What Happens To The 788 Indian Students Currently Enrolled At Harvard University?
Harvard University Students Controversy: Harvard sees 500–800 Indian admissions yearly; this year, 788 Indian students enrolled out of 6,800 international students.
Harvard University Students Controversy: In a move that could deliver a major blow to India's academic ambitions, the Donald Trump administration has imposed a ban on foreign student admissions at Harvard University. Each year, hundreds of Indian students secure admission to the Ivy League institution, regarded as one of the world's most prestigious centres of learning.
Ranked fourth in the QS World University Rankings 2025, Harvard is a coveted destination for Indian students pursuing courses in business, law, science and technology.
The announcement comes amid rising tensions between US President Donald Trump and Harvard University. Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), conveyed this decision through a letter to Harvard University, as reported by The New York Times. In her letter, Noem stated, 'I want to inform you that the certification of Harvard University's admission program for students and academic exchange has been cancelled with immediate effect." Consequently, this decision will affect Indian students currently studying at Harvard or those planning to enrol.
Harvard's official records indicate that each year, between 500 to 800 Indian students secure admission at the university, with around 6,800 international students overall. For the current year, 788 Indian students have enrolled.
Two Options For Indian Students
The Trump administration's decision presents a significant challenge for these students, offering them two options: transferring to another institution or losing their legal status in the US. Indian students can opt for admission at another American institute; failing to do so will necessitate leaving the country.
In the midst of this tension, there is a relief for students who have already commenced their current semester at Harvard. Kristi Noem's letter mentions that students enrolled in the current session can complete their graduation from Harvard. The policy change will be implemented from the academic year 2025-26, ensuring that current students face minimal disruption to their studies.
Why Was The Ban Imposed
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stated that Harvard's failure to comply with federal demands for records concerning its foreign students led to the government's action. Noem accused Harvard of 'creating an unsafe campus environment hostile to Jewish students, fostering pro-Hamas sentiments, and enforcing racist 'diversity, equity and inclusion' policies."
Consequently, the DHS revoked Harvard's certification under the Student Exchange and Visitor Program (SEVP), which is crucial for universities to sponsor international student visas.
How Did Harvard University Respond To The Ban
Harvard University quickly condemned the Trump administration's decision as 'unlawful" and a 'retaliatory action." In a statement, the Ivy League institution affirmed its dedication to its international community, declaring, 'We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard's ability to host our international students and scholars, who come from over 140 countries and greatly enrich the University – and this nation."
Why Are Harvard And Trump At Odds
Tensions between the Trump administration and Harvard University, the wealthiest university in the US with a $53.2 billion endowment as of 2024, have been escalating for months. In April 2025, Harvard became the first elite university to openly reject the White House's demands to curb pro-Palestinian protests and dismantle its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. Following this, several federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the National Institutes of Health, started cutting and freezing significant federal grant funding to Harvard, totaling billions of dollars and affecting numerous research projects.
Donald Trump later suggested that Harvard should lose its tax-exempt status, a move that would severely hinder the university's fundraising capabilities due to its impact on donor tax burdens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India will respond decisively whenever terrorism threatens citizens: Govt
Anticipating future warfare scenarios through "predictive technologies" and creating precise, targeted systems for counter-action are among the three-fold goals when it comes to India's futuristic defence programme, Sudarshan Chakra Mission, the government said on Wednesday. In a broad synopsis of the country's security scenario, the Press Information Bureau (PIB) on Wednesday shared some data and a summary of various defence-related developments in the past 11 years, titled 'Transformation of India's Defence and Internal Security Posture'. "Unlike in the past, India under the present government has become a global force to reckon with, a nation that speaks on issues from a position of strength," it says. The government said India has adopted a "firm and clear approach towards cross-border terrorism", adding that the pattern of action over the last decade reflects this policy. The most recent and defining operation came in May 2025 with Operation Sindoor. In response to the killing of civilians in Pahalgam, "India gave its armed forces full freedom of action", the synopsis says. Using drones and precision munitions, they struck nine terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir. More than 100 terrorists were eliminated, including individuals linked to the IC814 hijacking and the Pulwama attack. Pakistan attempted retaliatory strikes through drones and missiles, but Indian counter-drone systems neutralised them, it adds. In his 79th Independence Day address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi described Operation Sindoor as "a new normal", making it clear that "India will respond with full force whenever terrorism threatens its citizens," the synopsis says. Beyond immediate responses, the Modi government is preparing for "long-term threats," the government said. In his Independence Day speech, Modi had announced the Sudarshan Chakra Mission, a futuristic defence programme. "Its goals are threefold -- to ensure the entire system is researched, developed, and manufactured in India; to anticipate future warfare scenarios through predictive technologies; and to create precise, targeted systems for counter-action. By 2035, the aim is to provide a comprehensive national security shield for both strategic and civilian assets," it says. In the last eleven years, India's defence and internal security posture under the government of PM Modi has undergone a "profound transformation", it says. The shift has been marked by "greater