FIDE Women's WC to have Indian winner for first time
It's the first in the event's history that two Indians are facing each other in the final. Both Humpy and Deshmukh have qualified for the Women's candidates' tournament next year after reaching the final here. On pure experience of playing big games, Humpy goes in the final as the favourite against compatriot Deshmukh.
Humpy held her nerves to score a come-from-behind victory in the semifinals over Tingjie Lei of China in the tiebreaker on Thursday, while Deshmukh defeated former world champion Zhongyi Tan -- also of China -- in the second game of the last-four stage match.
Grandmaster Humpy, 38, was the winner of the world women's rapid tournament and also tied for first at the women's grand prix in recent times and she has proved yet again that age is just a number. Her grit and determination has not faded one bit in the past many years.
'It's one of the happiest moments for chess fans because now the title will go to India for sure. But of course, as a player, tomorrow will be quite a tough game as well -- Divya has played tremendously well in this whole tournament,' Humpy told FIDE website.
At half the age of Humpy, International Master Deshmukh has already stunned as many as three players ranked in top ten in the event. Her first victim was second seed Jiner Zhu of China, before ousting D Harika.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Divya Deshmukh vs Koneru Humpy: Nothing to separate Indians in FIDE Women's World Cup final opening act
In what was billed as the clash of generations between a 19-year-old Divya Deshmukh and a 38-year-old veteran Koneru Humpy in the all-Indian final of the FIDE Women's World Cup 2025 could best be described by Andrea Jeremiah's single, 'Neither Yours Nor Mine.' The game that could have swung either way, but eventually ended in a 41-move draw, and Divya will rue her missed chances with white pieces more than a relieved Humpy, who dodged a bullet against her young rival in the first leg of their Classical match in the Georgian coastal city of Batumi on Saturday. Divya began with a central pawn push in the D-file (1… d4), an opening move she hadn't played the entire event, hoping to surprise Humpy. In response, Humpy advanced her D-file pawn to d5 and captured Divya's pawn after the teenager played c4 on her second move. When Divya replied to Humpy's second move (2… dxc4) with another central pawn push (3… c4), it became clear she wasn't playing for a tame draw. Her third move was White's most ambitious move yet, aiming to gain a lot of space in the centre while attacking black's pawn at c4 with her bishop with a tempo. Indian GM Abhijeet Kunte explained the reasoning behind players opting for this opening. 'The opening is Queen's Gambit Accepted, which is quite popular and played when Black wants to play safe. White has some interesting aggressive options. The most important thing in these kinds of openings is that the players are tired,' said Kunte during his commentary for ChessBase India. 'They've played continuously for almost 25 days, and normally by this point, they've exhausted all their fresh ideas. So, they have to rely on middle-game strategies with basic concepts to maintain tempo and momentum. Going into long theoretical variations at this stage of the tournament is always tough,' he added. Divya then developed both her knights, while Humpy pinned White's king with her dark-squared bishop (4… Bb4+) and brought out one of her knights. The teenager offered a pawn sacrifice to Humpy, but the veteran misplaced her light-squared bishop (7… Bb7?), handing Divya a slight edge on the board. Pravin Thipsay, the third Indian ever to earn the GM title, explained where Humpy went wrong in the opening. 'Divya seemed very well-prepared in the opening. She not only played the Queen's Gambit but also offered another pawn. On the seventh move, Humpy should have probably taken the pawn as per theory,' Thipsay told The Indian Express. 'Theoretical variations could have led to a roughly equal position if Black had taken the pawn on the seventh move. But Humpy decided against it and developed her bishop instead, leading to a complex position. It was clear both players were now out of their opening preparation, and Divya was slightly better,' he explained. Venturing into uncharted territory, both players began making positional errors. Humpy's decision to retreat her knight (10… Nd6) instead of developing her other knight gave Divya a near-winning advantage by the 10th move. However, Divya failed to capitalise on Humpy's mistake, and her attempt to sacrifice her White knight instantly equalised the position, nullifying all her hard-earned advantage. Just as the game seemed headed for a quiet draw, Humpy made a decisive mistake on the 13th move, shifting her king toward the kingside closer to her H-file rook. This once again tilted the position in Divya's favour. Yet, for the third time, Divya let the advantage slip, opting to exchange light-squared bishops along the B-file, a move that neutralised her edge. The correct idea was to activate White's queen, bringing the strongest piece into play. Thipsay believes Divya's decision to exchange bishops was a critical error, as playing queen to e2 could have forced a quick loss for Humpy. 'The most important moment came when Divya traded bishops and gave away all her advantage. Had she advanced her queen to e2, I believe a mating attack would have followed, likely leading to a quick defeat for Humpy,' he said. 'It looked like a great escape after a risky battle as this game once again proves that Divya is quite well prepared, while Humpy tried to make over-the-board solutions, which perhaps may not be the best idea. Today, however, it worked, as Divya failed to find the best move on two key occasions.' In a roughly equal position, which was still vulnerable to one-move blunders in a double rook and queen endgame, Humpy attempted to force a draw via threefold repetition. But Divya, to everyone's surprise, declined the draw offer with less than a minute on her clock, still looking to play for a win. However, it was Humpy's superior time management that prevailed in the end as she soon secured the draw through the same threefold repetition. With White pieces on Sunday, Humpy will now look to impose her presence in this clash. But Divya, in her current form, looks quite ready to rise to any challenge. Meanwhile, the third-place match between Chinese players Lei Tingjie and Tan Zhongyi also ended in a draw.
