Japan to consider 2039 Women's World Cup bid after FIFA decision
March 8 (Reuters) - Japan Football Association president Tsuneyasu Miyamoto has said his country will consider bidding to host the 2039 Women's World Cup after FIFA's decision not to allow Asian nations to pitch for the rights to the 2031 or 2035 editions of the competition.
The game's governing body announced last week that bids for the 2031 rights would be permitted from countries in Africa and Concacaf, the regional body governing the sport in North and Central America as well as the Caribbean.
With only African and European bidders being considered for the 2035 finals, the Japanese and other Asian federations wishing to organise the quadrennial event will have to wait until 2039.
"This is extremely disappointing news for us as we were aiming to host the FIFA Women's World Cup in 2031," Miyamoto said in a statement.
"However, regardless of this decision, there is no change to our intention to expand women's football in Japan, increase the number of women playing football, and improve the level of competition."
The Japanese co-hosted the 2002 edition of the men's World Cup with South Korea but the country has never hosted the Women's World Cup.
Japan's women's team, known as the Nadeshiko, has a strong track record on the international stage, winning the Women's World Cup in 2011 before finishing as runners-up four years later.
The country also has an impressive record at youth level, reaching the final of the FIFA U20 Women's World Cup at each of the last three tournaments.
"There is no doubt that we are on a good track now," said Miyamoto.
"With an eye on hosting the Women's World Cup after 2039, we will continue to work to turn women's national teams of all ages into teams that can compete to be the best in the world, and to improve the environment for women's soccer all over the country."
The next edition of the Women's World Cup will be played in Brazil in 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why fans are becoming worried about the biggest World Cup ever
The US is set to host the World Cup in 2026 for the first time since 1994, with matches also held in Mexico and Canada, but key details like ticket sales, pricing, security measures, and the draw location are yet to be announced by FIFA, causing uncertainty. Security concerns have been raised following a breach at the 2024 Copa America final in Miami, prompting calls for robust security arrangements for the World Cup, as highlighted by former US defender Alexi Lalas. Despite increased interest in soccer in the US, with strong viewership for the Premier League and Champions League, MLS faces challenges in competing for viewers, especially with many games now exclusively on streaming platforms like AppleTV+. FIFA plans to announce general ticket information in the third quarter, but hospitality packages are already available at high prices, ranging from $25,800 to $73,200 per person for the final at MetLife Stadium. The 2026 World Cup, featuring 104 games, aims to expand soccer's accessibility across the US, with initiatives to ensure safe playing spaces and school programs, while logistical coordination is underway, including MLB adjusting schedules to accommodate stadium parking.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How Infantino used Trump and the Club World Cup to open up football's next cash cow
As Fifa put in final preparations for the big show to try and dazzle America, there is something increasingly being said behind closed doors. Figures within the federation openly talk about how the new Club World Cup will quickly move to a biannual tournament, rather than every four years. Despite sources telling the Independent that it is an 'an open secret', Uefa is adamant it will stay at four. They state they have an agreement. It is not, crucially, a legal agreement. The difference in viewpoints is just the latest schism in a build-up that has caused more fractious football politics than any tournament in history. That goes right up to an actual legal challenge against Fifa from the players' union FIFPro. Senior Uefa figures, including president Aleksander Ceferin, are said to barely be able to discuss the Club World Cup without spitting. It might yet cause greater upheaval for the game's future, since the competition almost serves as a nexus for the game's major forces: from the super clubs to Saudi Arabia. The irony is that there is one aspect of the Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday with Al Ahly Egypt vs. Inter Miami, that almost brings a unanimous agreement. Most in football admit the concept is a good idea. Football needed to start spreading the elite game's wealth outside Western Europe, which is why there is little sympathy from tournament supporters for the complaints of the Premier League or Champions League. They are quick to point out exhaustive pre-season tours. This format similarly makes more sense than the previous low-intensity, smaller annual tournament that was held previously. The initial idea even came from a genuine football legend with sporting concerns, in former Fifa Deputy Secretary General Zvonimir Boban. It was partly to replace the 'ridiculous' Confederations Cup - which served as a dress rehearsal for the classic World Cup - but mostly to properly crown club world champions. The problem, according to many in football, is that very little about its implementation has been 'proper'. Fifa president Gianni Infantino previously worked as Uefa Secretary General, and saw first-hand the Champions League's lucrative power. He then saw Boban's idea, and was determined to make it happen. There were even periods around 2018 when an earlier version of the concept was linked with the Super League. Infantino eventually announced the tournament on the eve of the 2022 World Cup final, to the surprise of the rest of the game. The complaint, which led to FIFPro's legal challenge, is that Fifa just unilaterally imposed the competition on the calendar without consulting major stakeholders. Hence, there has been so much agitation about European clubs being 'exhausted'. They point to how there was no obvious space in the calendar, a view supported by how some players are arriving straight from Fifa's own mandated June international break, and the African Cup of Nations has also been moved. Even Mauricio Pochettino 's United States squad will be missing Juventus' Weston McKennie and Timothy Weah for the regional Gold Cup, which runs at exactly the same time. The obvious question is why Infantino was so adamant, given this upheaval. There has been a constant perception of Fifa changing rules to suit the tournament, then dealing with the fallout later. The most controversial example has been Lionel Messi's Inter Miami belatedly being awarded the host slot as soon as they won the league stage of Major League Soccer, even though the US champions are crowned by the play-offs. Messi is a commercial behemoth, after all, which feels like the start of the answer to that question. The Club World Cup has been so tied up with Infantino himself that it's impossible not to put it into the context of his political career. The competition gives Fifa entry to the elite club game, which is where the money