clarity of purpose, stronger deterrence, and a sustained drive for self-reliance," the synopsis says. This government has consistently underlined that "national security is non-negotiable", and to ensure this security, India will build its own capacity and preparedness. This has resulted in a "more confident, modern, and proactive approach to challenges, both external and internal". it adds. Firm responses to terrorism, the clear articulation of new normal with Pakistan and futuristic initiatives like the Sudarshan Chakra Mission underscore a "forward-looking security doctrine," the government asserted. India's defence and internal security posture under the Modi government reflects a "decisive shift towards strength, clarity, and self-reliance". With record investments in defence, rapid growth in indigenous production, bold reforms, and the adoption of emerging technologies, India has transitioned from being a major importer to a rising global exporter of defence equipment, it added. "India's defence expenditure has steadily increased under the present government, rising from Rs 2.53 lakh crore in 201314 to Rs 6.81 lakh crore in 202526," the PIB synopsis says. "The focus is no longer only on acquiring weapons but also on building domestic capacity. In 202425, defence production touched a record Rs 1.50 lakh crore, more than triple the 201415 level," it adds. Fighter jets, missile systems, artillery systems, warships, naval vessels, aircraft carriers and a lot more are now being made in India, underlining how strongly "self-reliance and deterrence have become the cornerstone of national security," the government said. Defence exports grew thirty-four times over the last decade, reaching Rs 23,622 crore in 202425. Indian equipment is now exported to over 100 nations, including the United States, France, and Armenia, it said. The synopsis also shared data related to indigenisation efforts. The SRIJAN Portal (2020) enables the industry to locally develop items earlier imported. "To date, over 46,798 items have been listed". And, Positive Indigenisation Lists by DPSUs have identified 5,012 items (across five tranches), "signalling a phased ban on imports", it says. At the same time, progress in internal stability, food and energy security, financial inclusion, and technology innovation demonstrates that Atmanirbharta is "not confined to defence alone" but forms the foundation of a "resilient and confident India prepared to meet both traditional and non-traditional challenges on its path to becoming a global leader", the government asserted. "This tectonic shift reflects the deep resolve of the government to see the country as Viksit Bharat in every sense in the years to come. It also reaffirms that this government does not merely believe in rhetoric, but has actually done, and is continuing to do, what it takes to make India 'Viksit'," it said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants: Report
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel and other chipmakers in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act, which aims to spur factory-building in the US, two sources said. As part of a plan to revive US manufacturing - a key Trump agenda - Lutnick said earlier on Tuesday the US government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved by the administration of former President Joe Biden. Now Lutnick wants to expand that plan to other companies, according to a White House official and a person familiar with the situation. The Trump administration has recently made unusual deals with US companies, including allowing AI chip giant Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the US government receiving 15 per cent of those sales. The Pentagon is slated to become the largest shareholder in a small mining company to boost output of rare earth magnets. The government's intervention in corporate matters has worried critics who say President Donald Trump's actions create new categories of corporate risk and that a bad bet could mean a hit to taxpayer funds. Much of the funding under the CHIPS Act has not yet been dispersed for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, Samsung and Intel. TSMC and Intel declined to comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on whether Lutnick is considering more stakes. The two sources told Reuters on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act money. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed earlier that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10 per cent government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. Speaking on CNBC, Lutnick said the US wants a return on its "investment". "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away," he said. Trump has previously said he wanted to kill the CHIPS Act program. Lutnick's comments suggested any stake would be non-voting, meaning it would not enable the US government to tell the company how to run its business. His comments came a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2 billion in Intel, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer'," Lutnick said. South Korean presidential advisor Kim Yong-beom said neither the government nor the potentially affected companies have heard about such a plan. He added that foreign companies like Samsung needed "predictability" for their US investments. A Korean chip industry official, meanwhile, said it would be hard for chipmakers to accept US government equity stakes, and some may either decide not to invest or delay investments unless Washington provides incentives like increasing funding. Taking lawmaker questions in Taipei on Wednesday and asked whether the US government could take a stake in TSMC, Taiwan Economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei said his ministry would consult with the company, which he pointed out was private and not a state-owned enterprise. "We will also discuss with the National Development Council, as it is a shareholder of TSMC. We will thoroughly understand the underlying meaning of the US Commerce Secretary's remarks, but this will require some time for discussion and assessment," Kuo said.
News18
9 minutes ago
- News18
"Russia Ukraine Poles Apart" Mearsheimer Rules Out Trump Striking Deal Between Putin-Zelensky
John Mearsheimer the prominent political scientist known for his controversial prediction of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, predicts that there will be no peace deal and the war will be settled where it started - the battlefield. Speaking on Donald Trump's meetings with Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky, Mearsheimer said that Trump will be unable to strike any compromise between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders since both countries are poles apart. n18oc_crux
