‘Just ridiculous,' says Google Brain founder on hype about AI taking away all jobs, shares tips how anyone can become powerful
Artificial General Intelligence
(AGI) and its potential to revolutionise—or disrupt—the world, renowned AI expert and Google Brain co-founder
Andrew Ng
is urging a shift in perspective. Speaking recently at a Y Combinator event, Ng challenged the hype surrounding AGI, arguing that real impact in the AI age will come not from building superintelligent machines but from learning how to use existing
AI tools
effectively. 'AGI has been overhyped,' Ng said. 'For a long time, there'll be many things humans can do that AI simply can't.'
According to Ng, while AGI—a form of artificial intelligence that could match or exceed human cognitive abilities—remains a fascinating concept, it is being blown out of proportion. He believes that the constant speculation around AI overtaking humanity and wiping out jobs is not only unhelpful but also misleading.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
others
Product Management
Leadership
Data Science
Design Thinking
Cybersecurity
PGDM
Public Policy
MBA
MCA
Digital Marketing
Degree
Finance
Data Science
Technology
Artificial Intelligence
CXO
healthcare
Others
Operations Management
Management
Project Management
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The real power: Knowing how to use AI
Rather than fearing a dystopian future ruled by AGI, Ng advises individuals and organizations to focus on practical skills. He emphasizes that the most powerful people in the AI era will be those who can get computers to do exactly what they want, not necessarily those who can build new AI models from scratch. 'People who know how to use AI will be far more powerful than those who don't,' he said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World
Topgentlemen.com
Ng encourages people to adopt a hands-on approach—learning to integrate AI into real-world applications to solve problems in sectors like healthcare, education, and logistics.
AI vs. AGI: Stop chasing the hype
Ng also addressed the narrative being pushed by some tech companies that exaggerates the capabilities of current AI technologies. He criticized claims suggesting that AI is on the verge of rendering all human labour obsolete or that it poses existential risks to humanity.
Live Events
'The idea that AI will lead to human extinction or make all jobs disappear is just ridiculous,' Ng said. 'These are hype narratives that help companies raise money or appear more powerful than they actually are.'
He warned that such exaggerations only distract from more important, grounded conversations about the responsible and effective use of AI.
AI is a tool, not an end
Drawing a comparison to electricity, Ng described AI as a neutral technology whose impact depends entirely on how it is used.
'AI is neither safe nor unsafe. It's how you apply it that makes it so,' he said. 'Like electricity, AI can power countless positive applications—but it can also be used in harmful ways if mismanaged.'
Ng believes the key lies in responsible innovation, where developers and entrepreneurs focus on building useful, ethical, and scalable AI solutions rather than chasing speculative breakthroughs that may never materialize.
Advice to founders and developers
For aspiring entrepreneurs and AI developers, Ng had a clear message: focus on the practical. Instead of worrying about hypothetical AGI scenarios, work on solving real problems with existing tools.
