logo
Australian academics refuse to attend US conferences for fear of being detained

Australian academics refuse to attend US conferences for fear of being detained

The Guardian13-04-2025
When Gemma Lucy Smart received an invitation to attend an academic conference in the US, she was excited. But that was before Donald Trump was returned to office.
Now Smart, who has a disability and is queer, has decided it's too risky to travel to Seattle for the social sciences conference in September.
The disabilities officer at the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (Capa) and PhD candidate at the University of Sydney will instead attend remotely.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Shortly after Trump was inaugurated, the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) made its conference 'hybrid' in response to what it said were 'unpredictable' developments at the US border.
'They were concerned about people entering,' Smart said.
'I work on the history of psychiatry, so my field has a lot to do with diversity, equity and inclusion. They [the conference organisers] very explicitly said 'We don't believe it is safe for everyone to travel to the US, particularly our trans and diverse colleagues.'
'The focus on that is really troubling. That, if you legitimately have a different passport than you were given at a young age, you could be detained.'
The conference's co-chairs announced the hybrid move on 21 January – a day after Trump began his second term. They said in a statement that the decision reflected 'conversations with disability justice and environmental justice scholars and activists'.
'It also comes on the heels of political shifts that have made travel to the US more tenuous for many STS contributors,' they added.
Australian academics are not only cancelling trips to the US for key conferences. Scholarships are being rescinded and grant funding pulled as the fallout from the Trump administration's interference continues.
It follows media reports of travellers having their devices searched at the US border and being denied entry, including a French scientist who had messages on his phone critical of Donald Trump.
Prior to this Trump administration, US visa applicants were required to declare if they had a disability. But Smart said she began to hear accounts of people being stopped and 'detained or denied' on the basis of their condition.
'They are doing things like checking if your medication matches your declared disability. If it doesn't, they can deny you entry,' she said.
'As an openly disabled person, I would be very hesitant to be entering right now. If the conference hadn't switched online, I wouldn't have taken the risk [to attend in person].'
In a statement uploaded to its website in late January, 4S said it was 'aware' that the situation with US border control was 'currently unpredictable'.
'We … will be watching events closely in the coming months to make sure that we are supporting international attendees to the greatest possible extent,' organisers stated. 'Attendees are also encouraged to consult their own countries' travel advice.'
Australia's National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) said it had received multiple reports from members that US policy shifts have caused academics to cancel travel, while others have had planned research partnerships terminated with little explanation.
The union's national president, Dr Alison Barnes, said members had expressed 'deeply concerning impacts on their work and careers'.
'Academics are cancelling travel to the US, abandoning valuable research partnerships, and dealing with suddenly terminated grants and contracts,' she said.
'One researcher had their five-year USAID-funded conservation program terminated literally within days of the policy changes … another had a 10-year collaboration with the CDC abruptly ended when their US counterpart was sacked by email.
'Many academics tell us they're avoiding US travel entirely due to genuine fears about border detention and visa issues.'
Barnes said many LGBTQ+ researchers, in particular, no longer felt safe travelling to the US for conferences, 'directly impacting their career progression'.
'We're seeing grant applications go unanswered, contracts for 2025 jeopardised, and researchers facing significant career uncertainty,' she said.
'When our academics fear travelling to major conferences or partnering with US institutions, the impacts ripple through the entire global knowledge ecosystem.
'These changes threaten to isolate US research from vital international exchange at precisely the time when global collaboration is most needed.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Smart has a colleague who was shortlisted for a scholarship at an Ivy League university. The academic, who is openly trans, works on gender issues in her research.
'They have been told that the number of scholarships is dwindling, if there are any at all, and that it wouldn't be safe to enter the country,' Smart said. Her colleague declined to comment further but confirmed they'd been warned by the university that travel would be risky.
PhD candidate at the University of Melbourne and the national president of Capa, Jesse Gardner-Russell, said academic conferences are crucial for developing connections and partnerships with international collaboration, particularly for early and mid career-researchers.
'In Stem, the majority of the large research labs with the top equipment will generally be found in the United States,' he said.
'If there are cuts to NIH [National Institutes of Health] funding and how those grants are rolled out, there will be large implications on our researchers even if they don't directly receive that money, because it's impacting their collaborators.'
Last year, Gardner-Russell went to the US for an international research conference in his field of ophthalmology.
'I would never have learned of these individuals or their research if I hadn't had the opportunity to go there and be ingrained in that unique research culture,' he said.
'Losing students that might have to make a judgment call as to whether they can attend a conference based on the possibility of getting detained at the US is really troubling.'
He said there were also concerns over intellectual property, citing reports of phones and devices being taken and examined at the border.
Separately, on Friday, the host of cybersecurity podcast Risky Business, Patrick Gray, posted to Bluesky that he had cancelled a planned trip from Australia to the IT security conference RSA due to take place in San Francisco in April.
'Unfortunately, I have received advice that crossing the border into the United States right now would be a bad idea,' he wrote.
According to Smartraveller, which provides advice on behalf of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, customs and border protection have strict requirements and 'broad powers' for temporary detainment or deportation when assessing eligibility.
'Officials may ask to inspect your electronic devices, emails, text messages or social media accounts. If you refuse, they can deny your entry,' it states.
'You may be held at the port of entry or a nearby detention facility. The Australian government cannot intervene on your behalf, and our ability to provide consular assistance in these circumstances may be limited.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump mixes up Russia and Alaska ahead of peace talks with Putin
Trump mixes up Russia and Alaska ahead of peace talks with Putin

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump mixes up Russia and Alaska ahead of peace talks with Putin

Donald Trump appeared to confuse Russia with Alaska while announcing his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting is scheduled for Friday in Alaska, with the primary aim of discussing an end to the war in Ukraine. 'You know, I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia on Friday,' Trump told reporters at a Monday press conference in Washington D.C. This will be the first encounter between a US president and Putin since 2021, and Putin's first visit to the US in a decade, despite an International Criminal Court arrest warrant. Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski expressed cautious optimism about the summit, while Russian officials welcomed the choice of location due to historical connections.

