‘Jaja's African Hair Braiding' deftly blends comedy and conflict
From left: Ashley Aldarondo, Dru Sky Berrian, and MarHadoo Effeh.
Nile Scott Studios
Advertisement
They include Bea (Crystin Gilmore), an immigrant from Ghana who had entered into a green card marriage with a man from her church and dreams of opening her own salon; Miriam (MarHadoo Effeh), from Sierra Leone, who had to leave her young daughter behind when she immigrated to the US; Aminata (Kwezi Shongwe), originally from Senegal, who is caught in a turbulent marriage but seems to be vacillating on whether or not to end it; Ndidi (Catia), originally from Nigeria, who yearns to return to her home country and resume her acting career; and Jennifer (Hampton Richards), a customer who wants to be a journalist and is a model of forbearance, no matter how long it takes to braid her hair.
Advertisement
But the most compelling figure onstage at the Roberts Studio Theatre is one of the quietest: Marie, the 18-year-old daughter of the mostly unseen Jaja, an immigrant from Senegal. A valedictorian of her high school class, Marie is an aspiring writer who is running the shop for her mother. In Dru Sky Berrian's wonderfully precise, largely inward performance, we become aware not just of Marie's smarts and ambition but also of her anxiety — the submerged fears of someone who can sense the ground shifting beneath her.
'Jaja's' is comedic until it isn't. Bioh doesn't entirely finesse the transition to wrenching drama, as the play takes a sudden hairpin turn with a development quite literally torn from the headlines.
But narrowly defined structural cohesion matters less by that point than your degree of emotional investment — and it's likely to be high — in the fates of Bioh's characters.
In broad strokes, the late-in-the-play development in question does cast an illuminating retrospective light on much that came before it. You understand the precariousness of circumstance that underlies — or generates — the extravagantly expressive, seize-the-day spirit manifested by most of the salon's stylists and customers.
In Williams, 'Jaja's' has a director who is clearly on Bioh's wavelength. Over the past decade-plus, Williams has displayed a knack for untangling the most difficult dramatic knots until she achieves lucidity. She's brought that skill to a varied palette of works that have been epic or intimate or somewhere in between, with a partial list including
Advertisement
Williams has repeatedly marshaled the collective force of a large cast while also ensuring that individual faces and voices are seen and heard, and in 'Jaja's' she does it again.
Jaja, the salon's owner, an immigrant from from Senegal, is unseen for most of the play, but MaConnia Chesser makes her brief appearance a memorable one. On this day, Jaja is slated to be married at City Hall to a white man, of whom daughter Marie does not approve. (Jaja's dress is just one piece of the excellent work done by costume designer Danielle Domingue Sumi).
Chesser's Jaja appears to be indomitable, but seeming and being are two different things. In the hair braiding salon, the employees and the customers, whatever their different personalities, are defined by their humanity. The same cannot be said of those whose goal is to turn their lives upside down.
JAJA'S AFRICAN HAIR BRAIDING
Play by Jocelyn Bioh
Directed by Summer L. Williams
Presented by SpeakEasy Stage Company. At Roberts Studio Theatre, Calderwood Pavilion, Boston Center for the Arts. Through May 31. Tickets start at $25. 617-933-8600, SpeakEasyStage.com
Don Aucoin can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Priscilla Presley Hits Back At $50 Million Lawsuit Claiming She Let Her Daughter Die
legal drama with her former business partners skyrockets with scathing allegations leveled against her! The media personality, famously known as the ex-wife of the late Elvis Presley, became embroiled in a new lawsuit a year after suing her former business partners for financial elder abuse. The new allegations painted Priscilla Presley as a scheming con artist who made money from the fraudulent use of her name, image, and likeness (NIL). Additionally, the plaintiffs alleged that she influenced and exploited her daughter, Lisa Marie Presley's death. Priscilla Presley Accused Of Exploiting Her Daughter's Death According to the bombshell lawsuit obtained by The Blast, plaintiffs Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko are suing Priscilla for over $50 million in damages. They filed their allegations at the Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday, August 13, accusing Priscilla of exploitation and more. Kruse and Fialko argued that Priscilla had influenced and exploited her daughter's tragic passing. They alleged that she "ignored Lisa's health complaints before she suffered cardiac arrest and later quickly took her off of life support." The plaintiffs' accusations continued with claims of Priscilla using her daughter's death as a smokescreen to reclaim control of the assets she sold and to erase contracts