vanderhoof, B.C., and west of Prince George. The mine is approved with an economic and community development agreement with the Lhoosk'uz Dené Nation and Ulkatcho First Nation to share mineral tax revenue from the mine. Ebys says the two First Nations are equity partners in the project. "And this is the model that you're going to see and are seeing increasingly across the province," Eby said. When it comes to the spectre of a possible oil pipeline, Eby says no discussions with First Nations have yet occurred because the project doesn't exist. "There are lots of conversations underway with First Nations on actual projects that have actual proponents that actually are through or going through the environmental assessment process," said Eby. "B.C. has a hard enough time getting on the federal radar at all, and we have such huge projects with such consequential impacts for Canada's GDP, for prosperity, for our province, than to have the discussion be about a nonexistent project because Alberta wants to talk about it."
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Poison pill amendment:' Councillor slams changes to King Street proposal
City council has voted to temporarily reopen a small portion of King Street to vehicular traffic while effectively killing a proposal from an east-end councillor to allow vehicles along a longer portion of the corridor. Coun. Brad Bradford had proposed allowing vehicles to travel between Spadina and Church streets while construction on a nearby downtown intersection forced the rerouting of streetcars, calling it a 'common sense solution.' However, during a meeting on Thursday city councillors voted 16-5 in favour of an amendment tabled by Mayor Olivia Chow that specified that personal vehicles would only be allowed to travel along the portion of the transit priority corridor where both streetcars and buses 'are not currently in service.' That, in effect, means that vehicular traffic would only be allowed along a much smaller portion of the corridor between Yonge and Church streets. The change will be in effect while watermain work results in the closure of the intersection at King and Church streets and the rerouting of streetcars. That work is expected to be complete sometime later this summer. In a message posted to social media following the vote, Bradford said that Toronto had a chance to 'relieve the gridlock choking east-west traffic downtown.' Instead, he said that Chow moved a 'poison-pill amendment' that made his motion 'meaningless.' He said that reopening King Street to traffic but only along a one-block stretch won't benefit drivers and wont help reduce Toronto's gridlock. 'Torontonians expect us to put their needs ahead of petty politics. And they deserve the truth,' he said. 'We should be solving problems and helping Torontonians go where they need to go.'
