Hear Me Out: What If Gen Xers Are Actually the Cool Ones?
I am nine years old and my mother—in her mid-20s at the time—is vacuuming the living room while 'My Favourite Game' by the Cardigans plays on full blast. With each drum thwack she hits another corner with the power nozzle, bare feet padding across the carpet in low-rise jeans, me watching deadpan from the sofa. I will always associate that song with this memory. Sunlight splashing through the open window; those distorted vocals, turned up to full; and the big, blocky CD player, with speakers that make your hands shake if you touch them.
Though I was born in the '90s—a millennial—I was raised by a dyed-in-the-wool Gen Xer, and was therefore spoonfed Gen-X culture from an early age. Our CD rack was full of '90s bands: Pixies, PJ Harvey, Placebo. The films I later became obsessed with were all of this era: Girl, Interrupted; Fallen Angels; Run Lola Run; Hackers. By the time I got into Bret Easton Ellis, Elizabeth Wurtzel's Prozac Nation, and Irvine Welsh—all Gen-X writers, with Gen-X sensibilities—something had become abundantly clear. I had been born 15 years or so too late. And now I was destined for a life of Instagram and Asos packages, as opposed to being a '90s slacker making mixtapes and hating on my corporate job.
Over the past few years, generational warfare has only ramped up—so much so that it's become boring to even reference: Gen Z hating on millennials for being cringe, millennials hating on Gen Z for being puritanical, and everyone hating on boomers for being, well, boomers. But Gen X—born somewhere between 1965 and 1980—has been largely forgotten about (although even saying that has become a cliché of sorts). Alongside all of this finger-pointing among the generations are claims that, actually, we were the cool ones—no, it was me! But what if it's none of us? What if the cool ones are actually those unbothered people that nobody talks about?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman on Vacation Asks Gen Z and X for Same Photo—Can You Tell Who Took It?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman visiting Singapore has gone viral after asking both Gen Z and Gen X passersby to take a photo of her and her boyfriend—only to discover a hilarious difference in results that sparked a generational debate online. Ruby Doyle (@rubsjean), 22, from Melbourne, Australia, posed for a photo with her partner Luke Oates, 23, at Lantern, the rooftop bar at the Fullerton Hotel in Singapore, on May 28. In a TikTok video that has since garnered 15,000 likes and almost 535,000 views, Doyle compares the two photos: the first, taken by a Gen Z, is a polished high-angle shot that captures the dramatic cityscape in the background—believed to be Marina Bay Sands. The second, snapped by a Gen X stranger, is a close-up of the couple with little regard for composition or setting. "I was not expecting the post to garner as much attention as it did and I also wasn't expecting to create a generational war in the comments," Doyle told Newsweek. The Gen Z snap of Ruby and Luke versus the Gen X one. The Gen Z snap of Ruby and Luke versus the Gen X one. @rubsjean/@rubsjean "When we were posing for the photo being taken by the Gen X stranger my partner and I knew we weren't going to like it as she was holding it very low and only snapped the one pic," she added. The clip prompted hundreds of TikTok users to weigh in, sharing their own experiences and preferences when it comes to capturing a moment. Gen Z typically includes people born between 1997 and 2012, while Gen X refers to those born between 1965 and 1980. Generational differences in photography styles are often chalked up to the eras in which each group came of age. Gen Z, having grown up with smartphones and social media, often prioritize aesthetics, angles, and background. In contrast, Gen X—raised on film cameras and early digital devices—may approach photography with a more functional mindset. Doyle said she often offers to take photos for others when she sees them trying to take selfies, ensuring they have plenty of shots to choose from. "We took a photo of them in return making sure to get the background and take a few photos for them. We were happy when we found some younger people to take our photo as we thought they would have a similar eye as us," she explained. "When we compared the two photo it was funny to see the subtle differences in photography style so that's why I made the post. It also reminded me of my graduation when a girl stopped and asked my dad (Gen X) to take a photo of her and her family. My mom and I both laughed as we knew he is not very good with technology and jumped in to take over," she added. TikTok users flooded the comments with their takes. "First one is better, you can see the building," said one user. "Should have asked a millennial I think," quipped another. "I am constantly telling my mom to lift my phone higher and higher why do they go so low down," said Tess. "None of them, as a millennial I make two: one full-length and two cropped close up to the waist," said Vlad. "Gen X and I'd never take a photo like the second one—I take pride in my photos and take about 5 for people of all different angles," said another. "Lol, the Gen X photo is better tho," said another user. "First one is for the scenery while the second is like a fit of the day," another noted. "Both wrong. You should get both the buildings in the background and the full body without the feet cut off," someone else weighed in. "And neither is a photography masterpiece I'm afraid," added one critic. Do you have any viral videos or pictures that you want to share? We want to see the best ones! Send them in to life@ and they could appear on our site.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Why spiritual shopping is the new wellness trend you didn't see coming