Why Peak China may finally have arrived
Why Peak China may finally have arrived

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Why Peak China may finally have arrived

Proclamations about the inevitability of China's dominance of the global economic system, or the so-called Chinese century, were made long before Donald Trump's attempts to stymie its trade with the US. Common concerns about coercive politics and human rights aside, some notions of China as an unstoppable economic, technological and military behemoth sit alongside others focused more on an increasingly sclerotic, over- centralised political economy, that depends on wasteful economic stimulus, and features poor governance and institutions. The fusion of these notions suggests that we may already have reached 'peak China'. At the time of the 2008 financial crisis, China's official, and probably exaggerated, GDP was about $14tn (£10.4tn), or about a third of that of the US. By 2021, it had risen to three-quarters of America's $23.7tn, and there was widespread talk about in which year of the 2020s China would overtake the US. By 2024, however, China's $18tn economy had fallen back to just over 62% of the almost $30tn of the US. In GDP per head terms, China is still no more than 20% of the US. A rising China uniquely lifted its share of global GDP between 2000 and 2021 from 3.5% to 18.5%, but since then it has slipped back to about 16.5%. There is no question that China's rise is at least stalling. The working age and total population are now in relentless decline. The urbanisation rate, just over 60%, is flattening out. Productivity growth has stalled. The long surge in China's share of global manufacturing exports and production has levelled off, and the external environment for China is now much harder and more hostile. A 90-day pause in the US-China tariff war is due to expire on Tuesday, and it is unclear whether it will be extended. Part of the problem is that China has reached the end of extrapolation. The past really is another country. Some of its growth engines could only ever fire once: for example, enrolling children in primary and secondary schools; improving basic healthcare; reaping the demographic dividend of falling dependency rates; and moving people from the countryside to higher-productivity, urban jobs. Some growth also flowed from a number of highly effective policy initiatives such as those captured by the era of reform and opening-up, inspired by Deng Xiaoping: joining the World Trade Organization; creating a genuine market in housing, and exploiting globalisation. None of these can happen again. China's growth model, moreover, based on unrealistically high growth targets and uniquely high investment and savings rates, is becoming swamped by stagnant productivity, debt service difficulties and misallocation of capital. At the Central Economic Work Conference in December last year, China's premier, Li Qiang, summarised his country's condition by saying candidly that the foundation for sustained economic recovery and growth was not strong, demand was weak, and there were pressures on job creation and 'fiscal difficulties' among several local governments. Although consumption has been made a top priority, actual policy measures to make it so have been underwhelming, partly because redistributing economic power to companies and citizens also entails changes in political power, which are anathema to the Communist party. The structural downturn in the property sector, which at one stage accounted for more than a quarter of the economy, is likely to shrink for the foreseeable future, dogged by lower rates of household formation and smaller cohorts of first-time buyers, linked to demographics as well as a chronic oversupply of unsold and uncompleted real estate. The government has softened its approach to private enterprises and approved a new private economy promotion law to bolster AI, technology clusters and hubs, and reduce regulatory barriers. Low business confidence, though, is not really about regulations but about political interference, and weak demand and profits. The super-globalisation from which China benefited is pretty much over, and the world's biggest export nation is now confronted by a fragmenting and fracturing trade and investment environment in which commerce within blocs is holding up better than trade between them. China's bloc includes a majority of the world's population, but very small proportions of world GDP, investment and wealth. At the same time, developed and middle-income economies, as well as emerging nations, are pushing back against what they perceive to be predatory trade policies by a mercantilist China. Peak China does not stem from doubts about China's industrial prowess and pedigree. It is, though, about two things that can be simultaneously true: China can have world-class companies and trendsetters such as Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, CATL, Huawei and DeepSeek, as well as an economy with systemic imbalances, debt capacity limits, and political and economic contradictions. Put another way, China has islands of technological excellence and leadership in a sea of macroeconomic turbulence and trouble. This characterised Peak Japan 40 years ago, and China is shaping up for the encore. George Magnus is a research associate at Oxford University's China Centre and at Soas University of London. He is the author of Red Flags: Why Xi's China is in Jeopardy

Newsom warns Trump he's 'playing with fire' on redistricting
Newsom warns Trump he's 'playing with fire' on redistricting

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Newsom warns Trump he's 'playing with fire' on redistricting

By Gavin Newsom sent a stern warning to President Donald Trump that he is 'playing with fire' over efforts to rewrite the congressional map in Texas. In a letter penned to the president on Monday, Newsom vowed to not 'stand idly by' as Texas along with other GOP-dominated states attempt to add more Republican seats to protect and enlarge their majority in the U.S. House. Democrats only need to flip three House seats to regain control of the chamber in the upcoming 2026 midterms . 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom wrote. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment. Newsom goes on to address Trump directly by claiming the president is 'playing with fire' that will lead to the 'destabilization of our democracy.' 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom added. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' Newsom, who many believe has aspirations for a presidential run in 2028, made similar comments last week after claiming he will 'fight fire with fire' against Gov. Greg Abbott's redistricting plan. 'The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established,' Newsom told the press. 'Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire.' Newsom's new letter to Trump is the most outspoken example of Democrats planning to counter the GOP redistricting in Texas. Democratic state lawmakers fled from Texas to deny the GOP the quorum necessary to vote on legislation in the state capital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store