is, and where the power is. That in turn allows the president greater scope to fulfil election promises to the 211 member associations, in a patronage system. There, the federation distributes its ample resources through programmes like Fifa Forward and the associations return their votes. On top of all that are now greater political forces, from the super clubs to US President Donald Trump and state influence. Therefore, the political strife isn't really about the tournament but its impact, control, and the future of football. The Club World Cup already comes in a fractious period, where no one wants to give up space, and everyone is trying to claim more. Many domestic leagues are already concerned about their financial futures. Within that, Fifa isn't acting as the ultimate regulator but as commercial 'players', starting to tear football's 'social contract'. This is the collection of loose agreements on which the game just about functions, such as releasing players for international duty. The landscape has already been transformed by huge prize money. Although Fifa wants the wealth of the Champions League, they need to offer sufficient reward for the big clubs to take the competition seriously. That could see the winners get over $90m (£66.8m). This would work out at $18m (£13.4m) a game, which is $7m (£5.2m) more than the Champions League and $13m (£9.6m) more than the Premier League. It's game-changing stuff, driving the push for a biennial tournament. You only have to consider the impact on PSR. That is partly why Premier League clubs are totally unwilling to allow Chelsea and Manchester City late starts to the 2025-26 season, bringing yet more dispute. And while the Club World Cup has been promoted as redistributing money from Western Europe, the structure is such that Western European clubs are almost certain to get more, actually increasing financial disparity, especially between individual leagues. How will other South African clubs be able to compete with the new wealth of Mamelodi Sundowns? Such money was eventually possible through Fifa's $1bn (£742m) broadcast deal with DAZN, which will broadcast every game of the tournament, as well as various sponsorships. One with Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund was announced last week. Football's newest state power has consequently been influential in the tournament's staging, and that in football's newest market. The sport is currently enjoying a boom in the US, visible in supporter interest and club ownership. Everyone wants a piece of it, especially the super clubs. Industry figures tell the Independent that the Club World Cup is therefore affording Fifa 'first-mover advantage' in 'football's new frontier'. Infantino's relationship with Trump is consequently more important, since this tournament comes exactly 10 years after the US state investigated Fifa under the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act. The subsequent arrests directly led to the Infantino era. Now, the wonder is whether the Club World Cup leads to something else. Some sources already describe it as an alternative Super League, and potentially the equivalent to cricket's IPL. Might it be the first step in the game's true 'globalisation', where more competitive fixtures are played outside traditional territories? This is why the subject of two years or four years is so contentious. Many would say that is dependent on it being a success, amid doubts about attendances and whether European clubs are even fit enough. Except, the money ensures that doesn't matter. The clubs still want more. There may yet be more politics to come, along with the football.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
'I would love that' - Liverpool urged to hijack £60m Manchester United transfer
Emile Heskey wants Liverpool to hijack a Manchester United transfer deal as the Reds look to bolster Arne Slot's squad this summer. Liverpool have already signed Jeremie Frimpong from Bayer Leverkusen and are closing in on a huge deal for his former teammate Florian Wirtz. The Anfield club are also pushing to sign Milos Kerkez from Bournemouth and want to sign another attacker to strengthen Slot's attacking firepower. Liverpool won the Premier League by ten points last season but know reinforcements are needed ahead of their title defence with Manchester City expected to come back stronger and Arsenal well-placed for another title tilt. At the other end of the table, Manchester United made Matheus Cunha their first summer signing and are now working on a deal for Bryan Mbeumo. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link so we can send you football news tailored to you. Mbeumo has verbally agreed a move to Old Trafford but United are yet to meet Brentford's £60m valuation for a player who scored 20 Premier League goals last season. The Cameroon international was linked with Tottenham and Newcastle United before Manchester United emerged as the frontrunners to secure his signature. But Heskey wishes Mbeumo was heading for his former club Liverpool, insisting he would have been a perfect addition to Slot's squad. 'It's hard to ever say Liverpool make mistakes in the market, because their strategy is usually just so solid,' the former England striker told Prime Casino. 'I would have loved to have seen Bryan Mbeumo at Anfield with Liverpool though. He's got loads going for him. Manchester United In: Matheus Cunha Out: Christian Eriksen, Jonny Evans, Victor Lindelof Liverpool In: Jeremie Frimpong, Giorgi Mamardashvili, Armin Pecsi Out: Trent Alexander-Arnold, Caoimhin Kelleher 'He was someone that is tried and tested in the Premier League for a few years as well. His work rate's astounding. He knows where the goal is. He's very, very technical and understands the way that Liverpool would want to play. 'So it was interesting to see that they never really went in for him.' Mbeumo looks set to join a Manchester United team that finished just 15th in the Premier League last season and will not be involved in any European competition next year. Asked how United were able to attract Mbeumo and Cunha despite their dismal 2024-25 campaign, Heskey added: 'The thing is with United is that they still have the pull to attract players. 'Normally, Mbeumo would be wanting Champions League football, knowing what the club are going to do. 'Even now, without Europe, in a transitional phase, United can still get hold of players like him and Matheus Cunha. More Trending 'It's a bit like when I chose Liverpool, who weren't yet at their best. I always supported Liverpool, but I always wanted to be in on the ground floor on their comeback. 'I understood the assignment, and I saw where things were going if they went well. 'Mbeumo probably feels the same. He can be part of something that can be great again. 'Let's be honest, it's Liverpool and Manchester United when you're abroad. They're the only two clubs who matter to the rest of the world.' For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Chelsea banish four players from Club World Cup squad but hand chance to young star MORE: Benjamin Sesko's manager tells him to reject one club after Arsenal and Man Utd talks MORE: Carlo Ancelotti praises Man Utd and Arsenal stars after first Brazil win