It's 2025, and wellness isn't just about green smoothies and fitness trackers anymore. Americans are reaching for something deeper—something that touches the soul. And in this quiet cultural shift, spiritual shopping is becoming the unexpected bridge between modern self-care and ancient tradition. The Quiet Rise of Sacred Objects For many, surrounding themselves with meaningful symbols like rosaries, saint medals, and devotional candles is no longer solely a matter of religion. It has become a way to express identity, to create a sense of grounding, and to live with greater intention. These objects offer a form of presence in spaces often dominated by screens and noise. As spiritual curiosity grows—particularly among Millennials and Gen Z—religious items are appearing in unexpected places. No longer limited to churches or family altars, they're now found on nightstands, tucked into bags, or featured in TikTok videos that explore faith and spirituality. A cross necklace might be worn as a symbol of protection, while a small statue of St. Joseph could take on new meaning as part of a personal ritual in a first apartment. These items are resonating in ways that go beyond aesthetic or trend. They speak directly to the human need for connection, stability, and purpose. The Vatican's Lasting Cultural Footprint At the heart of this movement is the enduring presence of the Vatican, which for centuries has shaped the aesthetic and devotional traditions of Catholicism worldwide. From the grandeur of Michelangelo's frescoes to the simplicity of a hand-carved crucifix, the Vatican has long influenced how faith is expressed visually and spiritually. But its influence isn't just historical—it's deeply relevant today, especially in a time when many are searching for meaning, rootedness, and continuity. The recent election of Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff in Church history, has further energized interest in Catholic identity across the United States. Charismatic, intellectually grounded, and pastorally engaged, his leadership has brought a renewed sense of global unity to the Church. For American Catholics, in particular, the connection feels more personal than ever—bridging continents and generations, and awakening a new wave of interest in the symbols, rituals, and heritage of the faith. From the stunning art of the Vatican Museums to the sacred rituals that continue to draw thousands to St. Peter's Square each week, the Holy See remains a central source of spiritual inspiration. Its influence reaches far beyond theology, extending into the realms of craftsmanship, culture, and everyday devotion. Religious artisans—many of whom work in small, family-run workshops in and around Vatican City—still create devotional objects using time-honored techniques passed down through generations, preserving a legacy that spans centuries. Many religious items available today—such as rosaries, crucifixes, saint medals, and icons—are made just steps away from the Vatican. But their significance goes beyond geography. These objects carry with them the legacy of centuries of faith and tradition. For many believers, they're not just keepsakes or souvenirs, they represent a real connection to the Church's spiritual and cultural heritage. In a time when much of life feels disposable or digital, these pieces offer something lasting: a sense of meaning, beauty, and belonging. Influencers Bringing Faith Into the Feed A major driver of this trend? Catholic content creators who are reimagining how faith is expressed online. Take Leah Darrow, a former fashion model who now shares her journey of spiritual transformation with hundreds of thousands of followers. Her blend of authenticity and devotion has inspired many to explore their own faith—starting with a single rosary or saint medal. Then there's Fr. Mike Schmitz, whose 'Bible in a Year' podcast has ranked #1 on Apple Podcasts, proving that deep faith content can thrive in digital spaces. Other figures like Emily Wilson and Jackie Francois Angel have turned platforms like YouTube and Instagram into communities where Catholicism meets everyday life—joyfully, honestly, and often with a devotional in hand. Where Meaning Meets Craft Retailers rooted in religious tradition are seeing renewed interest—not because they've changed, but because the world has. As modern life grows more chaotic