
Topsy-turvy world
The world is becoming a very topsy-turvy place. For the last few decades, countries have been collaborating on technology and medical research. The Covid-19 vaccines were discovered in America. Then, they were produced in factories across the world, including in India.
Those vaccines rescued mankind. People and goods moved effortlessly between nations. Free thought, research and scholarship, broke the frontiers of knowledge and wisdom. Thus, we were reaping the benefits of globalisation... Now, every country is safeguarding its boundaries. People do not trust each other. We are becoming insulated nations. We could lose the fruits of globalisation and shared progress.
Various nations are negotiating tariff rates. Everyone knows, that higher tariffs will get passed to consumers. People across the world have been suffering from high inflation, after Covid-19 and the Ukraine war. Yet, it appears that tariffs will rise between countries. Prices will increase further. Common citizens, especially the salaried classes and the poor, will suffer.
The sales of many products have already declined in many Western countries, for fear of a recession. There is also panic-buying of everyday products like toilet paper and mineral water in some supermarkets. We need to think, what type of a world we are creating for future generations.
Rajendra Aneja,
By email

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
4 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Dimon warns that US's biggest problem is ‘the enemy within'
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has warned that China isn't the biggest threat to the US, it's 'the enemy within.' Dimon appeared at the Reagan National Economic Forum in Simi Valley, California, on Friday, arguing that 'tectonic plates are shifting.' 'Those tectonic plates are the geopolitics with these terrible wars, terrible proxy terrorist activity around the world, North Korea, the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons over time, which is the greatest threat to mankind,' said Dimon, one of America's top bankers. He said the other tectonic shift is the global economy, before going on to seemingly criticise the aggressive trade policies and the apparent breaking up of traditional Western alliances by President Donald Trump. 'The other tectonic shift is ... the global economy. So the global military umbrella of America, and then the global economy, of which trade is a part,' he said. 'The other parts are, do people want to partner with you? Do you have your alliances? You have investment agreements and all those various things. And they're changing.' 'Then our debt ... We added $10 trillion in five years,' he noted about the national debt, which stands at more than $36 trillion. 'You had (former President Ronald) Reagan up there talking about deficits. The debt-to-GDP was 35 percent, and the deficit was three and a half percent. Today, it's 100 percent debt to GDP ... and a deficit of almost seven percent.' 'We go into recession, that seven percent will be 10 percent, and so we have problems, and we've got to deal with them. And then the biggest one underlying both, that is the enemy within,' he said. 'China is a potential adversary — they're doing a lot of things well, they have a lot of problems,' Dimon added. 'But what I really worry about is us. Can we get our own act together — our own values, our own capability, our own management?' The CEO made the comments amid a sharp decline in trade between China and the US following the implementation of Trump's widespread tariffs. The president's trade policy has been in flux amid new agreements and court rulings. The tariffs have prompted further uncertainty in a trade relationship that significantly impacts the rest of the world. The dispute with China escalated on Friday as Trump claimed the Chinese 'totally violated' the most recent trade agreement. 'They're not scared, folks. This notion they're gonna come bow to America, I wouldn't count on that,' said Dimon. He added that he concurs with Warren Buffett, the outgoing Berkshire Hathaway CEO, that while the US is usually 'resilient,' this time could be different. 'We have to get our act together,' said Dimon. 