she no longer found convenient. Eventually, Kruse and Fialko became a liability to Priscilla, with the lawsuit alleging she went behind their backs to cut deals before throwing them under the bus with her financial elder abuse claims. The Plaintiffs Claim They Were Wrongfully Deceived Kruse and Fialko explained that their business relationship with Priscilla started in 2022 when she approached them to revitalize her brand and stabilize her dire financial situation. She allegedly owed nearly $700,000 in taxes, was behind on car payments, and was close to insolvency. The plaintiffs claimed they spent seven figures fixing Priscilla's problems, from rebuilding her brand to settling lawsuits and cleaning up multiple private disputes within her family. Their efforts, per the lawsuit, saw Priscilla's event profits increasing from under $10,000 to as much as $50,000 per show. Kruse and Fialko added that they were also instrumental in negotiating the $2.4 million payout Priscilla received during her legal dispute with her granddaughter, Riley Keough, over Lisa Marie Presley's trust. Their alleged services continued with the formation of several companies at Priscilla's request to exploit her NIL. Kruse and Fialko noted that they invested their money, time, and resources into Priscilla because she falsely claimed she had ownership of her NIL. However, she allegedly sold the rights to the last name "Presley" and "Graceland" for $6.5 million in a 2005 secret deal. The King Of Rock And Roll's Ex-Wife Refutes The Allegations Priscilla addressed Kruse and Fialko's allegations through her attorney, Marty Singer. The legal rep told TMZ, the lawsuit was a desperate and fabricated effort to tarnish his client's image, stressing that it was a "disgusting publicity stunt." Singer noted that bringing the late Lisa Marie into the picture was "not savvy advocacy" but a "malicious character assassination" that must be condemned. He added that the late media personality's daughter, Riley Keough, was equally shocked by the false allegations. The attorney claimed Riley "stands behind her grandmother 100% and is equally disgusted with this latest, vicious attempt by Kruse to attempt to ruin her grandmother's life." Singer added that he believed the lawsuit would be dismissed, pointing out that the plaintiffs were on their fourth set of lawyers. The Legal Drama Stemmed From The Media Personality's Financial Abuse Claims The issues between Priscilla and her former business partners surfaced in 2024 when she accused them of financial elder abuse. The Blast covered the story, reporting that she claimed Kruse and Fialko had abused their power over her finances. Priscilla accused them of interfering with her ability to earn a living, claiming they had been spamming her business associates, assistants, and family members with "baseless cease and desist letters." She claimed these letters demanded that people stop doing business with her. Priscilla stressed that Kruse and Fialko were not only sabotaging her professional relationships but had tricked her into signing deals that filled their pockets. She claimed they transferred over $620,000 from her account and demanded $1 million in compensation. Priscilla Presley's Daughter Accused Her Former Partner Of Abuse A year after her tragic passing on January 12, 2023, Lisa Marie's memoir "From Here to the Great Unknown" was released posthumously in October 2024. The Blast reported the book contained shocking allegations against her mother's former partner, actor Mike Edwards. Lisa Marie accused Edwards of molesting her when she was 10, recalling he came into her room at night for an unsolicited sex education. He allegedly touched her chest and between her legs before kissing her, an incident he later apologized for after Priscilla learned about it. Unfortunately, the alleged abuse did not end there, as Edwards would find reasons to spank Lisa Marie and jerk off, per her recollection. Although the actor vehemently denied the claims, he had once confessed to feeling sexually attracted to Lisa Marie. He dropped the shocking revelation in his 1988 book "Elvis, Priscilla and Me." Who will emerge victorious in Priscilla Presley's legal drama? Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
7 hours ago
- New York Times
Ranking every Premier League away kit for 2025-26: Batman shirt, inspired by a leisure centre, and… brown
