Appeal launched against Shell's approval to drill off Northern Cape coast
Environmentalists are appealing the government's decision to grant Shell permission to drill deep into the Northern Cape coast.
The Department of Mineral Resources granted Shell environmental authorisation for the site in early July, allowing for drilling up to depths of 3 200m.
Citing concerns from fishing communities and heritage organisations over the possible infringement of cultural rights, appellants highlighted what they believe are holes in Shell's initial submission.
Third-deepest well in the world
Shell's Northern Cape Ultra Deep (NCUD) oil and gas project could tap into deep-sea reserves located off the South African coast between Lamberts Bay and Namibia.
If Shell is successful, the well would become the third deepest offshore site in the world.
Organisations opposed to the project believe the oil giant's environmental impact assessment report did not cover the required criteria.
Natural Justice and The Green Connection's appeal states that the modelling used to determine Shell's ability to close the well in the event of a disaster was inadequate.
Additionally, full emergency plans were not disclosed, raising the suspicion of the environmentalists.
'How could decision-makers have considered all the risks or fully assess the adequacy of the various contingency plans, without having detailed, site-specific emergency response plans,' stated Neville van Rooy, Community Outreach Coordinator at The Green Connection.
The Citizen reached out to Shell for comment. Any response will be included once received.
Inadequate emergency plans
The plan listed by Shell in the impact report involved the installation of a capping stack within three weeks of a disaster.
The appellants questioned whether such an installation was possible at the required depth, within the stipulated timeframe, as Shell's models were based on existing sites, not the conditions specific to the NCUD.
The Green Connection's legal advisor, Shahil Singh, said the perceived lack of transparency violated legal protections and sections of the constitution.
'These omissions are not minor. It may violate the principles of South African environmental law, which demand transparency, precaution, and public participation,' said Singh.
Noting Shell's failed attempt to drill off the Eastern Cape coast several years ago, which was halted by court action, Singh said this scenario created a 'pattern' of attempting to dodge oversight.
'It is exploitation — because it doesn't uplift communities nor protect the environment — but destroys instead.
'We cannot stand by while our ocean and our future are sacrificed for short-term corporate profit,' Singh concluded.
NOW READ: Money was what pushed Shell out of South Africa – expert
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
20 minutes ago
- IOL News
Gauteng department faces scrutiny over R8. 4 million contracts to questionable 'military veterans'
Gauteng's Department of Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation faces criticism for awarding contracts to companies falsely claiming veteran ownership, raising serious concerns about misuse of public funds. The Gauteng Department of Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation (SACR) is slated after awarding over R8.4 million to companies claiming to be owned by 'military veterans,' despite records showing some directors were born in the 1990s. The Military Veterans Act of 2011 defines a military veteran as any South African citizen who falls into one of the following categories: Those who rendered military service to any of the military organisations involved on all sides of South Africa's liberation war from 1960 to 1994; Those who served in the Union Defence Force before 1961; and Those who became members of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) after 1994 have completed their military training, no longer perform military duties, and have not been dishonourably discharged from the military. Following questions raised by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL), the party stated that Gauteng MEC for Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation, Matome Chiloane, confirmed that the department awarded contracts to 24 companies owned by military veterans over the past three financial years. Kingsol Chabalala, DA Gauteng Shadow MEC for Sports, Arts, Culture and Recreation, stated that the awarded companies have provided a range of services, including security at libraries such as Driezik and Kagiso, as well as managing events for wreath-laying ceremonies and celebrations for Human Rights and Heritage Day. He highlighted that the documents, in possession of The Star, exposed a troubling trend of false claims, pointing out that many companies on the list are directed by individuals born in the 1990s, which disqualifies them from being considered genuine military veterans. 'A closer inspection of the entities reveals a disturbing pattern of misrepresentation. Notably, several listed companies have directors who were born in the 1990s, making them far too young to be categorised as military veterans. For instance, the director of RE DLALA GAME TRADING, which received R459 156.46, was born in 1990; the director of Intellectditcom, backed with R147 700, was born in 1995; and the director of MATHABATSEME ENTERPRISE, which received R486 349.50, was born in 1996.' Chabalala further asserted that this represents a clear abuse of procurement processes to secure profitable contracts, exposing how certain individuals within the department are prepared to exploit veterans' legacy and public resources for personal benefit. He further stated that the DA will contact Chiloane to seek clarification on how this clear inconsistency was ignored or tolerated. 'The DA will write to MEC Chiloane, urging him to clarify how such a blatant discrepancy went unnoticed or permitted to persist under his watch. We will also demand that he conduct an urgent investigation into those responsible for awarding these contracts and ensure that they face appropriate consequences. This process must be carried out transparently and without bias,' Chabalala added. Responding to the concerns, Mxolisi Mkhonza, spokesperson for the Department of Military Veterans, explained that serving members of the SANDF qualify as military veterans once they leave the armed forces and are registered on the South African National Military Veterans Database. This includes individuals who have completed the Military Skills Development System (MSDS), which annually recruits citizens into the SANDF. Mkhonza also noted that the department is considering amending the registration process. 