'Build things that people actually want,' he urged. 'Stay updated with AI developments, but focus on creating tangible value and using AI responsibly.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Here's a case for why AI should pay for the environmental damage it causes
Humanity has collectively decided to keep pampering the fossil-fuel industry despite knowing for decades that its products are not only harmful to long-term well-being but also imminently replaceable. It shouldn't make the same expensive mistake with artificial intelligence. Last week, Laurence Tubiana, chief executive officer of the European Climate Foundation, a non-profit research and advocacy group, suggested taxing AI to raise money for climate adaptation. Tubiana helped craft the Paris climate accord and is part of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, a group rummaging through the world's couch cushions for spare change to help it adjust to an environment growing more chaotic and destructive as the planet gets hotter. The group has identified some obvious targets, such as taxing 'premium flyers," cryptocurrencies, fossil-fuel profits and shipping emissions. Also Read: Outrage over AI is pointless if we're clueless about AI models Until Tubiana's comments, the group hasn't said much about AI. Sutton's Law—based on the apocryphal claim by Willie Sutton that he robbed banks because that's where the money was—suggests it might want to give AI a look. The United Nations Trade and Development Agency has estimated the value of this market will explode from $189 billion to $4.8 trillion by 2033, starting to threaten the size of the fossil-fuel market. All that growth will require dizzying amounts of energy to run data centers around the clock and a lot of water to cool acres of servers. These power-hungry facilities, which are popping up around the world like acne on a teenager, could consume as much as 12% of total US electricity by 2028, according to a report last year by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, up from 4.4% in 2023. By 2050, data centers could use as much as 8.7% of the entire world's energy, BloombergNEF estimates. Also Read: Climate progress: India's transition path to clean energy is about get steeper Much of that power will be generated by fossil fuels, the primary source of the greenhouse gases cooking the atmosphere. Data-center operations could increase global emissions of these gases by 3.5 billion tonnes in the next decade, BNEF reckons, which is about 10% of total global emissions today. The microchips, steel and cement used to build data centers carry their own heavy climate cost. Meanwhile, US data centers could guzzle 74 billion gallons of water a year by 2028, up from less than 6 billion in 2014, according to Lawrence Berkeley. In light of all this, taxing AI to defray its harm to the climate sounds like a great idea. We've already got the perfect example of what happens when you fail to hold an industry accountable for its externalities: fossil fuels. By one estimate, we give oil, gas and coal producers about $6 trillion every year in implied subsidies by failing to price their products high enough to account for their environmental damage. That's a lot of money that could go toward steeling ourselves against rising seas and weather disasters. Also Read: Rely on modern geothermal energy to power our AI ambitions The rationale of these subsidies is that the societal benefits of fossil fuels—namely, abundant energy to fuel economic growth—outweigh the costs. But this gets more untrue every year as an increasingly chaotic climate wreaks more havoc. Each degree Celsius the planet warms over pre-industrial averages cuts global economic growth by 12%, according to a National Bureau of Economic Research study last year. Of course, this wasn't so apparent in the 19th century, when today's fossil fuel industry was just a gleam in John D. Rockefeller's eye. Magical stuff came out of the ground that kept the lights on, and it took us a little while to see the downside. In contrast, the societal benefits of AI are fuzzy at best while the many downsides are already plain. It makes no sense to give this industry its own free pass on environmental destruction. In theory, a tax on AI, or at least its carbon emissions, would push tech companies to seek efficiency and cleaner energy sources. In practice, making such a tax work would be challenging, Robert Bikel, director of the Socially‚ Environmentally‚ and Ethically Responsible Programme at the Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, told me. If you make the tax too low, then it becomes just another cost of business and loses effectiveness. If you make it too high, then tech companies will just build their data centers in a jurisdiction that's not so picky about the environment. The net result might be more emissions than without the tax. Making such a levy universal would help solve that problem. But good luck getting two of the world's biggest AI enthusiasts—US President Donald Trump's US and China—to play along. For that matter, a global tax on carbon would be the most efficient device of all, taking care of those fossil-fuel subsidies and keeping the AI industry in line in one fell swoop. But that's even deeper in political fantasyland. Also Read: Going nuclear will be the only way to keep the lights on as AI guzzles ever more electricity Still, there are other tools. NIMBYism is unhelpful in many ways, but it has put some brakes on runaway data-center growth. In the past two years, projects worth $64 billion have been canceled or delayed by public opposition, according to the research group Data Center Watch. The blowback is bipartisan; 55% of the public officials opposing new data centers were Republicans. Pressure from locals and investors could be enough to make AI purveyors embrace tech that uses less energy and water. They could use their excess heat to keep local homes warm, cutting energy bills and fossil fuel demand. They could invest in renewables, grid upgrades and carbon removal and capture. Most importantly, though, they need to stop and think about exactly how much of this rush to make AI as big and resource-consuming as physically possible is truly necessary. 