logo
Israel's ‘humanitarian city' would be concentration camp for Palestinians, says former PM

Israel's ‘humanitarian city' would be concentration camp for Palestinians, says former PM

The Guardiana day ago
The 'humanitarian city' Israel's defence minister has proposed building on the ruins of Rafah would be a concentration camp, and forcing Palestinians inside would be ethnic cleansing, Israel's former prime minister Ehud Olmert has told the Guardian.
Israel was already committing war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank, Olmert said, and construction of the camp would mark an escalation.
'It is a concentration camp. I am sorry,' he said, when asked about the plans laid out by Israel Katz last week. Once inside, Palestinians would not be allowed to leave, except to go to other countries, Katz said.
Katz has ordered the military to start drawing up operational plans for construction of the 'humanitarian city' on the ruins of southern Gaza, initially to house 600,000 people and eventually the entire Palestinian population.
'If they [Palestinians] will be deported into the new 'humanitarian city', then you can say that this is part of an ethnic cleansing. It hasn't yet happened,' Olmert said. That would be 'the inevitable interpretation' of any attempt to create a camp for hundreds of thousands of people.
Olmert does not consider Israel's current campaign is ethnic cleansing because, he said, evacuating civilians to protect them from fighting was legal under international law, and Palestinians had returned to areas where military operations had finished.
The 'humanitarian city' project is backed by Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Israel's refusal to withdraw from the area Katz envisages for the camp is a sticking point in the faltering negotiations for a ceasefire deal, Israeli media have reported.
Olmert said that after months of violent rhetoric, including calls from ministers to 'cleanse' Gaza and projects to build Israeli settlements there, government claims that the 'humanitarian city' aimed to protect Palestinians were not credible.
'When they build a camp where they [plan to] 'clean' more than half of Gaza, then the inevitable understanding of the strategy of this [is that] it is not to save [Palestinians]. It is to deport them, to push them and to throw them away. There is no other understanding that I have, at least.'
Israeli human rights lawyers and scholars have described the plan as a blueprint for crimes against humanity and some have warned that if implemented, 'under certain conditions it could amount to the crime of genocide'.
Other Israelis who have described the planned 'humanitarian city' as a concentration camp have been attacked for invoking comparisons to Nazi Germany, when the government says it is designed to protect Palestinians. Yad Vashem, Israel's Holocaust memorial centre, accused one journalist of 'a serious and inappropriate distortion of the meaning of the Holocaust'.
Olmert, who led Israel from 2006 to 2009, spoke to the Guardian on the day funerals were held in the occupied West Bank for two Palestinian men, one an American citizen, who had been killed by settlers.
The latest deaths came after a campaign of violent intimidation that has forced the residents of several villages to flee their homes over the last two years.
The attacks were war crimes, Olmert said. '[It is] unforgivable. Unacceptable. There are continuous operations organised, orchestrated in the most brutal, criminal manner by a large group.'
The attackers are often called 'hilltop youth' in Israel and described as fringe extremists. Olmert said he preferred the term 'hilltop atrocities' to describe the young men whose campaign of spiralling violence was carried out with near-total impunity.
'There is no way that they can operate in such a consistent, massive and widespread manner without a framework of support and protection which is provided by the [Israeli] authorities in the [occupied Palestinian] territories,' he said.
Olmert described extremist cabinet ministers who backed violence in Gaza and the West Bank, where they have authorised major settlement expansions and control law enforcement, with a view to expanding the borders of Israel, as a greater threat to the country's long-term security than any external foe. 'These guys are the enemy from within,' he said.
Extreme suffering in Gaza and settler atrocities in the West Bank were fuelling growing anger against Israel that cannot all be written off as antisemitism, Olmert said.
'In the United States there is more and more and more expanding expressions of hatred to Israel,' he said. 'We make a discount to ourselves saying 'they are antisemites'. I don't think that they are only antisemites, I think many of them are anti-Israel because of what they watch on television, what they watch on social networks.
'This is a painful but normal reaction of people who say 'hey, you guys have crossed every possible line'.'
Attitudes inside Israel might only start to shift when Israelis started to feel the burden of international pressure, he said, calling for stronger international intervention in the absence of serious political opposition at home. He also criticised the Israeli media for its failure to report on violence against Palestinians.
Olmert backed the initial campaign against Hamas after the 7 October 2023 attacks. But by this spring, when the Israeli government 'publicly and in a brutal manner' abandoned negotiations for a permanent end to fighting, he had reached the conclusion his country was committing war crimes.
'Ashamed and heartbroken' that a war of self-defence had become something else, he decided to speak out. 'What can I do to change the attitude, except for number one, recognising these evils, and number two, to criticise them and to make sure the international public opinion knows there are [other] voices, many voices in Israel?' he asked.
He attributed what he called war crimes to negligence and a willingness to tolerate unconscionable levels of death and devastation, rather than an organised campaign of brutality. '[Did commanders] give an order? Never,' Olmert said.
Instead, he believes the military looked away when things were done that would inevitably 'cause the killing of a large number of non-involved people'. He said: 'That is why I cannot refrain from accusing this government of being responsible for war crimes committed.'
Despite the devastation in Gaza, as the last Israeli premier to seriously attempt to reach a negotiated solution with Palestinians, Olmert still hopes that a two-state solution is possible.
He is working with the former Palestinian foreign minister Nasser al-Kidwa to push for one internationally, and even believes that a historic settlement could be in reach – an end to the war in Gaza in exchange for normalisation of ties with Saudi Arabia – if only Netanyahu was able or willing to take it.
Instead Olmert was stunned to see Netanyahu, a man who has an arrest warrant for war crimes from the international criminal court, nominating Donald Trump for a Nobel peace prize.
Additional reporting by Quique Kierszenbaum
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's military and political leadership clash over proposed camp for Palestinians
Israel's military and political leadership clash over proposed camp for Palestinians