'We have to do it very quickly.' The CEO argued that the US has a 'mismanagement' problem and that a litany of things needed to be done, including fixing regulations, permitting, immigration, taxation, inner city schools, as well as the health care system. Dimon said the US could grow three percent a year if those things are taken care of. Referencing previous speakers at the conference, Dimon said: 'What you heard today on stage was the amount of mismanagement is extraordinary. By state, by city, for pensions ... and that stuff is going to kill us.' Last year, Dimon warned about inflation, political polarisation and wars that are creating risks not seen since WWII. The nation's most influential banker, Jamie Dimon, told investors that he continues to expect the US economy to be resilient and grow this year. But he worries geopolitical events including the war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war, as well as US political polarisation, might be creating an environment that 'may very well be creating risks that could eclipse anything since World War II.' The comments came in an annual shareholder letter from Dimon, who often uses the letter to weigh in broad topics like politics, regulation and global events and what it might mean to JPMorgan Chase, as well as the broader economy. Dimon also used his letter to forcefully defend the firm's diversity and equality efforts, pushing back on the arguments from Republicans who have said such efforts at Fortune 500 companies, colleges and universities are discriminatory and promote left-wing ideology. Agencies


Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
UK backs Morocco's Western Sahara autonomy plan in shift likely to anger Algeria
Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy has declared the UK's support for Morocco's 2007 autonomy proposal for Western Sahara, marking a significant diplomatic shift likely to deepen tensions with Algeria. During a visit to Rabat on Sunday, Lammy described the proposal as 'the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis' for resolving the decades-long dispute over the former Spanish colony, which has been at the heart of a protracted standoff between Morocco and the Algeria-backed Polisario Front. 'The UK will continue to act bilaterally, including economically, regionally and internationally in line with this position to support the resolution of the conflict,' Lammy said at a press conference alongside Morocco's Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. This position aligns Britain with France and the United States — the three Western permanent members of the UN Security Council — in backing Morocco's proposal, which offers limited autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty rather than full independence for the region. Bourita welcomed the UK's endorsement, calling it a 'historic' development and part of a broader diplomatic push to resolve the conflict. He noted that British investment in the disputed territory was under consideration. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The ministers also signed cooperation agreements covering healthcare, innovation, port infrastructure, water management and procurement. Lammy said the deals would ensure British firms benefit from Morocco's infrastructure drive as the country prepares to co-host the 2030 World Cup alongside Spain and Portugal. Contested territory Western Sahara, a phosphate-rich territory with valuable fishing waters, remains on the United Nations list of non-self-governing territories. Morocco controls about 80 percent of the land, while the rest is held by the Polisario Front, which seeks an independent Sahrawi state. Western Sahara: France backs Morocco's claim of sovereignty and its autonomy plan Read More » The conflict began in 1975 after Spain withdrew from the territory. A war between Moroccan forces and the Polisario Front ended in 1991 with a UN-brokered ceasefire that promised a referendum on self-determination — a vote that has never taken place. Since 2020, fighting has resumed, with artillery and drone strikes reported on both sides of a fortified sand wall — known as the berm — erected by Morocco. Human rights groups have repeatedly raised concerns about Morocco's crackdown on pro-independence Sahrawis in areas it controls. Algeria, a staunch supporter of Sahrawi independence, cut diplomatic ties with Morocco in 2021. It hosts the Polisario leadership and around 176,000 Sahrawi refugees in camps near Tindouf. Algiers has sharply criticised Western support for Morocco's plan. After France endorsed the autonomy initiative last year, Algerian officials accused Paris of backing 'a colonial fait accompli' and undermining UN efforts to decolonise the region.