Our keen eye has been cast over the Premier League's home kits, so now it's time for the away outfits. This is typically where chances are taken, outlandish designs come in, shirts that could be brilliant and beloved classics or could be complete duds. As a rule they tend to be more interesting…but will these be? Advertisement This season we have a garish copy of a cult classic, a shirt inspired by Pot Pourri, a Batman black shirt, one that looks like the walls of a provincial leisure centre, and perhaps the biggest disparity in quality between an away and a home design we've ever seen. Read on, and we're sure you won't be shy of telling us what you think… You have to marvel at the brass neck of football clubs. We all know why Newcastle's away shirt is green. It's not OK that their owners are using the club to spruce up the image of Saudi Arabia, to provide a glossy sheen to their seat of soft power, to use kits as walking billboards for their regime. But it would be insulting to anyone's intelligence to pretend this shirt is green for any other reason. Over to the Newcastle website, then, which declares that the shirt "draws inspiration from Newcastle's iconic riverside", and "features a striking green arch inspired by the legendary Tyne Bridge". Get lost. Do they think that sort of thing is funny? Or that people won't notice? Aesthetically, the shirt is fine, but if you're wondering why it's in last place, that's why. Oh. Oh no. Oh dear no. The history of the brown football shirt is short: Coventry City's away top of the late 1970s inspired some misty-eyed affection but then again, some people get nostalgic for the days of rationing, so you can't necessarily trust that. St Pauli's home shirt is brown (although this season, with white stripes), but those guys are a law unto themselves. If you want to tell their ultras they look stupid, then go for it, but I'm not going to. Otherwise, there's not much else, and there's probably a good reason for that. This shirt's only redeeming feature is the nice and striking bee logo that differs slightly from their usual crest, which is a bee inside a circle. But… they could quite easily have done that in a different colour. Bad. Very, very bad. Ah. Hmmm. Yes. Well. Forest's home kit this season is a pleasing nod to one of years past, a nice and clean design that is different to the last few years but is still identifiably 'Forest'. The away kit is… none of those things. The background design is a reference to the city's historical lace industry, which is a nice enough touch, the slight flaw being that it looks horrible and, somehow, quite boring for a shirt coated in an elaborate pattern. Maybe they would've got away with it if the Adidas stripes on the sleeves were the same blue contrast colour as the crest but for some reason, they're basically the same as the body colour. No bueno. Nope. Palace have announced this as a 'celebration' shirt, rather than their official away kit. Either way, this is clearly the shirt of a mid-range Championship team from 2005, rather than one embarking on European competition. Should that matter? Is it silly to expect a club to adhere to an arbitrary dress code that applies in some way to their general status? Of course it is, but, to bastardise the old Jerry Seinfeld quote, I'm ranking laundry here, so silly is probably the starting point. The thin stripy bits on the collars and cuffs and the piping around the shoulder redeem things slightly, but not enough. The important point is that this is not a good football shirt. You know in some films or TV shows where they will do a bit in black and white, which then dissolves into colour to symbolise a change in mood, or season, or something? No? Trust me, it happens. Can't remember any specific films, but just… trust me. Anyway, this shirt looks like the first part of that: the dreary, colourless past before life brightens up significantly. The blurb from Adidas declares that "on away days, this jersey reminds fans of the club's home city"… what, grey and boring? Now, I'm not a particular fan of Birmingham as a place, but you'd think if the club's kit was going to pay homage to it, they would find something a little more interesting than this. Yeesh. Bold. Still, you can't fault the commitment to the bit here: this shirt is a tribute to Fulham's striking 1999-2000 away kit, to the point where it's not really a tribute and more a direct copy, down to the placement of the contrast dark blue sections under the armpits and even using Fulham's old crest. The only real difference I can see is there's a buttoned collar as opposed to an open one. Is it good, though? Well, no, not really, if you're judging it by the standard of, "Do I actually want to be seen wearing this by people I know?" but it will have a cult following and enough of the Fulham support will love it, so by those criteria, maybe it is good? This is a slightly unusual shirt… actually, I'll rephrase: it elicited a slightly unusual response from me, because when I first saw it I instinctively disliked it, partly because the shades of potpourri/grandma's tea cosy purple are not the sort of thing you expect to see on a football shirt. But then I kept looking at it and for no particular reason, it has grown on me, to the point where I actually really like it now. That sort of evolution in taste isn't unusual in itself, but there's nothing really here to grow. It's just a plain shirt with two different shades of purple on it. There are no designs you didn't appreciate the first time you saw it, no little details you missed initially …it's just a purple shirt. And yet it's quite good. How would you describe this colour? The Wolves website doesn't but if you were to press me for a