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Israel's military and political leadership clash over proposed camp for Palestinians

A feud has broken between the Israeli government and the military over the cost and impact of a planned camp for Palestinians in southern Gaza, as politicians attacked former prime minister Ehud Olmert for warning that the project would create a 'concentration camp' if it goes ahead. The 'humanitarian city' project has become a sticking point in ceasefire talks with Hamas. Israel wants to keep troops stationed across significant parts of Gaza, including the ruins of Rafah city in the south, where defence minister, Israel Katz, says the camp will be built. Hamas is pushing for a more comprehensive withdrawal. Husam Badran, a senior member of the group said the camp plans were a 'deliberatively obstructive demand' that would complicate talks, the New York Times reported. 'This would be an isolated city that resembles a ghetto,' he said in a message to the paper. 'This is utterly unacceptable, and no Palestinian would agree to this.' Katz last week revealed that he had ordered the army to draw up plans for a camp. It envisages Palestinians crammed into an area between the Egyptian border and the Israeli military's 'Morag corridor', which cuts across the strip. He said initially 600,000 people would move there, and eventually Gaza's entire population. Those inside would only be allowed to leave for another country, he told Israeli journalists at a briefing. The plan was unveiled while prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was in Washington DC for an official visit, but was understood to have his backing. The plan caused immediate alarm both among Israel's allies, including the UK, and domestically. Olmert, who led Israel from 2006 to 2009, has been the most high-profile domestic critic of the project. He also warned that if Palestinians were forced to move to the camp, it would constitute ethnic cleansing. His comments evoking comparisons with Nazi-era Germany were fiercely attacked inside Israel. Heritage minister, Amichai Eliyahu, effectively called for Olmert to be jailed over the comments, with a barely veiled reference to time he served for corruption offences after leaving office. '(Olmert) already knows prison very well,' Eliyahu said. 'There is no other way to shut him down from the hatred and antisemitism he spreads around the world.' The military has also opposed the project, even as they followed orders to draw up plans to implement it. In a security cabinet meeting on Sunday night, tensions broke out into the open as IDF chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, clashed with Netanyahu, Israeli media reported. Zamir reportedly said the project would divert funds and other resources from the military, sapping its ability to fight and undermining efforts to rescue hostages. His office had previously argued that moving and 'concentrating' civilians was not a goal of the war, in response to a legal petition brought by reservists concerned they would face illegal orders to commit war crimes. Netanyahu reportedly lashed out at Zamir, saying the plans he presented – which estimated several months of construction work, and perhaps up to a year – were 'too expensive and too slow', Israel's channel 12 reported, citing official sources. 'I asked for a realistic plan!' the prime minister reportedly said, demanding a cheaper, faster timeline for construction be delivered by Tuesday. Finance ministry officials raised other practical objections to the 'humanitarian city' plan, Yedioth Ahronoth reported. They said an estimated 15 billion shekels annual cost would be a huge drain on the state's budget. That cost would probably fall on the Israeli taxpayer, taking money away from schools, hospitals and welfare, the paper added. Senior Israeli officials estimate that constructing a proposed 'humanitarian city' in the Rafah area would cost between $2.7bn and $4bn, Ynet reported. They added that, if the plan proceeds, Israel would initially bear nearly the entire cost. The row came as Israeli strikes across Gaza killed at least 31 people, according to local hospitals. Twelve people were killed by strikes in southern Gaza, including three who were waiting at an aid distribution point, according to Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, which received the bodies. Shifa hospital in Gaza City also received 12 bodies, including three children and two women, after a series of strikes in the north, according to the hospital's director, Dr Mohammed Abu Selmia. Al-Awda hospital reported seven killed and 11 wounded in strikes in central Gaza. UN agencies, including those providing food and health care, reiterated a warning made at the weekend that without adequate fuel, they 'will likely be forced to stop their operations entirely.' In a joint statement, they said that hospitals are already going dark and ambulances can no longer move. Without fuel, transport, water production, sanitation and telecommunications will shut down and bakeries and community kitchens cannot operate, they said.