'Therefore, there will be no need for an investigation as these are legitimate military veterans according to the Act in its current state. The DMV is, however, looking to begin the process of amending the Military Veterans Act in order to circumvent such gaps, which are being exploited by certain individuals.' He added that the application and verification process for recognition as a military veteran involves several requirements, beginning with proof of having served or trained as a soldier, details of which are available on the DMV website. Once approved, individuals are listed on the South African National Military Veterans Database and issued a confirmation letter. This letter enables them to apply for various benefits outlined in Section 5 of the Act, provided they meet the qualifying criteria. Mkhonza explained that the DMV can not comment on other departments' procedures but works with them across government to deliver benefits. 'As a coordinating department, we work with various other government departments at all spheres of government in rolling out benefits. Each department may then have its criteria on how to go about issuing benefits to individuals specifically earmarked as military veterans. The DMV cannot speak on processes followed by other departments, such as the SACR.' The Star's attempts to get a comment from SACR were unsuccessful. We had not received a response by publication time. The Star
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa Holds Hope for Review of US Import Tariffs After High-Level Call
Import tariffs by the United States could still be reconsidered, following direct communication between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump. Image: Mandel NGAN / AFP The South African government remains optimistic that recently imposed import tariffs by the United States could still be reconsidered, following direct communication between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump. In a phone call held on Wednesday, the two leaders discussed trade relations between the two countries, with a focus on the new tariffs that have raised concern among South African exporters. The conversation marks a significant diplomatic step as Pretoria seeks to protect local industries affected by the changes in US trade policy. While details of the discussion remain limited, government officials have confirmed that President Ramaphosa used the opportunity to raise concerns about the impact of the tariffs on South African businesses and jobs. According to sources familiar with the matter, Ramaphosa highlighted the long-standing partnership between the two nations and expressed hope that the tariffs could still be reviewed in a spirit of cooperation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The tariffs in question have placed added pressure on several key sectors in South Africa, particularly agriculture and steel. Exporters of these goods have already reported increased costs and reduced competitiveness in the American market since the duties came into effect. Business leaders have warned that unless the situation changes, some companies may be forced to scale back operations or even cut jobs. In response, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition has been engaging with its counterparts in Washington, hoping to find a resolution that will allow continued access to one of South Africa's most important trading partners. Officials say they are exploring all diplomatic and legal options available under international trade agreements. Minister of Trade Ebrahim Patel said the government remains committed to finding a way forward through dialogue. 'We believe that the relationship between South Africa and the United States has always been one of cooperation and mutual benefit. We are confident that, with continued engagement, we can address these recent trade developments in a way that supports both economies.' South Africa and the United States share a strong trade relationship under the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which gives eligible African countries preferential access to the US market. However, new tariff measures introduced by the Trump administration have threatened to disrupt that arrangement, especially for goods that are now facing additional duties upon entry into the US.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Southern African 'smart economic corridor' set to create 1.6 million jobs
Seven Southern African Development Community (SADC) nations have officially backed a plan that could unlock $16.1 billion in regional GDP and generate over 1.6 million jobs. SADC wants to transform the North-South Corridor (NSC) into a 'smart economic corridor.' This would position it as a central hub for industrialisation, sustainable development, and inclusive growth. At a recent high-level workshop in Johannesburg, Botswana, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe – along with international development partners – endorsed the NSC Economic Corridor Pilot Programme. This approval paves the way for the corridor to evolve from a purely transit and trade corridor into a fully integrated economic corridor. Stretching from Durban to Kolwezi in the DRC, the NSC carries more than 60% of all SADC trade. In the process, it serves over half of the region's population. It overlays key Trans-African Highways, traverses rich mineral belts in the DRC, Zambia, and Zimbabwe, and passes through prime agricultural zones and major river basins such as the Zambezi and Limpopo. With access to the Southern African Power Pool Grid and regional ICT infrastructure, the route is ideally positioned to boost manufacturing, enhance value chains, and modernise agriculture. The 'smart corridor' concept aims to concentrate growth hubs within easy reach of core infrastructure. This will ensure businesses, farmers, and communities benefit from improved transport, power, and digital connectivity. The NSC corridor is the backbone of the SADC region, extending from Durban, South Africa, to Kolwezi in the DRC. It overlaps with several Trans-African Highways (TAH), including: TAH3 : Cape Town to Tripoli : Cape Town to Tripoli TAH4 : Cape Town to Cairo : Cape Town to Cairo TAH9: Beira to Lobito The NSC Economic Corridor Pilot Programme, is expected to launch in 2026. Crucially, the initiative will focus on opportunities for youth, women, and small and medium-sized enterprises. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
