logo
Trump plan to cut programs that get poor kids into college makes no sense

Trump plan to cut programs that get poor kids into college makes no sense

Yahoo18-05-2025

Calling a 61-year-old federally funded project 'a relic of the past' is insulting, not because I'm just a few years older than the Upward Bound program that continues to provide a vital service in guiding low-income students into college.
Clearly, the Trump administration's effort to eliminate Upward Bound, Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate and other programs known by the acronym of TRIO, to trim 15% from federal education spending to allow for generous tax cuts to billionaires is not only short-sighted but also dumb.
How can they justify erasing programs that help get poor students into college, where they will move up the economic ladder and bring their families along with them?
They can't.
But Russell T. Vought, executive director of the president's Office of Management and Budget, gave it a try.
Opinion
'TRIO and GEAR UP are a relic of the past when financial incentives were needed to motivate Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) to engage with low-income students and increase access,' Vought said in a May 2 letter to Sen. Susan Collins in which he outlined President Donald Trump's recommendations on discretionary spending for 2026.
'Today, the pendulum has swung and access to college is not the obstacle it was for students of limited means,' said Vought, who added that institutions of higher education should fund those programs rather than engaging in woke ideology with federal taxpayer subsidies.'
There are seven TRIO programs, each designed to identify and provide services for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds. They range from Veterans Upward Bound to Educational Opportunity Centers to Educational Talent Search.
I wish some of them had been in place when I was graduating from Delano High School, where I never had a counselor point me toward college or explain how to fill out college applications.
Christopher Navas, an 18-year-old student at Riverdale High, is more fortunate. The Fresno State-bound Navas, who plans to major in mechanical engineering, is the second-youngest of seven children of a farm irrigation manager and a merchandiser.
'I'm so grateful that I took the risk to join ETS (Fresno State Educational Talent Search) because this simple program that was supposed to motivate students to pursue a higher education impacted my life significantly,' said Navas at Wednesday's ceremony honoring 23 TRIO graduates at his school.
Navas said he was ambivalent about college until a summer program in his sophomore year introduced him to college majors and helped him establish relationships with college staff. A trip to Disneyland remains a highlight.
Once in the program, Navas became more active in school, joining the baseball team and clubs and getting 'out of his comfort zone.'
Olga Núñez, director of the Educational Talent Search at Fresno State, said 94% of the 680 high school students with 62% of all California students.
The program gets $370,000 of federal funds for a staff of two counselors, an administrative assistant and Núñez. When money is available, student assistants are hired.
The return on investment is impressive: 91% graduate with the requirements to get into college (vs. a 45.3% state average); and 91% graduate from high school (vs. 52.7% average at Riverdale High, 48.5% at Mendota High).
'They need to want to go to college,' said Núñez, who stressed her team can't promote students to go to Fresno State. 'Maybe they don't know where, or what major, but we want to increase high school graduation rates and college enrollment rates.'
This TRIO program is critical because sometimes working-class parents with no college experience don't know how to prepare their children for college. Any help parents can get is sorely needed.
According to the Sacramento-based Public Policy Institute of California, high school students from the San Joaquín Valley are less likely to attend and graduate from college than their counterparts in the rest of the state. Only 26% of ninth graders in the region are on a path to earn a bachelor's degree (vs. 35% statewide), and only 57% of high school graduates attend public or nonprofit colleges (vs. 65% statewide).
Núñez was among those notified earlier this month about the Trump administration's desire to cut funding. TRIO programs are required to submit annual progress reports to remain eligible for 5-year grants. Núñez is preparing to submit another grant for the cycle starting in the 2026-27 school year.
A May 7 webinar organized by the Council for Opportunity in Education ran out of space after organizers were flooded by more than 5,000 requests. A follow-up session is scheduled for May 22 for TRIO educators.
Organizers want to remain nonpartisan because the TRIO program has gotten support from both Republicans and Democrats. Of more than 200 representatives who have signed a letter of support for TRIO for the 2026 fiscal year, only 63 are Democrats.
The Fresno State TRIO programs are among 3,500 at more than 1,000 colleges and universities in the country. They help 870,000 students through individualized counseling, advising and other services.
The letter explains why TRIO works: 'Since their inception in 1964, TRIO programs have produced over 6 million college graduates. Research demonstrates that college graduates have lower rates of unemployment, pay more in federal taxes, and earn a million dollars more throughout their working lives than non-college graduates.'
What is so difficult to understand that eliminating TRIO funding is bad for the country? It seems like Trump and his advisors need some education.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Santa Ono barred from UF presidency amid mounting pressure from GOP officials
Santa Ono barred from UF presidency amid mounting pressure from GOP officials