In Gaza, we know why Israel wants to herd us all into one camp – our lives are bargaining chips
In Gaza, we know why Israel wants to herd us all into one camp – our lives are bargaining chips

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

In Gaza, we know why Israel wants to herd us all into one camp – our lives are bargaining chips

After 21 months of war, the Israeli minister of defence, Israel Katz, has proposed a new initiative to force all Palestinians in Gaza into a camp on the ruins of Rafah. I lived west of Gaza city, just five minutes away from the beach. I used to see the waves from the roof of our house. The area was marvellous, with luxury architecture, hotels and tourist resorts. Since the war began, I have been moving between the northern, western and eastern areas of the city. We were unable to settle in one place because Israeli ground invasions continued to move from one area to another. Later, the Israeli army named these areas 'North Gaza' as part of its apartheid policy, dividing Gaza into north and south and treating them differently. I remember at the beginning of the conflict when the planes dropped evacuation leaflets saying: 'You must now head to the south of the valley. You are in a dangerous combat zone.' My father told me and my siblings that these leaflets were nothing but a displacement plan. The south was not safe, and we had to stay in northern Gaza. Before 7 October, we could move freely from north to south without any restrictions. This was one of the features that distinguished Gaza from the West Bank. However, when many people rejected Israel's orders at the start of the war, the IDF established a checkpoint between the north and the south. Israel said that anyone seeking food should travel to the south of Gaza and never return to the north. In fact, it implemented a starvation policy as a means of displacement. People who couldn't stand the hunger left, but we stood firm in our decision not to submit. I remember being poisoned during last year's Ramadan. There was nothing in the markets except weeds, whereas the south was brimming with goods. We were dying of hunger and exhausted as we were displaced from one area to another. Relatives who had been displaced to the south told us it was safe. But then, Israel invaded Rafah and destroyed it, killing many. After this, those who had fled became crowded in the centre of Gaza along roads, living in tattered tents. They were unable to return to the north across the Netzarim checkpoint. A young man, Omar Marouf, only 22 years old, decided to return to northern Gaza across the checkpoint. We still do not know what happened to him. Was he killed? Then the aid was cut off. Up and down the territory we were being bombed and starved, sometimes shot while queueing for what little food was being allowed in. According to Katz, Rafah will become a 'humanitarian city', but no one in Gaza can believe this claim. I asked my grandfather, who, aged four, witnessed the displacement of the Nakba in 1948, about the purpose of Katz's plan. 'Is this plan a prison within a prison?' I asked. 'There is no point in going there,' he responded. 'We are already in a prison with closed doors.' There will be death in every corner of Gaza as long as it is occupied. Neighbouring Arab countries have denied us refuge, especially Egypt. Currently, it only receives people from Gaza as patients and refuses to grant them residency. The people of Gaza believe the plan is nothing more than an Israeli pressure tactic against Hamas, hoping it will waive the demand that Israel withdraws from the Morag axis – an Israeli 'security corridor' between Rafah and Khan Younis. Gaza's people are waiting for another pause in the conflict with empty stomachs. Young people have stopped queueing for aid, hoping that a truce is near and that there is no need to risk their lives. This truce, even if it is for 60 days, is the only chance for us to breathe. I do not know what will happen if these negotiations fail. This ceasefire is our last hope to live in peace, even if for a short while. Nour Abo Aisha is a freelance writer based in Gaza