Arabian Post
2 days ago
- Arabian Post
Oil Market Waiting For Clear Signals As Pushes And Pulls Exert Divergent Pressures
By K Raveendran Brent crude oil futures continue to hover around the $65 per barrel mark, a level that reflects the push and pull of market forces clouded by a cocktail of geopolitical tensions, environmental disruptions, and strategic production decisions. As prices hold steady, the broader sentiment among traders and analysts leans toward caution, with a slightly bullish undertone given the confluence of supply-side constraints and persistent demand recovery hopes. Much of the current price resilience can be traced to heightened uncertainty regarding OPEC+'s intentions and external shocks to global oil supply. The oil market has been keenly watching the moves of OPEC+, the coalition of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, including Russia. Speculation about further output increases has gripped the market, especially with an expected announcement at an upcoming meeting this week. OPEC+ has already raised output in the past two consecutive months, signalling a gradual easing of the production curbs that were initially implemented to balance the market in the wake of the pandemic-induced demand collapse. While such actions may appear rational from the perspective of maintaining market share and responding to rebounding global consumption, they have also introduced a layer of uncertainty. The question remains whether the additional barrels will be absorbed smoothly or lead to a supply glut, especially if demand falters or economic growth slows in major oil-consuming regions. Layered atop these production developments are supply disruptions and geopolitical constraints that have bolstered bullish sentiment in recent weeks. Chief among them is the United States' decision to ban Chevron from exporting crude oil from Venezuela. This policy move, while targetted at maintaining pressure on the Venezuelan government, has effectively choked off a potential stream of supply to the international market, thereby tightening global crude availability. Venezuela's oil sector has been under pressure for years due to sanctions and underinvestment, and Chevron had served as one of the few remaining Western oil companies operating in the country. Cutting off exports from that channel amplifies the scarcity narrative that's become increasingly prominent in market discussions. At the same time, wildfires in Alberta, Canada, have further disrupted supply dynamics. Canada is one of the top global crude producers, and Alberta's oil sands represent a significant portion of that output. Wildfires in this region pose a dual threat: direct production halts due to damage or evacuation and logistical delays as transportation routes are impacted. These fires are not a one-off event but part of a growing trend of climate-induced challenges to oil production. Their recurrence and increasing intensity underscore the vulnerability of fossil fuel infrastructure to environmental risks, which is feeding into longer-term risk assessments and price expectations in the crude futures market. While these events tighten current and anticipated supply, they occur against a backdrop of broader transformation in the U.S. oil production landscape. Gone are the days of the 'drill baby drill' mantra that once dominated energy discourse in the United States. The shale revolution, which propelled the U.S. to become the world's largest oil producer, has hit a wall of investor skepticism, environmental scrutiny, and capital discipline. Production growth has plateaued, and the appetite for aggressive expansion has waned considerably. The lack of reinvestment, combined with mounting operational and regulatory hurdles, suggests that U.S. output may struggle to fill the gap left by other supply disruptions. This restraint from the U.S., once a swing producer capable of responding swiftly to market signals, has added another layer of tightness and unpredictability to global supply forecasts. In response to these multifaceted uncertainties, many countries are recalibrating their downstream strategies. Refiners are likely to maximize throughput to take advantage of margins that remain relatively healthy amid the tight crude market. With product inventories at historically low levels in several key regions, the incentive to run refineries at full tilt is strong. This move serves not only to meet immediate fuel needs but also as a hedge against future volatility. In a market where supply chains can be disrupted by policy or natural disaster overnight, stockpiling refined products becomes a strategic imperative. Moreover, building inventories now may offer a buffer as the market braces for further uncertainty in the second half of the year. Seasonal factors, such as increased travel during summer months in the northern hemisphere, typically boost gasoline and jet fuel demand. On the other side of the equation, supply risks persist—not just from the geopolitical and environmental fronts but also from the potential for OPEC+ discord. While the alliance has held together remarkably well since the pandemic, cracks could emerge, especially if price trajectories diverge significantly from the interests of individual members. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia may have differing tolerance levels for price volatility or production ceilings, and any sign of disunity could rattle markets. Complicating the picture further is the lack of clarity around Chinese demand. As the world's largest crude importer, China plays an outsized role in determining global oil balances. While there have been signs of recovery in Chinese industrial activity and mobility, the pace and sustainability of that recovery remain uncertain. Should China's demand ramp up more slowly than expected, the additional barrels from OPEC+ could depress prices. Conversely, if the Chinese economy rebounds more sharply, it could absorb much of the additional supply and further tighten the market. In such a finely balanced environment, sentiment can swing rapidly. Traders are closely monitoring inventory data, refinery throughput rates, and shipping flows for any signal that might provide clues about the trajectory of supply and demand. The tightness in product inventories across regions is especially significant. Low diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel stocks indicate that any hiccup in refining or logistics could lead to local shortages and price spikes, even if crude prices remain stable. This bifurcation between crude and product markets reflects structural bottlenecks and underscores the complexity of energy market dynamics today. (IPA Service)