Shahid Afridi 'offers tea' to Shikhar Dhawan in latest cross-border spat
Tensions following the recent attack in Pahalgam, located in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), have spilled over to social media, where not only citizens but also former cricketers from both India and Pakistan have become engaged in a war of words.
The interaction began when former Pakistan cricket captain Shahid Afridi made sharp remarks on a local TV programme, criticising the Indian military's performance in Kashmir.
Commenting on the Pahalgam incident, Afridi questioned how such an event could occur despite the presence of what he described as '800,000 Indian troops' in the region.
'If even a firecracker goes off in India, the blame is placed on Pakistan,' he said. 'You have eight lakh soldiers stationed in Kashmir and yet such incidents happen — this only means you're incompetent and useless.'
His comments quickly gained traction on Indian media and triggered a strong reaction from former Indian cricketer Shikhar Dhawan. Taking to social media platform X, Dhawan fired back at Afridi, referencing India's victory in the Kargil conflict.
'We defeated you in Kargil, how much lower will you stoop?' Dhawan wrote. 'Instead of making baseless comments, focus on your own country's development.'
The spat intensified on Tuesday when Afridi responded with a touch of sarcasm. Posting a photo of himself in military-style attire while holding a cup of tea, he wrote on X, 'Forget winning or losing — come, let me serve you some tea, Shikhar,' adding the hashtag #FantasticTea.
The hashtag #FantasticTea is a reference to a widely publicised incident on February 27, 2019, when Pakistan shot down two Indian aircraft that had violated its airspace and captured Indian Air Force Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman.
During his detention, a video showed a Pakistani officer politely asking, 'I hope you like the tea?' to which Abhinandan calmly replied, 'The tea is fantastic, thank you.' The clip quickly went viral and became a symbol of Pakistan's media narrative surrounding the incident.
Although Abhinandan was released and returned to India as a goodwill gesture, the moment, and the phrase, has since become a long-running meme in Pakistan, still frequently referenced in both political and pop culture contexts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
NA passes Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2024
The National Assembly on Wednesday passed the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill 2024 by a majority vote enacting it into law after rejecting opposition proposals amid protests in the House. The House suspended its routine agenda to take up the bill. Speaker Ayaz Sadiq ordered a headcount on the bill's passage, which showed 125 votes in favour and 45 against. Opposition members protested and shouted slogans during the process. PTI chairperson Barrister Gohar Ali Khan argued that the bill violated Article 10 of the Constitution and fundamental rights by allowing detention without trial for up to three months, extendable by another three. He said no law could be enacted in contravention of the Constitution or the Supreme Court's rulings, and noted past instances of prolonged detention without due process. Read: HRCP urges govt to scrap anti-terror bill Maulana Fazlur Rehman questioned the need for such a law, recalling similar measures in the Musharraf era that he said treated citizens as 'born criminals'. The opposition maintained that the law could be misused, while the government insisted it was necessary to address the prevailing security situation. Oil reserves Separately, Pakistan People's Party (PPP) lawmakers sought clarification from the government over US President Donald Trump's past remarks about vast oil reserves in Pakistan. On July 31, Trump took to social media to announce a new deal between the US and Pakistan for the joint development of Pakistan's "massive oil reserves". PPP's Dr Nafisa Shah questioned why the government had not provided information if such reserves existed. 'The US President is telling us about oil reserves in Pakistan, but why is the Government of Pakistan not informing us?' Read More: Trump wins his deal, Pakistan eyes the future Responding to the call to attention notice, Federal Minister for Petroleum Ali Pervaiz Malik said Pakistan had recently awarded oil exploration rights to companies from Kuwait, Turkey, and other countries. He confirmed the presence of reserves but said their exact size could only be determined after exploration work began. He added that three major gas fields—larger than the Sui field—had been discovered, and exploration had commenced in Hyderabad. Malik noted that countries such as China and the US possessed technology to verify the presence of oil and gas rapidly. Dr Shah also questioned whether Trump's remarks, including that Pakistan could one day export oil to India, were intended to pressure India into concessions, given that Pakistani ministers claimed they did not yet know the reserves' size. PPP lawmaker Syed Naveed Qamar asked if exploration opportunities would be open to countries beyond the US. Malik replied that rights would be available to multiple companies.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
India set to allow its private firms to mine and import uranium to help nuclear expansion
NEW DELHI: India aims to allow private firms to mine, import and process uranium as part of plans to end a decades-old state monopoly over the nuclear sector and bring in billions of dollars to boost the industry, two government sources said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government plans to expand nuclear power production capacity by 12 times by 2047 and it is also relaxing requirements to allow foreign players to take a minority stake in power plants, Reuters reported in April. If it meets its expansion goal, nuclear will provide 5% of India's total power needs, according to government estimates. Until now, the state has maintained control over the mining, import and processing of uranium fuel because of concerns over the possible misuse of nuclear material, radiation safety and strategic security. It will retain its grip on reprocessing spent uranium fuel and managing plutonium waste, in line with global practice. But to help meet a surge in demand for nuclear fuel as it expands nuclear power production, the government plans to draw up a regulatory framework that would allow private Indian firms to mine, import and process uranium, the two government sources told Reuters. They asked not to be named because the plans are not yet public. India shuts unit at country's largest nuclear power plant for maintenance The proposed policy, which the sources said was likely to be made public in the current fiscal year, will also permit private players to supply critical control system equipment for nuclear power plants, they said. The Finance Ministry, Department of Atomic Energy and Prime Minister's Office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Outside India, countries including Canada, South Africa and the United States allow private firms to mine and process uranium. Domestic supply is not enough India has an estimated 76,000 tonnes of uranium enough to fuel 10,000 megawatts of nuclear power for 30 years, according to government data. But the sources said domestic resources would only be able to meet about 25% of the projected increase. The rest would have to be imported and India would need to increase its processing capacity. In announcing its budget on February 1, the government made public its plans to open up the sector without giving details. Some of India's big conglomerates subsequently began drawing up investment plans. But analysts said amending the legislation could be complex. 'It's a major and bold initiative by the Indian Government which is critical for achieving the target,' said Charudatta Palekar, independent power sector consultant. 'The challenge will be to define quickly the rules of engagement with private sector.' New Delhi will have to change five laws, including the ones regulating mining and electricity sectors and India's foreign direct investment policy to enable private participation in many identified activities, the sources said.