'There's a lot of techno-optimism that more tech and more growth is inherently good," Bikel said. 'I like to flip that around and say what is the economy serving? What's AI serving? How is it contributing to human flourishing or even just existential stability?" Answering those questions would go a long way to making AI's growth more sustainable and avoiding many more expensive mistakes. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion editor and columnist covering climate change.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admits he is ‘scared' to use AI: ‘I don't know who is…'
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently admitted that is scared to use 'certain AI stuff' sometimes. Speaking at one of the episodes of Theo Von's podcast This Past Weekend, Altman said 'I get scared sometimes to use certain AI stuff, because I don't know how much personal information I want to put in, because I don't know who's going to have it.' Sam Altman was responding to Von's question on the fast pace of AI development 'Do you think there should be kind of like a slowing things down?' During the conversation, the OpenAI CEO compared the current competition among AI companies as an 'intense' race not only for commercial domination, but as tool that will echo for generations. He further stated that ChatGPT-maker OpenAI does not move quickly, someone else will, adding that fate of AI could slip out of hands of those most mindful about its social consequences. Uncertain about human future: Sam Altman During the podcast, Sam Altman acknowledged how uncertain the human future is. 'I think all of human history suggests we find a way to put ourselves at the center of the story and feel really good about it … Even in a world where AI is doing all of this stuff that humans used to do, we are going to find a way in our own telling of the story to feel like the main characters,' he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indian Investors Are Buying These Dubai Apartments—Here's Why Binghatti Developers FZE Explore Undo Altman also addressed the fear of certain jobs becoming obsolete because of AI. 'How will people survive?' host Von asked. To this, Sam Altman replied AI will create possibilities for individuals to pursue more creative, philosophical, or interpersonal goals. He said that when everyone can get instant help and knowledge through AI, people can rethink what it means to contribute to society. However, he warned that the shift could be very difficult for those who lose their jobs in the short term. Realme 15 Pro: Flagship Features for Less? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘From one chaiwala to another': Meet Akhil Patel, Indian-origin entrepreneur who serves tea to PM Modi in UK
During his recent visit to the UK, Prime Minister Narendra Modi shared a photo of himself enjoying a cup of tea served by Akhil Patel , an Indian-origin entrepreneur and founder of the UK-based tea company, Amala Chai. ''Chai Pe Charcha' with PM Keir Starmer at Chequers... brewing stronger India-UK ties!,' PM Modi captioned his post, which included two images—one of him holding a cup of tea and another of Patel pouring it. — narendramodi (@narendramodi) Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Digital Marketing CXO Data Analytics Degree Others Healthcare Finance Management Project Management Data Science Technology Operations Management Design Thinking Product Management Public Policy PGDM MCA healthcare Leadership MBA Data Science others Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Digital Marketing Strategies Customer Journey Mapping Paid Advertising Campaign Management Emerging Technologies in Digital Marketing Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Digital Marketing and Analytics Starts on May 14, 2024 Get Details A video of Patel engaging with PM Modi is gaining traction on social media. In the clip, Patel is seen pouring tea and humorously remarking, "from one chaiwala to another." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Who is Akhil Patel? As per his LinkedIn profile, Patel attended University College School in Hampstead, London, before pursuing a Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Management at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). While at university, he completed internships at several organisations and later worked as a data analyst post-graduation. However, in 2019, Patel decided to change his career path and launched Amala Chai, a venture inspired by his grandmother. Live Events According to the company's LinkedIn page, Amala Chai sources its Indian tea and spices directly from 'small family farms in Assam and Kerala.' In May, the British Museum spotlighted the brand in a video that showcased how Amala Chai procures its ingredients from India. Though Patel has not commented on the moment via his personal social media, a video was shared on Amala Chai's official Instagram page with the caption: "Just a casual Thursday serving chai for @narendramodi @keirstarmer What a crazy day! Beyond honoured. We'll be sharing the full story with you next week so keep your eyes peeled!' The clip features both PM Modi and UK PM Keir Starmer sipping tea served by Patel.