India Today
9 minutes ago
- India Today
Rishabh Pant will bat for India on Day 5 in Manchester, confirms batting coach
India batting coach Sitanshu Kotak has revealed that wicketkeeper batter Rishabh Pant will be available to bat on Day 5 of the fourth Test against England at Old Trafford in Manchester. Pant suffered a toe fracture on Day 1 of the game and had to be immediately taken off the braved through the pain on Day 2 and returned to bat to complete his half-century. He scored a brilliant 54 (75), smashing three fours and two sixes. With India once again needing Pant's services on Day 5, the star batter will be once again available to bat, Sitanshu Kotak think he will bat tomorrow,' said Kotak in the press conference at the end of the day's play. Furthermore, the Indian batting coach said that the players will have to play every ball on the merit on the final day and avoid unnecessary risks.'Don't be pre-planned. Play to the merit of the ball. Avoid unnecessary riks. If you are set and then you cut down on undue risks, the only way you can get out is if the ball behaves badly after pitching or if you get a brilliant delivery. These boys have the quality. They have the ability to do what they did today on Day 5. All these are all format players. Everybody is playing the IPL and international cricket. Your mindset is important. Your need to train your mind to play the situation. It takes mental effort more than skill,' he Test Day 4 UpdatesIndia finished Day 4 on 174/2 with KL Rahul and Shubman Gill at the crease. The duo got involved in an unbeaten 174-run stand for the third wicket after the team lost Sai Sudharsan and Yashasvi Jaiswal in the first over of the innings are still trailing by 137 runs in the second innings and will have to bat out of their skins to save the Test match on Day 5. Hence, Pant's services will be required for the team as they aim to bat out the entire day to deny England a victory and keep the series alive.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
PGTI set to launch its own league to take on rebel IGPL
New Delhi: Indian golf has struggled to find new champions at the international stage for some years now. Now, there is some upheaval in the domestic set-up as well. Days after the launch of a rival Indian Golf Premier League (IGPL) Tour and league, the official Professional Golf Tour of India (PGTI), which has downplayed the move, announced its scheduled for the rest of the season and a likely setting up of its own league. President of the Professional Golf Tour of India (PGTI), Kapil Dev, speaks at a press conference on Saturday. (AFP) The modalities for the league are being worked out. 'It's not in response to IGPL. We have been thinking about it for a while,' PGTI CEO Amandeep Johl said on Saturday. The six-team IGPL is expected to debut next January and will feature 60 golfers in a home-and-away, mixed-team format. It announced the signing of veterans Shiv Kapur, SSP Chawrasia, and Gaurav Ghei as three of the skippers with Asian Tour regular Gaganjeet Bhullar revealed as an icon player. The bulk of IGPL's male players will be drawn from PGTI — women pros will come from WGAI while the amateurs come under the Indian Golf Union (IGU) umbrella. Both WGAI and IGU are with IGPL and their representatives accompanied IGPL management when they met union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya recently. About 20-22 PGTI pros, it has been learned, have jumped the ship for a signing amount ranging between ₹10-20 lakh. Tour regulars Aman Raj and Sachin Baisoya are also tipped to join IGPL. PGTI president Kapil Dev on Saturday brushed aside concerns of an exodus. 'I have the responsibility of 350 golfers, not just 20. I have to see the bigger picture — for my team, my board, and everyone involved. Of course, I would have liked if they'd worked with us,' he said. PGTI and IGPL have been in touch for over a year but talks fell off in recent months. 'What's happened has happened. Let's not talk about what went wrong,' Johl said. Insiders claim the major point of contention was Bharat Golf Private Limited's — the company backing IGPL — opaque funding. 'We don't know where the money is coming from. The company was floated only last year. They are yet to file tax returns. They have the backing of a businessman from Hyderabad but there's no transparency,' a senior PGTI member said. Queries regarding IGPL funding, at their recent virtual press meet, were ignored. IGPL, it has been learned, intended to take over PGTI and rename it as IGPL Tour. The PGTI in lieu was to get ₹15 crore annually. 'We couldn't have let that happen. Also, we are dealing with DP World Tour and PGA Tour and any financial dealing that appears fishy will not work in our favour,' the official said. 'Most of the players they are in touch with are either past their prime or struggle to make the cut on PGTI.' With its no cut, three-day stroke play format, IGPL, like most leagues, envisions to 'revolutionise the sport and make it spectator friendly.' All contracted men and women pros will earn guaranteed prize money. Johl dismissed it. 'Golf is about being competitive. If you want to play at the highest level, you have to compete. If players start getting used to free money, you're never going to create world champions,' he said. 'We are going to play on the DP World Tour, the Olympics, the Asian Games—and we're going to win medals. But if you start giving freebies, players will stop working hard. Also, playing on PGTI gives you ranking points while there's no such incentive at IGPL,' he explained. Indian pros, meanwhile, have been struggling in international tours for a while now. For the past three years, thanks to PGTI's partnership with DP World Tour, the Order of Merit topper gets the full season European card. Every PGTI tournament offers a minimum prize purse of ₹1 crore, but the results are not coming. The last Indian man to win a European Tour event was Shubhankar Sharma in 2018, at the Maybank Championship in Kuala Lumpur. 'It's a concern, no doubt. Guys like Yuvraj Sandhu and Veer Ahlawat need to string together four good days, and once they do that, they can get on a roll,' Johl said. Shiv Kapur put it down to conditions and a lack of hunger. 'There are many factors. The conditions are starkly different overseas, but our players should show more hunger and desire to win,' he said.