description, I'd say 'provincial leisure centre green', which isn't necessarily one you'd choose for your bathroom (unless you were a trainee lifeguard who's really attached to the job, I suppose), but one they have opted for here anyway. The initial reaction was to turn away and wrinkle the nose but the more I look at this, the more I don't mind it. It's probably the collar that does it: pleasingly neat and in a dark enough green that it offsets the main body, but still goes with it nicely. It's faintly depressing for those of us with grey around the temples when clubs refer to "classic kits from our history", and it turns out they're talking about a time when the first of those greys started appearing. For example, the Bournemouth website reports that this simple but attractive blue and black striped shirt is "inspired by the club's classic kits from the club's history". We regret to inform any other grey-templed types that they last had a blue and black striped kit in 2012. Admittedly, it has popped up further back in their history (as long ago as 1990, as far as we can tell), but that 2012 shirt is enough to inspire some ennui. Anyway, nice shirt. "It won't take fans long to see the influence of the club's early-'90s Adidas snowflake kit on this jersey," declares Adidas about this Manchester United away shirt. Erm… won't it? If you peer pretty closely at what looks to be a broadly white shirt, you will see a version of the classic old pattern, used on their 1990-92 away kit and more explicitly referenced in the 2021-22 version. But it's pretty abstract. The shirt itself is fine, although the faint bluey-purpley hue of the snowflake design does leave it with the old favourite 'dark socks left in the white wash' feel to it. Sort of quite nice? I think? Supposedly, the wavy white patterns across the light blue are "sound waves of chants and singing recorded in our home sections" — the sort of thing a manufacturer would say, safe in the knowledge that nobody is actually going to check. Burnley's main sponsor this season is one of these white-label betting sites that aren't actually available in the UK, so it can't be displayed on children's shirts. No problem, say the commercial team at Turf Moor: the junior version of this shirt is thus sponsored by Dude Perfect, which, if you're not familiar, is a troupe of whooping American YouTubers who do increasingly elaborate trick shots and sport-related stunts. A strange old state of affairs. This shirt comes with its own marketing slogan, "In darkness, we dare", a reference to Tottenham Hotspur's club motto ("to dare is to do") — but it does sort of imply that the club itself is in darkness, and is trying to get out of it. Anyway, black/extremely dark and minimalist shirts are clearly a 'thing' this season and while this isn't quite the best of the bunch, it's pretty smart. A slightly bolder contrast colour would have improved it a bit, a more brilliant white, perhaps, as opposed to this grey-that-looks-slightly-purple-in-some-light option. I concentrate far too much on these kits' descriptions, but I have to tip my cap to whoever quickly retconned "a bold look to mark the return of Champions League away nights" into the spiel, given Spurs would have been slipping down the Premier League and nowhere near Europe's elite when the shirt was signed off. After gleaning retro inspiration from the classic 'bruised banana' away shirt of the early 1990s, they've moved on a few years and brought out a kit that gives a nod to one from 1994, with the 'lightning bolt' motif referencing something to do with the Royal Arsenal Gatehouse in Woolwich, from where the earliest version of the club sprang. It's pretty nice, but one quibble would be that they already did a kit a few years ago that referenced the lightning bolt thing. The two shirts look different but it feels like a slight paucity of imagination. Umbro have taken a 'back to basics' approach with West Ham's kits this year, which absolutely does not mean bad. Far from it. In this case it means 'quite good.' This shirt "takes inspiration: from the cream - or 'ecru', as only kit manufacturers or high-end paint companies call it - shirt that West Ham wore in 1996-97, and this is a rare case of the modern version actually being nicer than the retro shirt it is paying homage to. There's nothing to get particularly giddy about in this shirt, it's just clean, identifiably West Ham through the claret and blue trim, and will still look good in a few years when some of the more experimental designs will have aged rather badly. The manufacturers' descriptions of football kits are often full of nonsense, contain flimsy post-hoc justifications for designs and feature impenetrable marketing speak, but they're not often passive-aggressive. However, the blurb on the Liverpool website tells us that the "off-white shade will be familiar to Reds who know their history", which is reminiscent of those people who see someone wearing a band t-shirt and say: "oh you like them, do you? Name their first three albums". Presumably