Trump administration's arrest of judge stirs debate over immigration courthouse arrests
WASHINGTON, May 13 (Reuters) - The arrest of a Wisconsin state court judge for allegedly helping a migrant evade U.S. authorities marks another salvo in a long-brewing debate about the presence of immigration agents in local courthouses.
The judge, Hannah Dugan of Milwaukee County's circuit court, is due in federal court on Thursday to face charges of obstruction and harboring an individual due to face arrest. Dugan's legal team argues she will be exonerated.
Republican President Donald Trump's administration has broadened the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to carry out courthouse arrests as it ramps up deportations and cracks down on illegal immigration.
ICE courthouse operations have drawn fierce resistance from immigration advocates and some state courts, who have argued since Trump's first term that they risk disrupting court operations and dissuading millions of people from accessing the legal system.
The case against Dugan sits at the center of two themes of Trump's second term: boundary-pushing immigration enforcement and forceful pushback against judges the administration sees as standing in the way of its authority.
"All of this adds to a sense of the judiciary being under attack," said Jeremy Fogel, a former judge in California who now runs the Berkeley Judicial Institute. 'Whether or not it's going to be successful, it's seen as part of a broader attempt to weaken or delegitimize the judiciary.'
Dugan is accused of helping an immigrant in the U.S. illegally who was due to appear on assault-related charges evade immigration authorities on April 18 by escorting him into a non-public hallway, according to a criminal complaint and local police documents. The migrant, identified as Eduardo Flores Ruiz, was arrested outside after a foot chase.
As of May 6, ICE had conducted 189 courthouse arrests since Trump returned to office in January, more than doubling its pace from the prior full year under Democratic President Joe Biden's administration, according to a Reuters analysis of ICE data.
ICE early in Trump's second term rescinded a Biden administration policy narrowing the circumstances under which it can make arrests at courthouses as part of a broader effort to open up more sensitive locations to immigration authorities.
The new policy prioritizes migrants with criminal records, alleged gang members and those who have returned to the U.S. after previously being removed, but also allows relatives of criminal defendants or witnesses to be targeted.
State courthouses are an attractive venue for immigration authorities, given people reliably appear for court dates and are typically screened by security.
'The ability of law enforcement to make arrests of criminal illegal aliens in courthouses is common sense,' said Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration enforcement.
The practice has raised thorny issues over the divide between state and federal authority.
'When litigants stop feeling like they can access justice through the courts, and when the federal government starts taking time away from states administering justice to further their immigration enforcement agenda, it gets tricky under the law,' said Sarah Rogerson, a professor at Albany Law School.
Some Democratic-run states, including New York, have passed laws to restrict ICE's ability to carry out immigration enforcement in or near courthouses.
A Massachusetts judge was charged during Trump's first term with impeding a federal immigration arrest of a defendant in her courtroom. That criminal case was dropped under the Biden administration, but state disciplinary authorities have since accused her of misconduct.
The Trump administration has escalated its rhetoric against federal judges, which have issued dozens of rulings constraining Trump's aggressive use of presidential power on immigration, slashing the federal government and exacting retribution on perceived adversaries.
Trump-nominated FBI Director Kash Patel posted on social media a photo of a handcuffed Dugan being led toward a police vehicle with the caption, 'No one is above the law.'
FBI guidelines generally bar the agency from releasing photos of criminal defendants without a clear law enforcement purpose.
Pressed on the photo during a Senate hearing last week, Patel said the purpose was 'to show America that we investigate any individual who commits a crime, especially those in positions of public trust.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
From banning X to funding Dems: All the ways Musk and Trump could hurt each other as they go nuclear
An alliance between the two most powerful men in the world seemed destined to blow up into a volatile feud yet somehow held ... until it didn't. Within a few hours on Thursday, the public spat between Donald Trump and Elon Musk exploded into debates over the president's impeachment, calls to launch primary challengers against Republican allies in Congress, and Musk's accusation that the president is implicated in a sexual abuse scandal. But how they choose to escalate from here could have far-reaching impacts — and not just for the fate of a massive bill that sparked their breakup. Trump and Musk command the world's attention, own competing social media platforms, and are each in a position to wield the power of the presidency and spend, and lose, billions of dollars against one another. How Trump could go after Musk Kill government contracts Trump has already suggested yanking government contracts for Musk's companies Tesla and SpaceX, which are due to receive at least $3 billion in contracts from 17 agencies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. On his War Room podcast, Trump ally Steve Bannon urged Trump to retaliate against the world's wealthiest man by, among other things, using the Defense Production Act to take control of SpaceX. 'The U.S. government should seize it,' Bannon said Thursday. Cut off Elon's access to the White House Musk ended his 130-day 'special government employee' term in the Trump administration last week after serving as an 'adviser' to the president for the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk unleashed across the federal government to make drastic cuts to spending and the workforce. But Trump left the door open for Musk to return. That 130-day term can be renewed next year. Trump could sever that arrangement at any time. Bannon also called on Trump to strip Musk's top-secret clearances, which he is granted in conjunction with his work on SpaceX and NASA. Make X illegal With more than 220 million followers on a social media platform under his control, Musk can use that audience and ability to shift media narratives against the president to advance his agenda. Trump, whose entire campaign was built on retribution, possesses executive authority to shut X down, according to experts. Trump could declare X a national security risk, 'which would permit him to ban the platform outright,' claims Devan Leos with AI platform Undetectable AI. The president could invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act on national security grounds to prevent X from operating, which would likely trigger a high-profile legal battle. 