and digital, people are seeking something tangible, timeless, and intentional. There's a desire to reconnect with slower values—heritage, faith, and craftsmanship—and this is where spiritual artisanship thrives. One example is Savelli Religious, a family-run company based in Vatican City since 1898 that offers handcrafted religious items deeply rooted in Catholic tradition. With over a century of experience, the company has become a trusted name for those seeking objects that combine spiritual meaning with artistic craftsmanship. Their catalog ranges from classic rosaries and saint medals to intricate crucifixes and devotional gifts, each one reflecting the care of skilled Italian artisans and the spiritual heritage of its surroundings. What sets Savelli apart is not only its longevity, but its location—just steps from St. Peter's Basilica—where faith and history converge. For many who shop there, especially American Catholics discovering or rediscovering their roots, owning a rosary or sacred item crafted so close to the heart of the Church isn't simply a transaction. It becomes a way to stay connected to something timeless, to carry a piece of the Vatican's legacy into everyday life, and to find meaning in objects that are made to last. Finding Stillness in a Tangible Way You don't have to be particularly devout to feel a connection to symbols of peace, protection, or meaning. Increasingly, people of all backgrounds are incorporating items like crucifixes, saint pendants, and devotional candles into their homes—not necessarily as expressions of religious practice, but as quiet reminders of something greater than themselves. For some, it's about starting a personal ritual; for others, it's simply a way to bring intention or calm into their space. This trend reflects a broader cultural shift. As modern life becomes faster and more fragmented, there's a growing interest in objects and habits that offer a sense of permanence. Spiritual symbols—regardless of religious affiliation—can provide that. They represent continuity, identity, and values that transcend the present moment. In that sense, reaching for something timeless isn't about nostalgia or dogma; it's about finding balance in a world that rarely slows down.
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Pascal Siakam perfect for Pacers: How his NBA journey focused his drive
There has always been more to Pascal Siakam than just his long, graceful strides. Getting out in transition is what stood out about Siakam as a rookie, when an injury to Jared Sullinger made him an unlikely starter for the first half of the season for the Toronto Raptors. It is what stands out about him now, as he finishes so many sublime Tyrese Haliburton-orchestrated fast breaks for the Indiana Pacers. Over his nine-year career, he has been steadfast in meshing that stamina with skill development. Advertisement Crucially, as he improved, the tirelessness remained. In his final two years as Raptors coach, Nick Nurse was Thibodeauian in his reliance on his starters. Deep in the fourth quarter of a late-January 2022 game against the Miami Heat, Siakam was nearing 40 minutes for the night. Jimmy Butler attacked the rim in a close game, with Siakam sliding over as the backline defender to block him with two hands. Butler is strong, and the force of the drive knocked Siakam backward to the baseline. The ball fell back into Butler's hands, who attempted to drop it in the hoop. Siakam lunged forward, and swatted the ball away for possession. Siakam went on to play 17 more minutes that night in a triple-overtime win. He was a block and a steal away from a rare 5×5 game. What jumps out from that night, other than his game-high 56:31 of playing time, is that protecting the rim is way down the list of things Siakam does well. That is Siakam, though: He is better than you think at everything, even if he's not a star in any category besides playing in transition and durability. (Since 2018-19, when Siakam won Most Improved Player and helped the Raptors win the title, only Jayson Tatum and Nikola Jokić have played more than Siakam's 19,807 minutes, playoffs included.) By developing those skills over his nine-year career, Siakam has turned himself into the ideal second star for the uptempo, rollicking Indiana Pacers. He won MVP of the Eastern Conference finals on Saturday when the Pacers closed out the New York Knicks. Freed from the need to take the pull-up 3s that were required of him when he was the primary scorer at the end of his Raptors tenure, Siakam is a player without a notable weakness. Tyrese Haliburton powers the Pacers when they are at their high-speed best, with Siakam fitting in well because, after all these years, he still runs the floor better than the majority of players his size. Advertisement When the Pacers aren't humming, though, Siakam sets a sturdy floor for his team, with his ability to hit tough shots keeping the Pacers afloat, most notably evident in Game 2 against the Knicks. He's not Shai Gilgeous-Alexander or former teammate Kawhi Leonard from the midrange, but good enough — 45.6 percent accuracy on