Israel assassinates terrorist who held British hostage captive
Israel assassinates terrorist who held British hostage captive

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Israel assassinates terrorist who held British hostage captive

The Hamas terrorist who held Emily Damari captive in Gaza has been assassinated in a targeted strike. The Israeli military said that Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita, who was one of thousands of fighters who invaded southern Israel on Oct 7, was killed in Gaza City as operations in the besieged strip continue and ceasefire talks stall. 'Quneita was a terrorist in Hamas's Al-Furqan Battalions' military intelligence, who infiltrated Israel during the brutal Oct 7 massacre and held Emily Damari hostage in his home at the start of the war,' the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said while sharing footage of the deadly strike. Ms Damari, a British-Israeli who is now 28, was one of 251 people taken captive on the deadliest single day for the Jews since the Holocaust. She was shot and abducted after Hamas gunmen stormed her home in the Kfar Aza kibbutz. The terrorists killed Ms Damari's dog and shot her in the hand before blindfolding her and driving her into Gaza where she was held captive for 471 days. She subsequently lost two fingers. She was released in January as part of a short-lived ceasefire in which 10 Israeli hostages were released in exchange for 400 Palestinians held in Israeli jails, many on terror charges. She and her fellow hostages were denied sufficient food, which was rationed between them, and she also spoke of never seeing the sun during her time in captivity. Speaking to an Israeli broadcaster in May, she recalled a physical altercation with a Hamas captor who had pushed a fellow hostage. 'I started speaking in Hebrew, not Arabic – 'What are you doing?' – and pushed him back,' she told Channel 12. 'He grabbed me by the arm, and I pushed his arm away, until others separated us. 'Would I have gotten a bullet? Fine, then I'll die and won't be in captivity, thank you very much,' she said. 'Sucks for my family, for my friends, but I'll be out of this nightmare.' Ms Damari, who is gay, had to hide her sexuality from her captors during her time in Gaza, knowing that it could be fatal if the Islamist terror group found out. Homosexuality is illegal in Gaza, punishable by prison or even death. 'They can't know something like that, they consider it sick,' Ms Damari said. 'We once asked one of them, 'What if your brother were gay'? he said: 'I'd murder him'.' She told the news channel that during her long captivity she had quizzed her captors on topics from how they built the tunnel to how much they cost to build, the terrorist nicknaming her 'Fuduli,' meaning curious in Arabic. Ms Damari was from one of the worst hit communities on the Gaza border, the rural community of Kfar Aza. In a phone call with Sir Keir Starmer after her release, she claimed she had been held in facilities belonging to the UN refugee agency UNRWA during her captivity. She said she'd been denied medical treatment during her time as a hostage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store