this sniffy little aside is referring to their away kit from 1996-97…but of course, according to them, you won't need me to tell you that. Snarky online spiel aside, this is actually a really nice shirt, with the bold red contrasting the off-white main body really nicely, without overpowering the whole shirt. Now, name Liverpool's three top-scorers from 96-97. Now this is black. Jet black. Coal black. Batman black. This shirt looks like it could be deployed by the US military and be undetectable by radar. We've had black kits before but this is…black. Apparently it references the earliest known Manchester City kit from the 1880s, when they were a church team known as St Mark's. Things sure have changed in…well, yes, 141 years, as you might expect, but even when a club has strayed as far from its roots as City and therefore such nods to its past feel slightly hollow, those nods can still be pleasing. "Timeless, minimalist and powerful," reads the blurb from Puma…and I'm pretty close to swallowing it whole. Attempts to tie a shirt design to a club's locality or a beloved landmark can be pretty clumsy but even if they are, they can have a certain charm. Maybe I've been in a sentimental mood when writing about these kits this year, but it does feel like quite a few designers have got these things pretty spot on. Take this Sunderland shirt, which features, as its background pattern, a chessboard style arrangement with depictions of the Roker Lighthouse, which is a short distance away from the Stadium of Light and an even shorter distance from Sunderland's old ground, Roker Park. And it works: it works aesthetically and it works emotionally. Ideally, you wouldn't have an ugly betting company logo obscuring all of this, but within the confines of the grim capitalist nature of modern football, this is a delightful shirt. You'll probably already know this but Leeds's signature all white kits weren't the norm until the mid-1960s, when Don Revie took inspiration from Real Madrid and switched their colours from the dark blue and yellow they had largely worn to that point. So this shirt is a nod to the old days, one they have made many times before, but it's always quite nice when clubs do this, so I'm minded to like this shirt regardless of how good it looks. And it does look pretty good, even if it is slightly…shiny, and those thin horizontal stripes do make it seem a bit like you're looking at the shirt through the door of a retro, art deco-themed restaurant toilet. It might not be quite as nice as the home shirt, which is an absolute triumph, but this is absolutely terrific nonetheless. You don't get many pale yellow football shirts, almost the shade of a 1970s tennis top, but this has the bravery not to be needlessly brash, standing out by being different rather than grabbing you by the lapels and slapping you in the face. The detail on the cuffs is subtle (a nod to the railway tracks that once served the Liverpool docklands where their new stadium has been built) but sets off the rest of the shirt really nicely. Another win for Castore. Who saw this coming? This might be the biggest disparity between the quality of one club's two shirts in a single season because while Chelsea's home is an absolute horror, only ranked at 20 because there are no places lower than that, this is not only absolutely gorgeous but provides a short history lesson too. This shirt apparently references one Chelsea had in 1974 that paid tribute to the 'Mighty Magyars', the great Hungarian team of the 1950s, a shirt that came about simply because then-manager Dave Sexton admired them so much. I never knew that and I'm delighted to know it now. Almost as delighted as I am by this shirt, which simultaneously manages to nod to the club's past but still looks original; plus be subtle and striking at the same time. It's wonderful. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Four big reveals from Taylor Swift's ‘New Heights' podcast episode with Jason and Travis Kelce
1. Swift outlines her new album, 'The Life of a Showgirl' The biggest reveal of the episode was Swift's wealth of details about her upcoming album, 'The Life of a Showgirl,' which is Advertisement 'This is the record I've been wanting to make for a very long time,' Swift told the Kelce brothers. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The singer also revealed the 12 tracks that will appear on the album, including the title song, which features Sabrina Carpenter: 'The Fate of Ophelia' 'Elizabeth Taylor' 'Opalite' 'Father Figure' 'Eldest Daughter' 'Ruin the Friendship' 'Actually Romantic' 'Wi$h Li$t' 'Wood' 'Cancelled!' 