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Santa Ono barred from UF presidency amid mounting pressure from GOP officials

Santa Ono was barred from being the next president of the University of Florida amid rising dissent from leading Republicans who question whether he'd protect Jewish students in the preeminent state university. One thorny issue for Ono and many higher education leaders has been dealing with pro-Palestine encampments on campus: Protests generally are protected, but camping overnight or setting up structures can be subject to policies about safety and access, for example. And some Jewish students have reported feeling uneasy or even threatened because of encampments on campuses. UF's Board of Trustees approved Ono, president of the University of Michigan. Yet when facing the Board of Governors, a 17-member board that oversees the public university system, Ono was grilled the afternoon of June 3 over his handling of encampments in Michigan last year. UF Trustees vote: University of Florida Board of Trustees selects Dr. Santa Ono as university's 14th president U.S. Sen. Rick Scott, for instance, said in a statement prior to the failing vote that he was concerned over Ono's "concerning record" from allowing encampments for nearly a month, "putting Jewish students in danger and failing to uphold even the most basic standards of leadership. "This is the right decision for UF," Scott said in an X post after the vote. "UF's students, faculty and staff deserve a president who will stand for Florida values and against antisemitism." Ono's past support of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, which he has since walked back, also has gotten him crosswise with Florida GOP elected officials, including U.S. Rep. Jimmy Patronis, a Panhandle Republican who until recently was Florida's elected chief financial officer. "@UF sets the benchmark for education nationwide. There's too much smoke with Santa Ono. We need a leader, not a DEI acolyte. Leave the Ann Arbor thinking in Ann Arbor," Patronis posted June 2 on X. U.S. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Sarasota, wrote a letter to the board last week asking them to reject Ono and restart the presidential search, saying his past positions and policies in Michigan are disqualifying. "Hollow assurances of an 'evolved mindset' cannot erase Dr. Ono's history of preferential treatment for far-left causes, coupled with his cold indifference to student safety," Steube said in a press statement Friday. U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Naples, also questioned Ono's capability in a thread on X prior to the vote, saying, "Now more than ever, Floridians deserve answers." "How can the UF community be assured you'll be realistic about the prominence of anti-Semitism on college campuses, shut down protests, and keep public order?" asked Donalds, so far the only leading Republican to declare his candidacy for the 2026 Florida governor's race. More recently, Ono's handling of encampments and pro-Palestine demonstrations while leading the University of Michigan was specifically questioned. Ono has explained that resources available to him at the time were not enough to manage the situation and he wanted to ensure encampments would not affect the university graduation ceremonies, which is why it took 30 days to break them up. "It's just not acceptable," Ono said to the Board of Trustees, discussing encampments. In 2024, nine pro-Palestine protesters were arrested at the University of Florida, including many students. They argued they were exercising their First Amendment rights. UF released guidance that students are free to hold signs and engage in speech but not allowed to break rules against camping and violence. Pro-Palestine UF Protests: Controversy: UF may trespass protestors engaging in prohibited activities In his meeting with trustees, Ono did not specify further what would qualify as an encampment, what resources he would need to break one up if needed, and whether it would infringe on First Amendment rights to speech and assembly. Jerry Edwards, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, said universities often are given special deference in court because of their educational mission. "The way (speech restrictions are) implemented may end up being unconstitutional. On its face, I cannot say that they're not able to put restrictions in place," Edwards said. And Gainesville-based First Amendment attorney Gary Edinger said universities certainly can create rules on encampments that do not violate freedom of assembly, as long as these rules are created and enforced neutrally. "Application in universities has often been problematic," Edinger said. "If our new president says no encampments, and it's done on a neutral basis, … I think that's going to survive a challenge." More: Who is the next president of UF? What we know about finalist Dr. Santa Ono This reporting content is supported by a partnership with Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. USA Today Network-Florida First Amendment reporter Stephany Matat is based in Tallahassee, Fla. She can be reached at SMatat@ On X: @stephanymatat. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Santa Ono barred from UF presidency after Florida Republicans called for no-vote

In fight with Columbia, Trump seeks ‘death sentence'
In fight with Columbia, Trump seeks ‘death sentence'

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

In fight with Columbia, Trump seeks ‘death sentence'