the 250 shots he took this year from between 10 and 16 feet, including tough turnarounds — to salvage wayward possessions. It was a journey there. In his first All-Star season, the COVID-interrupted 2019-20, he took just 108 shots from that range, shooting 32.4 percent. He mostly used his footwork and spins to get to the rim from the post. Two years later, he had settled into the mid-to-high 40s on much higher volume from midrange. So it has gone for so much of his game. • Siakam attempted just 17 3s in his two years at New Mexico State, and only seven in his rookie season. In his second season in Toronto, the Raptors insisted he take more, even as he had a two-month stretch in which he shot 4 for 58 (including 25 straight misses at one point). A year later, he shot 36.9 percent on 2.7 attempts per game, making the Raptors' offensive system just a little more viable. He plateaued and occasionally dipped when asked to create those looks for himself, but he has hit 38.8 of his 526 attempts in Indiana. • While Siakam's 3 was a problem when he occupied a primary role in Toronto, his playmaking grew exponentially. Siakam entered the league as a play-finisher. He showed some intuitive passing in his second season as part of the Raptors' league-best second unit — Fred VanVleet, Jakob Poeltl and Delon Wright also graduated from that lineup to more substantial careers — but really flourished as his usage grew. In his second All-Star season in 2022-23, he was fifth among all forwards, averaging 5.8 assists per game, with 2.46 assists for every turnover, a pristine number. Siakam doesn't have to carry that load with the Pacers, but he still facilitates or initiates the seemingly random movement on which they thrive. It always felt unfair that Siakam wore so much of Raptors president Masai Ujiri's comments calling that year's team 'selfish.' Advertisement • Siakam's defense has never been a problem, but it has evolved as he has. In his early years, he didn't have the strength to battle with the likes of Blake Griffin, as was the case in a memorable late-season game in the second season. He is not burly, but Siakam has grown a wiry strength. Still, it is that tirelessness which is at the heart of his defensive contributions. Siakam can scramble, contest 3s and recover like few other forwards thanks to his stamina and length. That was key as the Raptors used an unorthodox style to put together the second-best defense in 2019-20 despite the loss of Kawhi Leonard, and it is perhaps the biggest reason the Pacers went from cute early-season story last year to serious contender. While Aaron Nesmith is the team's sturdiest one-on-one defender, likely to get the bulk of the Gilgeous-Alexander assignment, Siakam provides so much of the connective tissue that makes the system work, especially as the Pacers try to keep Myles Turner close to the paint. The Siakam/Raptors relationship ended sourly. Part of that was because Siakam and his co-leader, VanVleet, put in so much work to go from peripheral players to cornerstones, and had trouble abiding those they did not believe were doing the same. It was a messy ending, as most are, but that same maniacal devotion to his craft helped put the Raptors in a position to win and nobly try to defend a title in the first place. It's paying off in Indiana, now. 'I enjoy the process of getting better, knowing that before I couldn't do something and now I can do it,' Siakam said before that ill-fated 2022-23 season, reflecting on 14 post-pandemic months that slowed his developmental ascent. 'That process of the game is so important to me. And having the opportunity to do that while healthy, it was amazing. I just get lost in it.' That mindset never propelled him to MVP contention, as he desired. It never put him in a position to earn a supermax, which stopped him from being a potential career centerpiece for one franchise. Now he will get to see Haliburton try to do that in Indiana. It did, however, turn him from a role player to a central figure on several great teams. Draymond Green, not one for self-flagellation, recently said on TNT that his effort against Siakam in the 2019 NBA Finals was one of only two times he felt he lost his individual matchup. (He cited his performance against Minnesota's Julius Randle this year as the other.) Siakam's efficiency wavered in that series, but he bookended it with 32 points on 14-for-17 shooting in the opener and 26 on 10-for-17 shooting in the clincher. He scored the most important basket in that game, beating Green with a quick change of direction. As he enters the finals six years later against a historically great defensive team and excellent individual defenders, remember that he has been in this precise role, in this approximate situation, and succeeded before. When the Pacers traded for Siakam two Januarys ago and later re-signed him, he was seen as the type of star for whom the Pacers had to settle. Indianapolis, being a non-glamour market, would never get a superstar to pair with Haliburton, so they had to search elsewhere. Siakam would have to be good enough. Across the board, he has been.