'Honey' 'The Life of a Showgirl' (featuring Sabrina Carpenter) This album cover image released by Republic Records shows "The Life of a Showgirl" by Taylor Swift. Uncredited/Associated Press 2. Swift revisits the emotional journey of buying back her master recordings Swift opened up to the Kelce brothers about the emotional process of 'I always refer to it as 'I got my music back this summer,' but I never owned my music at all,' Swift said, noting that she signed her record deal at age 15, and that many artists don't own their masters. Advertisement The singer revealed that she'd been saving up to buy her master recordings since she was a teenager, and that she was devastated when her former label, Big Machine, sold them to music executive Scooter Braun in 2019. At the time, Swift criticized the deal in a 'It really ripped my heart out of my chest, and I told everyone exactly how that felt for me and what I was going through,' Swift told the Kelce brothers. 'I started basically, defiantly, re-recording my music because I wanted to own it, and this was the only way I thought it was ever going to happen.' While she was excited to re-record her albums, Swift admitted to thinking about not owning her music 'every day.' Swift pursued purchasing the master recordings following the conclusion of her 'Eras Tour,' after deciding with her team to approach Shamrock Capital, the private equity firm that bought them from Braun. However, she didn't want to strike a deal to own a percentage of the master recordings, and instead hoped to buy them outright. 'I want to own all of it,' Swift said, noting that it was a 'long shot' that 'they would sell that asset to me.' Swift started to tear up while talking about her family's role in helping her strike the deal, revealing that she sent her mother and brother — rather than lawyers or managers — to speak with the firm. The singer said that her family helped convey how much the music meant to her on a personal level. Advertisement 'I'm in the business of human emotion,' Swift said. 'I would so much rather lead heart-first in something like this.' A few months after the Super Bowl, Swift got a call from her mother while hanging out with Travis in Kansas City. 'She's like, 'You got your music,'' Swift said. 'I just like, very dramatically hit the floor, for real, like honestly just started bawling my eyes out.' The singer then ran to the room where Travis was playing video games and broke the good news to him through tears. 'I started crying too, you know I'm a crier,' Travis said. 'I was just so happy for you.' Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, right, appears with singer Taylor Swift after the Chiefs victory over the Buffalo Bills in the AFC Championship game in Kansas City, Mo., on Jan. 26. Charlie Riedel/Associated Press 3. Swift and Kelce share their love story The couple didn't shy away from talking about their relationship, including how Travis tried to get Swift's attention before they started dating in what she called the 'shooting your shot heard 'round the world.' The Chiefs star famously admitted his interest in her on the podcast in 2023, when he talked about trying (and failing) to give Swift a friendship bracelet with his number on it at one of her concerts. 'This podcast got me a boyfriend, ever since Travis decided to use it as his personal dating app about two years ago,' Swift joked. 'He threw a man-tantrum, it's so funny,' she later added. 'It was such a wild, romantic gesture to just be like, 'I want to date you!'' Swift pointed out how Travis never reached out to her management team, and that she didn't know about the attempt until the 2023 podcast came out. 'I was like, 'Did he ever reach out to be, like, in the tents, or did we know he was in the building?'' Swift said. 'He came with Pat [Mahomes], and he thought that because he knows the elevator lady that he could talk to her about getting down to my dressing room.' Advertisement 'That's how it works in 1973,' she joked. Swift called the public plea a sweet gesture, comparing it to a boombox outside of her window like a 1980s John Hughes movie. 'I was like, 'If this guy isn't crazy, which is a big if, this is sort of what I've been writing songs about wanting to happen to me since I was a teenager,'' Swift admitted. Taylor Swift performed at Gillette Stadium on May 19, 2023. Erin Clark/Globe Staff 4. Swift opens up about the physical toll of the 'Eras Tour' Swift got real about her historic, globe-spanning 'Eras Tour,' which wrapped in Vancouver last December. The singer admitted that, after traveling for so long across the world, she was glad to not be on the go all the time. 'It feels great Jason, to be honest, I'm not going to lie to you,' Swift said. 'I do miss it, but it was perfect for what it was.' The GRAMMY Award winner also talked about the physical toll of touring and how she was often in a 'state of perpetual physical discomfort,' comparing it to the brothers' experiences during an NFL season. Travis backed her claims, noting the intense recovery station in her hotel room after her three-plus hour shows. 'The similarities were crazy,' Travis said, comparing Swift's physical regimens for concerts to his routines for football. 'I'm like, 'Oh my gosh, she does more than I do.'' Later in the podcast, Travis admitted that she outworks him when they exercise together. 'We've been to the gym numerous times, and she works harder than me every time,' Travis said. Matt Juul can be reached at