In President Trump's war with higher education, Columbia University just became the first to face the nuclear option. While other schools have also faced devastating funding cuts and new investigations from multiple federal agencies under Trump, the Education Department is now calling for Columbia to lose its accreditation, endangering its access to the entire federal student loan system. Republicans are cheering Trump on, but for Columbia, which his administration accuses of violating Title VI antidiscrimination laws, the threat is existential. 'It's often called, colloquially, in higher education, a death sentence, because very few institutions could continue to enroll students, especially lower- and middle-income students, without having those students have the ability to borrow or get grants to go to those schools,' said Jon Fansmith, senior vice president of government relations and national engagement at the American Council on Education. The college accreditation process is typically one of the most mundane aspects of higher education, involving a federally approved nonpartisan accreditor evaluating every aspect of an institution, from class selections to admission processes. But the accreditor determines if a school is allowed to have access to student aid, including federal loans and Pell Grants. Columbia costs $71,000 a year for tuition and fees without financial aid, and that doesn't include room and board. The school notes that 24 percent of its first-year students have Pell Grants. Without access to aid, Columbia would be inaccessible to most students in the country. Experts doubt that the accreditor in question, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, will summarily nix Columbia's status. 'It is extraordinary for the Department of Education to do something like that, but I also recognize that Middle States is a very serious and professional entity,' said Raymond Brescia, associate dean for research and intellectual life at Albany Law School. 'I am confident that Middle States will take that concern seriously […] if Middle States determines that there is a concern here, then they will work with Columbia to rectify any issues,' he added. Typically, the Education Department will work with schools to try to correct specific issues before escalating the situation, but the Trump administration and other conservatives contend Columbia has had plenty of time to fix its alleged inaction on antisemitism. 'The question of 'Gosh, is this too soon?' I mean, how much longer do we need to wait? What other example of damage or harassment do we need to see before we can tell a university that it needs to comply with the law?' asked Jonathan Butcher, the Will Skillman senior research fellow in education policy at the Heritage Foundation. The very fight will cost Columbia time and money, even if it is ultimately victorious. The school said it is 'aware of the concerns' the Education Department brought to its accreditor 'and we have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States.' 'Columbia is deeply committed to combating antisemitism on our campus. We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it,' a spokesperson for the university added. Columbia and the Trump administration have been engaged in negotiations for months after the federal government pulled $400 million from the university, saying it had failed to adequately confront campus antisemitism. Instead of fighting like fellow Ivy League member Harvard University, Columbia agreed to many of the demands from the Trump administration, such as changing its disciplinary policies, but the capitulation only led to more funding being pulled. In recent weeks, friendlier tones were struck after the Trump administration praised Columbia for swiftly shutting down a pro-Palestinian protest at the school's library. Nevertheless, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said this week that Columbia has failed to meet its Title VI obligations. 'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus. This is not only immoral, but also unlawful. Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid,' McMahon said. 'Just as the Department of Education has an obligation to uphold federal antidiscrimination law, university accreditors have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' she added. 'We look forward to the Commission keeping the Department fully informed of actions taken to ensure Columbia's compliance with accreditation standards including compliance with federal civil rights laws.' Education experts suspect Columbia will not be the last to see its accreditation threatened. The president has taken away billions of dollars from universities, threatened to revoke schools' tax-exempt status and tried to rescind Harvard's ability to admit and enroll foreign students, along with launching numerous civil rights and Title IX investigations against colleges across the country. And considering Trump was willing to take this particular step against a university that has been cooperating with his administration, it seems like it could be only a matter of time before Harvard, which has launched two lawsuits against the federal government, will be next. 'The writings on the wall, right? Why would he stop at Columbia? The goal here is to control higher education, because they think that higher education is a threat to their authoritarian rule,' said Todd Wolfson, national president of American Association of University Professors. 'I think the most important point is the people who are getting hurt here are our students and our families across this country. They are the collateral damage here,' he added. But some highlight another target in this action: accreditors themselves. On the campaign trail, Trump called accreditors his 'secret weapon' against higher education. In April, he signed an executive order to create more competition among accreditors and make it easier for schools to switch accreditation organizations, saying some accreditors have engaged in 'ideological overreach.' 'A big part of this is to intimidate the accreditors, to try to force the administration's viewpoints, which, again, aren't really supported by the law,' Fansmith said. One part is to 'scare the institution, come after the institution, but another part of this is to try to force the accreditors to get in line with the administration's policies. And that is in many ways, just as, if not more, troubling than what they're trying to do with these institutions,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

‘Essentially running a small town': Eight questions with new AIC president Nicolle Cestero
‘Essentially running a small town': Eight questions with new AIC president Nicolle Cestero

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Essentially running a small town': Eight questions with new AIC president Nicolle Cestero