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
What falling out with the US means for India?
At the start of this year, relations between India and the United States appeared to be on an upward trajectory. In February, just a month after Donald Trump's return to the White House, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood alongside his long-time friend at the White House, pledging to raise bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 and signalling the possibility of a comprehensive trade agreement. This bonhomie wasn't restricted to just trade – it reflected on defence cooperation, energy trade, and the Indo-Pacific security framework. Modi invited Trump to India for the planned Quad leaders' summit later this year, a gesture intended to cement the personal rapport between the two leaders. That optimism began to unravel in May when tensions between India and Pakistan flared dangerously. In a brief but intense escalation, Pakistan claimed to have shot down six Indian fighter jets and destroyed a BrahMos missile storage facility in Indian-Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Both sides came perilously close to wider conflict before agreeing to a ceasefire on May 10. Trump publicly took credit for brokering the deal, calling it a personal diplomatic success. India, however, disputed that narrative, insisting it was a mutually agreed arrangement without US mediation. This disagreement planted the first seeds of mistrust. In June, the unease deepened when Trump invited Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir to the White House for a high-profile lunch. The meeting, followed by announcements of a favourable US-Pakistan trade arrangement, an oil reserve development deal, new cooperation on cryptocurrency regulation, and Washington's acceptance of Pakistan's long-standing demand to designate the Balochistan Liberation Army and its Majeed Brigade as terrorist organisations, signalled a strategic warming between Washington and Islamabad. Days before the Trump-Munir meeting, Modi and Trump held a tense phone call on June 17. According to reports, the conversation further soured their relationship, unravelling years of carefully built goodwill. The economic blow By August, the rupture had translated into hard measures. Trump slapped 25% tariffs on Indian imports, accusing New Delhi of maintaining 'strenuous and obnoxious' trade barriers. Days later, he doubled the rate to 50%, the highest for any Asian partner, citing India's continued purchases of Russian crude as undermining the US sanctions regime against Moscow. He ruled out further negotiations until India cut its Russian oil imports. This escalation came despite five rounds of talks toward an interim trade deal, in which India had shown willingness to increase US energy and defence purchases and lower tariffs on American industrial goods. Political miscalculations and disagreements over agricultural norms and quotas ultimately doomed the talks, leaving $190 billion in annual trade and a $46 billion deficit unresolved. The tariff hike threatens India's $87 billion export engine to the US, 18% of its total exports and over 2% of its GDP. Industry experts warn of a 40-50% drop in shipments, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, jewellery, and automobiles. Small and medium-sized enterprises face a severe loss of competitiveness, while economists have trimmed GDP growth forecasts by as much as 1%. Market reaction has been swift: a weaker rupee, the risk of imported inflation, capital flight by foreign portfolio investors, and higher borrowing costs for foreign-currency debt. Strategic fallout The dispute undermines New Delhi's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. While the foreign ministers of Australia, Japan, the US, and India recently met in Washington, the Quad leaders' summit now looks unlikely. Instead, India risks drifting closer to Russia, its long-time defence partner, and even exploring limited engagement with China, which Modi is set to visit later this month. For Washington, this marks a reversal of a 25-year strategy of building up India as a counterweight to China's rise. For New Delhi, it is a reminder of the volatility of personal diplomacy: the same leader who embraced Modi in Ahmedabad in 2020, before 100,000 cheering spectators, is now wielding tariffs as leverage. Political setback for Modi Domestically, the rupture is damaging for Modi. His image as a global statesman, reinforced by his perceived closeness to Trump, has been a key part of his appeal to India's middle class. The opposition Congress party has seized the moment, branding him 'Narendra Surrender' for failing to protect Indian trade interests. Even Hindu nationalist groups in the US, once among Trump's staunch supporters, feel abandoned by Washington's turn. With his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) having lost its parliamentary majority in the last election, Modi now faces questions about his handling of both foreign and economic policy. His perceived inability to counter China's assertiveness while losing favour in Washington could become a central vulnerability. The stakes At stake is more than just a trade dispute. The episode jeopardises three decades of India's economic ascent and its strategic positioning as an emerging power backed by a US partnership. Whether this moment leads to strategic drift, realignment toward other powers or eventual rapprochement with Washington will shape India's trajectory for years to come. The above article was contributed by Syed Ahmed Raza Rizvi, Senior Sub-Editor at Business Recorder (Digital).