'Musk now faces a difficult choice. He can ban Trump from X in retaliation, but that would almost certainly trigger an executive response from the White House,' according to Leos. The president, meanwhile, owns more than 100 million shares, or roughly 53 per cent, of Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of social media platform Truth Social. His stake in the company is worth billions of dollars. Investigate Musk's immigration status and drug use Musk was born in South Africa before he emigrated to Canada and later the United States. Last year, The Washington Post reported that the billionaire worked in the country illegally before gaining citizenship. Bannon called on the president to deport him. 'Elon Musk is illegal. He's got to go too,' Bannon said on his War Room podcast. Trump also could wield the power of his office to initiate other investigations under a Department of Justice controlled by his fierce ally Attorney General Pam Bondi, including into allegations of his drug use at the campaign trail and within the administration. How Musk could go after Trump Flood opponents with cash The world's wealthiest person spent tens of millions of dollars supporting Trump's 2024 campaign. On Thursday, he took credit for his victory. But this year, his multimillion-dollar effort to support a conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate blew up in his face, with his DOGE efforts tanking his — and Tesla's — appeal. Still, Republican candidates fear being his target. Musk and his allies have threatened to fund primary challenges against any GOP member of Congress who supports legislation he doesn't. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 percent in the middle?' Musk asked on Thursday. Democrats agree with Musk that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a disaster but aren't necessarily welcoming him to the party after the right-wing billionaire torched government agencies and helped but Trump back in office. 'We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, whose district represents Silicon Valley, told Politico. 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Liam Kerr, co-founder of the centrist WelcomeFest meeting underway in Washington during the Trump-Musk feud, told the outlet that 'of course' Democrats should be open to Musk. 'You don't want anyone wildly distorting your politics, which he has a unique capability to do. But it's a zero-sum game,' Kerr told Politico. 'Anything that he does that moves more toward Democrats hurts Republicans.' Wield social media against the president It took just four hours for a feud playing out on two different social media platforms for Musk to drop what he called a 'bomb' against the president. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' he wrote on X. '[Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' That loaded accusation — Musk's suggestion that Trump was involving the sex offender's trafficking scheme — appeared to be the tipping point in their feud. Musk, who just days ago seemed to have no problem associating with a man he is now alleging is implicated in Epstein's crimes, could launch a humiliation campaign against the president for an audience that has been largely disappointed with the Trump administration's approach to the Epstein case. Far-right influencers have turned on top federal law enforcement officials over the case, accusing Trump of continuing what they believe is a 'deep state' conspiracy theory covering up powerful people. Musk could leverage that hostility. Use DOGE against Trump Musk hired a small army of young loyalists and old allies for his government-wide operation to not only eliminate jobs and spending but extract reams of data from millions of Americans. DOGE's unprecedented access to Americans' data 'is alarming, made worse by the complete absence of meaningful oversight,' according to Ben Zipperer, a senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute. 'That unrestrained access to data will likely worsen the problem of identity theft in the United States, which could cost working families tens of billions of dollars annually.' A report from Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren's office also uncovered more than 100 instances that Musk allegedly abused his role as a 'special government employee' overseeing DOGE to benefit his private interests. Musk violated 'norms at an astonishing pace,' amounting to 'scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution.' The report accuses Musk of using the government to promote his businesses, including turning the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom, and allegedly discovered roughly two dozen instances where the government 'entered or explored new lucrative contracts' with the billionaire while halting enforcement actions against his companies.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: David Beckham to be awarded a knighthood by King Charles
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' - as president considering selling his Tesla
Donald Trump has said Elon Musk has "lost his mind", according to US media, as the White House reveals the president is not interested in speaking to him. In a phone interview with ABC News, the US president was asked about reports that a phone call was scheduled on Friday between Musk and himself. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" he is said to have responded. A White House official has said Mr Trump is not interested in talking to his former ally amid a bitter feud between the two, adding that no phone call is planned for the day. It comes as a source familiar with the situation has told Sky News the president is considering selling his Tesla, in a further sign that no resolution to the explosive bust-up is in sight. Mr Trump purchased a Tesla earlier this year, describing the company as Elon's "baby". 18:59 The pair's relationship broke down publicly on Thursday, just days after Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk left his role as a special government employee. In a fiery exchange, Musk posted a series of messages on X criticising the president's signature tax bill as a "big ugly spending bill". President Trump posted on Truth Social that Musk had been "wearing thin" and claimed he "asked him to leave" his government position, something Musk denied. Elon Musk then hit back, alleging the president "is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public." He gave no evidence for the claim, and it was dismissed by the White House. In a statement, it called the bust-up an "unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted." 1:17 The bill at the centre of the spat was passed by the House Republicans in May and has been described by the president as a "big, beautiful bill". The president said to reporters in the White House on Thursday that Musk "knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here". "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to have to cut the EV mandate." Musk then denied this, saying: "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" The spat hit Tesla shares, which closed down 14.3% on Thursday, losing about $150bn (£111bn) in value. Musk also said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft "immediately" after Mr Trump threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. Hours after issuing his threat, however, Musk heeded advice from X users telling him to "cool down" and posted: "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon". The row between two of the most powerful men in America comes a week after Musk left his position in the government, where he spearheaded a controversial cost-cutting department, DOGE - the Department of Government Efficiency.