SPRINGFIELD — American International College in Springfield makes history on July 1 by formally welcoming its first female president since the institution was founded 140 years ago. The college's board of trustees unanimously selected Nicolle Cestero as the 13th president of the institution. She was appointed president by the board in May and has assumed the responsibilities of the role, according to Denise Vozella, AIC's public relations and communications manager. The title becomes official next month. Cestero served as interim president beginning in March 2024, following her tenure as executive vice president, chief operating officer and chief of staff. As interim president, Cestero led the launch of Pathway to Progress, a business plan to guide the college's direction in the coming years. The plan addresses operations, a revised academic portfolio and expanded degree offerings. Before joining AIC in 2011, Cestero began her professional career in New York City at the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank focused on global affairs. Cestero holds a master's degree in business administration from AIC, a master's degree in industrial-organizational psychology from the University of West Florida and a bachelor's degree in psychology from Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley. Cestero spoke with The Republican recently about making history and her mark on AIC. Q. Have you always aspired to be a college president? A. There had been conversations between the board and I regarding whether I wanted to put my hat in the ring for the presidency, and I kept saying 'No.' I didn't want to do this because it's a huge lifestyle change. Being a college president is similar to being the mayor of a city because you are essentially running a small town. You have to worry about (everything from) whether there are weeds growing in the cracks of the sidewalk, to whether your students are safe, your academic product, fundraising with alumni and donors. There's a lot that goes into it and I still have four daughters. They range in age from 6 to 17. I didn't think it was the right time for me. Q. What changed your mind? A. We have worked hard over the past year to put a plan together to stabilize the institution and position it on a pathway for growth. There have been some positive things happening and I want to see them through because I care deeply about this institution, and I want to see us be successful. So here I am! Q. How meaningful is it for you to be the first female president of AIC? A. I have believed for a long time in empowering women and how women lead differently than men. I want to ensure the role of women in the workplace continues to be important and relevant. We need to continue to lift up other women so we can break that glass ceiling and show the power of women in general. It's cool for my daughters to see a woman in this position who can manage a job like this but also be a mom and give you a curfew and help with your homework. I'm glad they get to see and live that. Q. What is your overall vision for the college? A. The college found itself, like many other institutions, not in a very good position in many different ways — financially, programmatically, from a morale perspective. We did some deep work and called in experts over the past year and the outcome of that was a plan for the next three years that dovetailed with our strategic plan. There are shared goals across the institution that help us identify what we're doing and how everybody benefits. Q. How does the plan address the fact that fewer families are having children, which means fewer of them are going college? A. That decline is going to continue until 2032, which means there are relatively the same number of institutions that have a smaller customer base to pull from. You've got to be able to grab a larger portion of that smaller customer base to maintain and grow. We are changing how we market ourselves to meet the communication style for 18-year-olds. Students and kids are on social media all the time, so you need to make sure you've got a presence on Snapchat, Instagram and TikTok. We're also emailing and texting, finding out how they research and connect with colleges. We're also addressing programming. How do update our courses and make them more relevant? How do we expand our reach beyond this region for online programming? For example, how do we get a student in Chicago to attend AIC in Springfield? We're reaching out to demographic groups besides traditional first-time college freshmen. There are transfer students and an adult market. We've got different partnerships to help us make sure we're giving attention to these different groups so we are stabilizing and growing this institution. Q. How do you plan to balance the competing demands of your key audiences? A. There are different constituent groups, and they can have different feelings about the institution — and going through a presidential transition can be difficult. Let's take our alumni. They want to know who's leading this institution and is it similar to the school I went to — the school that cared for me and gave me this opportunity. The school that changed my life. Is the school still doing those things for students and does the president leading the institution have the values and the vision to ensure AIC is what we want it to be? I have been at the college for a long time, and we have made progress over the past year. We are trying to do a better job of bringing alumni together. We are having a positive effect on the alumni. We still have work to do, but at least we're starting that process, which is a good thing. Q. AIC has had a troubled relationship with students in the past. How are you addressing that? A. About a year and a half ago, the students were definitely not pleased about communication, transparency and they felt a lack of support under the previous administration. There were a lot of conversations about how upset they were. Things were posted online and there were meetings called to express their dissatisfaction. I believe that has changed, for the most part. Relationships have been worked on and been repaired, but that needs to continue. It's like a marriage; you don't fix one problem and move on. We have to pay attention to it constantly. I think things are improved but we have to continue to work on it every single day. Q. Are you looking forward to your installation? A. I'm not one of those people that likes that kind of stuff. I'd rather just do the work and make sure we're moving in the right direction. We don't need to have a party. Editor's note: Following The Republican's interview with Cestero, Vozella, the college's spokesperson, stated in an email, 'At this time, there are no immediate plans for a formal investiture. President Cestero prefers to focus on the work ahead rather than ceremony.' A disabled veteran is accusing a Holyoke city councilor of taking his home. Did he? Springfield Pride headliner Dawn Richard told 'Diddy' jurors of threats, violence, abuse Chicopee police cruiser spotted in Philadelphia causes social media buzz 1 million minutes of reading wanted in Springfield; area librarians warn of the 'summer slide' Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store